Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Charlotte O'Dell
Faabulous
187
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Good tankers of New Eden, I am sure that by now, you have heard that our beloved Marauders have been replaced by sorry excuses for 'tanks'. These are glass cannons of the highest authority. They CANNOT take any hits and one will be confined to rail sniping inside the red line. We did not ask to lose our Marauders, which we all loved because of how they inspired fear in the redberries. We did not ask for a glass cannon that had the same stats as their militia cousins. We did not ask to have the most disgusting nerf of tanks since the missile turrets became nerf cannons! WE DID NOT ASK FOR THIS. I urge every tanker to band together and protest this horrendous happening.
To the infantry: I am positive that nothing bothers you more than a rail tank because it cannot be killed. However, let me tell you that NOBODY enjoys rail sniping. We would rather be up there, in your face, or by your side, duking it out, but alas, we cannot because of tanks becoming complete jokes. If you do not want even more rail snipers in Uprising, help us to bring back tanks that can actually give you a chance of both receiving our support, and killing us. Because right now, we are invincible annoyances due to the loss of the Marauders and the introduction of the sickening glass cannons - the Enforcer HAV's.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=71491 (related forum)
http://www.dust514-france.fr/2013/05/videocast-tour-dhorizon-des-menus-duprising.html (visual proof of the b/s in question)
Charlotte O'Dell Your friendly neighborhood tank Sagaris pilot |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2964
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
I give up GG CCP
make a tank series feedback thread on how to bring back good tank fights, CCP makes glass cannon redline tanks to replace the marauders whats even worse.......the armor one gets a bonus to blasters that are close range turrets LOL GG #DoneGivingFeedback |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
124
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
At the very least I want the names brought back. The new ones sound goofy and childish. |
Charlotte O'Dell
Faabulous
187
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
A blaster tank with increased range and damage but with no armor...sounds legit. |
BatKing Deltor
Tank Bros. DARKSTAR ARMY
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Doesn't make all to much sense to be honest, removes variety.
Why remove current and add new? but instead they just add new and adjusted a few stats? ( oh sorry copy and pasted stats )
Just add enforcers to the line of what should really be named ADV tanks appropriately. |
Void Echo
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
62
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
w...t....f... I was planning on going tank driver until retirement from this game, but it seems as though the assaults that constantly cry "OP" won this build, I might as well just skill up into the gallente assault class instead or skill up into the fighters that I heard so much about...
thank you assault whiners, you have ruined the game for tank drivers basically and thank you CCP for bending over and being the assaulters' *****es, you should be proud.... |
Charlotte O'Dell
Faabulous
189
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP totally removed an area of gameplay. Seriously. Just remove vehicles altogether at this point. This also removes any reason to have AV because NOBODY is going to use tanks, now. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
290
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
You know, I really like you tankers, I really do. If you look up my past posts you'll see that I've been against your nerfing since day one. Fortunately, we share a common enemy: These AR CoD casuals are going to be the death of Dust. But there's a way to beat them; Since they think HAV are weaker now, they're not going to spec into AV, forgetting that you're a threat. If you want to beat them, beat them on the battlefield. Full armor, guns blazing, and nothing left but a river of their tears as they cry to the forums because they lost to your now toilet paper thin tanks. |
Charlotte O'Dell
Faabulous
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:You know, I really like you tankers, I really do. If you look up my past posts you'll see that I've been against your nerfing since day one. Fortunately, we share a common enemy: These AR CoD casuals are going to be the death of Dust. But there's a way to beat them; Since they think HAV are weaker now, they're not going to spec into AV, forgetting that you're a threat. If you want to beat them, beat them on the battlefield. Full armor, guns blazing, and nothing left but a river of their tears as they cry to the forums because they lost to your now toilet paper thin tanks.
I have no doubt that I'll kill them, but it wont be fun for me or for them bc red line sniping is boring. |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Hopefully the hulls have something like a 75% reduction to all damage done to them, and they made the mods significantly better.
Alts ftw! And Cosgar, I have heard that CCP has unfortunately nerfd ARs too. Expect to see 90% of the game go scrambler rifle / flaylock pistol after SP refund.
At least I think they made it so that the minimatar logi suit is no longer the best suit in the game, but I have not spent too much time going over every single suit's stats yet. |
|
Sylvana Nightwind
Expert Intervention Caldari State
296
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
How do you know that is final version of the market? How do you know they "removed" something from it? That was separate tournament build. Why do you judge before game gets officially patched? Too bored? :P |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3790
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
I am on the fence on this one, because the CPM is more worried about the turrets and skills involved with them now than the tank at the moment.
I predict the more expensive glass cannon is not going to fare well on the current battlefields. Also the enforcers where a bit too expensive to obtain in the tournament build. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:A blaster tank with increased range and damage but with no armor...sounds legit. missiles (shield side) is also short range now..thanks missile nerf so both have to be pretty close to any damage as well. |
BatKing Deltor
Tank Bros. DARKSTAR ARMY
10
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
I'm expecting human endurance Saturday 5 match for week 4 marauder tank is a collectors item now?
How useful...
That won't disappear along with the other marauder tanks will it since its an event item?
Because then what's the point in giving it as a reward then removing it?
Scratch that... Why is it a reward if they're being removed?
I'd rather have a free falchion now for testing ( lol blows up first few minutes its out to a forge gun... )than a no longer in game saigris that sits in my inventory. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
290
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
0 Try Harder wrote:Hopefully the hulls have something like a 75% reduction to all damage done to them, and they made the mods significantly better.
Alts ftw! And Cosgar, I have heard that CCP has unfortunately nerfd ARs too. Expect to see 90% of the game go scrambler rifle / flaylock pistol after SP refund.
At least I think they made it so that the minimatar logi suit is no longer the best suit in the game, but I have not spent too much time going over every single suit's stats yet. If tanks are getting hulls, that would be a huge change of events. That's a 3rd HP bar with a **** ton of passive resistance. Supposedly, vehicles are going to get capacitors soonGäó but that could mean as soon as 2015 lol.
Nah, Light Weapon Sharpshooter is gone so ARs, lasers and HMGs can't snipe from 100m+ anymore. It's a step in the right direction.
Scrambler is going to be the effective counter to shields and armor tanking is getting a (weak) buff. It looks like they're going for some kind of weapon balance, but I'll wait until the 6th to pass judgement.
Minmatar logi suit still gets more slots than all the other suits. It's geared for armor tanking which is going to be weird, but with so many slots and blinding speed, it's still going to be the king of versatility. Until someone QQs for a nerf |
Chris F2112
187.
89
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:11:00 -
[16] - Quote
Can we at least go until May 6th before we start bringing out petitions? Come on, this is pathetic. |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am on the fence on this one, because the CPM is more worried about the turrets and skills involved with them now than the tank at the moment.
I predict the more expensive glass cannon is not going to fare well on the current battlefields. Also the enforcers where a bit too expensive to obtain in the tournament build. Hopefully you mean Large and Small turrets for vehicles, and not installations which are not in the game yet.
If you do mean the vehicle turrets, and not yet another time sink that does not help the game in any way, it has to be looked at together. IE missiles are close to medium range, blasters are close-ish range, railguns are long. Have to base damage off of those and AV. Turret skills with Marauder are already high. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3790
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
0 Try Harder wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am on the fence on this one, because the CPM is more worried about the turrets and skills involved with them now than the tank at the moment.
I predict the more expensive glass cannon is not going to fare well on the current battlefields. Also the enforcers where a bit too expensive to obtain in the tournament build. Hopefully you mean Large and Small turrets for vehicles, and not installations which are not in the game yet. If you do mean the vehicle turrets, and not yet another time sink that does not help the game in any way, it has to be looked at together. IE missiles are close to medium range, blasters are close-ish range, railguns are long. Have to base damage off of those and AV. Turret skills with Marauder are already high.
Yup, most of us don't like the +damage skills and would rather see skills that like reduce heat builds and the sorts. |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yup, most of us don't like the +damage skills and would rather see skills that like reduce heat builds and the sorts. Why? The forge gun has high damage already, it would be stupid to let a forge gun do more damage, no? All the HAVs (may) have atm is damage, why do you want to take that away too? >.> |
Charlotte O'Dell
Faabulous
195
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 06:43:00 -
[20] - Quote
0 Try Harder wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yup, most of us don't like the +damage skills and would rather see skills that like reduce heat builds and the sorts. Why? The forge gun has high damage already, it would be stupid to let a forge gun do more damage, no? All the HAVs (may) have atm is damage, why do you want to take that away too? >.>
becuz ccp only cares what the cod bois want. cod bois win. |
|
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
313
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 06:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:0 Try Harder wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yup, most of us don't like the +damage skills and would rather see skills that like reduce heat builds and the sorts. Why? The forge gun has high damage already, it would be stupid to let a forge gun do more damage, no? All the HAVs (may) have atm is damage, why do you want to take that away too? >.> becuz ccp only cares what the cod bois want. cod bois win. They haven't won yet, but they have the advantage.
(for some reason) |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:32:00 -
[22] - Quote
Problem is not enough CoD players. Face it- Black Ops 1 was awesome!
CoD players cry 95% less than those who play dust.
FACT. t(-_-t)
but really, it's not the CoD guys. It's mostly those who came from EVE. |
BOZ MR
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
92
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
0 Try Harder wrote:Problem is not enough CoD players. Face it- Black Ops 1 was awesome!
CoD players cry 95% less than those who play dust.
FACT. t(-_-t)
but really, it's not the CoD guys. It's mostly those who came from EVE. I gave up, snipin and lasin from now on. Lowrate do you want to help me to get started? |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
BOZ MR wrote:I gave up, snipin and lasin from now on. Lol, if I only red line railgun snipe in my HAV, I bet I could get #1 K/DR and keep it ^-^ Then I'd have to make Chick Chicky Boom into a legitimate player 0_0
but really have to wait to make a final decision when the new build comes out. |
BOZ MR
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
92
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
0 Try Harder wrote:BOZ MR wrote:I gave up, snipin and lasin from now on. Lol, if I only red line railgun snipe in my HAV, I bet I could get #1 K/DR and keep it ^-^ Then I'd have to make Chick Chicky Boom into a legitimate player 0_0 but really have to wait to make a final decision when the new build comes out. I do not want to rail snipe. I ll go regular snipe and wait for jets. I am leaving in 3 months the ps3 altogether so probably will not see the jets. |
WyrmHero1945
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
164
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 08:22:00 -
[26] - Quote
I don't think they'll be coming back. They were an upgrade of the madrugar/gunnlogi without any sacrifices nor role. If you have noticed CCP is categorizing vehicles by role/class. Look at dropships for example. We got the assault one great, but it's not an obvious upgrade from the basic dropship. Less HP and flight than the STD one. What about the new scout LAVs. No one is talking about those I wonder why. Less HP than STD but higher speed I believe, and other advantages/disadvantages. We have this for now and maybe in the future we will see upgrades of these vehicles roles like the dropsuits (ADV, PRO). |
BOZ MR
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
93
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 08:44:00 -
[27] - Quote
WyrmHero1945 wrote:I don't think they'll be coming back. They were an upgrade of the madrugar/gunnlogi without any sacrifices nor role. If you have noticed CCP is categorizing vehicles by role/class. Look at dropships for example. We got the assault one great, but it's not an obvious upgrade from the basic dropship. Less HP and flight than the STD one. What about the new scout LAVs. No one is talking about those I wonder why. Less HP than STD but higher speed I believe, and other advantages/disadvantages. We have this for now and maybe in the future we will see upgrades of these vehicles roles like the dropsuits (ADV, PRO). Do you have any sacifices when you go through Assault-B to Proto? People can be , i dont know what to tell you , sometimes. |
Deranged Disaster
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
97
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 09:58:00 -
[28] - Quote
Protest... lol... |
Ninjanomyx
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 09:58:00 -
[29] - Quote
BOZ MR wrote:WyrmHero1945 wrote:I don't think they'll be coming back. They were an upgrade of the madrugar/gunnlogi without any sacrifices nor role. If you have noticed CCP is categorizing vehicles by role/class. Look at dropships for example. We got the assault one great, but it's not an obvious upgrade from the basic dropship. Less HP and flight than the STD one. What about the new scout LAVs. No one is talking about those I wonder why. Less HP than STD but higher speed I believe, and other advantages/disadvantages. We have this for now and maybe in the future we will see upgrades of these vehicles roles like the dropsuits (ADV, PRO). Do you have any sacifices when you go through Assault-B to Proto? People can be , i dont know what to tell you , sometimes.
I love "Slow People". They make the world smile at them while they Middle Fingerbang your Goldfish :P |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
887
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 10:18:00 -
[30] - Quote
People saying "Don't petition til the build is out", you're idiots. We've seen the stats, CCP can tweak them, we tell them their new "tanks" are jokes and maybe they'll sort it out and actually make it right, instead of sitting and waiting hoping they'll figure it out themselves (Which, they can't seem to do at all.)
The new tank is ridiculous, it's everything we don't need or want, I mean, railgun sniping is so ******* ****, a good railgun tanker on the field means no other tank is necessary, and with a buff to railgun tanks in terms of increased zoom and ****, whos gonna go blaster or missile? -_- |
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
634
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 10:44:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:The new tank is ridiculous, it's everything we don't need or want, I mean, railgun sniping is so ******* ****, a good railgun tanker on the field means no other tank is necessary, and with a buff to railgun tanks in terms of increased zoom and ****, whos gonna go blaster or missile? -_- Even now it's gotten so repetitive and boring that I've given up tanking in skirmish and just run around ambush as a militia sniper.
Especially when I can kill 2 gunnlogi's with 3 shots within the span of 10 seconds before they even see me. But I bet CCP will look at this post and think "Oh, railguns are OP we need to nerf the damage on those" and then there's no role at all for tanks. |
BOZ MR
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
93
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 10:48:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ninjanomyx wrote:BOZ MR wrote:WyrmHero1945 wrote:I don't think they'll be coming back. They were an upgrade of the madrugar/gunnlogi without any sacrifices nor role. If you have noticed CCP is categorizing vehicles by role/class. Look at dropships for example. We got the assault one great, but it's not an obvious upgrade from the basic dropship. Less HP and flight than the STD one. What about the new scout LAVs. No one is talking about those I wonder why. Less HP than STD but higher speed I believe, and other advantages/disadvantages. We have this for now and maybe in the future we will see upgrades of these vehicles roles like the dropsuits (ADV, PRO). Do you have any sacifices when you go through Assault-B to Proto? People can be , i dont know what to tell you , sometimes. I love "Slow People". They make the world smile at them while they Middle Fingerbang your Goldfish :P Ignorance is a bliss. |
Mortedeamor
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
13
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 10:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
so ******* stupid of ccp we all saw this coming dust 514 will have no tankers at this rate and the game will fail |
Mortedeamor
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
13
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:03:00 -
[34] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:You know, I really like you tankers, I really do. If you look up my past posts you'll see that I've been against your nerfing since day one. Fortunately, we share a common enemy: These AR CoD casuals are going to be the death of Dust. But there's a way to beat them; Since they think HAV are weaker now, they're not going to spec into AV, forgetting that you're a threat. If you want to beat them, beat them on the battlefield. Full armor, guns blazing, and nothing left but a river of their tears as they cry to the forums because they lost to your now toilet paper thin tanks.
or better yet how about we all rail snipe dust 514 to death they would regret this then build a long range absurdly long rang rail sniper death machine invisible one hit kills will rain throughout dust 514 and we will be the isk grinding machine ccp is trying to turn us into to drain eve those c.o.d ar bitches whine now what will they do when every tanker who refuses to give up tanking altogether become rail snipers and they are having death rained on the from heights that they cannot reach :) how long will it be before they are screaming for ccp to nurf us another ******* way im sick of you and your ****** vehicles ccp |
Mortedeamor
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
13
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:07:00 -
[35] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:The new tank is ridiculous, it's everything we don't need or want, I mean, railgun sniping is so ******* ****, a good railgun tanker on the field means no other tank is necessary, and with a buff to railgun tanks in terms of increased zoom and ****, whos gonna go blaster or missile? -_- Even now it's gotten so repetitive and boring that I've given up tanking in skirmish and just run around ambush as a militia sniper. Especially when I can kill 2 gunnlogi's with 3 shots within the span of 10 seconds before they even see me. But I bet CCP will look at this post and think "Oh, railguns are OP we need to nerf the damage on those" and then there's no role at all for tanks. and then they nurf rail and then what dust 514 has no heavy vehicles anymore lol ccp needs to learn to distinguish between actual gamers who know what they are talking about and have been playing this game for a long time and little c.o.d bitches who pick up this game get raped by a proto tank and then hop on the forums and start crying whatever perspective they based the av hav balance in this game on it was ******* pathetic |
Charlotte O'Dell
Faabulous
202
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:30:00 -
[36] - Quote
That's it. After may 6, tankers will no longer kill eachother. From that point on, we will only shoot the AR cod bois who forced us into the hills with our railguns. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1120
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
Signed. I like blowing up Sigaris and Suryas. Please don't take that pleasure away from me |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
891
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:35:00 -
[38] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Signed. I like blowing up Sigaris and Suryas. Please don't take that pleasure away from me
We like you blowing us up too :( Now we'll never come face to face because we'll be in the mountains away from you
*sobs* |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
369
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
We need them back
Give us another slot and better stats with more hp, we still dont have prototype tanks yet |
Snaps Tremor
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
Every prerelease QQ thread just creates more evidence that certain people are melodramatic tear production facilities.
I get that after the triple SP comedown you're done playing until the 6th, but let's try to not spend the entire time leading up to that point gumming up the forum with pre-emptive whining based on incomplete information and zero hours of playtime. |
|
Mortedeamor
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 11:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
i agree char we should just all convert to that yummy rail sniper fit with the enhanced zoom hand harvest souls from the hieghts until ccp fixes em |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
823
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:27:00 -
[42] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:0 Try Harder wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yup, most of us don't like the +damage skills and would rather see skills that like reduce heat builds and the sorts. Why? The forge gun has high damage already, it would be stupid to let a forge gun do more damage, no? All the HAVs (may) have atm is damage, why do you want to take that away too? >.> becuz ccp only cares what the cod bois want. cod bois win.
Speaking of cod, they only gone and developed ANOTHER one lol 'cod ghosts' or something like that. Same ol crap, same ol engine, different scenario. |
WyrmHero1945
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
164
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:06:00 -
[43] - Quote
BOZ MR wrote:Ninjanomyx wrote:BOZ MR wrote:WyrmHero1945 wrote:I don't think they'll be coming back. They were an upgrade of the madrugar/gunnlogi without any sacrifices nor role. If you have noticed CCP is categorizing vehicles by role/class. Look at dropships for example. We got the assault one great, but it's not an obvious upgrade from the basic dropship. Less HP and flight than the STD one. What about the new scout LAVs. No one is talking about those I wonder why. Less HP than STD but higher speed I believe, and other advantages/disadvantages. We have this for now and maybe in the future we will see upgrades of these vehicles roles like the dropsuits (ADV, PRO). Do you have any sacifices when you go through Assault-B to Proto? People can be , i dont know what to tell you , sometimes. I love "Slow People". They make the world smile at them while they Middle Fingerbang your Goldfish :P Ignorance is a bliss.
Ahem they were the only vehicles that were proto. Dropships and LAVs were "logistics" without a significant improvement over STD ones. CCP decided to the same with tanks. Assault dropship doesn't have omg 3500 HP 6 high slots.
It's the truth that you guys don't want to see. Why isn't everyone petitioning to bring proto dropships/LAVs with signinficant improvements on stats? Because they cant go 30-0?????But this isn't only happening to vehicles, proto dropsuits now cost much more SP and not everyone will be able to unlock them at Uprising. Pretty much must be a carebear move from CCP for the newbies.
|
slap26
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
596
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:11:00 -
[44] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am on the fence on this one, because the CPM is more worried about the turrets and skills involved with them now than the tank at the moment.
I predict the more expensive glass cannon is not going to fare well on the current battlefields. Also the enforcers where a bit too expensive to obtain in the tournament build.
CPM should only be focusing on getting a player elected counsel going, Pls don't mess with HAV's till an actual vehicle guy is on the CPM, 0tryharder or Caeli would be a great vehicle CPM guy. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1138
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:12:00 -
[45] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am on the fence on this one, because the CPM is more worried about the turrets and skills involved with them now than the tank at the moment.
I predict the more expensive glass cannon is not going to fare well on the current battlefields. Also the enforcers where a bit too expensive to obtain in the tournament build. CPM should only be focusing on getting a player elected counsel going, Pls don't mess with HAV's till an actual vehicle guy is on the CPM, 0tryharder or Caeli would be a great vehicle CPM guy.
Amen! +1 |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:CCP totally removed an area of gameplay. Seriously. Just remove vehicles altogether at this point. This also removes any reason to have AV because NOBODY is going to use tanks, now. I've already created two threads for that. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
1332
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:45:00 -
[47] - Quote
Hmm tanks with the HP of dropships, dropships which cost as much(if not more in some cases) as tanks. It's like CCP is trying to do break vehicles, rather than just do it by accident. |
BOZ MR
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
98
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:10:00 -
[48] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am on the fence on this one, because the CPM is more worried about the turrets and skills involved with them now than the tank at the moment.
I predict the more expensive glass cannon is not going to fare well on the current battlefields. Also the enforcers where a bit too expensive to obtain in the tournament build. CPM should only be focusing on getting a player elected counsel going, Pls don't mess with HAV's till an actual vehicle guy is on the CPM, 0tryharder or Caeli would be a great vehicle CPM guy. Maybe they can switch roles with Iron becoming not CPM , regular player instead. |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
299
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:09:00 -
[49] - Quote
Caeli and slap26 are clearly better than I.
I should not even be considered >.> |
slap26
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
613
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:12:00 -
[50] - Quote
0 Try Harder wrote:Caeli and slap26 are clearly better than I.
I should not even be considered >.>
I'm a bad PR guy, you guys are both very longwinded and detailed in your posts so either of you would be a good pick.
|
|
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1308
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:13:00 -
[51] - Quote
Hooray so i assume the enforcer HAV's can now 1 shot each other. And they benefit from sniping. Yes exactly what we didnt needed. CCP's stupidity at its best. |
Medic 1879
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
147
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:16:00 -
[52] - Quote
How would you feel if in uprising you got these new glass cannon tanks and a different version that had the opposite, lower damage but higher HP they could possibly balance each other. A glass cannon is balanced by it being able to wreak havok but is very risky. A higher health lowered dam would be less risky but have less capacity for violence more support.
Yay or nay? |
BobThe843CakeMan
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
237
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:17:00 -
[53] - Quote
Medic 1879 wrote:How would you feel if in uprising you got these new glass cannon tanks and a different version that had the opposite, lower damage but higher HP they could possibly balance each other. A glass cannon is balanced by it being able to wreak havok but is very risky. A higher health lowered dam would be less risky but have less capacity for violence more support.
Yay or nay? Yay cause then we'd have fun tank battles and could support the infantry. |
Medic 1879
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
149
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:20:00 -
[54] - Quote
BobThe843CakeMan wrote:Medic 1879 wrote:How would you feel if in uprising you got these new glass cannon tanks and a different version that had the opposite, lower damage but higher HP they could possibly balance each other. A glass cannon is balanced by it being able to wreak havok but is very risky. A higher health lowered dam would be less risky but have less capacity for violence more support.
Yay or nay? Yay cause then we'd have fun tank battles and could support the infantry.
EDIT it posted quote but not what I put for some reason.
Anyway 2 posts that make sense this month I am on fire lol.
But my point is why not give up bringing back the old HAV's some people will just dismiss that due to hate for tankers. However start an idea of bringing in a set of tanks opposite to these new glass cannons stating their strengths and weaknesses so people dont just dismiss it immediatley. |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
299
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:48:00 -
[55] - Quote
oops :> |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3800
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:49:00 -
[56] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am on the fence on this one, because the CPM is more worried about the turrets and skills involved with them now than the tank at the moment.
I predict the more expensive glass cannon is not going to fare well on the current battlefields. Also the enforcers where a bit too expensive to obtain in the tournament build. CPM should only be focusing on getting a player elected counsel going, Pls don't mess with HAV's till an actual vehicle guy is on the CPM, 0tryharder or Caeli would be a great vehicle CPM guy.
Uprising is in 4 days so there are important time critical issues to get shoved out the door right then and now. Once the expansion launches, ccp recovers from their epic hangovers, and dolan can be found again the talks on government will continue.
Also we're foundation building creating database of things for future CPMs so they can hit the ground running. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |