| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kyro Justice
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
20
   |
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
DUST514 got a 5.8/10 on IGN, now I see the fanboys calling that "Average" and "Good" for an F2P, so let's do some math.
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
So...A 58% is not "Average" by any means, in most school systems average is a "C" (Generally 70% or higher) and in some (bad) households a "D" (60%) A 58% will have people failing with an F+ so please tell me. In what world is this average? |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1596
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Depends on who you are and where you're from.
For example, me getting an F on my English Paper was average.
My entire class's average of getting an F, was pretty average for the school
50% is not great, but not terrible, it's half way between 0 and 100, average. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
1878
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Trololol.
Why are you applying school grading to that figure? |
Kyro Justice
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Depends on who you are and where you're from.
For example, me getting an F on my English Paper was average.
My entire class's average of getting an F, was pretty average for the school
50% is not great, but not terrible, it's half way between 0 and 100, average.
Where the hell did you go to school?! In most places "F" stands for failure, or...The character F if you have characters instead of words. |
Mike Poole
Kirkinen Risk Control
Caldari State
102
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Don't try to argue this here or the same fanboys will just insist that it's not ccp's fault they put marketing ahead of development and released a game that should still be in beta for months more before getting anywhere close to a reviewer. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
1878
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Depends on who you are and where you're from.
For example, me getting an F on my English Paper was average.
My entire class's average of getting an F, was pretty average for the school
50% is not great, but not terrible, it's half way between 0 and 100, average. Where the hell did you go to school?! In most places "F" stands for failure, or...The character F if you have characters instead of words.
Are the tests that school grading is based on marked out of ten before a grade is applied? |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
ROFL BROS
156
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
thats not how you calculate "average"
|
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
1878
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:thats not how you calculate "average"
For the record, IGN's average score is 6.888. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4851
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
It depends, there are a few sites I know that has yet to give our a 9 or a 10 to any game and 5 is considered fair value for the price. |
Kyro Justice
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:thats not how you calculate "average"
No what YOU'RE saying is that's not how you calculate ""Averages"" I'm calculating the score and comparing it to the streamlined average, which for IGN is apparently 6.888. Still fell short hm? |
|
|
Setaceous Prime
Nexus Prima
54
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Trololol.
Why are you applying school grading to that figure?
Because that's the "fact" that most supported his argument. He's well on his way to becoming a reasonable lawyer or politician. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
1879
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
It took you three operations to turn 5.8/10 into a percentage. Lol.
It took you two to turn 58/100 into one! |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4852
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:00:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Kyro Justice wrote:
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
It took you three operations to turn 5.8/10 into a percentage. Lol. It took you two to turn 58/100 into one!
The magic of algebra both answers are right. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
1879
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:thats not how you calculate "average"
No what YOU'RE saying is that's not how you calculate ""Averages"" I'm calculating the score and comparing it to the streamlined average, which for IGN is apparently 6.888. Still fell short hm?
That's not what you were doing at all. You were grading it on the, I assume American, letter grading system for some yet to be determined reason. |
Cere Harkens
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
If it's a true 1-10 scale, then 5.5 is average, that being the midpoint of the scale. (The sum of 1 to 10 is 55, then divide by 10.)
The score of 5.8 is pretty close to 5.5, so their characterization of it as average is spot-on.
Don't impose a school grading system on other systems that have nothing to do with academics. Only in academics is a score around 75% classified as average. Everywhere else, it's 50%. |
KalOfTheRathi
Talon Strike Force LTD
Orion Empire
468
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:11:00 -
[16] - Quote
I only gave it 5/10 which is Mediocre in IGN Speak.
Not that far off the 5.8 that IGN dished out.
The user community on IGN rates it 7.6 though (GMT 0100, 4 June, 2013) and that is Good.
Don't forget that between Mediocre and Good is Okay. So there is some ground that has to be covered to get to Good in IGNs eyes.
Chromosome was 7.5 for me.
What does it mean? Nothing.
You like it, you play it.
You want to support it, buy SomeSillyThing Pack. Buy two.
You don't want to? Don't.
Life goes on. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
772
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:15:00 -
[17] - Quote
This argument is ridiculous. In any job if you do only half the assigned task, and say "dont worry its average" you would he fired so quick!
58/100 is bad no matter how you spin it. I'm not gonna commentate on the validity of IGN's score as I have done that in other threads but all of you trying to twist 5.8/10 into being ok is making me incredulous.
>CCP promises AAA game quality
>gets at BEST a mediocre rating
... Just going on ratings alone, thats a pretty meh reaction. (not going on what I personally think, just the facts)
I dont see why you guys are bashing the OP |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
ROFL BROS
156
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:thats not how you calculate "average"
No what YOU'RE saying is that's not how you calculate ""Averages"" I'm calculating the score and comparing it to the streamlined average, which for IGN is apparently 6.888. Still fell short hm?
you were comparing it to failing English, you did not mention the 6.8 |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
ROFL BROS
156
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:22:00 -
[19] - Quote
isnt IGN owned by EA? aka hgas an invested interest in giving bad reviews to competition? |
Gotyougood
Planet Express LLC
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:34:00 -
[20] - Quote
It shouldn't be up for review until its on the the PS4. PS3 even when new was never a graphical powerhouse. Not really expecting PS4 to be either but more resources wont hurt the development effort. |
|
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
Gentlemen's Agreement
194
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:40:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:DUST514 got a 5.8/10 on IGN, now I see the fanboys calling that "Average" and "Good" for an F2P, so let's do some math.
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
So...A 58% is not "Average" by any means, in most school systems average is a "C" (Generally 70% or higher) and in some (bad) households a "D" (60%) A 58% will have people failing with an F+ so please tell me. In what world is this average?
well lets say there are 100 games.
42 games were ranked above 58 games and 58 games were ranked below 42 games.
Int hat case the game ranked 58 would be average...
Of course you are right that this is not how IGN does it and i suspect they rank more games above 5.8 then they do below it.
A strict reading of the IGN's rating is that Dust is below average....pretty accurate if you ask me.
Of course among PS3 shooters that support mouse and keyboard it is ranked number one as it is the only PS3 shooter i am aware of that does support it....so sadly i am sticky around to play this below average game. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries
RISE of LEGION
1524
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:45:00 -
[22] - Quote
People are confusing the midpoint of a measurement scale for an average.
To calculate an average you need to specify the population, then:
AVG = SUM( all observations) / number of observations
So if five games were given (2,3,7,5,3) on a scale of 1-10 the average would be:
(20)/5 = 4
If a game received 4 out of 10, it would be an average game. |
KalOfTheRathi
Talon Strike Force LTD
Orion Empire
468
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:isnt IGN owned by EA? aka hgas an invested interest in giving bad reviews to competition? A that would be a nope.
EA just got the licenses to make Star Wars games. That fantasy has some truth to it. Yours, not so much.
Although, you might be thinking about Blizzard picking up the IGN eSports group (IPL) recently. Which has nothing to do with this.
Also the term you used was invested but the term you meant was vested. Invested in putting resources into a venture and vested means you have a personal interest (financial in your usage) in the outcome.
TL;DR
Wrong information, incorrect assumptions and bad word choice. A perfect Dust514 post.  |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
1888
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 01:57:00 -
[24] - Quote
Skihids wrote:People are confusing the midpoint of a measurement scale for an average.
To calculate an average you need to specify the population, then:
AVG = SUM( all observations) / number of observations
So if five games were given (2,3,7,5,3) on a scale of 1-10 the average would be:
(20)/5 = 4
If a game received 4 out of 10, it would be an average game.
IGN's average is 6.8 recurring. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1597
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 02:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Depends on who you are and where you're from.
For example, me getting an F on my English Paper was average.
My entire class's average of getting an F, was pretty average for the school
50% is not great, but not terrible, it's half way between 0 and 100, average. Where the hell did you go to school?! In most places "F" stands for failure, or...The character F if you have characters instead of words.
Apparantly CCP doesn't let me post HTML.. despite it just being text, am confused.
Yes, F for failure.. my school is one of the lowest in the country for test scores, it was a beautiful place. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
ROFL BROS
159
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 02:07:00 -
[26] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:isnt IGN owned by EA? aka hgas an invested interest in giving bad reviews to competition? A that would be a nope. EA just got the licenses to make Star Wars games. That fantasy has some truth to it. Yours, not so much. Although, you might be thinking about Blizzard picking up the IGN eSports group (IPL) recently. Which has nothing to do with this. Also the term you used was invested but the term you meant was vested. Invested in putting resources into a venture and vested means you have a personal interest (financial in your usage) in the outcome. TL;DR Wrong information, incorrect assumptions and bad word choice. A perfect Dust514 post.
i see you missed all my question marks. they show that its a question, not a statement. |
dustwaffle
Ill Omens
EoN.
43
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 03:52:00 -
[27] - Quote
What we learned in this thread:
1. People are bad at maths
2. Some of us use arbitrary school grading systems to apply to highly subjective systems
3. Some of us went to **** schools
4. People will moan and gripe about something, and yet still put themselves through it
5. People need justification to do anything as they are unable to think for themselves (A game is bad according to X, so it must be bad, therefore I will tell everyone how bad it is, because X said so)
Pretty informative day so far |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
ROFL BROS
1706
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:00:00 -
[28] - Quote
Considering most schools pass everyone, of course they consider 70% "average"
Only complete dumbasses can't get at least a C 
What the school tells you is 70% is more like 50%, they just don't want you to feel bad. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
ROFL BROS
1706
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:15:00 -
[29] - Quote
Let me explain it in a bit more detail
Few people get As
Few people get Fs
Lots of people get Cs, therefore C, or 70%, is average.... for schools.
However, getting less than a 50% grade in most schools is almost impossible, they give you points for attendance FFS, therefore the bottom 50% is worthless, since very few people actually get scores that low. |
Don Von Hulio
Not Guilty
EoN.
277
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:17:00 -
[30] - Quote
I consider 5.8 a rather generous rating from IGN.
What i wouldve give it was a, "Aquaman/10" |
|
|
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
157
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
CCP should and are likely very worried about a 5.8 rating. Square Enix received a score like this on Final Fantasy XIV and hired a brand new team to fix it. A score of 5.8 is not good. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
i really hate 1 to 10 number systems where games are rated,a game is either good, bad( it's ****) or "meh",Dust scored a meh |
Don Von Hulio
Not Guilty
EoN.
279
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:35:00 -
[33] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:i really hate 1 to 10 number systems where games are rated,a game is either good, bad( it's ****) or "meh",Dust scored a meh
ok... how about if it was 1 out of 100.
and the a scale was a whole carrot, there would only be 58% of the carrot. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
ROFL BROS
1706
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
Don Von Hulio wrote:Johnny Guilt wrote:i really hate 1 to 10 number systems where games are rated,a game is either good, bad( it's ****) or "meh",Dust scored a meh ok... how about if it was 1 out of 100. and the a scale was a whole carrot, there would only be 58% of the carrot.
Top half, bottom half, horizontal split, mass wise?  |
Cygnus 2112
D3LTA ACADEMY
19
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:43:00 -
[35] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:DUST514 got a 5.8/10 on IGN, now I see the fanboys calling that "Average" and "Good" for an F2P, so let's do some math.
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
So...A 58% is not "Average" by any means, in most school systems average is a "C" (Generally 70% or higher) and in some (bad) households a "D" (60%) A 58% will have people failing with an F+ so please tell me. In what world is this average?
Wait... When did we start taking IGN seriously? They have literally one reviewer worth listening to. Greg. If its not Greg I dont pay attention. No one else should ether. |
Don Von Hulio
Not Guilty
EoN.
279
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Don Von Hulio wrote:Johnny Guilt wrote:i really hate 1 to 10 number systems where games are rated,a game is either good, bad( it's ****) or "meh",Dust scored a meh ok... how about if it was 1 out of 100. and the a scale was a whole carrot, there would only be 58% of the carrot. Top half, bottom half, horizontal split, mass wise?
Lets confuse the young man, we must start out simple, then slowly bring him up to speed.
|
Numot MTG
DUST University
Ivy League
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:54:00 -
[37] - Quote
Hate to break it to you but ign did a halfassed review based on a few hours of dust. Never even got out of the acedemy. Tentonhammer in the hand spent a few days with dust and gave it a 8/10. |
Joretur
One-Armed Bandits
Unclaimed.
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
So much failure in determining what "average" is. Well lets take every single score that has been given to games. Then we can find the Mean, Median and Mode of those scores.
For those not familiar with these
Mean: This is the avg. score. All scores added up then divided by the number of scores.
Median: This is the "middle" score in the list
Mode: The score that happens most.
For the "average" score, the Mean, or the Mode would be the most useful in determining what qualifies as average...not some school system grading. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1857
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 05:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
OP isn't crazy. The "average grade" is around 70 for a game review and that is considered mediocre. The system heavily biases towards success since games that are truly awful either get axed in development or aren't even reviewed at all. When you understand this 58 is fairly troubling score. It basically means "not even good", not "average". |
S0LlD SNAKE
PLAYSTATION4
95
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 06:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
5/10 is the right note for Rust514
|
|
|
Aesiron Kor-Azor
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
204
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 06:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:DUST514 got a 5.8/10 on IGN, now I see the fanboys calling that "Average" and "Good" for an F2P, so let's do some math.
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
So...A 58% is not "Average" by any means, in most school systems average is a "C" (Generally 70% or higher) and in some (bad) households a "D" (60%) A 58% will have people failing with an F+ so please tell me. In what world is this average?
I bet you feel good about transforming that fraction into a percentage, I mean seriously; did you need to show your working? |
KalOfTheRathi
Talon Strike Force LTD
Orion Empire
470
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 06:43:00 -
[42] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:i see you missed all my question marks. they show that its a question, not a statement. And I answered them. No to all of the above.
The question was so far off that it sounded like a perfect Dust514 post to me. Guess it wasn't. Rats. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3216
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 07:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
I've spent time in over a dozen countries where the schooling system considered 50% to be a C grade and is sufficient to pass.
We had exams that were difficult enough to actually be a legitimate challenge to the people doing it, and getting half the possible marks was considered an acceptable result.
Achieving ABSOLUTE PERFECTION 50% of the time is pretty good. Finding the right answer with minor, easily corrected mistakes in your working 100% of the time is pretty good.
Just because your schooling system is terrible, doesn't mean you should assume the entire world is based on the same terrible system.
More to the point though, REVIEWS ARE NOT SCHOOL EXAMS.
The rules are different from one to the next.
And even more to the point, IGN are being taken seriously as a source of legitimate reviews now? When did that happen?
Lets look at something with a better chance of resembling a valid result: Metacritic. It's ALSO unreliable, but it's less ridiculous than trusting a single review site, since it acts as an aggregate result for a variety of sites. Their result for DUST is 60%.
Now lets use a LEGITIMATE method of working out an average. Open up the PS3 games list on Metacritic, set it to "all games" instead of "recent releases", then sort by metascore. Now you'll notice there are 11 pages. Only the first 7 include scores, and DUST 514 is on the 5th page.
Now, rather than terrible math backed by ridiculous assumptions, you have a LOGICAL and RATIONAL argument that DUST is below average.
You're welcome.
And in spite of logic confirming the game is probably below average, I still enjoy it a lot more than the majority of current-gen FPS games. I'm not going to argue that the core mechanics are on a par with the Call of Duty and Battlefield series. The game has blatantly never performed as well as a legitimate AAA title. It's not ready for release, and slapping the "release" label on was a terrible idea. I can see the potential here for something so much better than the usual "AAA" junk title, and I hope CCP don't squander that potential, but right now, I can't honestly claim the game is in a fit state for a release-ready FPS. |
Spectral Clone
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
21
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 07:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/dust-514
Average score of critic reviews and player reviews. |
Don Von Hulio
Not Guilty
EoN.
281
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 07:52:00 -
[45] - Quote
... so much fail in this thread.
I dont know why everyone got so butthurt... 0.0-10.0 and 0-100 averages are the same damn thing.
Some of you went fullretard.... and while this was occurring you guys took some posts out of context and then typed up a rant for no reason.... lolforums. |
Panther Alpha
Commando Perkone
Caldari State
376
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 08:13:00 -
[46] - Quote
six out of teen (6/10) is "just" above average. But lets not forget, that the average score of Dust 514 across all reviewers and critics ( Worldwide ), is; four out of teen ( 4/10), which is "bellow" average. |
Leither Yiltron
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
492
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 08:21:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kyro Justice wrote:DUST514 got a 5.8/10 on IGN, now I see the fanboys calling that "Average" and "Good" for an F2P, so let's do some math.
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
So...A 58% is not "Average" by any means, in most school systems average is a "C" (Generally 70% or higher) and in some (bad) households a "D" (60%) A 58% will have people failing with an F+ so please tell me. In what world is this average?
Troll earns 2/10. Just really no soul in this one. |
SuperKing BigNuts
Contract Hunters
101
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 09:07:00 -
[48] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:And in spite of logic confirming the game is probably below average, I still enjoy it a lot more than the majority of current-gen FPS games. I'm not going to argue that the core mechanics are on a par with the Call of Duty and Battlefield series. The game has blatantly never performed as well as a legitimate AAA title. It's not ready for release, and slapping the "release" label on was a terrible idea. I can see the potential here for something so much better than the usual "AAA" junk title, and I hope CCP don't squander that potential, but right now, I can't honestly claim the game is in a fit state for a release-ready FPS.
i agree with most of this guys statements.
DUST 514 is in pretty awful condition for having been 'officially launched' on a gimmick release date... not to mention the hype that they have put out about the game... "Persistence", "A game where death has meaning", etc... currently, most of the hype CCP has been building for the game, simply isnt there... its got ambition, but is still premature.
if i had picked up a $60 game and had the experience ive had with DUST, id probably snap the disk and toss it out. if it wasnt for my extensive back-history in EVE, and knowing the ambitious goals that they have for DUST, i probably wouldnt have stuck around this long.
when and if they ever get everything pieced together, the game has promise... but how far away is 'SOONGäó'
Pending features:
EVE-DUST connection...
There is no REAL connection between the two... we have social capabilities, but aside from PC(currently only ONE region, hardly worth mention as far as im concerned), there are no benefits or drawbacks to 'interaction'(or more specifically the lack there of) between the two games...
Economy...
They want it to be a player driven economy, but they dont even have basic trading capabilities within dust or an option to sell anything back to NPCs, let alone linked EVE-DUST capabilities...
Industry...
heavily tied to the economy and with what theyve explained, also going to be heavily dependant upon EVE to do our production for us...
Drones...
or any real source of PVE Content to break up the monotony of spamming pub matches... every match is different, but every match is the same... it would be nice to be able to change things up and do ANYTHING ELSE for a while without having to resort to simply playing something other ... even an E-Sports or challenge mode?
MCC Commander...
ever changing tactical decisions made by the player... that was one of their initial drawing points, and we are nowhere near ready to support this yet... as far as im aware they dont have all of the installations that they demo'd and talked about before FANFEST-Build BETA first launched, let alone any sort of squad leader option to call in the currently existing assets.
this is my understandings based on what theyve said they wanted to do with the game. i may be mistaken on any of these features, and im sure ive missed other features theyve talked about adding over the last few years, but i feel ive made my point regarding the hype theyve created and yet to live up to. |
dustwaffle
Ill Omens
EoN.
47
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 09:39:00 -
[49] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Kyro Justice wrote:DUST514 got a 5.8/10 on IGN, now I see the fanboys calling that "Average" and "Good" for an F2P, so let's do some math.
5.8/10 x 10 = 58/100
58/100 >Deci> 0.58
0.58 x 100 = 58%
So...A 58% is not "Average" by any means, in most school systems average is a "C" (Generally 70% or higher) and in some (bad) households a "D" (60%) A 58% will have people failing with an F+ so please tell me. In what world is this average? Troll earns 2/10. Just really no soul in this one.
MY GOD, that's like,
2/10 x 10 = 20/100
20/100 >Deci> 0.20
0.20 x 100 = 20%
That's like, way below 'Average' in most schools, WHAT ARE THEY TEACHING OUR KIDS |
Raizor Feddie
Seraphim Auxiliaries
CRONOS.
55
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 16:07:00 -
[50] - Quote
I don't know about OP's logic, but yeah, game is kind of "Bad-seeming" take into account I said "Seeming" not to say it doesn't have potential, but it seems like the game was graded on said potential, instead of it's actual gameplay and I think 5.8/10 is kind of generous for all the Broken promises, Broken controls, Broken Balance, SP disparities, Broken Matchmaking, Ignored Feedback and Nerf hammers. |
|
|
Karl Koekwaus
Tronhadar Free Guard
Minmatar Republic
82
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 16:33:00 -
[51] - Quote
on a grade scale of 0-10 a 5.8 is average. It's a pass and fun can be had, but don't expect a flawless game.
However, gamesites handing out 10/10 or 9.5/10 on every other game are just to be ignored, as they don't know how to grade. |
Mobias Wyvern
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 09:14:00 -
[52] - Quote
Be your own Judge. What game looks like more fun to you? Dust.........Or this.........
Planetside 2
Coming to PS4 this year
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |