Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kharga Lum
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. |
Horizon Limit
Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY
10
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
AV nades are OP, they should damage, half hp of a LAV, to be balanced. |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
259
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
got to love em' but differently OP
75% of what they do now would be good |
EXASTRA INVICTAS
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
I agree that AV nades are a little OP. I wouldn't mind if they got a LAV to 25% health on an untrained character using the free fit. They shouldn't be useless but they shouldn't be "let's effortlessly blow up that expensive equipment" either.
Because you're not gonna see me spending that ISK on buying and fitting some LAVs and HAVs when I know it's gonna be trash after its first kill. |
Wojciak
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Low lvl nades should do less damage an you should need a lot to kill high lvl tanks ( 10 or more), but high lvl AV nades should do high damage to low lvl tanks ( 2/6 nades). if the tank and the nades are the same lvl the it should be a two man team to take out a tank (6/8 total).
i am not a tanker nor am i an AV (yet). |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
259
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
you do know tanks and LAVs are getting a HP buff tomorrow. right? lets let that settle then decided. |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
259
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
here it is. this was posted yesterday.
Quote:Vehicle skills, modules and balance: We are listening to your feedback in balancing heavy vehicle experiences. It is a delicate act which has us wanting them to be able to perform their intended GÇ£tankGÇ¥ role on the battlefield, while not being overpowered. HereGÇÖs a quick break down of some of the changes that are being introduced: Vehicle Balance In order to enable to vehicles to last longer in combat for more fun, enduring engagements weGÇÖve increased hit point values for LAVs and HAVs accordingly.
Std & Militia HAVs - 25% more hp Enforcer HAVs - 60% more hp Militia LAVs - 60% more hp Std & Scout LAVs - 50% more hp Charybdis Logistics LAV - 70% more hp Limbus Logistics LAV - 40% more hp
|
Draco Dustflier
Planetary Response Organisation
49
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
no. if you're stupid enough to drive your tank near a bunch of infantry without a cover squad or mewns of repair, i should be able to kill you with av grenades. tanks dont need more health. drivers need to get better. |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
259
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
its all most impossible to use tanks now unless your team is already steamrolling the other side |
Horizon Limit
Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY
10
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 17:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
Draco Dustflier wrote:no. if you're stupid enough to drive your tank near a bunch of infantry without a cover squad or mewns of repair, i should be able to kill you with av grenades. tanks dont need more health. drivers need to get better. another guy who never drove a tank... |
|
Kharga Lum
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 18:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Draco Dustflier wrote:no. if you're stupid enough to drive your tank near a bunch of infantry without a cover squad or mewns of repair, i should be able to kill you with av grenades. tanks dont need more health. drivers need to get better.
Tanks are slow to accelerate, low top speed and take all day to turn. Visibility is also terrible. You could stand on an elevation or even behind a box and throw AV from behind cover. Even swarms can be fired from a concealed position.
This would be easier if the primary gun and driver position were separated. As it is, it's very hard for the operator to fire at and withdraw from a hotspot at the same time. I'm either looking at my target or where I'm going. Should the tank gently bump into a wall or box it can take up to 500pts of damage.
If that happened to infantry you'd die every time you touched a wall....
I've you never used a tank or AV please refrain from trolling this thread. |
Kaze Eyrou
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
188
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 18:33:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. Uh, I don't think there is any Militia AV nades. You have to skill at least into Grenedier I for AV nades.
And before you say anything yes, I am aware of the Hacked Ex0 AV nades.
Don't expect those to be in your inventory on the 14th though. >:D |
Sylwester Dziewiecki
BetaMax. CRONOS.
61
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 19:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
In this build all vehicle was heavily nerf by 25%PG. What it's mean is that now people however they are trying they can't fit to standard HAV proto armor plate, proto armor repair and adv L turret without PG module(not speaking about rest of the fit). That HP% boost that you are speaking about may sound awesome, and it would be awesome if HAV was not silently nerfed in first place - currently they are all broke without that 25%PG.
As a HAV driver what moste I don't like in grenade is that they were meant to be use by stupid people(all they have to do is to spamm R2). All you have to do to kill HAV no metter with class, because all of they die after 5-7 grenades, is to:
1. Find spot near the enemy HAV - preferably not on his sight. 2. Drop nanohive under you feet. 3. While working with your radar aim the tank or place behind he supposed to be. 4. Spam "R2". 5. And... you done it!
Is that how you kill tanks in real word? Without any kind of knowledge about it, just spamming one button and that's it? Where is "Risk vs Reward"?
How I see this: First of all Pilot should be able to relocate they "weak spot" where ever they want, and place extra resistance on other parts of the HAV(for example). Guy who chose to kill/try to kill HAV with grenade should program them first to auto-aim particular parts of HAV, but to do so he should first gather information about that HAV to be more successful at his attack, this information could be also give to him by Scout(who is awesome at gathering that kind of stuff). Grenadier could also set his grenade to aim HAV in general, but in that way grenade would deal much less total dmg; Hi could also play roulette at choosing that particular HAV part and that could bring him luck: biggest dmg per grenade, or weakest dmg that is possible(even then setting grenade to aim HAV in general). But that's not all, art of throwing should be involve to this as well. If you miss you throw, and grenade will hit the HAV but at wrong side of it - nothing will happen - grenade will not explode. HAV pilot will be alarmed about the danger, because his sensor pickup specific signature that indicate explosive material.
|
Dezus 1000
Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS
21
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 19:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect.
Well put. Tanks now are overall a mess and less effective, but require more SP to use. It is ridiculous and I am just waiting for the optional respec. |
Wojciak
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 19:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:I How I see this: First of all Pilot should be able to relocate they "weak spot" where ever they want, and place extra resistance on other parts of the HAV(for example). Guy who chose to kill/try to kill HAV with grenade should program them first to auto-aim particular parts of HAV, but to do so he should first gather information about that HAV to be more successful at his attack, this information could be also give to him by Scout(who is awesome at gathering that kind of stuff). Grenadier could also set his grenade to aim HAV in general, but in that way grenade would deal much less total dmg; He could also play roulette at choosing that particular HAV part and that could bring him luck: biggest dmg per grenade, or weakest dmg that is possible(even then setting grenade to aim HAV in general). But that's not all, art of throwing should be involve to this as well. If you miss you throw, and grenade will hit the HAV but at wrong side of it - nothing will happen - grenade will not explode. HAV pilot will be alarmed about the danger, because his sensor pickup specific signature that indicate explosive material - that depend on sensor skills. Pilot should be also warned from with direction grenade came. It is not that hard ti kill an tank in real life, one RPG-7 can kill everyone in a tank. that satd thanks are a lot harder to kill now and in the future they will get harder and harder to take out. Your idea is ok, there should be a warning to where the danger is coming from. Each type of tank should have a week spot on different spots of the tank but the grenade should not have to be set for a spot on the tank and if you want a module that stops grenades going off, there are some people who have, i think that breaks the laws of Physics. |
nakaya indigene
Defensores Doctrina
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 20:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
AV nades are a bit insane. people with the ability to kill infantry and vehicles with the same amount of effort. please. If you want to kill a tank make a commitment to actually do it. Right now we have people that can sit behind cover and spam grenades. |
Kharga Lum
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 20:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
It's the dismissive easy you can casually chuck a brick at a tank, in casual passing, causing the tank to explode behind you. Almost like every Merc is an action hero wanting to slowly walk away from an explosion looking bad ass.
...only that explosion is me...in my tank... |
XV1
Challenger 4
8
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 20:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
AV grenades are a little OP, but wouldn't be so bad if the hacked AV grenades did not exist. I personally believe that they should be removed ASAP. I can use the hacked with no SP in grenades and buy them for same price as the advanced level ones for same PG/CPU cost and same effect, it is utterly ridiculous. |
Kharga Lum
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
49
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 20:53:00 -
[19] - Quote
There's an HP buff coming for vehicles (Except Dropships...for some reason, I dunno) but I'm not convinced this will fix the problem.
I can't fit more then 1 Heavy shield module on my heavy tank anyway since the PG is so low even with 2 PG extending modules. |
Xender17
Oblivion S.G.X
62
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 21:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
Kharga Lum wrote:There's an HP buff coming for vehicles (Except Dropships...for some reason, I dunno) but I'm not convinced this will fix the problem.
I can't fit more then 1 Heavy shield module on my heavy tank anyway since the PG is so low even with 2 PG extending modules. I agree. AV nades will still be a problem. |
|
KING CHECKMATE
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 21:43:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect.
AV grenades are a LITTLE too powerful, but not OP. The mere concept of getting CLOSE to a tank to throw something at it is ridiculous.
Forge guns and swarm launchers can damage a tank at great distances and grenades can't. Without AV grenades there wouldnt be a way to kill / scare away tanks at Close range making tanks even more OP.
Dont want AV grenades? keep your distance. |
KING CHECKMATE
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 21:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
In other games , tanks take their distance because Close quarter explosives do more damage than long ranges AV weapons. In other games C-4 is the most dreaded anti tank weapon. Just be grateful that Remote explosives dont stick to surfaces... XD
So yeah playing tanker is not a invincible game style, and at the moment your weakness are AV grenades? Dont get too close to spawn points or supply depos, cuz they will grenade the sh** out of you.
Thats that.
|
Illendar Cortharis
Digital Mercs
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 21:56:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect.
Stop crying, don't engage close range. |
Kharga Lum
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 21:57:00 -
[24] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. AV grenades are a LITTLE too powerful, but not OP. The mere concept of getting CLOSE to a tank to throw something at it is ridiculous. Forge guns and swarm launchers can damage a tank at great distances and grenades can't. Without AV grenades there wouldnt be a way to kill / scare away tanks at Close range making tanks even more OP. Dont want AV grenades? keep your distance.
This is not a thread about eliminating AV nades. I believe they have a place and should remain in game. But "...making tanks even more op" makes me think that you're missing the point. Tanks aren't currently functioning in the roll they are/were designed for.
I'm saying that, as it currently is, AV does a disproportional amount of damage for their cost in both SP and ISK compared to that of the tank. No where did I say I didn't want AV nades. I'm having a discussion about the balance between tanks and their counters. Taking any of these things out of the game would not even address the issue at all.
Even the Anti-Armor starter suit is devastating to vehicles of all kinds. There is no sp or isk investment in that at all. |
KING CHECKMATE
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 22:01:00 -
[25] - Quote
Illendar Cortharis wrote:Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. Stop crying, don't engage close range.
Pretty much. I mean AV grenades are the only thing stopping tanks to get into CQC where there is no other weapon suited to take them out.
Grenades: Damage High / Range close Swarm launchers: Damage Mid / Range Mid-Mid long - Not very useful in CQ situations Forge gun: Damage High / Range Long - Not very useful in CQ situations
Thats pretty much it....You want to nerf the only viable option at CQ to take care of a tank?
|
KING CHECKMATE
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 22:03:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kharga Lum wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. AV grenades are a LITTLE too powerful, but not OP. The mere concept of getting CLOSE to a tank to throw something at it is ridiculous. Forge guns and swarm launchers can damage a tank at great distances and grenades can't. Without AV grenades there wouldnt be a way to kill / scare away tanks at Close range making tanks even more OP. Dont want AV grenades? keep your distance. This is not a thread about eliminating AV nades. I believe they have a place and should remain in game. But "...making tanks even more op" makes me think that you're missing the point. Tanks aren't currently functioning in the roll they are/were designed for. I'm saying that, as it currently is, AV does a disproportional amount of damage for their cost in both SP and ISK compared to that of the tank. No where did I say I didn't want AV nades. I'm having a discussion about the balance between tanks and their counters. Taking any of these things out of the game would not even address the issue at all. Even the Anti-Armor starter suit is devastating to vehicles of all kinds. There is no sp or isk investment in that at all.
Th problem is, people think that because vehicles are so expensive they'll get some magic advantage since they spent SO MUCH SP. TRUE AV grenades should not do THAT much damage unless they are proto, but Tank players are not playing smart. If you get killed by AV grenades, you weren't supposed to be there bro. |
CharCharOdell
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 22:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
Draco Dustflier wrote:no. if you're stupid enough to drive your tank near a bunch of infantry without a cover squad or mewns of repair, i should be able to kill you with av grenades. tanks dont need more health. drivers need to get better.
Have you ever used a tank? NO? Well then don't comment here. Issues regarding vehicles vs AV should only be between vics and AV |
CharCharOdell
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 22:06:00 -
[28] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Kharga Lum wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. AV grenades are a LITTLE too powerful, but not OP. The mere concept of getting CLOSE to a tank to throw something at it is ridiculous. Forge guns and swarm launchers can damage a tank at great distances and grenades can't. Without AV grenades there wouldnt be a way to kill / scare away tanks at Close range making tanks even more OP. Dont want AV grenades? keep your distance. This is not a thread about eliminating AV nades. I believe they have a place and should remain in game. But "...making tanks even more op" makes me think that you're missing the point. Tanks aren't currently functioning in the roll they are/were designed for. I'm saying that, as it currently is, AV does a disproportional amount of damage for their cost in both SP and ISK compared to that of the tank. No where did I say I didn't want AV nades. I'm having a discussion about the balance between tanks and their counters. Taking any of these things out of the game would not even address the issue at all. Even the Anti-Armor starter suit is devastating to vehicles of all kinds. There is no sp or isk investment in that at all. Th problem is, people think that because vehicles are so expensive they'll get some magic advantage since they spent SO MUCH SP. TRUE AV grenades should not do THAT much damage unless they are proto, but Tank players are not playing smart. If you get killed by AV grenades, you weren't supposed to be there bro. Basically this thread is like someone wearing a PROTO suit complaining about why Regular Assault Rifles kill them.....
So you want us back in the hills rail sniping? |
CharCharOdell
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 22:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. AV grenades are a LITTLE too powerful, but not OP. The mere concept of getting CLOSE to a tank to throw something at it is ridiculous. Forge guns and swarm launchers can damage a tank at great distances and grenades can't. Without AV grenades there wouldnt be a way to kill / scare away tanks at Close range making tanks even more OP. Dont want AV grenades? keep your distance.
If you think tanks are OP, you don't know anyone who drives tanks. |
Kharga Lum
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 22:07:00 -
[30] - Quote
Illendar Cortharis wrote:Kharga Lum wrote:8.8m SP into tanks, just over 5800 shield HP and 5 milita AV nades kill me. This is not including my shield booster...active hardeners only last 10 seconds which enough time to absorbe a 1-2 shots before shutting down.
I understand the use of AV nades, my thinking is that the time and effort spent skilling into each is disproportional for their effect. Stop crying, don't engage close range.
*eye rolling
It's not about this...and neither am I "crying" about it. Before trolling this thread with your insight I suggest you try tanking. Gain perspective of both using AV on tanks and having AV used on your tank.
Using AV against a tank is easier then running from AV in a tank. Be it AV nades, forge gun or swarm launcher. Some of which can harras you from incredible distance
The investment vs effect of each is skewed towards AV in this build by a fair margin. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |