| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
9841. AV had changed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: You mean! You mean?! I actually have to plan how I'm going to take out HAVs?! You ask too much of me, man! All while HAVs require no planning beyond rotating the joysticks and holding R1. Your asking far to little.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.30 01:28:00
|
9842. AV had changed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: tankers QQd about AV being invisable :P theres a difference Nope. Of all of the tanker QQ threads, the rendering issue was brought up the least. And we weren't completely invisible. My tanking adventures have taught me...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.30 01:26:00
|
9843. What do you mean tanks are balanced? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The horde... is among us
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.30 00:42:00
|
9844. Blasters and Rails are balanced. missiles are UP - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: Funny how the blaster turret is on the chopping block now for these supposed forum warriors. Tanks and other vehicles feel the same about rails. You don't see vehicles complaining about rails. The blaster is doing its job. It...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.30 00:32:00
|
9845. The Brooklyn Project. - in General Discussions [original thread]
If your looking for a PC district, I would contact the person responsible for Thunderdome.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.30 00:24:00
|
9846. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: death needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter! For Infantry it does have a lasting effect. It's called ISK. Tanks on the other hand...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.30 00:21:00
|
9847. The Brooklyn Project. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sign me up!
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.30 00:14:00
|
9848. Blasters and Rails are balanced. missiles are UP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blasters compromise nothing. They have the ability to shred both Infantry and Tanks with ease, which makes it broken.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 22:08:00
|
9849. Hire a good tanker today! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fire of Prometheus wrote: Who needs a tanker when you have a jeep with REs on the bumper. I want a bumper sticker for my LAV that says "how's my driving?" Could I file a complaint about Reckless Endangerment then?
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 22:07:00
|
9850. Balancing Tanks with a nerf or AV buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: Increasing tank hulls costs by 50% would actually curb the tank spam a lot. While also making the vehicle class accessible for the rich only again, which is why many didn't tank pre 1.6. I believe there is a better way.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 22:06:00
|
9851. how much would you pay for officer weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: how much would you pay for 5 gausten FGs? Nobody want that $#!t.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 22:03:00
|
9852. Balancing Tanks with a nerf or AV buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Do you tank? Why do you think you could dictate how tanks are to be run with any legitimacy? Do you AV? Why do you think you could (or should) dictate how AV is to be used with any legitimacy?
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:59:00
|
9853. Balancing Tanks with a nerf or AV buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Yea aslong as the infantry is the size of a house and is utterly useless in infantry areas If you cant solo a mlt tank with proto AV then your doing it wrong If your getting soloed by even officer AV while in a ML...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:47:00
|
9854. Rail tanks are a bit to powerful - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: AP Grasshopper wrote: Rail tanks kinda take the fun out of flying I was only doing backflips :'( Aileron Rolls?
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:43:00
|
9855. ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
You should put Lifetime WP by the support logi section, as opposed to showing screenshots from 1 match. Also, rank the support logi section accordingly by total Lifetime WP. Also, put me by the support logi section.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:41:00
|
9856. Rail tanks are a bit to powerful - in General Discussions [original thread]
I say keep Railguns the way they are until AV gets buffed.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:33:00
|
9857. Logistics Are NOT Overpowered. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Robocop Junior wrote: Which is why he should be CPM! Hip hip hooray! I don't think anyone would want me on the CPM board. In fact, I think it would make vehicle pilots quit.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:28:00
|
9858. Logistics Are NOT Overpowered. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beld Errmon wrote: the weird part is you ppl are too ****ing stupid to realise you're being trolled by a twit, making you even less than a twit, Gee. I guess tankers don't fancy people using their "logic" and applying to something. Loving the...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:24:00
|
9859. Logistics Are NOT Overpowered. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: logistics is a suit sir. not a role. logi-bro is a role demolitions is a role resupply is a role logi-assault is also unfortunatly a role logistics is just the suit, what you put in it defines your role. it just so happ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:23:00
|
9860. Balancing Tanks with a nerf or AV buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: stlcarlos989 wrote: Keri Starlight wrote: What's the purpose of an AV tank if vehicles cannot be a real threat to infantry? Good rail tankers still wreck infantry and did you not read what i said about small blas...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.29 21:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |