| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1761. Ramming Speed! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Darken-Sol wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Lavs kill at 1m/s. Tanks kill only around 24m/s. If we could bring this to a median ground on each, that'd be nice. Maybe if vehicles were moving at one half their top speed to b...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.09 01:03:00
|
1762. To the New Tankers: - in General Discussions [original thread]
lllIIIlI IIIlIl wrote: Why wouldn't you spec into tanks? As you say, they're broken as ****. Kill people in 1 shot and never die. Hit me up tonight. I'll let you drive a 1.5 mil isk tank and if you don't die you get to be right. Oh, and it'l...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.09 00:58:00
|
1763. Ramming Speed! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lavs kill at 1m/s. Tanks kill only around 24m/s. If we could bring this to a median ground on each, that'd be nice. Maybe if vehicles were moving at one half their top speed to be lethal, that'd be good.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.09 00:56:00
|
1764. To the New Tankers: - in General Discussions [original thread]
I wonder if CCP intends to give us proto and adv HAVS...then we'd be fine but until then we're trying to use std defenses against proto AV.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.09 00:50:00
|
1765. To the New Tankers: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why did you spec into tanks after seeing all of the previous generation of tankers tell you how broken they were?
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 22:29:00
|
1766. Income source for tankers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Karl Koekwaus wrote: Tanks are not meant to be cost effective, they're meant to kill stuff that otherwise doesn't get killed fast enough or cause a threat that has to be dealt with in order for the other side to win. If you really want to rid...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 22:20:00
|
1767. Income source for tankers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
bastille123 wrote: the only way that HAV s get balanced and more viable is to: A: temporarily remove AV ADV and protos(this means that all AV weapons are stuck to standart like tanks are) and remove the 60 percent HP buff to LAV s and give 20 ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 22:19:00
|
1768. Income source for tankers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Part of your problem is that you're not that good. The other is tanks cost too much for how weak they are and we don't have prototanks. I can break even, generally. My tanks will last around 4-5 matches in pubs, but that still oonly pays for one ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 22:16:00
|
1769. Pick Your Side. (sandbox threatened to become US only) - in General Discussions [original thread]
North America is the best at shooters. Period. That's why we won WWII!
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 21:14:00
|
1770. To all "tank drivers" - in General Discussions [original thread]
You've just chose the hardest possible path. Welcome to the Brotherhood of Nerfed Tankers.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 19:47:00
|
1771. The Chakram HAV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soon(TM)...yeah, we won't have this until ever infantry weapon and dropsuit is perfect.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 19:45:00
|
1772. Marauder Tank class - in General Discussions [original thread]
Probably when we get BLOPS tanks back. Soon(TM)
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 19:41:00
|
1773. heavys driving lav's - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: currently you have 2 options for taking out lav's. kill the driver or blow the thing up. fair enougth well thats all well and good unless he is in a heavy suit weilding a heavy machinegun. shoot the driver and he has enougth...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 19:40:00
|
1774. Pick Your Side. (sandbox threatened to become US only) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kharga Lum wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: What sandbox? Oh, you mean the litter box in MH? Meh. Where's the point to FW for Dust? We'll have a real sandbox when we can travel around at will and camp Districts and roam freely around in enemy...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 01:28:00
|
1775. Pick Your Side. (sandbox threatened to become US only) - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP needs to open up more constellations so more corps can get in. This has been obvious since day one.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 01:26:00
|
1776. Team Deployment - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Teamwork is OP
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 01:22:00
|
1777. [Feedback] Proximity mines are underpowered - especially compared to AV grenades. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nerf MLT lavs
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.08 01:18:00
|
1778. Creating a list of what HAV needs. All Good Tankers are welcome. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Give us ADV and PRO HAVs as well as returning that 25% PG you took.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.07 03:50:00
|
1779. Every problem with vehicles and how to fix - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
-STD Tanks vs proto breach forge- Give us ADV and PRO tanks, as well as giving our 5%/lvl PG skill back bc it isnt a fair fight by definition. -mlt LAVs OP- giant HP nerf (45%) -Dropships UP- HP buff (35%), speed buff(25%), another cost reductio...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.07 03:47:00
|
1780. Why is it harder for me to take out lavs than tanks. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'd say we increase the SP requirement for the LLAV and declare it proto at this point. Tanks, however, need some love. We just want our PG back and to get our ADV and PRO variants before we official turn this AV vs Tank war on. BUFFING AV IS NOT ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.07 03:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |