| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. 1.5 squad locking vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP doesn't give a rip about this feature, it's been asked about since the beta, might as well make it so that you can steal people's dropsuits too. Good luck getting a response.
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.08.28 22:08:00
|
2. GG Ancient Exiles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nice, another pat my own back thread, Yay for you
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.08.08 03:42:00
|
3. OH LAWD!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Here come the hate threads again. It's a endless cycle, CCP releases an update, people cry. Some are happy about it. Then come the fits of rage just before the next update that smears general discussions front page. And the people whining that CC...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.21 19:17:00
|
4. Need a math wiz. - in General Discussions [original thread]
2
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.18 22:06:00
|
5. Tank Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks rule CCP! Take one and stick to cover you say? Death by AV nade spam, F this, I'm heading away from these A-holes, ez mode swarmed to death. You troops deserve to be ran over by LAV spam.
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.14 20:19:00
|
6. Dropships day 8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Starter fit of your choice + BPO LAV= angry proto mercs and positive isk for you!!
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.12 22:07:00
|
7. LAV's not doing their role.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anmol Singh wrote: The only reason people hate LAV's and LLAV's is because they are being used to run people over instead of havving the gunner shoot people or transporting so if their is a way to stop LAV's from 1 hit killing infantry we must ...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.12 01:10:00
|
8. tactics for destroy logi lav's? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You all lie, the capability to destroy the logistics LAV is a myth.
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.12 00:32:00
|
9. suggestion to stupid tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anmol Singh wrote: Void Echo wrote: Anmol Singh wrote: Void Echo wrote: as for you infantry, stop ******* complaining that a 50 ton vehicle will a vehicle sized weapon keeps killing you, its designed to do that. the more you keep com...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 23:36:00
|
10. suggestion to stupid tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anmol Singh wrote: Stop driving your tank into the clear and then whining like a nub and always plan your routs so you know where to go if you get ambushed by people... and before any of this can occur make sure thier are people with no proto A...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 23:34:00
|
11. Seriously can't stand railgun tank redline campers anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: Yep, run a few redline matches to pay for the tank you lose when you actually go out on the map, gotta love ducking into cover from swarms and having them stop, turn a 90 and hit you anyway I've been enjoying the invisibl...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 22:47:00
|
12. Seriously can't stand railgun tank redline campers anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
hackerzilla wrote: DumpsterJuice wrote: AV has forced us to the redline, when CCP returns balance you will no longer have as big of a problem with redline rails Railgun tanks aren't the only AV option. If thats your exuse then just **** of...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 22:45:00
|
13. Logi LAVs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: DumpsterJuice wrote: jdwalk-04 wrote: This is bullcrap. Logi LAVs are too OP. 5 volleys from a proto swarm launcher, AVs, and proxys and barely any damage done? Something's gotta be done........=\ Good, whenever I lose...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 22:43:00
|
14. Seriously can't stand railgun tank redline campers anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lol at these QQ threads about rail sniping, it's a way to make a profit as a dedicated tanker, balance AV vs vehicles or drop the price of tanks and the problem will be solved, nobody wants to sit and railsnipe.
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 22:21:00
|
15. Logi LAVs - in General Discussions [original thread]
jdwalk-04 wrote: This is bullcrap. Logi LAVs are too OP. 5 volleys from a proto swarm launcher, AVs, and proxys and barely any damage done? Something's gotta be done........=\ Good, whenever I lose a tank to the proto swarm spam, I bust out ...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 22:14:00
|
16. Seriously can't stand railgun tank redline campers anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: you got killed by an HAV and now your whining like an infantry player, if infantry players hadn't made tanks so weak we wouldn't be rednline sitting, the average tanker would be in the middle of the map, the good ones would be ...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 21:33:00
|
17. Seriously can't stand railgun tank redline campers anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Serimos Haeraven wrote: Cy Clone1 wrote: look tanks and dropships are in the same boat vs av. Rather than shooting us down from an unreachable location why don't you just look the other way? I mean we are going to bail out, is 75 wp really w...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 21:07:00
|
18. Seriously can't stand railgun tank redline campers anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
AV has forced us to the redline, when CCP returns balance you will no longer have as big of a problem with redline rails
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 20:19:00
|
19. Public Chats - in General Discussions [original thread]
LFSquad is a decent one
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 03:33:00
|
20. Make your own bounty - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'd love to put a bounty on the A-holes that steal your vehicles and team kill or AFK in the MCC, it would be nice to be able to select a limited number of mercs to hunt from a bounty list, and in game their name would show an icon or different co...
- by DumpsterJuice - at 2013.07.11 00:27:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |