| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
10621. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: in PC proto forges still **** me the **** off and end up making the other tank win in a tank v tank fight. AV is still there. but i do agree points for vehicle damage would make it a lot better. i think MLT tanks ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.14 01:48:00
|
10622. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
The cost itself doesn't really matter. However there should be an actual consequence to losing HAVs, similar to how there is a consequence to losing a PRO dropsuit. This super low price currently does nothing but encourage vehicle spam. And ML...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:45:00
|
10623. This is just sad.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
It would be nice if you could AV them before they escaped now wouldn't it?
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:33:00
|
10624. CONGRATZ - in General Discussions [original thread]
The only things involving Vehicles & AV that ever required "skill" or "difficulty" to use was the Dropship and Plasma Cannon. And the PLC technically isn't even AV.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:29:00
|
10625. Selling Templar BPO code - in General Discussions [original thread]
2 ISK. That's my final offer.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:26:00
|
10626. Imperial Complex Armor repairer - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Minmatar also only have 1 Combat Rifle. Many problem exist in the LP store. But this problem does need to be addressed (if any). I wouldn't know though. I never bothered checking the Amarr store.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:20:00
|
10627. The Solution to 1.7 Tanks- It already exists in EVE - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
/signed +1
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:17:00
|
10628. So who HASN'T been banned yet from FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seymor Krelborn wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: We are working on a fix for this friendly fire kicking not working as intended. In particular remote explosives and vehicle collision damage are causing issues. We will have a patch out shortly. ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:14:00
|
10629. Proof of OP TANKS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ansiiis The Trustworthy wrote: Tanks are meant to fight tanks,I mean AV. Really guys? Stop trying to use Anti-Vehicle weapons to take out vehicles. Now the only problem is that now everyone is a wannabe tanker. If you have at least 0 SP you can...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:13:00
|
10630. [suggestion] Give av a better purpose (not a buff/nerf, a purpose). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Artificer Ghost wrote: Also, by the way, before all the feral pro-AV users come in here and take away our civilized conversation , I'd like to point out that earlier in the thread, someone said the Plasma Cannon is an AV weapon? In the descrip...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 22:06:00
|
10631. WP for damage done vs vehicles has to be implemented ASAP, this is why... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oh yeah, here is a link to the original thread & confirmation. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1606325#post1606325 (I would hyperlink, but I'm on mobile atm)
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 21:29:00
|
10632. THIS IS WHAT I SEE ON THE FORUMS. - in General Discussions [original thread]
bear90211 wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Please don't. I DO AS I PLEASE. btw FW threads.... EPIC FACEPALM. What was wrong with his FW threads? And all of the issues that were addressed were serious problems that needed to be addressed ASAP.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 21:27:00
|
10633. WP for damage done vs vehicles has to be implemented ASAP, this is why... - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is why we CAN have nice things.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 21:25:00
|
10634. THIS IS WHAT I SEE ON THE FORUMS. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please Don't
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 21:23:00
|
10635. THIS IS WHAT I SEE ON THE FORUMS. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Please don't. Please Don't
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 21:23:00
|
10636. Proof of OP TANKS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Atiim wrote: LOL The hardners weren't even on. Really CCP? message from Godin: half of the swarms missed the HAV. Plus, it was almost dead. Bad positioning mostly. the nitro barely saved it. I'm watching the video ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 21:21:00
|
10637. Proof of OP TANKS - in General Discussions [original thread]
LOL The hardners weren't even on. Really CCP?
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 21:12:00
|
10638. So who HASN'T been banned yet from FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Me. I had a close call when I Jihad Jeeped though. Not really sure how I didn't get banned.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 20:40:00
|
10639. Hey CCP, here's a suggestion for FW ;) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seymor Krelborn wrote: Alldin Kan wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: That's getting closer, but I'd rather see the levels past 5 increase more incrementally. You seem to forget the presence of boosters... boosters, which cost money..... p...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 20:25:00
|
10640. Militia Tanks Need Adjusted From A Dedicated Tankers Prospective - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: Don't mind tanks being hard to kill, but we need to be rewarded for making you soil yourself and run away(WP for damage). We also need to be able to capitalize on the "waves of opportunity" as promised. I don't want an ea...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.13 19:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |