| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
621. SVER True Blood, you disappointed us. Massive loss of Respect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Full Metal Kitten wrote: Is it really all that different from corps that ran pre-nerf TAC AR almost exclusively? If I'm reading this rant correctly, you're saying. AUR items disqualify dudes from the coveted e-peen trophy, right? Maybe you guys...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.23 01:07:00
|
622. SVER True Blood, you disappointed us. Massive loss of Respect - in General Discussions [original thread]
WhiteMage7322 wrote: It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporati...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.23 01:05:00
|
623. SVER True Blood, you disappointed us. Massive loss of Respect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fiddlestaxp wrote: Cenex Langly wrote: What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap. You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. Shame that your ...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.23 00:59:00
|
624. SVER True Blood, you disappointed us. Massive loss of Respect - in General Discussions [original thread]
What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap. You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics.
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.23 00:54:00
|
625. SVER True Blood, you disappointed us. Massive loss of Respect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful. You've lost our respect...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.23 00:49:00
|
626. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fiddlestaxp wrote: If I had the power to change the mechanics I would have by now. But I don't. Read the thread from start to finish. I offer suggestions that would fix the mechanic and then offer you a temporary fix. Buy a district from someb...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.22 01:33:00
|
627. Flay 2 Win - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: An excellent article at TMC http://themittani.com/features/dust-514-flaylock-pistol-flay-2-win?page=0%2C0 Someone should send this article to the DEVs
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.21 16:46:00
|
628. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fiddlestaxp wrote: Cenex Langly wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: Corps looking to attack/defend without having to worry about clones should look into buying a district. In most cases, it is less expensive and less risky to buy a district than it...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.21 16:36:00
|
629. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: LOL at all the ppl commenting on PC, yet they don't even play in it. You want more than 100 clones then you better go and get some land And now we're back to square one with the main topic of this conversation. "How to acquir...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.21 16:34:00
|
630. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fiddlestaxp wrote: Corps looking to attack/defend without having to worry about clones should look into buying a district. In most cases, it is less expensive and less risky to buy a district than it is to take one. Chicagocubs4ever is the man ...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.21 01:49:00
|
631. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Marston VC wrote: Good game boys, solid effort put in today as well! I really wish our corps could just go at it in a corp battle several times. The battles are great because we're very evenly matched. It's sad that we've got this hinderance...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.21 01:05:00
|
632. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
STEALTH HUNTER ZERO wrote: I like what was stated earlier, 125 clone pack for 40 mil and limited to those without districts or a certain amount. I believe thats pretty reasonable, maybe another pack of 175 to 200 clones for a much higher price ...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.21 00:53:00
|
633. Auto Switch After Using Nanite Injector - in General Discussions [original thread]
IgniteableAura wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Moving this to Technical Support/Bugs section. It can also be helpful if you can record footage of you using the quick revive, swapping to the repair tool and then have it swap back to your original...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.21 00:49:00
|
634. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draka Marintu wrote: The reup mechanic is awesome and it saves alot of time but with how it currently is 100 clones is not enough. Corps who don't have a district can't take advantage of this mechanic and I don't understand why ccp would gear i...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.20 18:00:00
|
635. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: The 100 clone limit is designed to give corporations who attack from districts a slight advantage. It has been discussed amongst the team and the CPM that it may be a fraction too small though. We are waiting to gather so...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.20 02:34:00
|
636. An Attackers Perspective on PC Victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
As I mentioned in an earlier post I would give our unbiased perspective on our trials and tribulations in planetary conquest. Tonight we earned our first victory against SVER True Blood. They played an excellent match against us and just about c...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.20 01:58:00
|
637. Logistics shouldn't be allowed to be slayers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dale Templar wrote: Gauder Berwyck wrote: Dale Templar wrote: This is not Planetside, Battlefield or MAG. Nor is it a space point-and-click game. I don't have any interest in EVE, lore or anything even vaguely related to it fyi. ...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.19 13:04:00
|
638. The New Flavor of The Month is... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Mass driver & flaylock? I think you mean flaylock & flaylock. FLP > MD But i'm seeing more and more MD's in PC games. All about explosion spam. It's not about the explosion s...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.19 04:21:00
|
639. Planetary Conquest and 100 clone Starter Pack - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fiddlestaxp wrote: There are lots of corps that will sell you a district for cheaper than the 2-5 clone packs that it would take to capture a district. Just buy a district. Save yourself from having to pull off the perfect battle and fight on a...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.19 04:11:00
|
640. Planetary Conquest and 100 clone Starter Pack - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: being able to "store" genolution packs in the "air" would be a good way of having more that 100 clones to fight each battle Also, SBT are the only copr that have a whole planet for themselves so we nee to take it away from the...
- by Cenex Langly - at 2013.07.19 01:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |