Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
441. Meanwhile, in EVE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Golden Day wrote: You see even eve players want dust on PC! Obviously?
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.08 17:43:00
|
442. Meanwhile, in EVE - in General Discussions [original thread]
http://imgur.com/25GKGzJ
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.08 16:52:00
|
443. In the Caldari Border Zone with Arkena Wyrnspire - in General Discussions [original thread]
ew
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.08 16:18:00
|
444. Actually an attempt at constructive posting. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: But if they are warned they need it before the weapon, they then upgrade the suit first. Increasing their fitting ability before gaining a weapon. Is it really that bad?? if so, leave that part out. But I do not think so. I...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.08 13:55:00
|
445. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: I think I'm following, and I see no reason not to also introduce a Type C Cloak if we're entertaining the prospect of a Type B Cloak: Type A - large duration, small profile bonus Type B - small duration, large profile bonu...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 19:29:00
|
446. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Whilst I'm still working on numbers for an actual proposal, here are some efficacy vs fitting resource statistics which you may find interesting. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10vGwCgcJt...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 19:27:00
|
447. Ragtagthrowtogether pc build - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is not the power of a PS4 for $350, lol.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 18:32:00
|
448. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Whilst I'm still working on numbers for an actual proposal, here are some efficacy vs fitting resource statistics which you may find interesting. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10vGwCgcJttu1KhzueqtxXbajZrIeoGLXfoOUP2JIhwM/edit?usp=sharin...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 18:29:00
|
449. Actually an attempt at constructive posting. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: However.. I strongly disagree with Proto not being an advantage This is not what I am saying. Literally the only thing that this proposal would achieve, in tandem with the locking out of proto from public matches, is prevent...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 18:17:00
|
450. Actually an attempt at constructive posting. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: With the benefits these proposals would have for NPE.. I don't think it's asking too much for them to have to invest SP for better fittings. The advantage of proto on paper looks minimal, in-game it makes a much worse impact. ...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 18:00:00
|
451. Abstract Requiem - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
ZED Regent wrote: Immortal Zod wrote: Taskanoss wrote: Finally heard Dreis' voice today...British voice, that is. Well, he is British. He ain't no Oxford or nothing. I suspect York. Or he is not British and he is secretly from Edin...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 17:28:00
|
452. Actually an attempt at constructive posting. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Indeed, but it causes more issue for metalocks And the WP for kills based on tiers would be thrown off, by cheap suit w/PRO weapon 'Cheap suit' and 'proto weapon' are mutually exclusive. You get barely any benefit from using...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 17:24:00
|
453. Actually an attempt at constructive posting. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Suit locks for weapons. - To use a PRO weapon, it could only be equipped on a PRO suit (not APEX) - Any weapon can be fit on a suit equal or above the weapons tier. I don't think I agree. When a newbie is looking to u...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 17:00:00
|
454. GENERAL STRIKE CALL - in General Discussions [original thread]
\o/
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 16:14:00
|
455. Rebuilding Dust 514 For The Future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Golden Day wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Port DUST514 to PC and PS4 (I mainly want it on PS4) Are you perhaps special my friend?? Porting to PC and ps4 is a bad idea PC is were it should go because ccps whole playerbase is there + ...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.07 15:19:00
|
456. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spademan wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: that awkward moment when you oversleep and wake up halfway through your first lecture of the morning which is at 8 so decide not to go and just to go back to sleep and then sleep to the point where you...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.06 23:49:00
|
457. Swarm Launchers were even more OP in the Lore - in General Discussions [original thread]
Despite alliances the empires rarely field fleets in tandem.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.06 20:45:00
|
458. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
that awkward moment when you oversleep and wake up halfway through your first lecture of the morning which is at 8 so decide not to go and just to go back to sleep and then sleep to the point where you miss your next lecture at 4:00
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.06 16:41:00
|
459. Burst AR Question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jonny D Buelle wrote: jpmannu wrote: The Breach is the best weapon. Try gal ass lvl 5 with 2 damage mods and exp Breach AR and you will reconsider your thoughts... Already tried that, again its too slow and has too little ammo, those are ...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.05 10:37:00
|
460. Burst AR Question - in General Discussions [original thread]
The burst works a little weirdly with the RoF bonus. Having increased burst speed but with that fire delay leads to a really odd tempo.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2015.11.05 10:04:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |