| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
1321. Appledash - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is going to become a regular thing.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 11:43:00
|
1322. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Another Heavy SOB wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: As long as they're too SP intensive for anyone but people who are still tankers to use, I'm happy. I don't want the infantry trying to play with ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 11:42:00
|
1323. Appledash - in General Discussions [original thread]
What does everyone think of it? Cute? Creepy? Not the best pairing? My vote is cute and creepy. I neither approve nor disapprove.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 11:37:00
|
1324. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Another Heavy SOB wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: As long as they're too SP intensive for anyone but people who are still tankers to use, I'm happy. I don't want the infantry trying to play with our new toys. I mean, either way, they have pot...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 11:36:00
|
1325. Anti air HAV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apparently my railgun doesn't 2-shot them already. DS pilots, I refuse to use this weapon until all of you have a fair shot at killing me. CCP, this is overkill. Are you yet again balancing for things that don't exist like fighters and gunships? H...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 08:53:00
|
1326. Way to possibly balance the Lav epidemic - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aviatnaut wrote: remove the free ones that people spam, and also make all the lavs costs about 80,000 for a stanard and 110,000 for a logi and scout. This WILL get rid of the lav pandemic because this way spammers can't do so anymore, and if ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 08:50:00
|
1327. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
As long as they're too SP intensive for anyone but people who are still tankers to use, I'm happy. I don't want the infantry trying to play with our new toys. I mean, either way, they have potential. If they were like super fast, high HP, high dmg...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 08:49:00
|
1328. The dedicated AV player union - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reign Omega wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: ^I want it. I want to blow it up! lol. Seriously though, from Running AV in Chromosome and in Uprising, Surya and Sagaris were NOT a 1 man job. Right now I can solo just about any tank I come ac...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 08:30:00
|
1329. Your mentor - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, General Grodd inspired me to tank, but a lot of my current playstyle is the influence of 0 Try Harder and Mortedeamor.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 08:22:00
|
1330. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Am I the only one that wants thrusters and a big ass plasma blade with my MTAC? No or not :) I really hope they don't nerf these BC they have so much potential. Imagine a team of two jumping ontop of a tank and ripping i...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 04:15:00
|
1331. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: For one, it might be small enough to fit inside of structures. But yea, those are some pretty pessimistic and unfounded assumptions...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 04:12:00
|
1332. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: For one, it might be small enough to fit inside of structures. But yea, those are some pretty pessimistic and unfounded assumptions. OK, then let's assume...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 03:38:00
|
1333. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: For one, it might be small enough to fit inside of structures. But yea, those are some pretty pessimistic and unfounded assumptions. Agreed. Personally, I envision them as the Tech-III shi...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 03:37:00
|
1334. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Syther Shadows wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Alright, let's assume we'll get MTACs this year. I think it's safe to say they'll require vehicle skills, use small turrets, move slower than tanks, and have less HP than tanks. How is a vehicle...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 03:34:00
|
1335. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: MTACs don't even exist yet, not even concept art and you're complaining? 1. they are vehicles of COURSE they'll need vehicle skills 2. who's to say they don't get a single large turret or a small turret on both arms (two sma...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 03:32:00
|
1336. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: For one, it might be small enough to fit inside of structures. But yea, those are some pretty pessimistic and unfounded assumptions. OK, then let's assume they're good. What happens to vehicles that are combat ef...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 03:26:00
|
1337. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alright, let's assume we'll get MTACs this year. I think it's safe to say they'll require vehicle skills, use small turrets, move slower than tanks, and have less HP than tanks. How is a vehicle that moves slower than a tank and that has less DPS...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 03:07:00
|
1338. The dedicated AV player union - in General Discussions [original thread]
^I want it.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 03:04:00
|
1339. Sticky:Tranquility Connectivity Issues - 01:00 UTC - June 12, 2013 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Still down in So Cal
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 01:16:00
|
1340. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Hiding the problem doesn't fix the problem. This is just separating them. Although I feel like the main problem is the player base. I feel that infantry should o...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.16 01:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |