Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
541
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 03:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
I predicted this was going to happen 1 week before this respec. People had it in their head what they was going to invest in prior to the sp reset. It is called an "investment" for reasons being either you make a good one or a bad one.If you allow another sp respec due to peoples bad investments on day one, how does that help one aquire better decision making skills?
Are you going to give players a BONUS for not accepting a SP reset if one is made available? A reward for not blowing all their sp and trying to see what skill sinks are worthy of investment by actually playing the game a few days before wasting all their sp going straight for proto? Will you show us the % of people that blew their sp on day one as soon as they turned uprising on before even seeing if and what "investments" would be good ones?
The best way to handle the situation IMO is to just charge a $5.00 fee for everytime someone makes a bad sp sink and wishes to respec skill points. That way we will not see thread after thread of bad sp investors wasting valuable space that might cause a person to overlook an important thread.
$5.00 Skill Respec option in the charater information, yes please!
|
Nexus Tau
DIOS EX.
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 03:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Good plan, that should shut up the QQers. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organization
2212
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 03:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Skill respec for sale = Bad idea
No, I will not explain why as this has been talked about for the past 5 years already. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
173
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Idc for a respec but I also wouldn't mind it being an option later on |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
531
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
No deal on general New Eden principles. Be lucky we got a respec at all. In EVE when new content gets added, players are stuck with their skills whether power creep issues arise or something got nerfed to novelty. If people can just pay to respec whenever they want, it destroys the impact of your decisions to invest into something.
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2768
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
Skill respec is only valid because there are skills where the description doesn't match the effect provided.
They have no right to charge us for THEIR mistakes causing us to skill into useless things, or overskill into things that are currently not working as intended. Regardless of which problem is the case, it's a problem caused by CCP's own mistake, not by players making bad decisions. |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
542
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:No deal on general New Eden principles. Be lucky we got a respec at all. In EVE when new content gets added, players are stuck with their skills whether power creep issues arise or something got nerfed to novelty. If people can just pay to respec whenever they want, it destroys the impact of your decisions to invest into something.
you are soo correct |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
542
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Skill respec is only valid because there are skills where the description doesn't match the effect provided.
They have no right to charge us for THEIR mistakes causing us to skill into useless things, or overskill into things that are currently not working as intended. Regardless of which problem is the case, it's a problem caused by CCP's own mistake, not by players making bad decisions.
So this is the excuse for people going bat sh@t crazy? I wonder how many broken skills we had last build? I want to see how many people blew all their skills going straight into proto on day one and how many of those people are wanting refunds....
If a skill is broken, give the player that sp back for that skill....simple |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
203
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:25:00 -
[9] - Quote
hmm.. In general, what if you had to pay SPs to respec?
Say 500k SPs to resepec. As many times as you want to afford it.
But! With regards to this point and time.. I think a respec on the 14th makes sense.
- not all content was released so some people are doing things blind. honestly, if they had released everything- I'd say no respec as well.
- the skill system currently has black holes. For example- if you spec into dropsuit command. Anyone who specs to level 5 is a sucker right now. Spec'ing past 4 for 155k+SP nets you nothing. In the past build it equated to a 5% decrease in your sig. this build it's 0. So the system is obviously not finished or in error, etc. Dropsuit Command is another black hole trap. After level 3 you get no benefit. HEavies are opened at lv 3. To pay lv 4&5 is another expensive black hole with no explanation of any future benefits.. or how far into the future those benefits are.
CCP changed a lot of their approach to what was being released and what wasn't.
So to me, it seems fair and not really a big deal to call it a tester showcase week (CCP made it into one), and on full release when they release everything everyone gets to start fresh. If CCP can start fresh, so should everyone else.
and like the other thread- full disclosure on my part- I would respec everything exactly the way i already did. I read everything, budgeted, tested, and am very happy with my choices. The only sadness I have is I was short 50K SP to get a decent weapon after all was said and done. 10.8m SP just wasn't enough ;) |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
542
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
mollerz wrote:hmm.. In general, what if you had to pay SPs to respec?
Say 500k SPs to resepec. As many times as you want to afford it.
But! With regards to this point and time.. I think a respec on the 14th makes sense.
- not all content was released so some people are doing things blind. honestly, if they had released everything- I'd say no respec as well.
- the skill system currently has black holes. For example- if you spec into dropsuit command. Anyone who specs to level 5 is a sucker right now. Spec'ing past 4 for 155k+SP nets you nothing. In the past build it equated to a 5% decrease in your sig. this build it's 0. So the system is obviously not finished or in error, etc. Dropsuit Command is another black hole trap. After level 3 you get no benefit. HEavies are opened at lv 3. To pay lv 4&5 is another expensive black hole with no explanation of any future benefits.. or how far into the future those benefits are.
CCP changed a lot of their approach to what was being released and what wasn't.
So to me, it seems fair and not really a big deal to call it a tester showcase week (CCP made it into one), and on full release when they release everything everyone gets to start fresh. If CCP can start fresh, so should everyone else.
and like the other thread- full disclosure on my part- I would respec everything exactly the way i already did. I read everything, budgeted, tested, and am very happy with my choices. The only sadness I have is I was short 50K SP to get a decent weapon after all was said and done. 10.8m SP just wasn't enough ;)
If a skill is broken, give the player that sp back for that skill....simple |
|
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
531
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
You guys are missing another point that I regretfully didn't think of a the time. Wouldn't it just seem like a big money grab on CCP's part or make people think this game is P2W? What Dust 514 really needs is a certificate system similar to what EVE Online has. For every ship you want to skill into, there's a set of guidelines on what recommended skills you would need to pilot it with click and learn shortcuts. Do the same for drop suits in Dust, and it'll cut down on a lot of buyers remorse. It would be good for new players coming into the game to so they don't just wast those 500k SP like most of us did starting out. |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
542
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:36:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:You guys are missing another point that I regretfully didn't think of a the time. Wouldn't it just seem like a big money grab on CCP's part or make people think this game is P2W? What Dust 514 really needs is a certificate system similar to what EVE Online has. For every ship you want to skill into, there's a set of guidelines on what recommended skills you would need to pilot it with click and learn shortcuts. Do the same for drop suits in Dust, and it'll cut down on a lot of buyers remorse. It would be good for new players coming into the game to so they don't just wast those 500k SP like most of us did starting out.
I agree with you, there could and should be more education. Threads are abundant as far as education, for the meantime. If this is a players 3-4 build and they are having issues with making bad sp investments, and want a respec...is that truly due to lack of education, or bad investment?
We all know that we should play for a bit and see how the mechanics are going to effect gameplay, and it is also part of the reason the give you free fits. within the two hours of uprising when it was actually open, I ran into probably 20 or more proto users....2 hours into the build 0o |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2769
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Skill respec is only valid because there are skills where the description doesn't match the effect provided.
They have no right to charge us for THEIR mistakes causing us to skill into useless things, or overskill into things that are currently not working as intended. Regardless of which problem is the case, it's a problem caused by CCP's own mistake, not by players making bad decisions. So this is the excuse for people going bat sh@t crazy? I wonder how many broken skills we had last build? I want to see how many people blew all their sp going straight into proto on day one and how many of those people are wanting refunds.... If a skill is broken, give the player that sp back for that skill....simple It would be that simple if it wasn't a skill that literally completely invalidates the entire concept of vehicle fittings by being broken.
Our +5% PG skill doesn't give +5% PG. It supposedly gives a 5% reduction in CPU cost for PG modules, but on my tank, it doesn't seem to be doing that either. And while some people have said otherwise, my Electronics skill doesn't seem to have applied the relevant 5% CPU increase either.
When you literally can't skill into vehicles because of broken skills not working as described, and you find out after skilling into several aspects of the vehicle before realising the skills don't work, only refunding the broken skills isn't a solution. I can't fit a tank as I had planned, and as I had worked out I should be able to, and as such, I'm not going to run tanks on that character. It's an alt with a fairly tight SP limit, not my main, so I don't have SP to spare on a series of broken skills that don't apply their bonuses as advertised, and without those skills, I'm going to need to respec completely. ALL the skills that have issues need fixing and refunding, and if they aren't being fixed to match the current descriptions, then a FULL respec is needed. Or at least the whole vehicle tree needs to be refunded.
EDIT: although even then, the minimal skills I've trained for infantry were to support my intended role as a tanker, so a full respec would still be more worthwhile so I can fix my character and PROPERLY build for the new intended role. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
203
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:40:00 -
[14] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:
If a skill is broken, give the player that sp back for that skill....simple
I take it you mean if a player paid SPs for LV 4 and 5 into Dropsuit command (for example) and fall into said black hole, CCP should refund the SPS solely for LV4 and 5 of that skill? To refund the sp back for the skill would create paradoxes since the skills i mentioned were entry level prereq skills :)
I guess that would define a sense of fairness. But, I feel the rest of my reasoning is just as valid toward being wholly fair.
CCP got to shuffle and change- thus creating a situation where they got to release partial content. There's no doubt this created confusion on top of the sweeping changes they made. |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
542
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Skill respec is only valid because there are skills where the description doesn't match the effect provided.
They have no right to charge us for THEIR mistakes causing us to skill into useless things, or overskill into things that are currently not working as intended. Regardless of which problem is the case, it's a problem caused by CCP's own mistake, not by players making bad decisions. So this is the excuse for people going bat sh@t crazy? I wonder how many broken skills we had last build? I want to see how many people blew all their sp going straight into proto on day one and how many of those people are wanting refunds.... If a skill is broken, give the player that sp back for that skill....simple It would be that simple if it wasn't a skill that literally completely invalidates the entire concept of vehicle fittings by being broken. Our +5% PG skill doesn't give +5% PG. It supposedly gives a 5% reduction in CPU cost for PG modules, but on my tank, it doesn't seem to be doing that either. And while some people have said otherwise, my Electronics skill doesn't seem to have applied the relevant 5% CPU increase either. When you literally can't skill into vehicles because of broken skills not working as described, and you find out after skilling into several aspects of the vehicle before realising the skills don't work, only refunding the broken skills isn't a solution. I can't fit a tank as I had planned, and as I had worked out I should be able to, and as such, I'm not going to run tanks on that character. It's an alt with a fairly tight SP limit, not my main, so I don't have SP to spare on a series of broken skills that don't apply their bonuses as advertised, and without those skills, I'm going to need to respec completely. ALL the skills that have issues need fixing and refunding, and if they aren't being fixed to match the current descriptions, then a FULL respec is needed. Or at least the whole vehicle tree needs to be refunded. EDIT: although even then, the minimal skills I've trained for infantry were to support my intended role as a tanker, so a full respec would still be more worthwhile so I can fix my character and PROPERLY build for the new intended role.
So I asuming from what you have said, in which if true, which I will assume, CCP is aware of this and plans on not fixing it? |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
542
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
mollerz wrote:lowratehitman wrote:
If a skill is broken, give the player that sp back for that skill....simple
I take it you mean if a player paid SPs for LV 4 and 5 into Dropsuit command (for example) and fall into said black hole, CCP should refund the SPS solely for LV4 and 5 of that skill? To refund the sp back for the skill would create paradoxes since the skills i mentioned were entry level prereq skills :) I guess that would define a sense of fairness. But, I feel the rest of my reasoning is just as valid toward being wholly fair. CCP got to shuffle and change- thus creating a situation where they got to release partial content. There's no doubt this created confusion on top of the sweeping changes they made.
I never skilled into dropsuit command for the % benifit it claimed to give.....has it ever worked? |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
531
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 04:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Skill respec is only valid because there are skills where the description doesn't match the effect provided.
They have no right to charge us for THEIR mistakes causing us to skill into useless things, or overskill into things that are currently not working as intended. Regardless of which problem is the case, it's a problem caused by CCP's own mistake, not by players making bad decisions. So this is the excuse for people going bat sh@t crazy? I wonder how many broken skills we had last build? I want to see how many people blew all their sp going straight into proto on day one and how many of those people are wanting refunds.... If a skill is broken, give the player that sp back for that skill....simple It would be that simple if it wasn't a skill that literally completely invalidates the entire concept of vehicle fittings by being broken. Our +5% PG skill doesn't give +5% PG. It supposedly gives a 5% reduction in CPU cost for PG modules, but on my tank, it doesn't seem to be doing that either. And while some people have said otherwise, my Electronics skill doesn't seem to have applied the relevant 5% CPU increase either. When you literally can't skill into vehicles because of broken skills not working as described, and you find out after skilling into several aspects of the vehicle before realising the skills don't work, only refunding the broken skills isn't a solution. I can't fit a tank as I had planned, and as I had worked out I should be able to, and as such, I'm not going to run tanks on that character. It's an alt with a fairly tight SP limit, not my main, so I don't have SP to spare on a series of broken skills that don't apply their bonuses as advertised, and without those skills, I'm going to need to respec completely. ALL the skills that have issues need fixing and refunding, and if they aren't being fixed to match the current descriptions, then a FULL respec is needed. Or at least the whole vehicle tree needs to be refunded. EDIT: although even then, the minimal skills I've trained for infantry were to support my intended role as a tanker, so a full respec would still be more worthwhile so I can fix my character and PROPERLY build for the new intended role. So I asuming from what you have said, in which if true, which I will assume, CCP is aware of this and plans on not fixing it? Now I see why the patch notes were so vague and short. Heavies have been upset thinking that CCP hates them, they respected them enough to tell them they were getting nerfed... again. There were so many ninja nerfs this build, I thought I feel like I'm playing an online JRPG. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2776
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 05:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:So I asuming from what you have said, in which if true, which I will assume, CCP is aware of this and plans on not fixing it? They've said they're aware of a problem with "the vehicle PG skill" without being clear on whether the problem is an incorrect description or a correct description and an incorrect bonus being applied (which doesn't seem to be working for everyone). They've said they intend to fix it, but haven't said how they intend to fix it.
If they fix it by changing the description, I need a full respec to get out of vehicles and into something I'm going to actually be able to play.
If they fix it by actually fixing it, I need a respec on the skills I over-trained because I was trying to make my fitting work with broken skills that weren't applying the appropriate bonuses, not all of which are specifically the skills that aren't working correctly. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
203
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 05:04:00 -
[19] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:
I never skilled into dropsuit command for the % benifit it claimed to give.....has it ever worked?
Hard to say for sure- but I mostly played a successful lone wolf scout and would routinely shoot people in the back as well as kill unawares snipers from close range in hills and stuff. shrug. I think so?
I know anyone serious about stealth maxed that as well as profile dampening.
Another thing about a respec- I don't believe it would give anyone an advantage either. CCP changed a lot. A LOT. Their job isn't to punish customers. If they had a flawless launch with all the content, I'd be with you. But that is far from the case. So to me it seems fair.
The reasoning that i's new eden doesn't pass the eve test. This is a developer caused confusion. Not a player one. |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
544
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 05:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
Considering what you just said, perhaps the question should be.... will a respec help at all? if there is so many broken components. I play on the free builds they give us and have a blast..... with 0 out of 11 million sp invested
I do know as I said about the proto investers out of the gate kicking themselves in the ass and are praying and helping promote a respec for that reason alone.... making a bad investment, and with that comes alot of excuses.... and that is just being blunt and truthful |
|
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
34
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 05:09:00 -
[21] - Quote
I'd pay for a respec but with Dust I the current state, I won't give CCP any money. I miss the old build. |
The Cobra Commander
Bojo's School of the Trades
8
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 05:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Considering what you just said, perhaps the question should be.... will a respec help at all? if there is so many broken components. I play on the free builds they give us and have a blast..... with 0 out of 11 million sp invested
I do know as I said about the proto investers out of the gate kicking themselves in the ass and are praying and helping promote a respec for that reason alone.... making a bad investment, and with that comes alot of excuses.... and that is just being blunt and truthful
For me I play this game for the vehicles. My Grim is useless because it cannot move. I am still not sure if I am getting the bonuses I spent SP for. The logi LAV still does not rep. CCP knew this and left it there.
Sure you can run a cheap fit infantry outfit and have a blast...try that with a DS and see how long it is before some militia swarms knock you out of the sky.
Point is that some of these things you have to "trust" CCP got right...but looks like that did not happen lol!
Edit...would not pay them a dime for anything right now... |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
204
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 05:48:00 -
[23] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Considering what you just said, perhaps the question should be.... will a respec help at all? if there is so many broken components. I play on the free builds they give us and have a blast..... with 0 out of 11 million sp invested
I do know as I said about the proto investers out of the gate kicking themselves in the ass and are praying and helping promote a respec for that reason alone.... making a bad investment, and with that comes alot of excuses.... and that is just being blunt and truthful
Ah man I'm running a minmatar proto light and having a blast. to each their own.
but that's not relevant here. The questions isn't whether a respec will help or not. The question is a respec fair given the particulars of the situation.
It is mean spirited, if anything, to tell a player to HTFU this is business as usual when it's a developer caused situation. Also, I don't believe it will give anyone an unfair advantage. They aren't going to make extra SPs off of it. So what if they change direction even. They are just better equipped to play the game on a level playing field as opposed to being stuck with something for god knows how long because it's fubar from go. It will have only been ten days without all the content of release since the respec. There is no advantage to be had in a way it negatively affects the game. maybe a small fraction of players will become tougher opponents because of it, but is that really the concern? |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
546
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 07:38:00 -
[24] - Quote
mollerz wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Considering what you just said, perhaps the question should be.... will a respec help at all? if there is so many broken components. I play on the free builds they give us and have a blast..... with 0 out of 11 million sp invested
I do know as I said about the proto investers out of the gate kicking themselves in the ass and are praying and helping promote a respec for that reason alone.... making a bad investment, and with that comes alot of excuses.... and that is just being blunt and truthful Ah man I'm running a minmatar proto light and having a blast. to each their own. but that's not relevant here. The questions isn't whether a respec will help or not. The question is a respec fair given the particulars of the situation. It is mean spirited, if anything, to tell a player to HTFU this is business as usual when it's a developer caused situation. Also, I don't believe it will give anyone an unfair advantage. They aren't going to make extra SPs off of it. So what if they change direction even. They are just better equipped to play the game on a level playing field as opposed to being stuck with something for god knows how long because it's fubar from go. It will have only been ten days without all the content of release since the respec. There is no advantage to be had in a way it negatively affects the game. maybe a small fraction of players will become tougher opponents because of it, but is that really the concern?
I say fix the problems that people have, if they truly are problems, than look into a "respec" if one is needed.
Granting a "respec" due to skills not working correct will not fix the game, nor the problem.... perhaps lock the skill until it is fixed so nobody can skill into it., im not sure.... as long as the skill is broken, and not fixed...there is no point in a respec when people will keep skilling into the same broken skill. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2795
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 07:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Considering what you just said, perhaps the question should be.... will a respec help at all? if there is so many broken components. I play on the free builds they give us and have a blast..... with 0 out of 11 million sp invested
I do know as I said about the proto investers out of the gate kicking themselves in the ass and are praying and helping promote a respec for that reason alone.... making a bad investment, and with that comes alot of excuses.... and that is just being blunt and truthful There are a handful of broken core skills for vehicles.
Devs have mentioned that there are known issues but listed - so far - only one of the problem skills that I've seen.
If they fix the issues, AND let us respec with the skills fixed, then yes, a respec will help. If they DON'T fix it, or if they "fix" it by changing descriptions to match what the skills actually do, a respec will still help because we can skill into something useful instead. |
S0LlD SNAKE
PLAYSTATION4
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:19:00 -
[26] - Quote
No
Adapt or Die |
TheMarkOf22
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
114
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:23:00 -
[27] - Quote
they should just give u a once a month respec option to prevent the game from getting stale, but also forces the player to suffer the consequences. |
Your Absolut End
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
41
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Idc for a respec but I also wouldn't mind it being an option later on
They should make it like with the attributes in EVE, you can change them, but just once a year if I got this right. This would be totally fair for everyone and we don't have the downsides on a payed respec. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
147
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:13:00 -
[29] - Quote
I would pay 5Gé¼ to be able to change my race to have one of those new racial rooms. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
431
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:17:00 -
[30] - Quote
One of the most important principles of good free to play systems is that nothing should available for real money that can't be gained in-game through playing, so if you want to make this an option, it should be available for isk too.
That said, I'm totally against a respec option of any kind anyway. |
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
177
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:I would pay 5Gé¼ to be able to change my race to have one of those new racial rooms.
What about people like me. I didn't screw up my skill respec CCP did by screwing up the descriptions of the tank skills. Why in hell should I have to pay $5.00 when the only reason I am in this mess is due to no fault of my own. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
431
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:23:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Jack McReady wrote:I would pay 5Gé¼ to be able to change my race to have one of those new racial rooms. What about people like me. I didn't screw up my skill respec CCP did by screwing up the descriptions of the tank skills. Why in hell should I have to pay $5.00 when the only reason I am in this mess is due to no fault of my own. That's a different issue and if skills are changed in terms of descriptions or the way they work, the SP in those skills only should be refunded. |
x-KOR-x
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:36:00 -
[33] - Quote
S0LlD SNAKE wrote:No
Adapt or Die
Snake, what happened? Snake?!! Snaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake!!!!!! |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
177
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Jack McReady wrote:I would pay 5Gé¼ to be able to change my race to have one of those new racial rooms. What about people like me. I didn't screw up my skill respec CCP did by screwing up the descriptions of the tank skills. Why in hell should I have to pay $5.00 when the only reason I am in this mess is due to no fault of my own. That's a different issue and if skills are changed in terms of descriptions or the way they work, the SP in those skills only should be refunded.
No all the SP I put in tank should be refunded, which is incidentally the only thing I currently have skill point in. The reason for this is because with the changes CCP is seemingly going to make to the vehicle engineering skill (THE MOST IMPORTANT VEHICLE SKILL OF ALL OF THEM) I now have ZERO desire to be speced into vehicles. A thing I would have been able to figure out on my own and without incident if the description for the vehicle engineering skill had been accurate. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
681
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
There's respec already available, it's called "Terminate Character".
Bad thread, bad posters, half a decade old. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2801
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:There's respec already available, it's called "Terminate Character".
Bad thread, bad posters, half a decade old. And this fixes the over-use of SP on dev-confirmed broken skills without deleting BPOs or losing any earned SP?
Pretty sure you're wrong. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
178
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:02:00 -
[37] - Quote
x-KOR-x wrote:S0LlD SNAKE wrote:No
Adapt or Die Snake, what happened? Snake?!! Snaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake!!!!!!
LMFAO. Don't know how I mised this the first time around. |
Snaps Tremor
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
161
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
I'm not necessarily in favour of a respec (and if there was one it should be paid for in ISK to suck some capital out of the game), but there is no 1:1 comparison between Eve and Dust. If Eve let you allocate five months of skillpoints into whatever you wanted in the space of five minutes, you'd get equally dramatic reactions on the forum. Dust is not the same measured, math-based experience Eve is. Sometimes FPS people just want to use a scrambler pistol because it looks cool, or are invested in the lore, and if it turns out the mechanics of the game make it impossible to use effectively, they're naturally going to be pissed off about wasting that SP for something they don't see as their fault.
tl;dr: Dust is not Eve, do not compare the skill systems to kill the discussion of potential changes to it. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1410
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:30:00 -
[39] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Skill respec for sale = Bad idea
No, I will not explain why as this has been talked about for the past 5 years already. Then I will.
The issue is that whether or not this is true, this will be interpreted as buying skillpoints for IRL money, and thus P2W to the extreme. |
Deadeye Dic
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
31
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
I would support this idea, IF, the cost was $10 or more AND the person doing the respec lost 25% of their total SP.
This means that players will have to pay better attention to what they spend points and it means that players be more cautious about just spending money to respec. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |