| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
261. Why is staff allowed to take vacation when their game is broken? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Furtive Pygmy wrote: As a consumer, I'm entitled to expect a quality product being delivered to me when I pay for it. Game is free. Try again.
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 17:18:00
|
262. Why is staff allowed to take vacation when their game is broken? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Furtive Pygmy wrote: Altina McAlterson wrote: The Furtive Pygmy wrote: Many people have been refunded money from this game, actually. Maybe. I'll admit that I used to give in to people like you just so they'd go away. Or ignored t...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 17:15:00
|
263. Why is staff allowed to take vacation when their game is broken? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Furtive Pygmy wrote: Many people have been refunded money from this game, actually. Maybe. I'll admit that I used to give in to people like you just so they'd go away. Or ignored them until they got so mad they went away. So you might...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 17:07:00
|
264. Why is staff allowed to take vacation when their game is broken? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Furtive Pygmy wrote: Skullmiser Vulcansu wrote: Yes. Nobody working on this game should even be allowed to eat or sleep until YOU are satisfied with how everything works. They have to work on this game and do nothing else, because it is ...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 16:58:00
|
265. Why is staff allowed to take vacation when their game is broken? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skullmiser Vulcansu wrote: They should not get a vacation. I agree with slave driving because I am of the Amarr. I admit it is hard to argue that point.
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 16:54:00
|
266. Why is staff allowed to take vacation when their game is broken? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crap, I really didn't think you were serious OP. If that's the case I can go ahead a predict a life of being disappointed and angry but having your complaints fall on deaf ears because they are irrational.
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 16:52:00
|
267. Why is staff allowed to take vacation when their game is broken? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because being a game dev is a cushy job. There's no unpaid overtime ever, you only have to work when you feel like because there's no one giving you deadlines for anything, there's no interference from anyone else outside of your small company and...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 16:41:00
|
268. [Redline] How about this as a temporary fix - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wish they'd just come up with a lore reason for the redline that affected weapons in some way. Seems to be the most logical action. Is there a reason given that enemy soldiers die in the redline? Can't whatever that is affect weapons too? And as ...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 14:36:00
|
269. Death - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aisha Ctarl wrote: I've wondered the same. In any other game with a revive mechanic, it counts as a death until you are revived, once revived the death is expunged. In DUST it seems that regardless of you get revived or not, you still "died" ...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 14:30:00
|
270. Death - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because that would destroy the KDR and a lot of people really care about that and then you wouldn't get any WP for it so no SP and ISK. It would be horribly broken otherwise.
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 14:15:00
|
271. Guns from other games you wish were in Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cerebral Bore from Turok 2. Completely impractical but the most fun weapon in the history of gaming as far as I'm concerned. Just the pants-crapping sound it makes as it homes in sells it for me.
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.05 14:11:00
|
272. Stacking Penalties - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disturbingly Bored wrote: Kraw Zin wrote: This seams to be for EVE and who knows if it translates to Dust. Does anyone know what the Dust penalty's are for sure? Those numbers have been experimentally verified to be the same for DUST. I...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 23:02:00
|
273. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: People. When stating something as a fact such as "You cannot travel faster than the speed to light" please state your evidence, all material along with a report as to why it is what it is. Also please include documentation...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 07:10:00
|
274. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Amarrgheddon wrote: Amarrgheddon wrote: Thurak1 wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Hyper space makes more sense than warp drive because hyper space is the act of using a worm hole to travel through space, but warp drive is ...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 06:55:00
|
275. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Amarrgheddon wrote: Traveling faster than light cannot be achieved. Tachyons. Theoretical I know, I'm just pointing them out. Accelerating to the speed of light is impossible. But just so we're clear are you saying that both star wars an...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 06:50:00
|
276. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Amarrgheddon wrote: Altina McAlterson wrote: Amarrgheddon wrote: how is manipulating space time different than using a worm hole? There are no wormholes in the tech of either series so what does it matter? do you know what a worm ...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 06:44:00
|
277. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Amarrgheddon wrote: how is manipulating space time different than using a worm hole? There are no wormholes in the tech of either series so what does it matter?
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 06:30:00
|
278. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Amarrgheddon wrote: Altina McAlterson wrote: Amarrgheddon wrote: celerity is the speed limit. Even if you could exploit entanglement the particles still only travel at speeds of C or less. What? No one was talking about entanglement we...
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 06:28:00
|
279. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Amarrgheddon wrote: celerity is the speed limit. Even if you could exploit entanglement the particles still only travel at speeds of C or less. What? No one was talking about entanglement were they?
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 06:18:00
|
280. Star Trek vs Star Wars. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: Also, there are people currently working on functional warp drives inspired from Stak Trek. They are called Alcubierre Warp Drives. Saying they're "working" on them is a bit of a stretch but otherwise you're on point.
- by Altina McAlterson - at 2014.01.04 05:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |