DUST Search - How Molden Heath Became a Bucket of Tears...

TEXA5 HiTM4N wrote:

Gods Architect wrote:

He has a great point but this is the only game I've ever known that fighting a conflict is too high of a risk. Losing a war is a corp almost certain death. With that kind of gameplay it's understandable why corps refuse to fight competitively. All that effort you put into a corp as a CEO and you watch it all fall apart over a conflict that was supposed to be fun, learning, and a bonding experience. Under those conditions you have to be an idiot or a gambler to fight or stay in PC if the risk is that great. Sver is the only corp that I certainly know that a lost a war including a entire planet and gain almost everything back.

Outer.Heavens almost there, and Hellstorm is doing it best with that blindside that happened. PC war are not cost effective or player worthy by any means. I have stupid for respect EON and for what that Empire has done for PC and the community, but from what I know you guys haven't been severely strained by losing wars in PC. You lost a few but won them too. Every corp believes their bond is unbreakable up until they start losing battles and cannot best the opponent no matter what they do.

Once that pain happens to you then you to me have the right to boast you friendships and corp mates. But at this time you are the king of the hill and I hope you never have to go through what we did. Most respect tho

Don't know why people turn on each other when they start losing in a game. I'll put my newest players against one of the best corps in the game and not care about the outcome. We don't really care about winning as long as we have fun.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3291	Posted - 2013.08.03 07:43:00 - [1] - Quote There is no TL;DR version of this opinion piece. I would like to start off by saying I was never an EVE person. First time I heard "HTFU" was when I came on the forums. New Eden? Dafuq was that? Well I did my reading, i searched for what made EVE so famous, and what struck me the hardest was how ruthless a place New Eden is. Now with that in mind, I came to remind certain fairies of DUST this mantra. In New Eden, nothing's suppose to be given to you. You fight for it, and nothing rings more true than the mentality of FPS players. We're competitive by nature, and by that I mean we all play to win. Nobody likes to lose. We invest time, effort and money. Fighting to get better, why? To win, and this case to secure districts. Yet here we are. Drowning in a bucket of tears in MH. I haven't commented in the War Room for a while cuz all I've been doing is listening to people. What I've been seeing is people kissing ass, people pointing fingers at others, people trying their hand at meta, people making excuses for their failures, people trolling, people TRYING to troll, people trying to sound smart, and people who actually did come across smart. There's one thing I haven't seen yet, and I'll get to that later on. Planetary Conquest was something that really got me interested in DUST. Competitive players going at it for fun. Simple as that. No EVE influence needed for corps to want to fight each other...well some corps, other corps just played dodge ball, but that's another TL;DR thread in the making. Corps were respected for fighting each other. Corps who fought each other, respected each other. Now, here's what been going on in MH, and I'll quote my friend Baracka on this: Baracka Flocka Flame wrote: everyone supported teams 'pulling out'(quitting) and suddenly winning and dominating was looked down upon ^ This right here. Since when has winning become a bad thing? People were fine with other corps leaving PC, running away from competition, but when the people that stayed are fighting, and competing there's a problem? Do you fairies see the problem here? I'm personally sick and tired of hearing about "helping the Indie corps". Thankfully I'm not a CEO or director so i don't have to deal with it. It's a good concept, but is New Eden a place to babysit? That is my personal opinion and view. Grown ups have disagreements and that's ok kids. Nobody is getting a divorce. (same can't be said about other alliances). I personally gave the members of an indie corp money after they attacked us and lost. I didn't do it cuz I was trolling. I did it cuz they fought us! Out of respect, I compensated them for their effort. Corps that don't want to fight and just be given districts, is babysitting in my eyes. I'll come back to my earlier point. The one thing I didn't see amongst all the tears and finger pointing, is the one person to point a finger back at themselves. People blaming EoN... how about you sit back for a second, and think about that. EoN started day 1 of PC with a handful of districts...literally. There were corps in EoN that didn't have a single district. We fought, and clawed our way through 2 wars. Our alliance stood strong throughout everything with minor hiccups here and there. We fought like animals. Every corp in EoN pulled its weight, and I was proud to be part of its success. We fought for what we have right now. Yet people hating on our success? You're hating on our determination? Our teamwork? Our organization? Our will to never give up? Our motivation? Blame yourselves, and while you're at it, ask yourselves these things: - What did you as an individual do? - What did your corp do? - What did your alliance do? Truth is, everyone here in the War Room crying about us, don't want to answer these questions honestly. It's easier to point fingers and cry. It's easier to whine on the forums than it is to muster up a pair of balls and attack us. I'll close this thread by saying this, the amount of tears I've witnessed the past couple weeks in a game that shares New Eden's universe with EVE, is sad. It's pathetic. HTFU isn't enough of an expression to people in here anymore. I've lost respect for so many corps. Where's the "eye of the tiger"? All i see is bloodshot eyes filled with tears looking at me. Individuals making themselves sound misinformed, and frankly sound stupid. How the corps of these individuals allow them to even whisper the crap that they proudly shout is beyond me. Making yourselves sound like cowards is what you're doing. Hiding behind words on a forum. Truth is, if some of yall can muster the courage to attack as easy as you muster the tendency to talk **** on the forums, MH won't be so full of tears and salty individuals pointing fingers every direction. MH might actually be a place of battles. But hey, what do i know. I only saw first hand what we did from having nothing. We were nobodies, and now here we are. The "bad guys" of Molden Heath. Hate us for dominating, and winning, but tell me, what's the feeling you get when you think about attacking us? That feeling you got, is what defines you in this game, and it's what makes EoN so hated. Stay classy.
Skipper Jones Murder Cakes Of Doom 570	Posted - 2013.08.03 07:55:00 - [2] - Quote Amen botha
Baracka Flocka Flame SyNergy Gaming EoN. 637	Posted - 2013.08.03 08:03:00 - [3] - Quote I heard the reason was EoN blue'd with everyone and refuses to break up... thats the problem with Dust and PC.
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3293	Posted - 2013.08.03 08:07:00 - [4] - Quote Baracka Flocka Flame wrote: I heard the reason was EoN blue'd with everyone and refuses to break up... thats the problem with Dust and PC. lol ROFL, LoI, CRONOS, Orion, NF All are / were major alliances at one point. The one time we blued with NF (which lasted a couple weeks) was against CRONOS... but hey, lol @ logic and reason on this forum. But hey, we blued everyone up is always the argument people bring up
Jarlaxle Xorlarrin SyNergy Gaming EoN. 130	Posted - 2013.08.03 08:22:00 - [5] - Quote I still don't get why people blame EoN solely for blue'ing up. I mean, it takes two to blue, right? and tbh we aren't even "Blue" with anyone except those in EoN. You know... the people in the alliance. People be like "Oh they blue'd up with RND and Intrepidus and 0.H before the 6 Day War herp derp". Just in case you guys haven't noticed... those people are still here. And the corps bitching about us blue'ing up could... idk... attack us? Form an Anti-EoN coalition? Nope they'd rather just ***** and moan. Not even the sexy kind of moaning. You know that sound a cat makes when it has its leg/tail/head caught in something? That kind of moan. Btw, Lance, people won't understand any of your post. There is simply too much logic in it.
Gods Architect SVER True Blood 264	Posted - 2013.08.03 08:24:00 - [6] - Quote He has a great point but this is the only game I've ever known that fighting a conflict is too high of a risk. Losing a war is a corp almost certain death. With that kind of gameplay it's understandable why corps refuse to fight competitively. All that effort you put into a corp as a CEO and you watch it all fall apart over a conflict that was supposed to be fun, learning, and a bonding experience. Under those conditions you have to be an idiot or a gambler to fight or stay in PC if the risk is that great. Sver is the only corp that I certainly know that I lost a war and gain almost everything back. Outer.Heavens almost there, and Hellstorm is doing it best with that blindside that happened. PC war are not cost effective or player worthy by any means. I have stupid for respect EON and for what that Empire has done for PC and the community, but from what I know you guys haven't been severely strained by losing wars in PC. You lost a few but won them too. Every corp believes their bond is unbreakable up until they start losing battles and cannot best the opponent no matter what they do. Once that pain happens to you then you to me have the right to boast you friendships and corp mates. But at this time you are the king of the hill and I hope you never have to go through what we did. Most respect tho
TEXA5 HiTM4N ROGUE SPADES EoN. 159	Posted - 2013.08.03 08:35:00 - [7] - Quote Gods Architect wrote: He has a great point but this is the only game I've ever known that fighting a conflict is too high of a risk. Losing a war is a corp almost certain death. With that kind of gameplay it's understandable why corps refuse to fight competitively. All that effort you put into a corp as a CEO and you watch it all fall apart over a conflict that was supposed to be fun, learning, and a bonding experience. Under those conditions you have to be an idiot or a gambler to fight or stay in PC if the risk is that great. Sver is the only corp that I certainly know that a lost a war including a entire planet and gain almost everything back. Outer.Heavens almost there, and Hellstorm is doing it best with that blindside that happened. PC war are not cost effective or player worthy by any means. I have stupid for respect EON and for what that Empire has done for PC and the community, but from what I know you guys haven't been severely strained by losing wars in PC. You lost a few but won them too. Every corp believes their bond is unbreakable up until they start losing battles and cannot best the opponent no matter what they do. Once that pain happens to you then you to me have the right to boast you friendships and corp mates. But at this time you are the king of the hill and I hope you never have to go through what we did. Most respect tho Don't know why people turn on each other when they start losing in a game. I'll put my newest players against one of the best corps in the game and not care about the outcome. We don't really care about winning as long as we have fun.
Yokal Bob BetaMax. 68	Posted - 2013.08.03 09:12:00 - [8] - Quote TEXA5 HiTM4N wrote: Gods Architect wrote: He has a great point but this is the only game I've ever known that fighting a conflict is too high of a risk. Losing a war is a corp almost certain death. With that kind of gameplay it's understandable why corps refuse to fight competitively. All that effort you put into a corp as a CEO and you watch it all fall apart over a conflict that was supposed to be fun, learning, and a bonding experience. Under those conditions you have to be an idiot or a gambler to fight or stay in PC if the risk is that great. Sver is the only corp that I certainly know that a lost a war including a entire planet and gain almost everything back. Outer.Heavens almost there, and Hellstorm is doing it best with that blindside that happened. PC war are not cost effective or player worthy by any means. I have stupid for respect EON and for what that Empire has done for PC and the community, but from what I know you guys haven't been severely strained by losing wars in PC. You lost a few but won them too. Every corp believes their bond is unbreakable up until they start losing battles and cannot best the opponent no matter what they do. Once that pain happens to you then you to me have the right to boast you friendships and corp mates. But at this time you are the king of the hill and I hope you never have to go through what we did. Most respect tho Don't know why people turn on each other when they start losing in a game. I'll put my newest players against one of the best corps in the game and not care about the outcome. We don't really care about winning as long as we have fun. Well said
Azura Sakura Militaires-Sans-Frontieres 414	Posted - 2013.08.03 09:52:00 - [9] - Quote All of this can be solved if EoN just take all of MH. Me personally, I am up for some ringing against EoN if that happens. More of a learning experience for me but I doubt I'll play for long if they make KB/m better. DS3 can compete with KB/m but you have to be like 100x better than than the KB/m user (x_x).
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3986	Posted - 2013.08.03 10:16:00 - [10] - Quote Gods Architect wrote: He has a great point but this is the only game I've ever known that fighting a conflict is too high of a risk. Losing a war is a corp almost certain death. With that kind of gameplay it's understandable why corps refuse to fight competitively. All that effort you put into a corp as a CEO and you watch it all fall apart over a conflict that was supposed to be fun, learning, and a bonding experience. Under those conditions you have to be an idiot or a gambler to fight or stay in PC if the risk is that great. Sver is the only corp that I certainly know that a lost a war including a entire planet and gain almost everything back. Outer.Heavens almost there, and Hellstorm is doing it best with that blindside that happened. PC war are not cost effective or player worthy by any means. I have stupid for respect EON and for what that Empire has done for PC and the community, but from what I know you guys haven't been severely strained by losing wars in PC. You lost a few but won them too. Every corp believes their bond is unbreakable up until they start losing battles and cannot best the opponent no matter what they do. Once that pain happens to you then you to me have the right to boast you friendships and corp mates. But at this time you are the king of the hill and I hope you never have to go through what we did. Most respect tho oh we been strained with battles alright cronos war was brutal, we were on the back foot for TWO WEEKS straight on the OLD PC mechanics where u could NOT get off bad timers unless ur opponent allowed u to. and i strongly disagree with the bolded. we already had backup plans in case should we have lost that cronos war we came into PC with the RIGHT mindset which was fights not land so losing all our space and being "kicked out" wouldnt have been a huge deal for us. When i went around gettin corps into EoN i sat down with CEOs and Directors to interview each 1 because i wanted corps who not just skillful but ppl willing and wanting to learn, get better and most of all that fighting spirit to not give up and also good personalities no egos. Losing a war or gettin evicted honestly wont affect us that much and i was and still am shocked to see it have such a crippling effect on other alliances and IMHO it comes down to the mindset of the corps and players and thats where i feel i got ppl with the right mindset for PC. That and combined with the fact that almost all the EoN corps were founded outside DUST and been around for years that gives us a better sense of community than most who only formed in DUST and only play DUST together. To these ppl they just in it for DUST so its easy for them to jump ship and float about (both corps and players) but to us we hav our seperate clans we built up prior to DUST and brought each of these communities together to form a larger 1 thats not just on for DUST but sees the importance of sticking together outside of DUST. People need to stop trying to form alliances for DUST and start building communities if they wanna succeed in the long run.

Monsku Kifini Rautaleijona Top Men. 87	Posted - 2013.08.03 11:26:00 - [11] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: People need to stop trying to form alliances for DUST and start building communities if they wanna succeed in the long run. ^this my 2isk: I dont get why people qq about EON. I respect what they have archieved in this game. And most of eon guys that I have played with were always polite and fun to play with. Just played few pubs with RS guy last night and was the most fun that I,ve had in this game for a while. Yes EON has some members that troll on these forums and that is something I personally dont like, but its only few individuals. Too bad you guys are on wrong tz +ñ I dont get these whiners, if you lose you have to look why did that happen, fix your *** and next time you will do better. People who are just after easy fights will always complain and cry. Build your corp/alliance on solid base with healthy community and in the long run you will make it.
Yokal Bob BetaMax. 68	Posted - 2013.08.03 11:42:00 - [12] - Quote ^^ Exactly if you don't build some kind of foundations upon which to work on then people don't have a reason to stay. I always stress the importance of friendship both in and out of games, talk to people on skype, on a different game etc. If you lose then don't complain or give up, work out why you lost and use it as something to work on. This way you keep morale high and people will be willing to go that extra mile.
XeroTheBigBoss TeamPlayers EoN. 756	Posted - 2013.08.03 12:37:00 - [13] - Quote Let the world fear us all...it's just means to an end!
Kinky Burrito A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 119	Posted - 2013.08.03 15:21:00 - [14] - Quote Jarlaxle Xorlarrin wrote: I still don't get why people blame EoN solely for blue'ing up. I mean, it takes two to blue, right? and tbh we aren't even "Blue" with anyone except those in EoN. You know... the people in the alliance. People be like "Oh they blue'd up with RND and Intrepidus and 0.H before the 6 Day War herp derp". Just in case you guys haven't noticed... those people are still here. And the corps bitching about us blue'ing up could... idk... attack us? Form an Anti-EoN coalition? Nope they'd rather just *** and moan. Not even the sexy kind of moaning. You know that sound a cat makes when it has its leg/tail/head caught in something? That kind of moan. Btw, Lance, people won't understand any of your post. There is simply too much logic in it. The problem with attacking EON is once you attack them, all of your districts are locked down with attacks from every Tom, **, and Harry in the Alliance, keeping all of your clones in there. 100 clone battles aren't fun for anyone,
The Attorney General ZionTCD 649	Posted - 2013.08.03 15:48:00 - [15] - Quote I have no issues with EoN dominating MH, they earned it through hard work and determination, kudos to them. What sucks about it is that since EoN became the powerhouse, higher skilled players generally start to gravitate towards EoN corps if they decide to leave their current corps. Not that there is anything wrong with it, but it makes it far more challenging to put up a real effort when you lose your most skilled players, both SP and gun game wise, to the people you would have to fight to get a foothold. Sure, I could go out and recruit a bunch of ringers, but then it becomes an unsustainable model for taking and trying to hold territory. Or I could recruit a bunch of new players and wait six months to be able to attempt to take and hold turf. Either option is not attractive, either for economic or time constraints. I'm not going to tax the crap out of my members so that I can throw them to the lions with 15+ mill SP night after night until my corp goes bankrupt. Thanks to SI and EoN for getting PFC going though, that is where the fun is for the smaller corps. EoN won PC, enjoy the spoils.
Viktor Zokas 187. 120	Posted - 2013.08.03 15:50:00 - [16] - Quote TL;DR: Attention Whoring. Next!
Kinky Burrito A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 119	Posted - 2013.08.03 15:59:00 - [17] - Quote Monsku Kifini wrote: Mavado V Noriega wrote: People need to stop trying to form alliances for DUST and start building communities if they wanna succeed in the long run. ^this my 2isk: I dont get why people qq about EON. I respect what they have archieved in this game. And most of eon guys that I have played with were always polite and fun to play with. Just played few pubs with RS guy last night and was the most fun that I,ve had in this game for a while. Yes EON has some members that troll on these forums and that is something I personally dont like, but its only few individuals. Too bad you guys are on wrong tz +ñ I dont get these whiners, if you lose you have to look why did that happen, fix your *** and next time you will do better. People who are just after easy fights will always complain and cry. Build your corp/alliance on solid base with healthy community and in the long run you will make it. This. I think a lot of the hate has to do with the trolling. A lot of it also has to do with general frustration over the way this game works. It took Eon a year to become what they are, and people on both sides need to realize that it will take a good while for anyone to challenge them. Because of the limited player pool, players getting fed up with CCP and leaving, and the SP required to compete on equal footing, building a quality PC team takes months. Getting a strong alliance together of quality PC teams takes much longer.
The Black Art Pro Hic Immortalis League of Infamy 176	Posted - 2013.08.03 16:21:00 - [18] - Quote The Attorney General wrote: I have no issues with EoN dominating MH, they earned it through hard work and determination, kudos to them. What sucks about it is that since EoN became the powerhouse, higher skilled players generally start to gravitate towards EoN corps if they decide to leave their current corps. Not that there is anything wrong with it, but it makes it far more challenging to put up a real effort when you lose your most skilled players, both SP and gun game wise, to the people you would have to fight to get a foothold. This. Plus no matter what anyone does now, Eon. is there. Indies can't even fight between themselves without Eon. ringers apparently. We had one PC match vs STB where they fielded literally 16 TP (TP player joined STB to fill ranks). It gets old really fast. Merc contract, doing a favor, whatever, Eon. is everywhere. This game is at the point where Eon. guys are just trying to have fun in PC before everyone moves on, but it's at the expense of others' fun. Is it Eon.'s fault? No, but that's the situation.
Medical Crash Vacuum Cleaner. LLC RUST415 45	Posted - 2013.08.03 17:35:00 - [19] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: "cuz". Soon as I saw this slang term I stopped reading. You can't possibly be an adult.
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3304	Posted - 2013.08.03 18:02:00 - [20] - Quote Medical Crash wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: "cuz". Soon as I saw this slang term I stopped reading. You can't possibly be an adult. I'm not a news reporter, so i'm free to write and use whatever "slang" i feel to. Thanks for contributing that important bit of info

Soraya Xel New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men. 228	Posted - 2013.08.03 18:36:00 - [21] - Quote It has nothing to do with sympathy or being nice. These issues have cropped up because dominating forces push others out of the game. And we're trying to keep the game alive long enough for CCP to make it worth playing.
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3306	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:02:00 - [22] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: It has nothing to do with sympathy or being nice. These issues have cropped up because dominating forces push others out of the game. And we're trying to keep the game alive long enough for CCP to make it worth playing. people been leaving long before EoN established itself in MH.
Soraya Xel New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men. 228	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:04:00 - [23] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: It has nothing to do with sympathy or being nice. These issues have cropped up because dominating forces push others out of the game. And we're trying to keep the game alive long enough for CCP to make it worth playing. people been leaving long before EoN established itself in MH. True. But PC gives them a reason to not leave, if they have a chance to play in it. So... a temporary relief of bad game mechanics can give them the chance to experience what they game will be, and give them more reason to stick it out. Whereas them just staying in pubs won't retain them.
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3307	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:11:00 - [24] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: It has nothing to do with sympathy or being nice. These issues have cropped up because dominating forces push others out of the game. And we're trying to keep the game alive long enough for CCP to make it worth playing. people been leaving long before EoN established itself in MH. True. But PC gives them a reason to not leave, if they have a chance to play in it. So... a temporary relief of bad game mechanics can give them the chance to experience what they game will be, and give them more reason to stick it out. Whereas them just staying in pubs won't retain them. and you think people leaving is EoN's fault? Has EoN been wiping indie corps out of PC? Funny thing about this. CRONOS attacked and removed Dust Uni from PC first week of PC. LoI wiped ROFL from PC and would have done it to other alliances if they had the chance to. Yet, EoN is in the spotlight for doing what exactly? Not babysitting people enough? Not giving fulfilling people's self entitled needs? Please explain to me, how exactly people leaving has anything to do with EoN. You think if EoN wasn't here, there won't have been another "super power"? lol... they probably won't have extended the same courtesy EoN has.
TXSnowman Pro Hic Immortalis League of Infamy 26	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:13:00 - [25] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: It has nothing to do with sympathy or being nice. These issues have cropped up because dominating forces push others out of the game. And we're trying to keep the game alive long enough for CCP to make it worth playing. people been leaving long before EoN established itself in MH. True. But PC gives them a reason to not leave, if they have a chance to play in it. So... a temporary relief of bad game mechanics can give them the chance to experience what they game will be, and give them more reason to stick it out. Whereas them just staying in pubs won't retain them. and you think people leaving is EoN's fault? Has EoN been wiping indie corps out of PC? Funny thing about this. CRONOS attacked and removed Dust Uni from PC first week of PC. LoI wiped ROFL from PC and would have done it to other alliances if they had the chance to. Yet, EoN is in the spotlight for doing what exactly? Not babysitting people enough? Not giving fulfilling people's self entitled needs? Please explain to me, how exactly people leaving has anything to do with EoN. You should put the keyboard down and go outside.
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3307	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:15:00 - [26] - Quote TXSnowman wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: It has nothing to do with sympathy or being nice. These issues have cropped up because dominating forces push others out of the game. And we're trying to keep the game alive long enough for CCP to make it worth playing. people been leaving long before EoN established itself in MH. True. But PC gives them a reason to not leave, if they have a chance to play in it. So... a temporary relief of bad game mechanics can give them the chance to experience what they game will be, and give them more reason to stick it out. Whereas them just staying in pubs won't retain them. and you think people leaving is EoN's fault? Has EoN been wiping indie corps out of PC? Funny thing about this. CRONOS attacked and removed Dust Uni from PC first week of PC. LoI wiped ROFL from PC and would have done it to other alliances if they had the chance to. Yet, EoN is in the spotlight for doing what exactly? Not babysitting people enough? Not giving fulfilling people's self entitled needs? Please explain to me, how exactly people leaving has anything to do with EoN. You should put the keyboard down and go outside. who says i'm not ouside with my KB?
Rogatien Merc Red Star. EoN. 586	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:20:00 - [27] - Quote Medical Crash wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: "cuz". Soon as I saw this slang term I stopped reading. You can't possibly be an adult. "Soon as I..." "Soon as..." Irony.
Medical Crash Vacuum Cleaner. LLC RUST415 45	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:47:00 - [28] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Medical Crash wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: "cuz". Soon as I saw this slang term I stopped reading. You can't possibly be an adult. I'm not a news reporter, so i'm free to write and use whatever "slang" i feel to. Thanks for contributing that important bit of info Ah, trying to be validated by the forum, sad. As I said you are not an adult. ()
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3310	Posted - 2013.08.03 19:59:00 - [29] - Quote Medical Crash wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Medical Crash wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: "cuz". Soon as I saw this slang term I stopped reading. You can't possibly be an adult. I'm not a news reporter, so i'm free to write and use whatever "slang" i feel to. Thanks for contributing that important bit of info Ah, trying to be validated by the forum, sad. As I said you are not an adult. () validated? why? lol... you're the one saying I'm not an adult, yet gave no reason other than i used "slang"...gg
SoTah Pawp Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 416	Posted - 2013.08.03 20:14:00 - [30] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Medical Crash wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Medical Crash wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: "cuz". Soon as I saw this slang term I stopped reading. You can't possibly be an adult. I'm not a news reporter, so i'm free to write and use whatever "slang" i feel to. Thanks for contributing that important bit of info Ah, trying to be validated by the forum, sad. As I said you are not an adult. () validated? why? lol... you're the one saying I'm not an adult, yet gave no reason other than i used "slang"...gg Lance - it's better to just ignore fools like him. I don't know how people can go to a gaming forum and not expect slang to be used.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page