| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
1021. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chances Ghost wrote: i agree, tanks NEEDS to be infantry centric infantry should want tanks around, they should be benificial to the team in many ways, but limited in others. i see tanks being more important on open ground tanks should be ...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.25 12:08:00
|
1022. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
infantry and vehicles kill av, av kill vehicles, vehicles kill infantry and av. all are weak defence against each other and all are powerful damage against each other. every vehicle use and suit choice should be situational based on whats happenin...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.25 11:51:00
|
1023. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: and reduce the effectiveness of av on tanks by a similar amount. it just came to me a few mins ago that tanks kill mercs too easy and that mercs kills tanks too easy. it just dawned on me tha...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 13:19:00
|
1024. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chances Ghost wrote: makes sence the massive assist mobile wouldnt be too bad concidering its effectivness against vehicles would be top notch. i actually realy like this balance i'm glad someone can see the point i'm trying to make.
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 12:58:00
|
1025. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chances Ghost wrote: they need to have SOME anti infantry ability or they are restricted to anti tank. and there would be no reason to bbring out tanks if their only role is to kill other tanks, whos only role is to kill the first tanks.... ...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 12:54:00
|
1026. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chances Ghost wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Chances Ghost wrote: an idea was mentioned elsewhere so please tell me what you think 1: reduce large turrets effectiness against infantry, making them primarily AV oriented 2: increase effectivnes...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 12:29:00
|
1027. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chances Ghost wrote: an idea was mentioned elsewhere so please tell me what you think 1: reduce large turrets effectiness against infantry, making them primarily AV oriented 2: increase effectivness of small turrets against infantry 3:inscreas...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 12:12:00
|
1028. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
what i'm talking about is vehicles and infantry working side by side without one overpowering the other or dividing them into separate areas i.e vehicle vs everything, infantry vs infantry, av vs tank
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 11:56:00
|
1029. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: what if i hide in a hole with an anti tank weapon? you cant see me but i see you and i can fuk you up just because you in a tank it doesnt mean you dont need infantry this is the point of the post. read it carefully...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 11:53:00
|
1030. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
and reduce the effectiveness of av on tanks by a similar amount. it just came to me a few mins ago that tanks kill mercs too easy and that mercs kills tanks too easy. it just dawned on me that the whole mechanic of tanks vs merc is badly broken ...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 11:50:00
|
1031. ccp are you ever going to fix vehicle recall - in General Discussions [original thread]
your completely missing the point. forget for a moment all your misgivings with the state of amount of tank versus the amount of AV dps. this is not about we want to kill your vehicles and for you to have no choice about it. this is about making t...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 11:18:00
|
1032. ccp are you ever going to fix vehicle recall - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: you have until the rdv actually grabs it to destroy it that would be no different than having them vanish into thin air.
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 01:21:00
|
1033. ccp are you ever going to fix vehicle recall - in General Discussions [original thread]
i'm not saying everyone does it. there are tank drivers and dropship pilots out there i could rain missiles down on all day and they just shrug them off or change positions which is perfectly fine and when the vehicle is no longer needed they move...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 01:20:00
|
1034. ccp are you ever going to fix vehicle recall - in General Discussions [original thread]
people constantly complain that vehicles are under powered and av is op mostly because everyone stacks damage mods. now personally i don't understand why people put damage mods on tanks anyway but i'm not a tank driver so can't really speculate o...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.24 00:47:00
|
1035. Click to find out how much SP you get with the daily activity bonus - in General Discussions [original thread]
XANDER KAG wrote: So I guess this is reset at down time? Not some ridiculous 24 hour thing? i would say thats likely, on the plus side you only have to log in to unlock the bonus so if your not up for playing just log in and log straight out...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.22 19:23:00
|
1036. Dusts turn to be put on back burner AKA Valkyrie - in General Discussions [original thread]
those are two separate dev teams, those are two separate dev teams, those are two separate dev teams, those are two separate dev teams, those are two separate dev teams, those are two separate dev teams, those are two separate dev teams, those are...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.21 21:33:00
|
1037. Dusts turn to be put on back burner AKA Valkyrie - in General Discussions [original thread]
i really enjoy reading all these ******** forum posts. keep them comming
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.21 20:26:00
|
1038. Tanks drivers suck big time - in General Discussions [original thread]
funny how this is starting to turn into a fix tank thread, everyone meet the 99 percenters
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.19 19:57:00
|
1039. Tanks drivers suck big time - in General Discussions [original thread]
unless your f****** awsome, skilled, dont moan and just get on with the job honing your skills and becoming more Awesomer. i commend you and if your on my side, i will protect you and not just leech on your kills just my piece to praise those g...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.19 16:59:00
|
1040. lolswarm launcher - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Well if you think that the missiles bending around corners/cover, locking on through objects, jumping while locking, firing while locking , not even looking at the target and still maintaining lock and able to fire...
- by ADAM-OF-EVE - at 2013.08.19 16:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |