Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
111
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
1375
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect. No one gives a fk. |
Poplo Furuya
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
440
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Man, that must suck. That many locusts must've eaten the entire district's crops. |
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
230
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
and that my friend is why the red line and sniper rifles are your friends |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1169
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
pay to win baby! woot woot!
In this case they paid and they won... its like... a literal definition lolol. |
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
111
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap.
You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
251
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap.
You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. Shame that your conquest is faring so poorly. That district is probably getting pretty expensive at this point. |
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
113
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 00:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap.
You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. Shame that your conquest is faring so poorly. That district is probably getting pretty expensive at this point.
You again. Shame on you for being so ignorant to what it means to EARN a district. Shame on you. |
WhiteMage7322
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
242
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. |
Full Metal Kitten
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
832
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Is it really all that different from corps that ran pre-nerf TAC AR almost exclusively? If I'm reading this rant correctly, you're saying. AUR items disqualify dudes from the coveted e-peen trophy, right? Maybe you guys should have switched to tanks. Lol |
|
stlcarlos989
SVER True Blood
400
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
Right because core flaylocks are ok |
da GAND
187. League of Infamy
112
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
That's why you shouldn't make any agreements on what's allowed on the battlefield, it's pointless to try and trust the other side. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1172
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
I think this might actually be appropriate:
Welcome to New Eden Adapt of Die |
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
113
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:05:00 -
[14] - Quote
WhiteMage7322 wrote:It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust.
First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness. |
Sgt Kirk
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
924
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
That's weak. |
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
113
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
Full Metal Kitten wrote:Is it really all that different from corps that ran pre-nerf TAC AR almost exclusively? If I'm reading this rant correctly, you're saying. AUR items disqualify dudes from the coveted e-peen trophy, right? Maybe you guys should have switched to tanks. Lol
I'm not saying anything of the like. I'm saying that this corporation is good enough to not use the tactic as they have continually proved. The battles have been fun and enjoyable. Then to see this... It's sad. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
653
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect.
Canex, first of all, your one of the worst abusers of AOE weaponry. Flux nade and mass driver spam all day (or maybe that was somebody else on your team? idk..... too tired to remember). Your team, using core locus grenades backed by heavies backed by repping logis. You would even go as far as putting a dual core flaylock pistol user on a bridge overlooking one of the letters. Your upset we made a tactical decision as a team to use grenades? What are we supposed to do? Post a big sign on our asses and say "here you can ram it into us for free, and without fear of repercussions"?
The only reason we switched to grenade use is because its the only way to effectively combat what you guys were doing. Just because your not getting a 2 - 1 k/d every match now doesn't mean were being cheesy...... it just means were adjusting to the tactics that you guys have repeated consistently on the same map for the last 7 battles we've had with you. So yeah, sorry if you lost respect for us. That sort of things happens, and I wouldn't feel good about my opponent either if my record was 1 and 7......
And in conclusion...... If this was a first match that you sighted us using "contact nade spam" This is one loss of many...... Do you think if we used them or not, would it have made a difference? Im not trying to sound like a douche, but I mean...... how am I supposed to respond to a person that apparently lost all respect for my corp? Idk..... Sorry for the disappointment, if you are disappointed. |
stlcarlos989
SVER True Blood
402
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
I've got a thread going for people to vote to remove contact grenades because I hate them and the concept. But until then I use abuse the hell out of them to get people angry about them, so CCP does something. Until then sorry you were on the receiving end. |
Killar-12
Intrepidus XI EoN.
246
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
You could call the Imps they probably would kick SEVR's ass again just to laugh |
Skyhound Solbrave
Rough Riders..
160
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:I think this might actually be appropriate: Welcome to New Eden Adapt or Die
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap.
You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. Shame that your conquest is faring so poorly. That district is probably getting pretty expensive at this point.
This coming from a corp that is vehemently against flaylocks/fused locusts. Lemme guess, you're not even close to placing on the A team, are you? |
|
da GAND
187. League of Infamy
114
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:11:00 -
[21] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:You could call the Imps they probably would kick SEVR's ass again just to laugh
Oh boy history shall repeat itself again |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
781
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:12:00 -
[22] - Quote
Marston VC wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect. Canex, first of all, your one of the worst abusers of AOE weaponry. Flux nade and mass driver spam all day (or maybe that was somebody else on your team? idk..... too tired to remember). Your team, using core locus grenades backed by heavies backed by repping logis. You would even go as far as putting a dual core flaylock pistol user on a bridge overlooking one of the letters. Your upset we made a tactical decision as a team to use grenades? What are we supposed to do? Post a big sign on our asses and say "here you can ram it into us for free, and without fear of repercussions"? The only reason we switched to grenade use is because its the only way to effectively combat what you guys were doing. Just because your not getting a 2 - 1 k/d every match now doesn't mean were being cheesy...... it just means were adjusting to the tactics that you guys have repeated consistently on the same map for the last 7 battles we've had with you. So yeah, sorry if you lost respect for us. That sort of things happens, and I wouldn't feel good about my opponent either if my record was 1 and 7...... And in conclusion...... If this was a first match that you sighted us using "contact nade spam" This is one loss of many...... Do you think if we used them or not, would it have made a difference? Im not trying to sound like a douche, but I mean...... how am I supposed to respond to a person that apparently lost all respect for my corp? Idk..... Sorry for the disappointment, if you are disappointed. So wait they used Logi's correctly and you told them that they are abusing game mechanics?
If anything the fact that they are using logis correctly in PC is amazing for the game! Why fight when you can both use Logi's correctly together! |
WhiteMage7322
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
242
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:WhiteMage7322 wrote:It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness.
Thanks for the correction. There must have been a reason for them to used those weapons. I can understand if they did it without a reason, then shame on them but if they did so because the other team started to use unbalanced then they had the right to do so. |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1371
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
A team that fields almost full team of Teamplayers ringers.
What'd you expect, and please dont group, Fused and the Flaylock with the MD.
And complaining about him using Flux? Lol, thats new, what are you a Cal Logi? |
stlcarlos989
SVER True Blood
402
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:14:00 -
[25] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Marston VC wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect. Canex, first of all, your one of the worst abusers of AOE weaponry. Flux nade and mass driver spam all day (or maybe that was somebody else on your team? idk..... too tired to remember). Your team, using core locus grenades backed by heavies backed by repping logis. You would even go as far as putting a dual core flaylock pistol user on a bridge overlooking one of the letters. Your upset we made a tactical decision as a team to use grenades? What are we supposed to do? Post a big sign on our asses and say "here you can ram it into us for free, and without fear of repercussions"? The only reason we switched to grenade use is because its the only way to effectively combat what you guys were doing. Just because your not getting a 2 - 1 k/d every match now doesn't mean were being cheesy...... it just means were adjusting to the tactics that you guys have repeated consistently on the same map for the last 7 battles we've had with you. So yeah, sorry if you lost respect for us. That sort of things happens, and I wouldn't feel good about my opponent either if my record was 1 and 7...... And in conclusion...... If this was a first match that you sighted us using "contact nade spam" This is one loss of many...... Do you think if we used them or not, would it have made a difference? Im not trying to sound like a douche, but I mean...... how am I supposed to respond to a person that apparently lost all respect for my corp? Idk..... Sorry for the disappointment, if you are disappointed. So wait they used Logi's correctly and you told them that they are abusing game mechanics? Not abusing anything, his point was that we countered what they threw at us. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
251
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:WhiteMage7322 wrote:It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness.
You are correct in many ways. In the situations that you speak of, both sides had multiple attacks queued for the other and had been waiting to play them for 2 months.
Little bit different when it is repeated unprovoked clone pack attacks attempting to break up their planet. If you want a match without flaylock or fused, my corp is always down. Just make sure you let us know that you fully fill in the "Lube" option circle with a #2 pencil on the application. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
653
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:16:00 -
[27] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Marston VC wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect. Canex, first of all, your one of the worst abusers of AOE weaponry. Flux nade and mass driver spam all day (or maybe that was somebody else on your team? idk..... too tired to remember). Your team, using core locus grenades backed by heavies backed by repping logis. You would even go as far as putting a dual core flaylock pistol user on a bridge overlooking one of the letters. Your upset we made a tactical decision as a team to use grenades? What are we supposed to do? Post a big sign on our asses and say "here you can ram it into us for free, and without fear of repercussions"? The only reason we switched to grenade use is because its the only way to effectively combat what you guys were doing. Just because your not getting a 2 - 1 k/d every match now doesn't mean were being cheesy...... it just means were adjusting to the tactics that you guys have repeated consistently on the same map for the last 7 battles we've had with you. So yeah, sorry if you lost respect for us. That sort of things happens, and I wouldn't feel good about my opponent either if my record was 1 and 7...... And in conclusion...... If this was a first match that you sighted us using "contact nade spam" This is one loss of many...... Do you think if we used them or not, would it have made a difference? Im not trying to sound like a douche, but I mean...... how am I supposed to respond to a person that apparently lost all respect for my corp? Idk..... Sorry for the disappointment, if you are disappointed. So wait they used Logi's correctly and you told them that they are abusing game mechanics? If anything the fact that they are using logis correctly in PC is amazing for the game! Why fight when you can both use Logi's correctly together!
Your right they did use logis right, they also used Core flaylocks and mass drivers right too...... |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1174
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:24:00 -
[28] - Quote
Skyhound Solbrave wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:I think this might actually be appropriate: Welcome to New Eden Adapt or Die Fiddlestaxp wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap.
You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. Shame that your conquest is faring so poorly. That district is probably getting pretty expensive at this point. This coming from a corp that is vehemently against flaylocks/fused locusts. Lemme guess, you're not even close to placing on the A team, are you?
aw... u mad bro? |
Mikey The Bandaid
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:32:00 -
[29] - Quote
Marston VC wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect. Canex, first of all, your one of the worst abusers of AOE weaponry. Flux nade and mass driver spam all day (or maybe that was somebody else on your team? idk..... too tired to remember). Your team, using core locus grenades backed by heavies backed by repping logis. You would even go as far as putting a dual core flaylock pistol user on a bridge overlooking one of the letters. Your upset we made a tactical decision as a team to use grenades? What are we supposed to do? Post a big sign on our asses and say "here you can ram it into us for free, and without fear of repercussions"? The only reason we switched to grenade use is because its the only way to effectively combat what you guys were doing. Just because your not getting a 2 - 1 k/d every match now doesn't mean were being cheesy...... it just means were adjusting to the tactics that you guys have repeated consistently on the same map for the last 7 battles we've had with you. So yeah, sorry if you lost respect for us. That sort of things happens, and I wouldn't feel good about my opponent either if my record was 1 and 7...... And in conclusion...... If this was a first match that you sighted us using "contact nade spam" This is one loss of many...... Do you think if we used them or not, would it have made a difference? Im not trying to sound like a douche, but I mean...... how am I supposed to respond to a person that apparently lost all respect for my corp? Idk..... Sorry for the disappointment, if you are disappointed. So what I got out of this post was....
"Because your corp actually put up multiple close battles when they were out cloned 4:1 almost every match, managed to beat us once, we decided to resort to extremely hack, blatantly obvious pay-to-win tactics"
I guess I should feel honored that such a prestigious corporation such as yourself had to fall back on such tactics to beat a corp coming at you with 100 clones. Thank you :) |
dazlb72
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
50
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:37:00 -
[30] - Quote
i didn't play in this battle and have no idea what went on. I think a few people who play this game are sick of some weapons that are being used, but at the same time you can't really complain if someone uses them. The fact is we've been going at SVER for a while and have only won one battle. That is the only thing that matters, and the only thing people will remember. SVER haven't cheated in any way by using weapons that are available to them, or to anyone in our corp. TBH I'm a bit disappointed this thread was opened, it just made us look like poor losers. |
|
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
114
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:39:00 -
[31] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:A team that fields almost full team of Teamplayers ringers. What'd you expect, and please dont group, Fused and the Flaylock with the MD. And complaining about him using Flux? Lol, thats new, what are you a Cal Logi?
He acts as if I just started using this tactic. I've been doing it since February, since before uprising was even brought to the publics attention. I've haven't changed my primary weapon in 4 months. I've used the same tactic when they were useless, and the same tactic when they've been revived to useful again.
Plus, a weapon that can insta-kill in one hit, vs a tactic that requires a grenade plus several rounds (each firing a second apart). If that's cheating then I'm not sure what isn't cheating.
I'm not calling SVER cheaters now, so don't misuse my words. I'm saying that their tactic to use a well known unbalanced weapon, with which many alliances are banning from their own PC battles, shows their cowardice and their weakness. It's shameful. |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1371
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
After just coming out of a pub match, where almost a whole squad were carrying Core Flaylocks (DEFIANCE), I've got to say, I'm lead believe you play no different in PC matches.
I didn't even bother saying gg, because it wasn't even that.
It seems there is no place in Dust for diversity, and everything is about the FOTM to remain competitive, meanwhile, me in my Scout suit, am still trying to go strong, fighting through the nerfs, and CCP's love for all things Caldari and Assault/Logi.
I'm just glad I'm part of a Corp, where even if you've only got MLT items, you're allowed participate in these battles, some people may think thats stupid, but I think its cool.
Anyway, good luck capturing SVER Prime, its not personally something I'd try to do, because I believe better choices lie elsewhere on the Starmap, but hopefully something is planned.
Knight Soiaire, #1 For unbiased opinions |
Green Living
0uter.Heaven EoN.
676
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
Poplo Furuya wrote:Man, that must suck. That many locusts must've eaten the entire district's crops.
hahaha you're killing me smalls! |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
251
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 01:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
From This Thread. from one day earlier in General Discussion.
Cenex Langly wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote: If I had the power to change the mechanics I would have by now. But I don't. Read the thread from start to finish. I offer suggestions that would fix the mechanic and then offer you a temporary fix. Buy a district from somebody else... Could care less. Accusing me of being a profiteer isn't going to help you though. Fact is, without new blood in PC this game will die(many proclaim it dead already). We would make more money sitting on our districts than selling them.
Blah Blah Blah Blah ^-- Look at me, I've resulted to childish antics!
The two threads are brothers and don't deserve to be separated. |
Rogatien Merc
Red Star. EoN.
481
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap.
You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. Shame that your conquest is faring so poorly. That district is probably getting pretty expensive at this point. You again. Shame on you for being so ignorant to what it means to EARN a district. Shame on you.
u new here? |
ragewardog
SVER True Blood
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:05:00 -
[36] - Quote
aside from all the crying great games guys ive had a blast taking on your tanks |
RuckingFetard
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
461
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:After just coming out of a pub match, where almost a whole squad were carrying Core Flaylocks (DEFIANCE), I've got to say, I'm lead believe you play no different in PC matches. I didn't even bother saying gg, because it wasn't even that. It seems there is no place in Dust for diversity, and everything is about the FOTM to remain competitive, meanwhile, me in my Scout suit, am still trying to go strong, fighting through the nerfs, and CCP's love for all things Caldari and Assault/Logi. I'm just glad I'm part of a Corp, where even if you've only got MLT items, you're allowed participate in these battles, some people may think thats stupid, but I think its cool. Anyway, good luck capturing SVER Prime, its not personally something I'd try to do, because I believe better choices lie elsewhere on the Starmap, but hopefully something is planned. Knight Soiaire, #1 For unbiased opinions you silenced 'em well |
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:13:00 -
[38] - Quote
stlcarlos989 wrote:I've got a thread going for people to vote to remove contact grenades because I hate them and the concept. But until then I use abuse the hell out of them to get people angry about them, so CCP does something. Until then sorry you were on the receiving end.
Well your plan is working. I didn't think much of it until I met you in PC battles... My god you've blown me out of my socks with those things! Add me to the list of haters of contact grenades. |
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:19:00 -
[39] - Quote
I will be the first to say I hate the flaylock and have never personally used it. That said, I believe there is only two or so on our squads we've been bringing that use it and it is currently how it is as much as we all hate it to some degree.
I think Cenex is frustrated at the mass use of contact grenades which is understandable. We all have our own limit to some tactics ... by god don't get me started on people throwing remote explosives at your feet for insta kills! Enough said. |
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
dazlb72 wrote:i didn't play in this battle and have no idea what went on. I think a few people who play this game are sick of some weapons that are being used, but at the same time you can't really complain if someone uses them. The fact is we've been going at SVER for a while and have only won one battle. That is the only thing that matters, and the only thing people will remember. SVER haven't cheated in any way by using weapons that are available to them, or to anyone in our corp. TBH I'm a bit disappointed this thread was opened, it just made us look like poor losers.
I disagree with what will be remembered portion. We've learned a lot and I would think earned the respect of our enemies on a number of these battles. If we had a tad more then the 100 clones i would think there would be a decent chance of a different outcome on who currently holds that planet. This last battle felt like crap, but I've enjoyed all the others (minus the one with lag).
Frustrations vented, lets hope issues with certain weapon balance are fixed by CCP... One day. :) |
|
stlcarlos989
SVER True Blood
404
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:48:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ares 514 wrote:stlcarlos989 wrote:I've got a thread going for people to vote to remove contact grenades because I hate them and the concept. But until then I use abuse the hell out of them to get people angry about them, so CCP does something. Until then sorry you were on the receiving end. Well your plan is working. I didn't think much of it until I met you in PC battles... My god you've blown me out of my socks with those things! Add me to the list of haters of contact grenades. Here is the thread, feel free to vote and show your disapproval. |
OP's Dirty Secret
MoIon Labe.
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Honestly, Can't blame STB. They are probably TeamPlayers biggest customer. Quick can make enough money off the districts he bought from them to pay for his defenses and make up the money he paid for them in a month. He just played the long game well and waited out the storm that was imps. He will never be able to recruit great talent again, and it would take stacking timers to break them again, just this time with a small alliance or two. TCD toxicated and dem durrty boys already broke off, how many other corps with grow from them, they aren't much different than PRO, just a bit smarter with their money and they have a name from when they were successful back in the day. If quick didn't have such a mouth they'd still be a top player, now they sit on high on stb simply cause they **** enough gold to pay Cubs to look the other way to their farming. Kinda weird sha hasn't done the same TBQH. |
DJINN Kujo
Who Gives A Flux
404
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 03:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Maybe talk to them before game to come to some kind of agreement?
I know a lot of people really enjoyed no using Flaylock Pistols or Contact Grenades. It really brought this game back to where it used to be, back into some CQC fights which I know a lot of the veteran players really miss.
Of course even with a such agreement, you have to keep in mind, players will adapt on either side and use a mass driver. Not saying it's trash etc. cause the mass driver got nerfed really hard at the beginning of Uprising, nerfed enough for nobody to use them. So to see them come out again is actually nice to see. Goes to show that the game is not forgetting it's roots of deviation.
Good luck in your future fights, you should look into streaming them, Dust community loves that kind of stuff. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
253
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:00:00 -
[44] - Quote
DJINN Kujo wrote: players will adapt on either side and use a mass driver. And so it begins... I knew this day would come.
Nah... The core flaylock/fused ban resulted in the best matches in weeks. I advise everyone to consider such agreements. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
656
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:19:00 -
[45] - Quote
OP's Dirty Secret wrote:Honestly, Can't blame STB. They are probably TeamPlayers biggest customer. Quick can make enough money off the districts he bought from them to pay for his defenses + make up the money he paid for them in a month. He just played the long game well and waited out the storm that was imps. He will never be able to recruit great talent again and it would take stacking timers to break them again. This time with a small alliance or two should do the trick. TCD toxicated and dem durrty boys already broke off. How many other corps with grow from them. Aren't much different than PRO. Just a bit smarter with their money.
They have a name from when they were successful back in the day. If quick didn't have such a mouth they'd still be a top player. Now they sit on high on 'Regnum's Shithole" simply cause they **** enough gold there to pay Cubs to look the other way to their farming. Kinda weird Sha hasn't done the same TBQH.
Wow...... you have a lot of..... unbiased opinions? I suppose? By what your saying i'd imagine that we have a corp full of rich directors a few unlucky suckers. Lol, if only that was true. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
656
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:21:00 -
[46] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:DJINN Kujo wrote: players will adapt on either side and use a mass driver. And so it begins... I knew this day would come. Nah... The core flaylock/fused ban resulted in the best matches in weeks. I advise everyone to consider such agreements.
No problem that im aware of in regards to arranging some sort of agreement. Its just, we go an entire week, day after day, flaylock/mass driver spam. So what do we do? We bite back..... its not very complicated if you think about it |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
932
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:WhiteMage7322 wrote:It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness.
Unfortunately this is simply not true. Lots of 'agreements' were made during the war with eon and loi, and only team players vs hellstorm to my knowledge actually held that agreement, throughout dozens of matches.
I can gladly say it helped to provide some outstanding, competitive matches that both sides left the field with their heads held high.
But never expect an agreement. We were ready to bring out that crap as soon as they did, but my guys have the discipline to wait for the kill feed to give the green light. Once again I commend hellstorm for their diligence on that.
Flaylocks getting nerfed within a week anyway, and fused nades have been around forever. Its when both are present is when things tend to get ugly.
Earning districts is certainly commendable, but you do realize there are 2 entire planets of corps that have similar experience as you. STB has been around since the beginning of PC. They have taken on the best, many times. They know what it takes to win, and their take great pride in their land, as does everyone. You cannot fault them for defending their land by any means necessary.
Sure its cheesy, but the victory screen is the reason we all play this game
|
Cenex Langly
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
117
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:32:00 -
[48] - Quote
Marston VC wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:DJINN Kujo wrote: players will adapt on either side and use a mass driver. And so it begins... I knew this day would come. Nah... The core flaylock/fused ban resulted in the best matches in weeks. I advise everyone to consider such agreements. No problem that im aware of in regards to arranging some sort of agreement. Its just, we go an entire week, day after day, flaylock/mass driver spam. So what do we do? We bite back..... its not very complicated if you think about it
By my count, only one person was using a mass driver (me). Which I've used since well before Uprising. And 2 people were using Flay Locks. One in particular, the other as a "sidearm" for a forge gun, only shooting tanks. That's a lot of spam... |
Chesty Ranger
SVER True Blood
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
LOL. I have the battle recorded, and icedslayer have also we will upload video probably tomorrow. So you can all watch all this "nade spam". Also got footage of you guys camping over the bridge with fraylock over watching A. Anyways you guys where pretty good sport sad to see your corp go out in salty note. Just hold dat L over your chest and carry on bro.
Spoiler OP claim is highly exaggerated. |
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
Chesty Ranger wrote:LOL. I have the battle recorded, and icedslayer have also we will upload video probably tomorrow. So you can all watch all this "nade spam". Also got footage of you guys camping over the bridge with fraylock over watching A. Anyways you guys where pretty good sport sad to see your corp go out in salty note. Just hold dat L over your chest and carry on bro.
Spoiler OP claim is highly exaggerated.
I wished you guys had the good battles recorded where the screen goes black for a sec and neither side knows who won. Happened twice and those were the best games in my opinion. Unfortunately none of us can record at the moment.
I will point out that a kill feed is not always a clear representation of what is really being used... But enjoy the video, cause that game I sucked it up... Flux / fused grenades combo were my undoing. |
|
Gods Architect
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
250
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 06:21:00 -
[51] - Quote
I wasted 10 minutes of my life reading this thread instead of sleeping with my fianc+¬e. What a waste of digital space. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2982
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 09:32:00 -
[52] - Quote
da GAND wrote:That's why you shouldn't make any agreements on what's allowed on the battlefield, it's pointless to try and trust the other side.
Hellstorm held their word on the agreement we had. SyN / TP vs HS had fused + flaylock pistol - LESS games. It's a sign of mutual respect. People wanted good games with each other, not a explosion spamfest.
Good fights were had. Winning or losing. I guess that's what adults do, make an agreement and stick to it |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1376
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 11:28:00 -
[53] - Quote
That match didn't look to bad, its what I'd have expected from a PC match.
You could use some more experience with tanking , (04:46) I was almost shouting at my screen, really, when you're that overwhelmed by AV, you should retreat, or at least shoot at the players with the AV
And if I'm being really honest, both teams could use a Winmatar Scout |
Exergonic
TeamPlayers EoN.
237
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 11:53:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:What an awful tactic by a corporation that is able, and has been able, to hold their own. Then they come out with that crap.
You've shamed your corp by using such terrible tactics. Shame that your conquest is faring so poorly. That district is probably getting pretty expensive at this point. You again. Shame on you for being so ignorant to what it means to EARN a district. Shame on you.
Wait are you saying Teamplayers doesn't know what its like to EARN a district?? JW |
dazlb72
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
54
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 12:32:00 -
[55] - Quote
dazlb72 wrote:i didn't play in this battle and have no idea what went on. I think a few people who play this game are sick of some weapons that are being used, but at the same time you can't really complain if someone uses them. The fact is we've been going at SVER for a while and have only won one battle. That is the only thing that matters, and the only thing people will remember. SVER haven't cheated in any way by using weapons that are available to them, or to anyone in our corp. TBH I'm a bit disappointed this thread was opened, it just made us look like poor losers.
i posted this last night, mainly to try and defuse a situation i could see getting out of hand. Cenex is a good person, and everyone is entitled to rage every now and then, and i daresay 95% of the people who have posted on this thread have at one time or another. Hell i can rage with the best of them. I have enjoyed playing SVER in many games, along with most of the top corps. i know most of the time I'll get my butt kicked but its a rush playing the top players in this game, people flooding towards you hell bent on your destruction. And long may that continue
|
Guinevere Bravo
SVER True Blood
266
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 13:40:00 -
[56] - Quote
Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.
Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).
So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.
Well we have two choices here; 1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this. 2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.
So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life. |
Rupture Reaperson
Kinsho Swords Caldari State
255
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 13:52:00 -
[57] - Quote
All i got from this thread |
OP's Dirty Secret
MoIon Labe.
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 14:41:00 -
[58] - Quote
Guinevere Bravo wrote:Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.
Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).
So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.
Well we have two choices here; 1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this. 2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.
So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life.
There ya go, let's see if they accept! If they do good on em and we leave it to you to post the results. If they don't agree then their loss you offered. |
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 15:19:00 -
[59] - Quote
Guinevere Bravo wrote:Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.
Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).
So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.
Well we have two choices here; 1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this. 2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.
So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life.
Given the exchange of mails after battle I'm surprised you didn't raise this issue if you felt it was so abused. As I have said, I'm only aware of two players that use the flaylock and to my knowledge none of our guys have used contact grenades. Your 9/10 comment seems a bit out of line given until this battle I have been top on our side and you'll never see me use them. Also our logis and heavys are often near the top on our boards. I believe camps murdered the **** out of you guys last round and that was all heavy machine gun.
I will say this thread started as a frustrated vent after a rather unpleasant battle. So let me say I still respect you guys but that battle really made me hate that contact grenade with a passion.
I hate telling my guys what to use, just as I never complained about the contact grenades in previous battles, it just gets a bit out of hand when a large number of players on one side uses a weapon that is iffy balance wise.
If the only way to prevent the mass contact grenades I saw last night is a full agreement to not use those two weapons that can be arranged, personally I prefer to just keep things reasonable and not have a large number of guys come out with the same weapon. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
258
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 16:52:00 -
[60] - Quote
Ares 514 wrote:Guinevere Bravo wrote:Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.
Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).
So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.
Well we have two choices here; 1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this. 2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.
So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life. Given the exchange of mails after battle I'm surprised you didn't raise this issue if you felt it was so abused. As I have said, I'm only aware of two players that use the flaylock and to my knowledge none of our guys have used contact grenades. Your 9/10 comment seems a bit out of line given until this battle I have been top on our side and you'll never see me use them. Also our logis and heavys are often near the top on our boards. I believe camps murdered the **** out of you guys last round and that was all heavy machine gun. I will say this thread started as a frustrated vent after a rather unpleasant battle. So let me say I still respect you guys but that battle really made me hate that contact grenade with a passion. I hate telling my guys what to use, just as I never complained about the contact grenades in previous battles, it just gets a bit out of hand when a large number of players on one side uses a weapon that is iffy balance wise. If the only way to prevent the mass contact grenades I saw last night is a full agreement to not use those two weapons that can be arranged, personally I prefer to just keep things reasonable and not have a large number of guys come out with the same weapon.
So, that's a "No" I think. On second look, it appears to be a weak and uncertain "Yes". |
|
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
27
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:22:00 -
[61] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Ares 514 wrote:Guinevere Bravo wrote:Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.
Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).
So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.
Well we have two choices here; 1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this. 2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.
So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life. Given the exchange of mails after battle I'm surprised you didn't raise this issue if you felt it was so abused. As I have said, I'm only aware of two players that use the flaylock and to my knowledge none of our guys have used contact grenades. Your 9/10 comment seems a bit out of line given until this battle I have been top on our side and you'll never see me use them. Also our logis and heavys are often near the top on our boards. I believe camps murdered the **** out of you guys last round and that was all heavy machine gun. I will say this thread started as a frustrated vent after a rather unpleasant battle. So let me say I still respect you guys but that battle really made me hate that contact grenade with a passion. I hate telling my guys what to use, just as I never complained about the contact grenades in previous battles, it just gets a bit out of hand when a large number of players on one side uses a weapon that is iffy balance wise. If the only way to prevent the mass contact grenades I saw last night is a full agreement to not use those two weapons that can be arranged, personally I prefer to just keep things reasonable and not have a large number of guys come out with the same weapon. So, that's a "No" I think. On second look, it appears to be a weak and uncertain "Yes".
There is nothing weak or uncertain about it in my mind. It's me saying that I don't tell any of my guys what to use or not to use normally and i'm sure we all wish that there were not some weapons in the game that could be abused in such a way so we wouldn't have to even discuss this.
It looks like CCP is addressing the Flaylock issue although i'm not sure the Contact Grenades will be fixed in PC battles (it will fix it in public matches though I bet):
http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/07/explosive-dampening-weapon-rebalancing-in-uprising-1.3/
I'm saying if the only way from having you guys stop spamming that contact grenade is to have a couple of my guys stop using the flaylock then sure, that can be arranged. On the other hand, if a couple of you roll with contact grenades and a couple of my guys have the flaylock, then honestly it seems somewhat balanced. It's just when there is mass use of one weapon that might very well not be balanced at the moment that issues arise. |
OP's Dirty Secret
MoIon Labe.
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:27:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ares 514 wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Ares 514 wrote:Guinevere Bravo wrote:Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.
Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).
So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.
Well we have two choices here; 1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this. 2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.
So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life. Given the exchange of mails after battle I'm surprised you didn't raise this issue if you felt it was so abused. As I have said, I'm only aware of two players that use the flaylock and to my knowledge none of our guys have used contact grenades. Your 9/10 comment seems a bit out of line given until this battle I have been top on our side and you'll never see me use them. Also our logis and heavys are often near the top on our boards. I believe camps murdered the **** out of you guys last round and that was all heavy machine gun. I will say this thread started as a frustrated vent after a rather unpleasant battle. So let me say I still respect you guys but that battle really made me hate that contact grenade with a passion. I hate telling my guys what to use, just as I never complained about the contact grenades in previous battles, it just gets a bit out of hand when a large number of players on one side uses a weapon that is iffy balance wise. If the only way to prevent the mass contact grenades I saw last night is a full agreement to not use those two weapons that can be arranged, personally I prefer to just keep things reasonable and not have a large number of guys come out with the same weapon. So, that's a "No" I think. On second look, it appears to be a weak and uncertain "Yes". There is nothing weak or uncertain about it in my mind. It's me saying that I don't tell any of my guys what to use or not to use normally and i'm sure we all wish that there were not some weapons in the game that could be abused in such a way so we wouldn't have to even discuss this. It looks like CCP is addressing the Flaylock issue although i'm not sure the Contact Grenades will be fixed in PC battles (it will fix it in public matches though I bet): http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/07/explosive-dampening-weapon-rebalancing-in-uprising-1.3/I'm saying if the only way from having you guys stop spamming that contact grenade is to have a couple of my guys stop using the flaylock then sure, that can be arranged. On the other hand, if a couple of you roll with contact grenades and a couple of my guys have the flaylock, then honestly it seems somewhat balanced. It's just when there is mass use of one weapon that might very well not be balanced at the moment that issues arise.
One man's flaylock crutch is another man's contact nade spam. Ban both and both will oblige. /thread till one side dishonors the agreement. |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1399
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:44:00 -
[63] - Quote
If I'm being honest, you should just agree to a Light Frame melee match.
PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO US SCOUTS! |
CPL Bloodstone
Neanderthal Nation
123
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 21:02:00 -
[64] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:If I'm being honest, you should just agree to a Light Frame melee match. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO US SCOUTS!
um scouts rock Mass driving fools. just sayin |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
667
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 02:04:00 -
[65] - Quote
Mikey The Bandaid wrote:Marston VC wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:Tisk tisk SVER. You've given us such good battles. You show in your victories against us that you can do it without fused grenades. And then you fight us with your entire team using Fused Locusts Grenades. Wow. How awful.
You've lost our respect for that one. Massive loss of respect. Canex, first of all, your one of the worst abusers of AOE weaponry. Flux nade and mass driver spam all day (or maybe that was somebody else on your team? idk..... too tired to remember). Your team, using core locus grenades backed by heavies backed by repping logis. You would even go as far as putting a dual core flaylock pistol user on a bridge overlooking one of the letters. Your upset we made a tactical decision as a team to use grenades? What are we supposed to do? Post a big sign on our asses and say "here you can ram it into us for free, and without fear of repercussions"? The only reason we switched to grenade use is because its the only way to effectively combat what you guys were doing. Just because your not getting a 2 - 1 k/d every match now doesn't mean were being cheesy...... it just means were adjusting to the tactics that you guys have repeated consistently on the same map for the last 7 battles we've had with you. So yeah, sorry if you lost respect for us. That sort of things happens, and I wouldn't feel good about my opponent either if my record was 1 and 7...... And in conclusion...... If this was a first match that you sighted us using "contact nade spam" This is one loss of many...... Do you think if we used them or not, would it have made a difference? Im not trying to sound like a douche, but I mean...... how am I supposed to respond to a person that apparently lost all respect for my corp? Idk..... Sorry for the disappointment, if you are disappointed. So what I got out of this post was.... "Because your corp actually put up multiple close battles when they were out cloned 4:1 almost every match, managed to beat us once, we decided to resort to extremely hack, blatantly obvious pay-to-win tactics" I guess I should feel honored that such a prestigious corporation such as yourself had to fall back on such tactics to beat a corp coming at you with 100 clones. Thank you :)
Prestigious??? Take a look at the damn forums dude, the only people who seem to like our corp are the members And maybe your right! Maybe We suck so bad that we had to resort to "win tactics" though I don't know of many who endorse "lose tactics". Either way this goes, Will see who's still winning after they nerf flaylock pistols and contact nades. Let me give you a hint...... The district aint changing hands. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
667
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 02:06:00 -
[66] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:WhiteMage7322 wrote:It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness. Unfortunately this is simply not true. Lots of 'agreements' were made during the war with eon and loi, and only team players vs hellstorm to my knowledge actually held that agreement, throughout dozens of matches. I can gladly say it helped to provide some outstanding, competitive matches that both sides left the field with their heads held high. But never expect an agreement. We were ready to bring out that crap as soon as they did, but my guys have the discipline to wait for the kill feed to give the green light. Once again I commend hellstorm for their diligence on that. Flaylocks getting nerfed within a week anyway, and fused nades have been around forever. Its when both are present is when things tend to get ugly. Earning districts is certainly commendable, but you do realize there are 2 entire planets of corps that have similar experience as you. STB has been around since the beginning of PC. They have taken on the best, many times. They know what it takes to win, and their take great pride in their land, as does everyone. You cannot fault them for defending their land by any means necessary. Sure its cheesy, but the victory screen is the reason we all play this game
The realism in this post....... Outstanding. Truly remarkable. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
668
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 02:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ares 514 wrote:Chesty Ranger wrote:LOL. I have the battle recorded, and icedslayer have also we will upload video probably tomorrow. So you can all watch all this "nade spam". Also got footage of you guys camping over the bridge with fraylock over watching A. Anyways you guys where pretty good sport sad to see your corp go out in salty note. Just hold dat L over your chest and carry on bro.
Spoiler OP claim is highly exaggerated. I wished you guys had the good battles recorded where the screen goes black for a sec and neither side knows who won. Happened twice and those were the best games in my opinion. Unfortunately none of us can record at the moment. I will point out that a kill feed is not always a clear representation of what is really being used... But enjoy the video, cause that game I sucked it up... Flux / fused grenades combo were my undoing.
If im not mistaken, the battle we lossed to you guys was put up. But whatevs, its not my choice what videos go up, its the choice of the 1 - 3 recorders we have weather or not they feel like uploading for 2 hours. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
668
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 02:12:00 -
[68] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:That match didn't look to bad, its what I'd have expected from a PC match. You could use some more experience with tanking , (04:46) I was almost shouting at my screen, really, when you're that overwhelmed by AV, you should retreat, or at least shoot at the players with the AV And if I'm being really honest, both teams could use a Winmatar Scout
We actually had a winmatar scout, I just ordered him to do semi-specific things during the match so its unlikely you saw him much, if not at all. As for the tanks, generally they have orders they have to follow too, though I haven't seen the video so I cant completely vouch for the driver in question. Lol but in my mind, For every man that's spending time Throwing AV nades at tanks, that's one less man they could have shooting us. But maybe that's a bit narrow minded? Who knows :/ |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
668
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 02:15:00 -
[69] - Quote
dazlb72 wrote:dazlb72 wrote:i didn't play in this battle and have no idea what went on. I think a few people who play this game are sick of some weapons that are being used, but at the same time you can't really complain if someone uses them. The fact is we've been going at SVER for a while and have only won one battle. That is the only thing that matters, and the only thing people will remember. SVER haven't cheated in any way by using weapons that are available to them, or to anyone in our corp. TBH I'm a bit disappointed this thread was opened, it just made us look like poor losers. i posted this last night, mainly to try and defuse a situation i could see getting out of hand. Cenex is a good person, and everyone is entitled to rage every now and then, and i daresay 95% of the people who have posted on this thread have at one time or another. Hell i can rage with the best of them. I have enjoyed playing SVER in many games, along with most of the top corps. i know most of the time I'll get my butt kicked but its a rush playing the top players in this game, people flooding towards you hell bent on your destruction. And long may that continue
The situation isn't out of hand, its just people venting. I don't think theres any hard feelings, but who knows. Rest assured, when contact nades and flaylocks are nerfed you'll see a reduction in the crying about them on the forums. |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1404
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 11:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Marston VC wrote:Knight Soiaire wrote:That match didn't look to bad, its what I'd have expected from a PC match. You could use some more experience with tanking , (04:46) I was almost shouting at my screen, really, when you're that overwhelmed by AV, you should retreat, or at least shoot at the players with the AV And if I'm being really honest, both teams could use a Winmatar Scout We actually had a winmatar scout, I just ordered him to do semi-specific things during the match so its unlikely you saw him much, if not at all. As for the tanks, generally they have orders they have to follow too, though I haven't seen the video so I cant completely vouch for the driver in question. Lol but in my mind, For every man that's spending time Throwing AV nades at tanks, that's one less man they could have shooting us. But maybe that's a bit narrow minded? Who knows :/
Not talking about your tanker, the DL one.
You'll see what I mean when you watch the video |
|
Chesty Ranger
SVER True Blood
8
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 13:05:00 -
[71] - Quote
Here's the nade spam of the century. Props to icedslayer our combat camera and sub machine gun slayer. Good **** to our scout team fending off a point from multiple tanks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvBNVQe0i-c&feature=youtube_gdata_player |
fahrenheitM
Pro Hic Immortalis League of Infamy
373
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 13:36:00 -
[72] - Quote
Out of 97 kills by STB - 30 of them were Fused Locus. |
Severance Pay
Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic
844
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 13:44:00 -
[73] - Quote
Soooooo. Your weakness is fused locust grenades? Gotcha! |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1404
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 13:54:00 -
[74] - Quote
Severance Pay wrote:Soooooo. Your weakness is fused locust grenades? Gotcha!
Yep.
I have a phobia of all things "Bugs"
So Locusts are definitely my weakness |
pamuku420tyme
out-phase
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 14:38:00 -
[75] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:WhiteMage7322 wrote:It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness.
hey smart guy u sit here and talk about tactics, what the hell do u think they just did? you all say "no nades in battle" so why wouldn't they exploit the fact that u are not using them and that they are BATTLING AGAINST YOU and use anything in their arsenal to kill you and obviously win. -1 for cryin on a forum. and -1 for trying to organize a battle against an opponent... yes cause that seems to work so well in real life lets try it in a game....
complete fail! |
Jotun Izalaru
Goonfeet Top Men.
8
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 16:24:00 -
[76] - Quote
Wait, Dark Legion is fighting in PC?
I thought they were a flaylock-only gimmick corp. |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1411
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 17:59:00 -
[77] - Quote
Jotun Izalaru wrote:Wait, Dark Legion is fighting in PC?
I thought they were a flaylock-only gimmick corp.
Lul.
Goonfeet..... |
stlcarlos989
SVER True Blood
422
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 20:12:00 -
[78] - Quote
fahrenheitM wrote:Out of 97 kills by STB - 30 of them were Fused Locus.
I didn't get 30 on my count... Here are the kill totals I got. I guess the fused locus are why we had 3/4 of our MCC armor at the end . DL feel free to attack after the flaylock and contact grenade nerf, I'm sure you still have plenty of officer weapons after these 7 or so matches against us. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
210
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 07:28:00 -
[79] - Quote
pamuku420tyme wrote:Cenex Langly wrote:WhiteMage7322 wrote:It doesn't matter what was used, what matters is who are the loser and the winners. There is no rules in Dust. First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness. hey smart guy u sit here and talk about tactics, what the hell do u think they just did? you all say "no nades in battle" so why wouldn't they exploit the fact that u are not using them and that they are BATTLING AGAINST YOU and use anything in their arsenal to kill you and obviously win. -1 for cryin on a forum. and -1 for trying to organize a battle against an opponent... yes cause that seems to work so well in real life lets try it in a game.... complete fail! Says the no-name scrub.
Nice alt there, twinky
|
RuckingFetard
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
463
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 10:01:00 -
[80] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Jotun Izalaru wrote:Wait, Dark Legion is fighting in PC?
I thought they were a flaylock-only gimmick corp. Lul. Goonfeet..... TBH, he is right |
|
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1423
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 11:59:00 -
[81] - Quote
RuckingFetard wrote:Knight Soiaire wrote:Jotun Izalaru wrote:Wait, Dark Legion is fighting in PC?
I thought they were a flaylock-only gimmick corp. Lul. Goonfeet..... TBH, he is right
No... but Goonfeet......
Lol |
STEALTH HUNTER ZERO
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
13
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:19:00 -
[82] - Quote
Im not sure where you people are getting that DL heavily uses flaylocks. I know of Nox who uses it as a sidearm and superjoe who has ran duals occasionally but I really don't know of anyone else who is skilled in it in our corp. Sorry but we Actually have people with gun game. I wasn't in the last battle though, however I was in the FP/fused nade fest of us attacking an indy Corp with all their ringer friends, lol right, like these big Corps want anyone else in PC. |
Quickgloves
SVER True Blood
708
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 17:01:00 -
[83] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvBNVQe0i-c&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvBNVQe0i-c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvUS87stGNU
there is 3 of the matches prolly got more. don't see much flaylock or nade spam on are side. just saying |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |