| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. HMG fixes coming (hopefully) tomorrow, tomorrow you shall hear the song of our ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
When I first started playing DUST a heavy could make a whole squad of meds and lights run for cover, I'd like to see them take their rightful place as the most fearsome dropsuit on the battlefield.
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.17 19:53:00
|
62. LOLTank Brigade Wants Swarm Launchers Nerfed? Again?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
drake sadani wrote: TL;DR version , tank players say keep nerfing AV . AV says boost us back so we don't get owned tank players say use better tactics . AV says maybe you should use better tactics tankers tank players say we don't have...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.17 19:50:00
|
63. LOLTank Brigade Wants Swarm Launchers Nerfed? Again?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
You can't win the argument logically, so now you resort to using complete fabrications. I have not seen or heard a single vehicle user asking for another AV nerf. Obvious troll is obvious.
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.17 19:49:00
|
64. Red Line Rail Tanks.............................BS - in General Discussions [original thread]
What map was it, I don't think there is one where you can shoot from redline to redline, but tbh I never redline railgun snipe unless I am forced to so I may be wrong on this one. Still, I understand the problem in pub and FW but in PC you better ...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.17 03:54:00
|
65. I STILL DONT UNDERSTAND - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yea, vehicle DB rating is the highest of anything in Dust, well except for MCCs maybe. I think the main issue is passive scan in general, I had two complex precision mods and range extender on my infantry alt and I still couldn't see anyone. Activ...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.17 03:47:00
|
66. Flamethrowers - in General Discussions [original thread]
calvin b wrote: Ya we need them, I want to smell burning clones in the morning. Also make it possible for DS to drop Napalm all over the battlefield. Put a +1 if you agree or have another weapon idea. This. This plus 1000000000000.
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 22:01:00
|
67. A quick PSA about vehicle crews. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: I So them's the facts, hope I educated someone today. And as for the HAV thing, I want you to be totally honest with me HAV pilots of the world. How many of you ever gave a damn about your gunners, and how many immediately r...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 21:59:00
|
68. No faction is pure good or pure evil, no one is masking anything - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also, the Caldari actually have democracy. I am a little fuzzy on the details and can look them up again, but basically if you work for a company you have shares of that company, and you can vote during shareholder meetings. Sometimes people sell ...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 21:55:00
|
69. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slag Emberforge wrote: Speaker, please pick up a little what were putting down: 1. You have no credibility as you are a scrub. 2. No one respects you 3. Your ideas are bad, and you should feel bad. 4. Dust like EVE is Risk vs ISK, current mode...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 17:39:00
|
70. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
echo47 wrote: double post Nice.
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:30:00
|
71. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Too many quotes, don't feel like dealing with the code. "If you're a tanker and you got solo'd by a FG that you can see, you're a noob." That's what you said and I can only take it to mean that you think a hidden FGer is a dangerous and effective...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:27:00
|
72. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: Head over to the Rookie Training Grounds, find a really good forge gunner, ask for some tips, and come back after you have been in a proto ...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:16:00
|
73. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: Head over to the Rookie Training Grounds, find a really good forge gunner, ask for some tips, and come back after you have been in a proto tank that was on the receiving end of a fully proto m...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:11:00
|
74. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xender17 wrote: Nobody understands or is accepting that you actually have to play smart to kill a tank. When a sniper continuously kills your team do you just use the same fitting and go looking for wherever he could possibly be? No. You grab ...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:10:00
|
75. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: Failed to comprehend my post I see. The whole point of the post was that Heavy suits (you know those suits that are supposed to be able to ...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:07:00
|
76. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I'm telling infantry to HTFU. basically saying "I like the easy mode currently, so HTFU" DOUBLE POST DOUBLE POINTS WOOOOOOOOOOOOT. But seriously, this is the exact attitude of AV after Upri...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:04:00
|
77. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: Failed to comprehend my post I see. The whole point of the post was that Heavy suits (you know those suits that are supposed to be able to go toe-to-toe with vehicles?) can take on a tank sing...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 08:03:00
|
78. Why are LAVs Convertibles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or they could just make a real combat oriented LAV, instead of those scouts. A combat LAV with enclosed crew compartment and frontal (and maybe side?) shield for gunner.
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 07:51:00
|
79. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: Well, in Chromosome we had AVers complain tanks were too strong. Then in Uprising they were horrible and tankers complained. Now they are strong and weak. Plus I think they were going for someth...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 07:46:00
|
80. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, in Chromosome we had AVers complain tanks were too strong. Then in Uprising they were horrible and tankers complained. Now they are strong and weak. Plus I think they were going for something a little different, the best thing to take out a ...
- by Commander Tzu - at 2013.12.16 07:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |