| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
1121. if tanks stay gimped, can we at least get a price reduction? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: lololololololol We heavies asked for a price reduction because didn't think the price was justified. CCP's response, lower costs... and then gimp the HMG. No CCP, they were not worth their original cost, their was no reason n...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 03:19:00
|
1122. Why perfect AV balance is years away - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: As a player completely specialized in infantry vs infantry combat, I cannot be sympathize with your dilemma. However what I can say, is that vehicles and tanks are a hard counter to my style. I will never ever be to down a tank ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 03:18:00
|
1123. Priorities, CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't need to explain myself when snow somehow made it to the 'important' list for 1.2 Do it again and I'm gonna start bumping the PS2 bomber's posts for a whole week straight.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 03:16:00
|
1124. if tanks stay gimped, can we at least get a price reduction? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Disturbingly Bored wrote: Yeah, so, had an interesting experience today. I solo'd a tank. Now you might say, "DB, you're a Heavy. Us tank drivers already pray to whatever gods we believe in that every one of you Forge Gunne...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 03:14:00
|
1125. if tanks stay gimped, can we at least get a price reduction? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: All I see in your posts now is "Waaaaaaaaaah" All I see in your response is: "I'm mad because I don't support the viability of something I have never tried, and therefore, percieve to be over powered." Let me tell you that ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 03:12:00
|
1126. snow in 1.2!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
oh. great. snow. that's exactly what dust was missing. ******* snow. great. just ******* great. not the imbalance between AV and tanks, the lack of variety in weapons, the much needed buffs to the mass driver and laser rifle, the caldari logi bein...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 03:05:00
|
1127. if tanks stay gimped, can we at least get a price reduction? - in General Discussions [original thread]
like, i dont see tanks getting a buff for at least another 2 builds, so i just want to make money like the rest of the dust community and have many millions upon millions. 500,000 for a well fit tank would be fair. Right now, theyre double that.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 03:01:00
|
1128. if tanks stay gimped, can we at least get a price reduction? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reducing hull prices and turret prices 50% would be a quantum leap toward balance, for now, because making money would be easier for us. If we can call in more tanks, the av can get more kills, and therefore money. sounds balanced to me.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 02:56:00
|
1129. Why is the Plantetside 2 Bomber not Banned yet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
this is how i know ccp doesnt even reasd the forums
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.27 01:19:00
|
1130. How newberries approach AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
We've all seen it happen. Mlt assault tries to kill tank. Tanks gives response.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 23:37:00
|
1131. Take out proto AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
HyperionsThunder wrote: Anmol Singh wrote: The Attorney General wrote: As a full blooded tanker, there is no need to remove proto AV. It is not OP, it is not even unfair to tankers. An RPG-7 costs a heck of a lot less than a MBT, but ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 23:36:00
|
1132. Take out proto AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Altina McAlterson wrote: Soldier of Mawat wrote: As an AV guy I can agree to this. Even though my role is to blow your tanks up I have to be right with you in fighting for balance. If tanks suck then there will be no more tankers and I will ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 23:34:00
|
1133. Remove Damage and Shield/Armor enhancers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Fearless Speech wrote: Chinduko wrote: Remove damage, shield/armor enhancers from modules and skill points. This will balance the game for new and experienced players by allowing everyone the same potential for kills. ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 23:11:00
|
1134. Why perfect AV balance is years away - in General Discussions [original thread]
KOBLAKA1 wrote: while a pain to read you are right. I wonder how taliban guys feel when we hit them with gunships and Close Air sUpport and Tanks.. there should be no issue with Vehicle>infantry. i imagine very bad. Let's not even mentio...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 21:17:00
|
1135. Take out proto AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Arms have gone down to enemy action in Iraq, just to let you know. Aside from that, tanking is not an elitist club. I am not that good, I run tanks 100% of the time and I turn a profit. Most of the tanks I see g...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 20:56:00
|
1136. Why perfect AV balance is years away - in General Discussions [original thread]
The obvious solution is to give us ADV and PRO HAVs, but with the maps we're using right now, they would be unstoppable in pubs- but that is the problem: balancing is done for pubs. Even with proto AV on the field (no more than one), i can still t...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 20:50:00
|
1137. Take out proto AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
If we remove ADV and PRO AV, then we have to nerf the **** out of all lavs because it is hard for even the best AV, or tanks for that matter, to kill them with the best weapons. LLAVs ARE PROTO.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 20:24:00
|
1138. Take out proto AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: As a full blooded tanker, there is no need to remove proto AV. It is not OP, it is not even unfair to tankers. An RPG-7 costs a heck of a lot less than a MBT, but can destroy it quite easily. It is not terribly...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 20:22:00
|
1139. Tanks and grunts need a divorce - in General Discussions [original thread]
I never said it was a great idea. Anyone else have an option we all can agree on?
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 13:53:00
|
1140. Take out proto AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Like
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.26 13:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |