A team that fields almost full team of Teamplayers ringers.

What'd you expect, and please dont group, Fused and the Flaylock with the MD.

And complaining about him using Flux? Lol, thats new, what are you a Cal Logi?

Man, that must suck. That many locusts must've eaten the entire district's crops.

Blah Blah Blah Blah

^-- Look at me, I've resulted to childish antics!

You again. Shame on you for being so ignorant to what it means to EARN a district. Shame on you.

After just coming out of a pub match, where almost a whole squad were carrying Core Flaylocks (DEFIANCE), I've got to say, I'm lead believe you play no different in PC matches.

I didn't even bother saying gg, because it wasn't even that.

It seems there is no place in Dust for diversity, and everything is about the FOTM to remain competitive, meanwhile, me in my Scout suit, am still trying to go strong, fighting through the nerfs, and CCP's love for all things Caldari and Assault/Logi.

I'm just glad I'm part of a Corp, where even if you've only got MLT items, you're allowed participate in these battles, some people may think thats stupid, but I think its cool.

Anyway, good luck capturing SVER Prime, its not personally something I'd try to do, because I believe better choices lie elsewhere on the Starmap, but hopefully something is planned.

Knight Soiaire, #1 For unbiased opinions

I've got a thread going for people to vote to remove contact grenades because I hate them and the concept. But until then I use abuse the hell out of them to get people angry about them, so CCP does something. Until then sorry you were on the receiving end.

i didn't play in this battle and have no idea what went on. I think a few people who play this game are sick of some weapons that are being used, but at the same time you can't really complain if someone uses them. The fact is we've been going at SVER for a while and have only won one battle. That is the only thing that matters, and the only thing people will remember. SVER haven't cheated in any way by using weapons that are available to them, or to anyone in our corp. TBH I'm a bit disappointed this thread was opened, it just made us look like poor losers.

Well your plan is working. I didn't think much of it until I met you in PC battles... My god you've blown me out of my socks with those things! Add me to the list of haters of contact grenades.

players will adapt on either side and use a mass driver.

Honestly, Can't blame STB. They are probably TeamPlayers biggest customer.
Quick can make enough money off the districts he bought from them to pay for his defenses + make up the money he paid for them in a month.
He just played the long game well and waited out the storm that was imps.
He will never be able to recruit great talent again and it would take stacking timers to break them again.
This time with a small alliance or two should do the trick.
TCD toxicated and dem durrty boys already broke off.
How many other corps with grow from them.
Aren't much different than PRO.
Just a bit smarter with their money.

They have a name from when they were successful back in the day.
If quick didn't have such a mouth they'd still be a top player.
Now they sit on high on 'Regnum's Shithole" simply cause they **** enough gold there to pay Cubs to look the other way to their farming.
Kinda weird Sha hasn't done the same TBQH.

And so it begins... I knew this day would come.

Nah... The core flaylock/fused ban resulted in the best matches in weeks. I advise everyone to consider such agreements.

First -There "are" no rules- is what you meant to say. Second, we all know these are what the top corporations are making agreements on what to leave out of the battle. These treaties show the entire dust community that these weapons are really broken and unbalanced. To strictly use that as a tactic for victory is shameful and shows ones weakness.

No problem that im aware of in regards to arranging some sort of agreement. Its just, we go an entire week, day after day, flaylock/mass driver spam. So what do we do? We bite back..... its not very complicated if you think about it

LOL. I have the battle recorded, and icedslayer have also we will upload video probably tomorrow. So you can all watch all this "nade spam". Also got footage of you guys camping over the bridge with fraylock over watching A. Anyways you guys where pretty good sport sad to see your corp go out in salty note. Just hold dat L over your chest and carry on bro.

Spoiler OP claim is highly exaggerated.

That's why you shouldn't make any agreements on what's allowed on the battlefield, it's pointless to try and trust the other side.

You again. Shame on you for being so ignorant to what it means to EARN a district. Shame on you.

i didn't play in this battle and have no idea what went on. I think a few people who play this game are sick of some weapons that are being used, but at the same time you can't really complain if someone uses them. The fact is we've been going at SVER for a while and have only won one battle. That is the only thing that matters, and the only thing people will remember. SVER haven't cheated in any way by using weapons that are available to them, or to anyone in our corp. TBH I'm a bit disappointed this thread was opened, it just made us look like poor losers.

Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.

Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).

So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.

Well we have two choices here;
1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this.
2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.

So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life.

Guys... STB as a whole do not condone or use on a regualar basis FP or Contact nades.

Wehave seen at least two or three of your guys 'camping' with said weapons whilst playing Corp matches. 9/10 they are your most effective players (Figure that!). Not once did we moan here (War forum).

So to combat said FP we run with contact nades, and now we get 'OMGAWD SVER IS SO BAD CONTACT NADE SPAM LOL'.

Well we have two choices here;
1. Either both comitt to NOT using FP or Contact nades. I will enforce this.
2. Escalate until its a pathetic 'i have more contact nades and FP than anyone else game' Which lets face it is boring.

So if you wish to 'man-up' and except the no FP or Contact nade rule then let me know, if not then be prepared to play the most boring losses of your life.

Given the exchange of mails after battle I'm surprised you didn't raise this issue if you felt it was so abused. As I have said, I'm only aware of two players that use the flaylock and to my knowledge none of our guys have used contact grenades. Your 9/10 comment seems a bit out of line given until this battle I have been top on our side and you'll never see me use them. Also our logis and heavys are often near the top on our boards. I believe camps murdered the **** out of you guys last round and that was all heavy machine gun.

I will say this thread started as a frustrated vent after a rather unpleasant battle. So let me say I still respect you guys but that battle really made me hate that contact grenade with a passion.

I hate telling my guys what to use, just as I never complained about the contact grenades in previous battles, it just gets a bit out of hand when a large number of players on one side uses a weapon that is iffy balance wise.

If the only way to prevent the mass contact grenades I saw last night is a full agreement to not use those two weapons that can be arranged, personally I prefer to just keep things reasonable and not have a large number of guys come out with the same weapon.