Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
darkiller240
K-A-O-S theory
114
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 19:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft? |
Zekain Kade
TeamPlayers EoN.
1360
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 19:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Its currently too heavy to fly. |
Skihids
Bullet Cluster
1809
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 19:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
The cake is a lie. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
310
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 19:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
SOONGäó |
xSaloLx
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
72
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 19:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Gunships.
EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
510
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
who cares and/or were you expecting to see flying tanks? |
darkiller240
K-A-O-S theory
114
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
xSaloLx wrote:Gunships.
EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Good luck getting that through AR supremist without an OP rant |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
2921
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Probably still stuck in the art department. |
Skihids
Bullet Cluster
1811
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
xSaloLx wrote:Gunships.
EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front.
And the pilot receives -75 WP for each merc that boards the ship. |
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
1540
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Oso Peresoso wrote:who cares and/or were you expecting to see flying tanks?
Thats what vehicle pilots were expecting I believe, to be nice and safe inside their toy Sadly for them weapons technology usually outpaces armor and in the real world we have had man portable AV for decades and its only gotten better and better |
|
Dimitri Rascolovitch
The Immortal Knights
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
what you mean new targets for my forge gun? i like the sound of this |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
2609
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:49:00 -
[12] - Quote
Heavy aircraft already sound pointless. In order to be slower and less responsive (heavier) than dropships, CCP would need to armor plate a hot air balloon. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3289
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
lol...expecting content soon... good one |
Azura Sakura
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
413
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft? I'm curious on how the bomber will work. |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
208
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Anyone who expects fast flying aircraft to be in the heavy class with more eHp than a dropship are going to be sorely disappointing. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 22:04:00 -
[16] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Anyone who expects fast flying aircraft to be in the heavy class with more eHp than a dropship are going to be sorely disappointing.
Who said its going to be fast? |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 22:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP has never even indirectly stated what their plans for Heavy Air Vehicles looks like.
We have LAV, HAV, dropship (light land, heavy land, medium air) We've seen models for MAV, Speeders, Jets (Medium land, light land, light air)
That leaves one single vehicle category completely enshrouded by mystery. The Heavy Air Vehicle. Obviously CCP hasn't even got concept art for it yet, let alone any idea how they want it to work.
Which is sad because this is going to be one of the more interesting vehicles in the game I think. I hope they say something about it in my lifetime or show us a preview of what to expect.
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 22:08:00 -
[18] - Quote
darkiller240 wrote:xSaloLx wrote:Gunships.
EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Good luck getting that through AR supremist without an OP rant
I think forge gunners would welcome new targets.
|
Hasa Hakira
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 22:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft?
You are spawning out of it |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
208
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:26:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:Anyone who expects fast flying aircraft to be in the heavy class with more eHp than a dropship are going to be sorely disappointing. Who said its going to be fast? Fixed wing aircraft generally are. I guess dropships could race with old biplanes. It is highly unlikely CCP is going to release fixed wing aircraft slower than Dropships. Anything is possible but my opinion of the Devs is higher than that. |
|
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
2927
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
Azura Sakura wrote:darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft? I'm curious on how the bomber will work. Poorly most likely. |
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
351
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:42:00 -
[22] - Quote
I thought RDVs were Heavy ships. Hell, they're super tanky as well: taking out DSs, HAVs, LAVs, and other RDVs like it was nobody's business. |
Dimitri Rascolovitch
The Immortal Knights
12
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:darkiller240 wrote:xSaloLx wrote:Gunships.
EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Good luck getting that through AR supremist without an OP rant I think forge gunners would welcome new targets.
if you scroll up, you will see that i DO welcome new targets, more stuff to swat out of the sky means more WP/ISK/SP per match for me and others like me |
SERPENT-Adamapple
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
150
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
This is my prediction/assumption for the aircraft:
Light = Jetbike Medium = Dropships Heavy = Fighter( Only because when they showed them at fanfest, they were scaled to the size of a HAV) |
CoD isAIDS
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
111
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 02:09:00 -
[25] - Quote
Oso Peresoso wrote:who cares and/or were you expecting to see flying tanks? Hell yeah I want a flying tank. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 04:13:00 -
[26] - Quote
I don't see the problem with a "Flying tank" Or heavily armored gunship.
The secret advantage of Tanks and LAV's right now over dropships (other than DS being paper) is the Fact that they are on the ground. Or rather, they are constantly LOS and have many obstacles to move around or behind in order to rep up or hide from Forge Guns and swarms.
In the air there is no cover.
Imagine a HAV as it is now, except flying in the air and fairly slow. The thing would almost be a joke, it'd be so easy to kill.
Any AV on the map could target it from anywhere and if it got close to the ground it might die from collision impacts or flip over. Or get stuck as it's landing gear glues it to one spot for being too too low. Such a tank would be demolished in moments.
So what is the problem with a heavy aircraft vehicle again? |
GET ATMESON
Robbing The Hood
91
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 04:21:00 -
[27] - Quote
darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft?
The thing is its a HEAVY. Look at heavy suits we only have one. Anything with heavy is done LAST. Its sad but true |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 04:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
GET ATMESON wrote:darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft? The thing is its a HEAVY. Look at heavy suits we only have one. Anything with heavy is done LAST. Its sad but true
You might be onto something.
Seriously. Give heavies some more interesting weapons than the jack-of-all-trades forge gun so that if it gets nerfed they won't QQ about how CCP hates their frames. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
320
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 04:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
xSaloLx wrote:Gunships.
EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front.
Hell no. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 04:32:00 -
[30] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:xSaloLx wrote:Gunships.
EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Hell no.
All those guns would take so much PG/CPU and all the offense in the world won't save it from the fact that it's a slow moving vehicle in the air where everything can fire at it and it has no cover. Nor the range to counter so.
I agree 6 turrets is silly but the point is Heavy Aircraft in general is nothing to be apprehensive about |
|
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
208
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:01:00 -
[31] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:So what is the problem with a heavy aircraft vehicle again? The problem was Fixed Wing Heavy Aircraft.
Because high eHP and good mobility will equal invulnerability in this game. L-LAVs have pretty much proven that. The only counter then would be Stinger missiles and some variant of the Aegis Combat System.
Not to mention it would be a big middle finger to Dropships.
I don't foresee CCP putting out vehicles with the eHP of a HAV, speed of a LAV, and mobility of a Dropship. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:06:00 -
[32] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:So what is the problem with a heavy aircraft vehicle again? The problem was Fixed Wing Heavy Aircraft. Because high eHP and good mobility will equal invulnerability in this game. L-LAVs have pretty much proven that. The only counter then would be Stinger missiles and some variant of the Aegis Combat System. Not to mention it would be a big middle finger to Dropships. I don't foresee CCP putting out vehicles with the eHP of a HAV, speed of a LAV, and mobility of a Dropship.
Wait I'm so confused. Who was talking about fixed wing anything or fast "air tanks" ?
I don't think any person is suggesting there should be jets moving at jet speed that are tankier than a HAV (See also, current logi LAV's lol)
PS LAV's are so survivable not just because of their speed but because they are on the ground, able to go between buildings, under bridges, and around all sorts of things.
A heavy air vehicle would neither be that fast nor able to squeeze between and hide under such cover. I'm not sure what you're on about.. |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
369
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:11:00 -
[33] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Probably still stuck in the art department.
This |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:16:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:gbghg wrote:Probably still stuck in the art department. This
CPM stated in IRC that the art department is actually not the holdup, as revealed to them by CCP in conversations.
Basically Heavy Aircraft Vehicle has not yet been discussed or brainstormed by developers since they sat around a table and said "Yeah, we'll have them".
They are stuck in the idea department. Several floors below the "We got screwed with Carbon by PS3" and then "Wow...We really ****ed up, time to spend a year doing quick patches to hardly salvage things" departments..
|
darkiller240
K-A-O-S theory
120
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:I don't see the problem with a "Flying tank" Or heavily armored gunship.
The secret advantage of Tanks and LAV's right now over dropships (other than DS being paper) is the Fact that they are on the ground. Or rather, they are constantly LOS and have many obstacles to move around or behind in order to rep up or hide from Forge Guns and swarms.
In the air there is no cover.
Imagine a HAV as it is now, except flying in the air and fairly slow. The thing would almost be a joke, it'd be so easy to kill.
Any AV on the map could target it from anywhere and if it got close to the ground it might die from collision impacts or flip over. Or get stuck as it's landing gear glues it to one spot for being too too low. Such a tank would be demolished in moments.
So what is the problem with a heavy aircraft vehicle again? There he gets it |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
208
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:25:00 -
[36] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Wait I'm so confused. Who was talking about fixed wing anything or fast "air tanks" ?
I don't think any person is suggesting there should be jets moving at jet speed that are tankier than a HAV (See also, current logi LAV's lol)
PS LAV's are so survivable not just because of their speed but because they are on the ground, able to go between buildings, under bridges, and around all sorts of things.
A heavy air vehicle would neither be that fast nor able to squeeze between and hide under such cover. I'm not sure what you're on about.. It's completely my fault. Sorry Nguruthos. My sarcasm radar failed. |
Hunter Junko
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
125
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:27:00 -
[37] - Quote
Dimitri Rascolovitch wrote: if you scroll up, you will see that i DO welcome new targets, more stuff to swat out of the sky means more WP/ISK/SP per match for me and others like me
until CCP introduces Countermeasures |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
976
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 05:31:00 -
[38] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Wait I'm so confused. Who was talking about fixed wing anything or fast "air tanks" ?
I don't think any person is suggesting there should be jets moving at jet speed that are tankier than a HAV (See also, current logi LAV's lol)
PS LAV's are so survivable not just because of their speed but because they are on the ground, able to go between buildings, under bridges, and around all sorts of things.
A heavy air vehicle would neither be that fast nor able to squeeze between and hide under such cover. I'm not sure what you're on about.. It's completely my fault. Sorry Nguruthos. My sarcasm radar failed.
Oh that's okay. I hadn't read all the posts, I was wondering if some moron actually suggested for some tank jet abomination.
I would expect this to look something like the mothership from starcraft 2. Maybe it could have a good top speed but only after immensely* slow build up. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2839
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft? Who knows?
Hell, we've even had a Dev make a post about MTACs, but not a single damn word about aircraft.
Kind of a downer for someone who got into this game wanting to be a pilot. |
darkiller240
K-A-O-S theory
123
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:26:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft? Who knows? Hell, we've even had a Dev make a post about MTACs, but not a single damn word about aircraft. Kind of a downer for someone who got into this game wanting to be a pilot. ,.......... |
|
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2844
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:30:00 -
[41] - Quote
darkiller240 wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:darkiller240 wrote:So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that were getting is just an expensive paper weight with bombs Where is our heavy aircraft? Who knows? Hell, we've even had a Dev make a post about MTACs, but not a single damn word about aircraft. Kind of a downer for someone who got into this game wanting to be a pilot. ,.......... Oh, sorry, I guess I forgot "Bomber Dropships".
|
Scipio Falconius
Nemesis Consortium
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 11:44:00 -
[42] - Quote
I always figured the Heavy Aircraft would be similar to the Dragon gunship in Avatar. |
Shadow of War88
0uter.Heaven EoN.
27
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 12:22:00 -
[43] - Quote
hold ur horses buddy, they have yet to balance current vehicles. Dont talk to me bout jets n heavy aircraft |
darkiller240
K-A-O-S theory
123
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 18:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Shadow of War88 wrote:hold ur horses buddy, they have yet to balance current vehicles. Dont talk to me bout jets n heavy aircraft i wish they would balace dropships |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2855
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 19:28:00 -
[45] - Quote
Shadow of War88 wrote:hold ur horses buddy, they have yet to balance current vehicles. Dont talk to me bout jets n heavy aircraft But that's what I'm talking about.
I don't want more air assets with the balance we have right now. That's part of why I'm so opposed to Bomber Dropships, because it's emblematic of the same train of thought CCP Reykjavik had to work their way out of with EVE Online, that being constantly releasing new content but rarely iterating on the things that needed fixing.
As many free-to-play games have proven, you can have all the content in the world and it won't save you from people leaving because the mechanics are lousy. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1063
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 20:07:00 -
[46] - Quote
Maybe we already have them, & they just get forge gunned out of the sky before anyone realises. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2859
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 20:34:00 -
[47] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Maybe we already have them, & they just get forge gunned out of the sky before anyone realises. QFT |
Taeryn Frost
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:23:00 -
[48] - Quote
All this talk of proto tanks and heavy dropships...guess I better start skilling into proto swarms. Doesn't help that in the past 2 days I've had 2 dropships kill me by landing on top of me: one was crashing and burning, the other seemed like it bounced me on purpose. (New murder taxi?) |
Lightning Bolt2
DUST University Ivy League
89
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:41:00 -
[49] - Quote
Taeryn Frost wrote:All this talk of proto tanks and heavy dropships...guess I better start skilling into proto swarms. Doesn't help that in the past 2 days I've had 2 dropships kill me by landing on top of me: one was crashing and burning, the other seemed like it bounced me on purpose. (New murder taxi?)
lol, I've been using dropships trying to kill by crushing people... did you see my name? |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2860
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
Taeryn Frost wrote:All this talk of proto tanks and heavy dropships...guess I better start skilling into proto swarms. Doesn't help that in the past 2 days I've had 2 dropships kill me by landing on top of me: one was crashing and burning, the other seemed like it bounced me on purpose. (New murder taxi?) Speaking of that, we still need a Swarm nerf.
For the sake of spreading this as much as possible: give the Plasma Cannon the current damage of Swarms, and vice versa.
Then reduce the arc and increase the speed of the PC projectile, and give Swarms a major speed buff so they're great for hitting fast targets. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |