| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
63
   |
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:53:00 -
[61] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Hi, I'm Void Echo, you may know about me through the forums for being a tank driver and killing almost everything in sight.
I'm greatly disappointed in CCP for a few reasons: 1. They only listen to assault players that constantly whine "OP" in this game,
I am stating here publically on the forums in front of the Dust 514 community and CCP that I will refuse to skill up into HAVs now until they are revived in the next build or brought back to their former glory before Open Beta.
I'm deeply saddened and disappointed that I have been forced to consider abandoning tanks and skill up into an infantry class now.....
The cost of the new tanks is WAY TOO much for it to be THAT WEAK, they are now complete glass cannons thanks to the whiny assaulters crying "OP" constantly.
The ONLY way I will remain a Tank Driver is if they don't alter any of the stats for the Madrugar or Gunnlogi and or they bring back the Surya and Sagaris, and if they nerf the OP AV equipment.
I may just quit Dust 514 all together if they continue to make AV more OP .
you know for some one who says Assault QQ a lot.... |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
372
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:56:00 -
[62] - Quote
DESTROYER416 wrote:stop pissing and moaning bout a build that you havent played with yet. i mean really its stuip. until a dev or a real ccp members gives the notes on the the build dont believe what other people tell you til then STFU and play the game. and if you dont like what i said then to bad grow up its a game thats not fully out yet and til it is there will always be a form of issues with the balancing. infanty will always complain bout vehicles and vehicles bout infanty. all you can do is grown up and suggest things if not play smarter. stop judging a game that doesn't have everything in it just stop. wait til everything is put into the game. plus you still have yours tanks bout for the few pilots in this game that want the fighters not possibly not getting them and are stuck with thr assault dropships that are probably worse then the standard one. think bout it. YOU STILL HAVE ARE TANKS,glass tanks or not they are still there.
But how much longer? You see how many people QQ over tanks in open beta, imagine how many are going to QQ on release when they're too stupid to want to spec into some AV. They won't be happy until a HAV (or my beloved LAVs) go down to half a clip from an AR. |
Void Echo
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
74
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 21:21:00 -
[63] - Quote
DESTROYER416 wrote:stop pissing and moaning bout a build that you havent played with yet. i mean really its stuip. until a dev or a real ccp members gives the notes on the the build dont believe what other people tell you til then STFU and play the game. and if you dont like what i said then to bad grow up its a game thats not fully out yet and til it is there will always be a form of issues with the balancing. infanty will always complain bout vehicles and vehicles bout infanty. all you can do is grown up and suggest things if not play smarter. stop judging a game that doesn't have everything in it just stop. wait til everything is put into the game. plus you still have yours tanks bout for the few pilots in this game that want the fighters not possibly not getting them and are stuck with thr assault dropships that are probably worse then the standard one. think bout it. YOU STILL HAVE ARE TANKS,glass tanks or not they are still there.
1st of all, learn to type and maybe people will like your posts. |
Void Echo
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
74
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 21:27:00 -
[64] - Quote
Uprising will hopefully be opposite of what they have showed us for HAVs, but if it is true, I will and so will many other tank drivers refuse to use HAVs. |
Nstomper
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
264
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 21:28:00 -
[65] - Quote
They may have been complaing because the amount of tank use in ambush , what ccp really needs to do is have a infantry only game mode no vehicles no nothing just weapons that should satisfy some people and maybe ccp will rebuff havs |
Void Echo
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
74
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 21:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
Nstomper wrote:They may have been complaing because the amount of tank use in ambush , what ccp really needs to do is have a infantry only game mode no vehicles no nothing just weapons that should satisfy some people and maybe ccp will rebuff havs
if they do that, they need to have a vehicle only game mode as well with NO AV weapons..
Uprising CCP has abandoned their "This is New Eden, adapt or die" philosophy and gone with catering to the BF and COD players and making it another call of duty. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 21:54:00 -
[67] - Quote
Nstomper wrote:They may have been complaing because the amount of tank use in ambush , what ccp really needs to do is have a infantry only game mode no vehicles no nothing just weapons that should satisfy some people and maybe ccp will rebuff havs
Nah the problem is manus peak which is a tiny map on ambush and then drop a big vehicle like a tank on it and just drive around murdering people on their spawnpoints. This doesnt happend on the OMS variant cause the map is actually larger and gives you the option to strike back. On other maps you have buildings where you can camp with AV or chokepoints where you can ambush them. Tanks are not the problem its the maps. |
Void Echo
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
74
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 21:58:00 -
[68] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Nstomper wrote:They may have been complaing because the amount of tank use in ambush , what ccp really needs to do is have a infantry only game mode no vehicles no nothing just weapons that should satisfy some people and maybe ccp will rebuff havs Nah the problem is manus peak which is a tiny map on ambush and then drop a big vehicle like a tank on it and just drive around murdering people on their spawnpoints. This doesnt happend on the OMS variant cause the map is actually larger and gives you the option to strike back. On other maps you have buildings where you can camp with AV or chokepoints where you can ambush them. Tanks are not the problem its the maps.
there are many problems dealing with this, the main being the broken balance between AV and HAV users. |
Void Echo
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 23:24:00 -
[69] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=71620
tank truce, assault class you will be hunted for what you have done |
Occupation
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 16:05:00 -
[70] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=71620
tank truce, assault class you will be hunted for what you have done
As someone who has played EVE for 9 years, I have built up a fair share of patience. It took CCP about 5 years before EVE was a game someone could say they liked, and they usually take months or even years before they fix major problems, exploits, or broken game mechanics. People that are not familiar with how CCP runs, and only have gaming experience from COD, Halo, (insert FPS), will have a tough time.
As an EVE player, I expect rough starts, and as for all of the assault guys crying that tanks are OP? Come join EVE for a single day, and just tell me what system you are in, so i can kill you in one shot while you probably dont even know that Im in the system at all, then cry OP. CCP doesn't make games to cater to COD guys, so in the meantime...
1: Welcome to New Eden, and have Patience
2: I have faith that CCP will *eventually*, *fix* tanks vs infantry and vise versa
3: Get over yourselves... This game is not and never will be for the faint hearted button mashers, and if you feel like complaining OP every time you die... I wish you the best in you're endeavors.... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |