Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
NIGGSWORM
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
22
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 18:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YB26grrZS2A |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
367
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 18:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
"Basically, if something gets nerfed, people should get their SP back."
No. That is not sufficient. Re-balancing is not a phase. Any patch update or expansion can have balance adjustments be a part of it. |
Serimos Haeraven
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
296
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 18:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
I agree with this youtuber's main point; If they nerf a certain weapon or vehicle, etc. without warning, the users of those weapons of vehicles should have the SP they used to skill into that weapon or item refunded to them. Not the entire amount of SP they've ever earned, but only the amount they actually put into getting that weapon that was nerfed. It's especially important to note that they should only do this for hotfixes, etc. If it's being anticipated and it's announced ahead of time, there should be no respecs. |
BrownEye1129
SVER True Blood
19
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nope, you want to spec into a sidearm and run around with it as your primary and secondary weapon. You are stuck with it. Not that hard to figure out how CCP wants to balence the guns and suits. Pretty obvious when something is a bit OP and iis going to get a little nerf. Besides these nerfs aren't even that bad. |
Xender17
Intrepidus XI EoN.
383
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
I only think a respec is needed for new gear. Pilot, new racial heavy, etc. But lock the SP respect to the new suit or to whatever suit you were specced into. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
737
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
BrownEye1129 wrote:Nope, you want to spec into a sidearm and run around with it as your primary and secondary weapon. You are stuck with it. Not that hard to figure out how CCP wants to balence the guns and suits. Pretty obvious when something is a bit OP and iis going to get a little nerf. Besides these nerfs aren't even that bad.
This is the line of thinking that I don't understand.
We are supposed to forecast what might be nerfed and choose accordingly.
If nobody uses it, it won't get balanced because there is no data or feedback.
If people use it and it gets balanced (which is what we should want) the people who used it should be punished for it.
Seems like a weird way to look at things. |
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
1932
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
How many Eve players have cried for respecs during the entire Tiericide iteration? Y'know, that movement CCP is doing to rework every ship that has ever existed in the game? |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
6591
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:How many Eve players have cried for respecs during the entire Tiericide iteration? Y'know, that movement CCP is doing to rework every ship that has ever existed in the game?
None. What you should be screaming for is better balancing, not respecs. Abusers will move on, real operators will continue to do well and underappreciated stuff gets useful. Nothing should be at the bottom of the barrel, nothing should be at the top either. |
BrownEye1129
SVER True Blood
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:BrownEye1129 wrote:Nope, you want to spec into a sidearm and run around with it as your primary and secondary weapon. You are stuck with it. Not that hard to figure out how CCP wants to balence the guns and suits. Pretty obvious when something is a bit OP and iis going to get a little nerf. Besides these nerfs aren't even that bad. This is the line of thinking that I don't understand. We are supposed to forecast what might be nerfed and choose accordingly. If nobody uses it, it won't get balanced because there is no data or feedback. If people use it and it gets balanced (which is what we should want) the people who used it should be punished for it. Seems like a weird way to look at things.
You don't max out something you know absolutely nothing about. You drop a few SP in it to test it and see how you like it. You can tell alot about weapons with just the STD variations. That and on top of reading the Stats of gear. Do a little math and you get a solid idea of what a new weapon is all about. You don't need to reach proto to use new gear. |
Rowdy Railgunner
TRUE TEA BAGGERS EoN.
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:29:00 -
[10] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:How many Eve players have cried for respecs during the entire Tiericide iteration? Y'know, that movement CCP is doing to rework every ship that has ever existed in the game? Here is the thing about tiericide, they made all the ships better and set them in a good balance. Except the Rifter, that sucks now, but it wasn't nerfed it was just left alone. In DUST things are just made horrible so that they are not OP anymore. There is no balance just 'OOPS this is OP let's kill it off' and they just heavy hand the nerf bat upon it and things become useless. |
|
Brolaire of Asstoria
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
56
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Video threads for respecs now.... They'll be sending out flyers about it next... |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
367
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Serimos Haeraven wrote:It's especially important to note that they should only do this for hotfixes, etc. If it's being anticipated and it's announced ahead of time, there should be no respecs.
What does it matter when the nerf is announced? If you think balance changes are something players should be insulated from, then there will always be people who spec into something before the announcement is made, weather its a same-day fix or one broadcasted by CCP a month in advance.
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:How many Eve players have cried for respecs during the entire Tiericide iteration? Y'know, that movement CCP is doing to rework every ship that has ever existed in the game? None.
Wrong, LOTS of Eve players cry for respects or partially refunded SP when significant changes went through. There was the great nano-nerf, there was the mothership HP nerf, there was the moros/mom drone usage nerf. More recently there were nerfs to unscannable ships, heavy missiles, a nerf to falloff, tiericde for the drake and hurricane, changes to drone aggro in missions, and changes to scannable corp hangar arrays. Each and every one of those changes had people asking for partial SP refunds. CCP never granted any, and most players were happy they didn't too! |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
6595
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
mis quoted trying again |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1291
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:40:00 -
[14] - Quote
Oso Peresoso wrote:"Basically, if something gets nerfed, people should get their SP back."
No. That is not sufficient. Re-balancing is not a phase. Any patch update or expansion can have balance adjustments be a part of it. No more respecs. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
6595
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
Oso Peresoso wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:How many Eve players have cried for respecs during the entire Tiericide iteration? Y'know, that movement CCP is doing to rework every ship that has ever existed in the game? None. Wrong, LOTS of Eve players cry for respects or partially refunded SP when significant changes went through. There was the great nano-nerf, there was the mothership HP nerf, there was the moros/mom drone usage nerf. More recently there were nerfs to unscannable ships, heavy missiles, a nerf to falloff, tiericde for the drake and hurricane, changes to drone aggro in missions, and changes to scannable corp hangar arrays. Each and every one of those changes had people asking for partial SP refunds. CCP never granted any, and most Eve players were happy they didn't too!
The mothership changes were not part of the teiricide, also by now most eve players are cross disciplined they have multiple ships ready to go because the game forces to take up multiple roles dependent on what their fleets and situation calls for. Also even though the drake and hurricane got nerfed there was the ferox, naga, tornadeo, and cyclones are still available along with many of the tech 2 cousins most of thos pilots have access to as well as the previous frigate, destroyers, and cruisers required to train before the battlecruiser. |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
370
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ok, I wasn't just talking about tiericide, but yes, tiericide has made people ask for SP back. It doesn't mean those requests were well received by the rest of the Eve community. |
echo47
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:43:00 -
[17] - Quote
I dont think there should be respecs, at the same time I do not think there should be major cahnges to weapons, skills and suits unitl all items are added. IMHO this should be the focus. If the other weapons and suits were actually in the game right now one of those may have been able to properly counter the CAl logi, LAVS and Flaylock. Personally I prefer tools to counter rather than nerfs and buffs, thats the easy way out. CCP give us the tools and let us decide how to use them.
The cries for respect could not be justified in EVE because there are so many ships already in the game. Right now in dust we are kind of limited in fits suits and weapons. Thee are plenty of ways to counter in EVE. The constant comparison to EVE just does not fly. |
Nitrobeacon
Freek Coalition
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
If CCP decides to turn a HAV into a dropsuit, they are basically bending the intended choices of poor peoples who wanted a HAV! not a dropsuit. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
873
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:56:00 -
[19] - Quote
Now i don't have the impression that lowrate wants to convince anybody in the first place in which case he can say whatever he wants whenever he wants. I actually think the OP misconstrued a casual, honest statement of opinion as a serious attempt to support a certain position on the subject at hand but i'll bite regardless.
The only point where lowrate actually adresses the other side it amounts to (paraphrase,second to last last sentence in the video):
"most of those who say no to respecs say so because they are not affected"
This is an sweeping generalization of the opposition and discards any and every argument ever made against respecs out of hand without any further justification.
It's also an ad hominem by definition. Whether nay sayers are affected or not (as a Tar sporting cal logi i was earlier and am now again) is completely irrelevant to the question.
Always engage the argument, not the person arguing.
Here, here and here are a few posts that highlight some of the problems with respecs in dust. For all those who are pro respec, please have a read and respond to the linked points to prevent this thread from becoming yet another repetition of old arguments so we can have a reasonable, productive discussion for once. |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:58:00 -
[20] - Quote
echo47 wrote:I dont think there should be respecs, at the same time I do not think there should be major cahnges to weapons, skills and suits unitl all items are added. IMHO this should be the focus. If the other weapons and suits were actually in the game right now one of those may have been able to properly counter the CAl logi, LAVS and Flaylock. Personally I prefer tools to counter rather than nerfs and buffs, thats the easy way out. CCP give us the tools and let us decide how to use them.
The cries for respect could not be justified in EVE because there are so many ships already in the game. Right now in dust we are kind of limited in fits suits and weapons. Thee are plenty of ways to counter in EVE. The constant comparison to EVE just does not fly.
So when the Heavy Laser comes out and it starts melting through shield tanks, dropships, LLAVs and infantry like butter right from the start, you wouldn't want it brought in line until they release the rest of the weapons and suits?
Cause man, that IS gonna happen. |
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
765
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:16:00 -
[21] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:How many Eve players have cried for respecs during the entire Tiericide iteration? Y'know, that movement CCP is doing to rework every ship that has ever existed in the game? None. What you should be screaming for is better balancing, not respecs. What you should be screaming for is getting racial equality, not respecs. Abusers will move on, real operators will continue to do well, underappreciated stuff gets useful, creatives will find new ways to play. Nothing should be at the bottom of the barrel, nothing should be at the top either.
Quote:Abusers will move on
You are casting a net that captures the innocent as well.
First off people are stupid. I can point to a several instances where i have found pretty idiotic things being written by you on these very forums. Out right lies in some cases. It does not seem unreasonable that people were just stupid when they picked their build....why should they be punished as abusers and pushed out of the game as you imply with your "move on" statement?
Next I know why i chose Galante logi. I wanted to be one of the good guys and my suit looks sexy. I am sure many choose Cal logi and flaylock for similar reasons.
Punishing them, and as you say they will quit, is throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Also players may very well have chosen cal logi with flaylock because of how it plays. They wanted splash damage, they wanted high shields vs what the other racials had....they had no idea it was OP and we have no idea if the nerfs are balanced. everyone can see the Laser nerf at least for the proto laser was needed but everyone can also agree the laser has been nerfed to worthlessness. The cal logi flaylock nerfs are more ambiguous but still it seems a bit extreme to say they need to be punished...when they can simply be given a choice to respec. Should we be cheering on players being pushed from the game on the word that CCP got this nerfing balance right?
I know you are CCPs #1 chearleader but are you seriously that blind to all of CCP past mistakes that for some magical reason you assume CCP got this one change perfectly right that you are willing to sacrifice players defending it?
Lastly we have people using the exploit of being invisible...and every time it is brought up people give the excuse that the player may not know....and therefor should not be punished. I have read the bug report and it seems pretty obvious that in most instances this is not the case. Replicating the invisibility bug takes pretty specific player actions...and it always seems to be the players in the know who are abusing it. Why is a council member wanting to cast such a huge net over the cal logi flaylock users who used a spec that CCP did make and did design purposely into the game and call them abusers who will "move on" yet dismiss and ignore real exploits and real abusers of those exploits?
Why are you beating up on min max players rather then real cheaters? |
Duran Lex
Silver Talon Corporation
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
hooc order wrote:
everyone can see the Laser nerf at least for the proto laser was needed but everyone can also agree the laser has been nerfed to worthlessness.
It was my understanding only the viziam got spanked (and rightfully so). The iron sights on the laser rifle are whats preventing it from really shining atm, not the guns stats. Or at least...thats what i thought i was reading what actual laser rifle users were saying. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
986
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:24:00 -
[23] - Quote
HFTU and no respects. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
hooc order wrote: You are casting a net that captures the innocent as well.
First off people are stupid. I can point to a several instances where i have found pretty idiotic things being written by you on these very forums. Out right lies in some cases. It does not seem unreasonable that people were just stupid when they picked their build....why should they be punished as abusers and pushed out of the game as you imply with your "move on" statement?
Next I know why i chose Galante logi. I wanted to be one of the good guys and my suit looks sexy. I am sure many choose Cal logi and flaylock for similar reasons.
Punishing them, and as you say they will quit, is throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Also players may very well have chosen cal logi with flaylock because of how it plays. They wanted splash damage, they wanted high shields vs what the other racials had....they had no idea it was OP and we have no idea if the nerfs are balanced. everyone can see the Laser nerf at least for the proto laser was needed but everyone can also agree the laser has been nerfed to worthlessness. The cal logi flaylock nerfs are more ambiguous but still it seems a bit extreme to say they need to be punished...when they can simply be given a choice to respec. Should we be cheering on players being pushed from the game on the word that CCP got this nerfing balance right?
I know you are CCPs #1 chearleader but are you seriously that blind to all of CCP past mistakes that for some magical reason you assume CCP got this one change perfectly right that you are willing to sacrifice players defending it?
Lastly we have people using the exploit of being invisible...and every time it is brought up people give the excuse that the player may not know....and therefor should not be punished. I have read the bug report and it seems pretty obvious that in most instances this is not the case. Replicating the invisibility bug takes pretty specific player actions...and it always seems to be the players in the know who are abusing it. Why is a council member wanting to cast such a huge net over the cal logi flaylock users who used a spec that CCP did make and did design purposely into the game and call them abusers who will "move on" yet dismiss and ignore real exploits and real abusers of those exploits?
Why are you beating up on min max players rather then real cheaters?
Some of the things you mention are intended consequences of the SP system. It's not just punishment of FOTM chasers, it's permanence which gives purpose to planning decision making.
On the other hand if someone liked the cal logi for the reasons of wanting a strong shield tanked support suit and they enjoyed the way the flaylock worked, they don't need a respec. We just need to find the right balance point that allows them to play what they like while not upsetting overall game play. |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
754
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:BrownEye1129 wrote:Nope, you want to spec into a sidearm and run around with it as your primary and secondary weapon. You are stuck with it. Not that hard to figure out how CCP wants to balence the guns and suits. Pretty obvious when something is a bit OP and iis going to get a little nerf. Besides these nerfs aren't even that bad. This is the line of thinking that I don't understand. We are supposed to forecast what might be nerfed and choose accordingly. If nobody uses it, it won't get balanced because there is no data or feedback. If people use it and it gets balanced (which is what we should want) the people who used it should be punished for it. Seems like a weird way to look at things.
No.
You're supposed to play for fun.
Not to be a min/maxing little crybaby. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
6605
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:48:00 -
[26] - Quote
Majority of the abusers are those very late to the party/bandwagon though word of mouth folks. Most of them are there of their own choosing. For example guess where majority of the players spent their last respec. Like those ordered to skill into a specific skill set by their corporate commanders because that was assurance to victory.
Like I said, those who skilled into the said weapons and suits under the original impressions and uses will be able to happily continue their jobs still, creatives will probably find an amazing shield combination that makes them extraordinarily hard to kill and abusers will find the next best weapon to skill into, probably forge guns or something sillier.
Those who been using the cal logi as a logi will enjoy the low down times. Those who been using the flaylock as a skill shot or ambusher weapon (shooting a guy in the back unawares) will still score kills as usual |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1025
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:51:00 -
[27] - Quote
If you purposely spec into a weapon you know is going to get nerfed, you deserve to lose your SP investment. |
echo47
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:echo47 wrote:I dont think there should be respecs, at the same time I do not think there should be major cahnges to weapons, skills and suits unitl all items are added. IMHO this should be the focus. If the other weapons and suits were actually in the game right now one of those may have been able to properly counter the CAl logi, LAVS and Flaylock. Personally I prefer tools to counter rather than nerfs and buffs, thats the easy way out. CCP give us the tools and let us decide how to use them.
The cries for respect could not be justified in EVE because there are so many ships already in the game. Right now in dust we are kind of limited in fits suits and weapons. There are plenty of ways to counter in EVE. The constant comparison to EVE just does not fly. So when the Heavy Laser comes out and it starts melting through shield tanks, dropships, LLAVs and infantry like butter right from the start, you wouldn't want it brought in line until they release the rest of the weapons and suits? Cause man, that IS gonna happen.
NO, release them all or none at all thats the only way to have to get balance. Give us the tools to counter before saying something is OP. If the other pistols were in the game and just as good as the flaylock, so many may not have even specced into them . Heavy Laser sounds like a good counter against an LLAV. Right now the LLAV looks OP swarms just tickle its shields. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |