Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away. |
ISuperstar
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
I say no to your stupid thread and mental retardation. |
Macheria Perforati
Defensores Doctrina
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nevermind that some vehicle skills didn't do what they claimed to do and the only way for players to find this out was for them to spend SP and find out the hard way (or have someone else do it first and give them some warning). |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
299
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Define 'Research'
What exactly did you do? |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
79
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away.
So your saying you should not waste 2 min to put your sp back to where you put em. I didn't screw up my repec either, but come dude what's the real reason to not let them have it? |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
ISuperstar wrote:I say no to your stupid thread and mental retardation.
isnt that cute. |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Macheria Perforati wrote:Nevermind that some vehicle skills didn't do what they claimed to do and the only way for players to find this out was for them to spend SP and find out the hard way (or have someone else do it first and give them some warning).
CCP is fixing those skills, get over it. |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote:Define 'Research'
What exactly did you do?
I did my skill planning, carefully looked at skills. Purposefully avoided vehicles once I saw the skill changes to them. |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:25:00 -
[9] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away. So your saying you should not waste 2 min to put your sp back to where you put em. I didn't screw up my repec either, but come dude what's the real reason to not let them have it?
Yes. |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
299
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:Macheria Perforati wrote:Nevermind that some vehicle skills didn't do what they claimed to do and the only way for players to find this out was for them to spend SP and find out the hard way (or have someone else do it first and give them some warning). CCP is fixing those skills, get over it.
No they're not.
They say "+5% to Vehicle PG per level", but what they actually do is give a "-5% CPU cost to PG modules per level" they're just going to change the description to suit that, leaving us Pilots left with SP in skills we never would've wanted.
Coming from a guy who speaks so highly of research, you dont do a lot, do you? |
|
EnIgMa99
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
you guys know whats going to happen again right? Whatever you skilled into will get "rebalanced" again and will have to ask for another sp reallocation. this whole game is effed. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1028
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away.
How did a ****** like you get into IE?
I worked everything out SP wise, i knew how much SP i was putting and where
Then CCP drops a bomb, the skills dont work but also they have the wrong descriptions then i find out what the proper descriptions do say and essentially its a stealth PG nerf to all vehicles which effects everything and if it was one nerf i knew about before the build i could have gone assault babby like you did
CCP screwed up big time with the skills and requirements espc for vehicles, they have changed the entire vehicle class and essentially killed it atm |
Beld Errmon
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
615
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away.
You might be my corpie, but fk off and die, you'll be crying for a respec when they nerf whatever FOTM fit you followed the big boys into. |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:Macheria Perforati wrote:Nevermind that some vehicle skills didn't do what they claimed to do and the only way for players to find this out was for them to spend SP and find out the hard way (or have someone else do it first and give them some warning). CCP is fixing those skills, get over it. No they're not. They say "+5% to Vehicle PG per level", but what they actually do is give a "-5% CPU cost to PG modules per level" they're just going to change the description to suit that, leaving us Pilots left with SP in skills we never would've wanted. Coming from a guy who speaks so highly of research, you dont do a lot, do you?
Oh, I'm sorry you couldnt build a super tank. HTFU and throw some PG mods on it. |
K9 Wez
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
28
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:ISuperstar wrote:I say no to your stupid thread and mental retardation. isnt that cute.
Judging from this thread i have also concluded that your are in fact suffering from profound mental retardation. |
EnIgMa99
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
does it even really matter at this point guys since they effed the controls effed skills and equipment effed range at which you shoot people effed visibly seeing people. its all jacked. |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
Beld Errmon wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away. You might be my corpie, but fk off and die, you'll be crying for a respec when they nerf whatever FOTM fit you followed the big boys into.
LOL, I dont do FOTM. I run logi, or used to until CCP jacked up the req's. I've used every role in this game in every build. CUrrent FOTM is caldari logi, but I run all minmatar mk.0 basic with SMG. Tell me again how that is FOTM. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
168
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
I think HTFU and Adapt or Die are more excuses for ccps **** ups than anything else..... |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
299
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:36:00 -
[19] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:Knight SoIaire wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:Macheria Perforati wrote:Nevermind that some vehicle skills didn't do what they claimed to do and the only way for players to find this out was for them to spend SP and find out the hard way (or have someone else do it first and give them some warning). CCP is fixing those skills, get over it. No they're not. They say "+5% to Vehicle PG per level", but what they actually do is give a "-5% CPU cost to PG modules per level" they're just going to change the description to suit that, leaving us Pilots left with SP in skills we never would've wanted. Coming from a guy who speaks so highly of research, you dont do a lot, do you? Oh, I'm sorry you couldnt build a super tank. HTFU and throw some PG mods on it.
I have 2 Beta PG Extension Modules, I still cant fit the decent tank I had in Chromosone, both my Low slots are taken up by PG Extension Modules, I should be able to fit a Damage Mod on there.
But of course, you infantry newbs wouldn't know the ins and outs of making a good tank. |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
K9 Wez wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:ISuperstar wrote:I say no to your stupid thread and mental retardation. isnt that cute. Judging from this thread i have also concluded that your are in fact suffering from profound mental retardation.
What a substantial post. This adds so much to our 'great' community. |
|
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:39:00 -
[21] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:Knight SoIaire wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:Macheria Perforati wrote:Nevermind that some vehicle skills didn't do what they claimed to do and the only way for players to find this out was for them to spend SP and find out the hard way (or have someone else do it first and give them some warning). CCP is fixing those skills, get over it. No they're not. They say "+5% to Vehicle PG per level", but what they actually do is give a "-5% CPU cost to PG modules per level" they're just going to change the description to suit that, leaving us Pilots left with SP in skills we never would've wanted. Coming from a guy who speaks so highly of research, you dont do a lot, do you? Oh, I'm sorry you couldnt build a super tank. HTFU and throw some PG mods on it. I have 2 Beta PG Extension Modules, I still cant fit the decent tank I had in Chromosone, both my Low slots are taken up by PG Extension Modules, I should be able to fit a Damage Mod on there. But of course, you infantry newbs wouldn't know the ins and outs of making a good tank.
LOL. So you want to be able to tank the shield AND run damage mods.
Sorry, but I ran tanks during the E3 and Codex builds, I know what it takes to tank. You just want an unstoppable tank. Instead you should be asking CCP for balance. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
178
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:40:00 -
[22] - Quote
You havnt been able to make a legit super tank since closed beta early in closed beta...good times |
Kovak Therim
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
235
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tell that to players that use the heavy frames and were forced to spec into Amarr. They will need to do one more when all the racial suits hit the market imo. |
martinofski
Rebelles A Quebec Orion Empire
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Looking at how this thread just started, you might just want to let it die. Many change to come, who say your SMG and dropsuit wont be the next useless one and that you won't be saying I want a respec or I quit!
|
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
168
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
So far besides: 1. I don't want to have to redo my points 2. I want people to live with their mistakes because it makes them easier to kill
I haven't seen any real reasons why to not do a respec. Especially considering ccp messed up some skills I don't see why not. |
K9 Wez
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
28
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:47:00 -
[26] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:K9 Wez wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:ISuperstar wrote:I say no to your stupid thread and mental retardation. isnt that cute. Judging from this thread i have also concluded that your are in fact suffering from profound mental retardation. What a substantial post. This adds so much to our 'great' community.
Consider it public service, people need to be aware of your diagnosis so they may better be prepared on how to respond to you. |
Happy Violentime
OMFGZOMBIESRUN
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:47:00 -
[27] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away.
lol - half your alliance want's there SP back GTFO! |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:48:00 -
[28] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:So far besides: 1. I don't want to have to redo my points 2. I want people to live with their mistakes because it makes them easier to kill
I haven't seen any real reasons why to not do a respec. Especially considering ccp messed up some skills I don't see why not.
LOL. 1. Yes, I did my research carefully. I like where my points are at. 2. You rushed into vehicles so you could ROFL stomp infantry like in previous builds, and got nerfed. Adapt...or die. |
Zombie Supreme
D3LTA FORC3 Orion Empire
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away.
I planned out my skills carefully too, I downloaded the spreadsheet, opened it in Excel, and studied it for days. Then CCP (yesterday) decided that the description for "Vehicle Engineering" was not really what the skill was going to do. Instead of giving all vehicles a 5% PG boost per level, it will now do something worthless and stupid. Then today they changed the prerequisites for shield extenders on vehicles.
A respec is necessary not just because people that understand the new skill tree made mistakes, but because CCP changed the definitions for the skills days after the game came out.
If there are people that don't want to respec again, then let it be an optional respec. |
Phoenix Arakyd
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
54
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 15:50:00 -
[30] - Quote
Happy Violentime wrote:Phoenix Arakyd wrote:I took the time to do my research before I dumped my SP. I shouldnt have to do it again because its too hard for you kiddies.
Or, let them have a respec, but take half their SP away. lol - half your alliance want's there SP back GTFO!
Doubtful. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |