| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
961. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
semperfi1999 wrote: Buster just stop. You have proven yourself to not have the intellect necessary to properly perform a study and use the data given to reach a conclusion that is appropriate based on the method of your data capture. You have ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 16:43:00
|
962. I hate to say it, but most people here don't care about balance... - in General Discussions [original thread]
semperfi1999 wrote: This was a good topic (although immediately brought down from its height by posts calling Dust AR 514 when the AR has not been the dominate weapon "as in OP" at the very least since the TAC Nerf) I agree......people come on...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 16:29:00
|
963. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maximus Stryker wrote: please understand that you have show how many kills with each weapons. please understand what you HAVE NOT shown is how many people were running those weapons. please understand that I was simply trying to show you why...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 16:03:00
|
964. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: When the data doesnt fit your original hypothesis (OP'dness"), change it! Bad science is bad. LOL, facts. You started with assumptions and bias and set out to "prove" it. That is not science, and certainly not statistics...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:58:00
|
965. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Buster Friently wrote: lol. keep defending your AR OP EZ mode please. Listen. The stats don't lie. The AR is a problem, it's used 10 times more than a supposedly similar ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:53:00
|
966. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Maximus Stryker wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Honestly, I don't expect many of you to agree with the facts. It's because you're part of the AR wielding hegemony. Wasn't t...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:49:00
|
967. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Buster Friently wrote: lol. keep defending your AR OP EZ mode please. Listen. The stats don't lie. The AR is a problem, it's used 10 times more than a supposedly similar weapon, the SR. All this data shows is that the...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:46:00
|
968. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Maximus Stryker wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Honestly, I don't expect many of you to agree with the facts. It's because you're part of the AR wielding hegemony. Wasn't the argument against the flaylock (and other weap...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:43:00
|
969. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Bad science is bad. Amount of use is not an indicator of OP'dness. Wrong. But even going with your flawed logic (BTW it's c...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:39:00
|
970. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Bad science is bad. Amount of use is not an indicator of OP'dness. Wrong. But even going with your flawed logic (BTW it's clear to anyone with brains that people migrate t...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:25:00
|
971. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Honestly, I don't expect many of you to agree with the facts. It's because you're part of the AR wielding hegemony. Wasn't the argument against the flaylock (and other weapons before it) that people were speccing into it and getting cheap kills b...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:19:00
|
972. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Bad science is bad. Amount of use is not an indicator of OP'dness. Wrong. But even going with your flawed logic (BTW it's clear to anyone with brains that people migrate to what is OP, hence the term FOTM) Even that asi...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:11:00
|
973. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP, please comment on these stats. Several of us now have clearly shown how out of whack the AR is, and yet you continue to pursue balancing on weapons that represent 4 or 5% of the killbase. What's the point of even having these weapons when th...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:06:00
|
974. General Kill Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: Firstly, I want to apologise to anyone who played a game with me in today because I was AFK while I was doing this for 10 games - I don't do it often but at least this time I had good reason. Okay, so what I did was fairly s...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 15:02:00
|
975. So if designers of EVE nerf a ship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Small mind How did you think that this was going to help your argument in anyway. You mean the fact that Dust is F2P? B...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 05:58:00
|
976. So if designers of EVE nerf a ship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Buster Friently wrote: lol. Grow up Small mind How did you think that this was going to help your argument in anyway. You mean the fact that Dust is F2P? Because t...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 05:47:00
|
977. If CCP Shuts Down Dust 514 for Good... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Buster Friently wrote: It has to come to PC before it will get shut down, low playerbase or no. I will have to say though, that most Eve players wouldn't even notice, and of those that do, many would be happy if Dust we...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 05:42:00
|
978. If CCP Shuts Down Dust 514 for Good... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Buster Friently wrote: It has to come to PC before it will get shut down, low playerbase or no. I will have to say though, that most Eve players wouldn't even notice, and of those that do, many would be happy if Dust went bell...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 05:38:00
|
979. So if designers of EVE nerf a ship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Syther Shadows wrote: Cosgar wrote: Dale Templar wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Cosgar wrote: You should have seen the rage induced over the Battleship nerf. It makes the Dust forums look civil. Good Point but are EVE forums ususally lik...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 05:36:00
|
980. So if designers of EVE nerf a ship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Syther Shadows wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Make this game all passive and you can use this point, until then its completely different. if dust was full passive then there would be no incentive to play for the top tier players they would just...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.19 05:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |