Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Sergamon Draco
Darkstar Mercs
11
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 17:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have this question,if my corp joins alliance which are caldari loyalist,and i play faction warfares in gallente side.Does this affect my character,and which way it affects my character? sorry my grammar |
Coleman Gray
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
185
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 17:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
as of yet doesn't really matter to us |
Vaerana Myshtana
Bojo's School of the Trades
687
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 12:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hopefully it will matter, someday.
I EVE, every character and corp has "Standings" with the factions (and others).
Your standing affects what missions are available to you and how much you get paid for them.
Your standings also affect your corp's standings.
In Dust, this could potentially mean that your patriotic pro-Gallente missions could drop your corp's payouts from the Caldari. Your impact would likely be small, but they deserve it for backing the Caldari. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sergamon Draco wrote:I have this question,if my corp joins alliance which are caldari loyalist,and i play faction warfares in gallente side.Does this affect my character,and which way it affects my character? sorry my grammar
there is no loyalty among faction warfare.
it is very unlikely that a situation such as the one you bring up will affect your standing in dust. |
Martin0 Brancaleone
Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS.
225
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
If you corp joins an alliance enlisted in the Caldari militia your corp (and you) will also be enlisted in thte caldari militia. |
Guinevere Bravo
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
151
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Im a merc, as long a i can shoot people in the face i don't care who its for. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
232
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Martin0 Brancaleone wrote:If you corp joins an alliance enlisted in the Caldari militia your corp (and you) will also be enlisted in thte caldari militia.
But in DUST we will be given the option to fight for whoever we want since we are mercs
So OP is asking if he will get punished in anyway for fighting for the enemy
Until standings come in a doubt anything will happen but if the alliance/corp is big enough then 1 person may not do that much damage but a few can cause the standing to drop low enough that they may get booted from FW |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3131
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. |
|
Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe
Planetary Response Organisation
264
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
That's disappointing. I was looking forward to using standing to purchase factional dropships! |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
536
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 14:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
Foxy let me teach you the way of AFK sabotage |
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
487
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 14:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
I'd rather see a benefit to those that want to commit.
Your current take on this is to force everyone into one role, the true mercenary. Its like saying all EVE pilots should be mission runners or have to join a null sec alliance and fight for their warlord.
I want to fight for the Minmatar. I want to pledge my loyalty, wave the flag and in return receive a benefit for being loyal to the Minmatar. I should earn access to faction gear and be able to skin my equipment in Minmatar camouflage.
Stop trying to tell me what I am or I'll start calling you Soxy again. |
Vaerana Myshtana
Bojo's School of the Trades
689
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:32:00 -
[12] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
That's sad. :(
There should be rewards for sticking with a side and drawbacks to switching sides too much. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
233
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
Adding the awesome LP store with faction weapons/vehicles would also go along way to keeping us |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
83
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:39:00 -
[14] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. I'd rather see a benefit to those that want to commit. Your current take on this is to force everyone into one role, the true mercenary. Its like saying all EVE pilots should be mission runners or have to join a null sec alliance and fight for their warlord. I want to fight for the Minmatar. I want to pledge my loyalty, wave the flag and in return receive a benefit for being loyal to the Minmatar. I should earn access to faction gear and be able to skin my equipment in Minmatar camouflage. Stop trying to tell me what I am or I'll start calling you Soxy again.
^^This
My corp is already in Minmatar FW, the eggers can go PVP with WTs and farm LP if they like, why can't the mercs in my corp? |
Skyhound Solbrave
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 16:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
Lolwut? This kind of thing would completely defeat the purpose of the whole immortal mercenary backstory of Dust. Especially if you include faction specific/better equipment as a result. People would be forced to pick a side to remain competitive, effectively eliminating the need for true mercenaries. I'm not sure how Eve works but I've seen hints that each faction has their own "philosophy" and play style that will affect their specific equipment. You can ally with a faction without expecting CCP to reward you. Just require that everyone in your corp use faction specific equipment and only take contracts from that faction. There, you are effectively allied with that faction.
It would pay off in its own way. The major flaw in the merc business is the lack of loyalty. Sure you can hire this corp to help even the odds against someone who is richer or better equipped, but that richer opponent can just buy off those mercenaries to back stab you. However, a patriotic flag waving corp can be trusted not to be bought out by your opponent from another group. They may be at a disadvantage since they're committed to one type of equipment, but at least they will be loyal. Trustworthiness will be just as important as quality when it comes to hiring a corp, so making yourself loyal to a specific customer base will pay in your favor. |
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
92
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 16:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Skyhound Solbrave wrote:Lolwut? This kind of thing would completely defeat the purpose of the whole immortal mercenary backstory of Dust. Especially if you include faction specific/better equipment as a result. People would be forced to pick a side to remain competitive, effectively eliminating the need for true mercenaries. I'm not sure how Eve works but I've seen hints that each faction has their own "philosophy" and play style that will affect their specific equipment. You can ally with a faction without expecting CCP to reward you. Just require that everyone in your corp use faction specific equipment and only take contracts from that faction. There, you are effectively allied with that faction.
It would pay off in its own way. The major flaw in the merc business is the lack of loyalty. Sure you can hire this corp to help even the odds against someone who is richer or better equipped, but that richer opponent can just buy off those mercenaries to back stab you. However, a patriotic flag waving corp can be trusted not to be bought out by your opponent from another group. They may be at a disadvantage since they're committed to one type of equipment, but at least they will be loyal. Trustworthiness will be just as important as quality when it comes to hiring a corp, so making yourself loyal to a specific customer base will pay in your favor.
This. |
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 16:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
you sound like a true mercenary yourself.
do the devs ever play in-game? |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
489
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 17:08:00 -
[18] - Quote
Skyhound Solbrave wrote:Lolwut? This kind of thing would completely defeat the purpose of the whole immortal mercenary backstory of Dust. Especially if you include faction specific/better equipment as a result. People would be forced to pick a side to remain competitive, effectively eliminating the need for true mercenaries. I'm not sure how Eve works but I've seen hints that each faction has their own "philosophy" and play style that will affect their specific equipment. You can ally with a faction without expecting CCP to reward you. Just require that everyone in your corp use faction specific equipment and only take contracts from that faction. There, you are effectively allied with that faction.
It would pay off in its own way. The major flaw in the merc business is the lack of loyalty. Sure you can hire this corp to help even the odds against someone who is richer or better equipped, but that richer opponent can just buy off those mercenaries to back stab you. However, a patriotic flag waving corp can be trusted not to be bought out by your opponent from another group. They may be at a disadvantage since they're committed to one type of equipment, but at least they will be loyal. Trustworthiness will be just as important as quality when it comes to hiring a corp, so making yourself loyal to a specific customer base will pay in your favor.
How does EVE faction warfare defeat the whole immortal pilot backstory? It doesn't. It just adds another choice in the big sandbox.
DUST is unfinished. When the market is in place anybody will be able to purchase faction gear from those that do participate. If you want to remain independent you just buy your gear the same way everybody else does.
There is no commitment to a specific factions equipment. You can use whatever you want today and that doesn't change when you join a faction. |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
85
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 17:08:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
Reading over this again made me think of something.
We don't get offers from the corporations we are fighting for before the matches, we get paid retroactively based on performance. I don't imagine any mercs would go into a contract without guarantees of pay. Why am I going to subject myself to pain and suffering and potential repeated death for a cause that I don't believe in just because I'll get paid according to the battle?
That makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever.
If we were given offers of pay beforehand, we could decide on which side we preferred to work for. Maybe one side is paying in equipment that I don't use, why would I choose to fight for them? Where is the possibility for the classic "Whatever they're paying you, I'll double it"?
Given the state of the game as it is right now, we should be allowed to throw in with particular Corporation/Factions to prove our loyalty and prowess on the battlefield.
Why couldn't we choose to sign timed contracts with specific NPC corps? Say contract duration is 30 days, we get our pay for the 30 day contract (or a fraction of it with the rest disbursed at the close of the contract) and then for the next 30 days, whenever we go into battle, we are only placed on the side that we signed up with for the contract.
That is an actual mercenary business model, what we have now is just a way to be rewarded for murder and mayhem |
Goric Rumis
Dead Six Initiative
147
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 17:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Vaerana Myshtana wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. That's sad. :( There should be rewards for sticking with a side and drawbacks to switching sides too much. I disagree, I think there should be rewards for sticking with a side AND rewards for switching sides all the time. Just different kinds of rewards. |
|
G Torq
ALTA B2O
131
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 17:38:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP SoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
Dont take this the wrong way, but....
buuuuuuuuuuh |
XXfootnoteXX
DUST University Ivy League
197
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 17:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
My question is if Mercs work for faction. Will we get LP and get faction gear? BecauseThat is really what I want to see. |
Cpt Murd0ck
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
131
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 18:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
you guys are jumping to conclusions. He never said anything about LP or gear. just that we wont have standings yet which has already been said.
There is nothing to stop them introducing LP or just Faction loot for playing for that side.
personally I would rather see EVE players of that faction being able to get DUST faction gear from their LP store and "donate" it to mercs to fight their wars
I will be Minmatar all the way faction loot or not 07. |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
141
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 19:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more.
There is already zero difference between the motivations of a capsuleer and the motivations of a mercenary. We're both free agents, we both want ISK and we'll both screw anyone over to get it.
The only difference is our combat capabilities.
You cannot remove standings from Dust without also admitting you believe it was a mistake to have it in Eve in the first place.
And a lot of people would take up arms over that assessment.
|
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3139
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:38:00 -
[25] - Quote
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:do the devs ever play in-game?
Yes we do. |
|
GeneralButtNaked
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
338
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:43:00 -
[26] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:do the devs ever play in-game? Yes we do.
Must be trying to keep the servers populated. |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3139
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:45:00 -
[27] - Quote
So yea, basically I disagree.
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:There is already zero difference between the motivations of a capsuleer and the motivations of a mercenary. We're both free agents, we both want ISK and we'll both screw anyone over to get it.
We have the chance to make the motivations different. We don't have to make DUST and EVE characters have the same motivation for participating in FW. I didn't say we wouldn't introduce standings, just that we have no plans now.
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:The only difference is our combat capabilities. There are plenty of differences and we can make it as different or similar as we want. The discussion should be about what we think those differences and similarities should be, not what the must be just because the other game has it that way. These are two games, we must do what is best for each as they play very differently.
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:You cannot remove standings from Dust without also admitting you believe it was a mistake to have it in Eve in the first place.
Um... we haven't added them to DUST so there is no removing... so... yea...
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:And a lot of people would take up arms over that assessment.
OK... that discussion is on the EVE teams. Our focus is on making DUST players care about FW and making it fun for them. We care about the link between the two, but the details on the EVE side of FW are up to the EVE teams. How FW works in DUST should not be the deciding factor in how it works in EVE.
However much we at CCP like to talk about two games in one universe and all that jazz, the fact remains that these are two games. A gameplay element for one game is not necessarily good for the other. |
|
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:49:00 -
[28] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:So yea, basically I disagree. Himiko Kuronaga wrote:There is already zero difference between the motivations of a capsuleer and the motivations of a mercenary. We're both free agents, we both want ISK and we'll both screw anyone over to get it. We have the chance to make the motivations different. We don't have to make DUST and EVE characters have the same motivation for participating in FW. I didn't say we wouldn't introduce standings, just that we have no plans now. Himiko Kuronaga wrote:The only difference is our combat capabilities. There are plenty of differences and we can make it as different or similar as we want. The discussion should be about what we think those differences and similarities should be, not what the must be just because the other game has it that way. These are two games, we must do what is best for each as they play very differently. Himiko Kuronaga wrote:You cannot remove standings from Dust without also admitting you believe it was a mistake to have it in Eve in the first place. Um... we haven't added them to DUST so there is no removing... so... yea... Himiko Kuronaga wrote:And a lot of people would take up arms over that assessment. OK... that discussion is on the EVE teams. Our focus is on making DUST players care about FW and making it fun for them. We care about the link between the two, but the details on the EVE side of FW are up to the EVE teams. How FW works in DUST should not be the deciding factor in how it works in EVE. However much we at CCP like to talk about two games in one universe and all that jazz, the fact remains that these are two games. A gameplay element for one game is not necessarily good for the other.
and yet y'all talk about not opening up the market cause y'all don't want to screw up your precious EVE
what was that about dust and eve teams being independent and doing what's best for THEIR game????
|
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:do the devs ever play in-game? Yes we do.
bet you use alts |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3139
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:54:00 -
[30] - Quote
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:and yet y'all talk about not opening up the market cause y'all don't want to screw up your precious EVE
what was that about dust and eve teams being independent and doing what's best for THEIR game????
It's not just about not screwing up EVE, it's about not screwing up DUST as well.
We have teams that work on both projects, like the team I am on. We touch both EVE code and DUST code. I personally go to the EVE daily design meetings and am kept in the loop of what they are doing just as they are kept in the loop on what we are doing.
We are not say "only do what is best for one game or the other" and neither are we saying "only do what is best for the combined game."
We are trying to make all three products, DUST, EVE, and DUST/EVE awesome. The games have to be able to stand on their own, but we also want an awesome and meaningful link between them. |
|
|
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3139
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 21:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:do the devs ever play in-game? Yes we do. bet you use alts
Yes, just like in EVE our identities must be kept a secret. :) |
|
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:do the devs ever play in-game? Yes we do. bet you use alts Yes, just like in EVE our identities must be kept a secret. :)
so you can join any corps you want?
that sounds like favoritism....
didn't that create a firestorm in eve when a DEV abused his powers? |
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:09:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:and yet y'all talk about not opening up the market cause y'all don't want to screw up your precious EVE
what was that about dust and eve teams being independent and doing what's best for THEIR game????
It's not just about not screwing up EVE, it's about not screwing up DUST as well. We have teams that work on both projects, like the team I am on. We touch both EVE code and DUST code. I personally go to the EVE daily design meetings and am kept in the loop of what they are doing just as they are kept in the loop on what we are doing. We are not say "only do what is best for one game or the other" and neither are we saying "only do what is best for the combined game." We are trying to make all three products, DUST, EVE, and DUST/EVE awesome. The games have to be able to stand on their own, but we also want an awesome and meaningful link between them.
couldn't yall make a seperate dust market then that's seperated from eve and go from there?
having static prices isn't very eve-universe~ish |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3140
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:do the devs ever play in-game? Yes we do. bet you use alts Yes, just like in EVE our identities must be kept a secret. :) so you can join any corps you want? that sounds like favoritism.... didn't that create a firestorm in eve when a DEV abused his powers?
Yes, this is why our identities in EVE and DUST are a secret, to you the players. So you don't know who we are and go asking and tempting us to do stupid things.
We have an internal affairs division, they know who all our characters are, and they watch them very closely to make sure we don't cheat. |
|
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:15:00 -
[35] - Quote
you just cheated, that was 5 quotes
AI!!!!!!!
;) |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
211
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:
Yes, just like in EVE our identities must be kept a secret. :)
so you can join any corps you want? that sounds like favoritism.... didn't that create a firestorm in eve when a DEV abused his powers? It did cause problems once, yes. That's why CCP now has an Internal Affairs team that ensures that nobody abuses their insider knowledge or uses any 'DevHax' to game the system.
Also, FoxFour = Batman? |
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
lmao |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3141
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:44:00 -
[38] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:
Yes, just like in EVE our identities must be kept a secret. :)
so you can join any corps you want? that sounds like favoritism.... didn't that create a firestorm in eve when a DEV abused his powers? It did cause problems once, yes. That's why CCP now has an Internal Affairs team that ensures that nobody abuses their insider knowledge or uses any 'DevHax' to game the system. Also, FoxFour = Batman? EDIT: FoxFour also = Ninja - Dammit!
:P |
|
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:45:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Lord-of-the-Dreadfort wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:
Yes, just like in EVE our identities must be kept a secret. :)
so you can join any corps you want? that sounds like favoritism.... didn't that create a firestorm in eve when a DEV abused his powers? It did cause problems once, yes. That's why CCP now has an Internal Affairs team that ensures that nobody abuses their insider knowledge or uses any 'DevHax' to game the system. Also, FoxFour = Batman? EDIT: FoxFour also = Ninja - Dammit!
he admitted it! |
slypie11
Planetary Response Organisation
157
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 22:48:00 -
[40] - Quote
How will factions compete for our support. Also, how will you keep all the mercs from going to one corp because they promise the most money? |
|
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
212
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 23:02:00 -
[41] - Quote
slypie11 wrote:How will factions compete for our support. Also, how will you keep all the mercs from going to one corp because they promise the most money? Last I heard, it was stuff like faction specific high end loot that was one of the main motivators for sticking to a faction, another possibility being faction Loyalty Points (LP) which you would earn by participating in FW battle and LP stores where you would trade the LP for powerful faction specific gear. The motivation in both being that to earn the best version of what you want, you would need to keep playing for the faction that gives you it.
The above is mostly old, probably out of date info and speculation and should be treated as such.
There is ofc RP and RL motivators - RP being that you hate the Amarr slavers and will therefore fight for the Minmatar. RL reasons being that you hate (for arguments sake) the Imperfects, who have aligned themselves with the Caldari, so you go and fight for the Gallente. |
hooc roht
Black Soul Choir
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 23:04:00 -
[42] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:
There are plenty of differences and we can make it as different or similar as we want. The discussion should be about what we think those differences and similarities should be, not what the must be just because the other game has it that way. These are two games, we must do what is best for each as they play very differently.
One difference should be the perspective of news reports. The right watches Fox the left watches MSNBC. Why would a Merc read news reports biased towards EVE players?
Go watch Cowboy beebop. The bountyhunters had their own special bounty hunter channel....wouldn't mercs have their own news channel?
You guys are MMO roleplaying developers....and you choose to put the role playing and lore and story telling into the game.....well lets see some roleplayer writing that actually fits the role play of Dust Mercs. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2766
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 23:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. Adding the awesome LP store with faction weapons/vehicles would also go along way to keeping us
lol this not coming in Uprising? gg? lol how hard is it to bring out some Faction weapons and vehicles??? just alter some stats and new paint scheme :/ |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
212
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 23:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. Adding the awesome LP store with faction weapons/vehicles would also go along way to keeping us lol this not coming in Uprising? gg? lol how hard is it to bring out some Faction weapons and vehicles??? just alter some stats and new paint scheme :/ That just so happens to be the incredibly difficult part to get right. |
slypie11
Planetary Response Organisation
157
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 23:53:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:slypie11 wrote:How will factions compete for our support. Also, how will you keep all the mercs from going to one corp because they promise the most money? Last I heard, it was stuff like faction specific high end loot that was one of the main motivators for sticking to a faction, another possibility being faction Loyalty Points (LP) which you would earn by participating in FW battle and LP stores where you would trade the LP for powerful faction specific gear. The motivation in both being that to earn the best version of what you want, you would need to keep playing for the faction that gives you it. The above is mostly old, probably out of date info and speculation and should be treated as such. (Basically, don't take it as gospel) There is ofc RP and RL motivators - RP being that you hate the Amarr slavers and will therefore fight for the Minmatar. RL reasons being that you hate (for arguments sake) the Imperfects, who have aligned themselves with the Caldari, so you go and fight for the Gallente. I feel that standing could work easily. You stick with a faction, they see that you're reliable and trustworthy, they give you more jobs and pay you more. However, if you work for everybody and do well, everyone wants a piece of you and will pay whatever sum to get it. |
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 01:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. Adding the awesome LP store with faction weapons/vehicles would also go along way to keeping us lol this not coming in Uprising? gg? lol how hard is it to bring out some Faction weapons and vehicles??? just alter some stats and new paint scheme :/ That just so happens to be the incredibly difficult part to get right.
they tweaked the heavy into the grave easily enough...... |
XXfootnoteXX
DUST University Ivy League
198
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 01:32:00 -
[47] - Quote
XXfootnoteXX wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. My question is if Mercs work for faction. Will we get LP for faction gear? BecauseThat is really what I want to see.
No comment? |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
212
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 02:01:00 -
[48] - Quote
XXfootnoteXX wrote:XXfootnoteXX wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. My question is if Mercs work for faction. Will we get LP for faction gear? BecauseThat is really what I want to see. No comment? I think he's asleep... it's 2am in Iceland. |
Warpfiend Thanos
Destruction Initiative Enterprise
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 09:11:00 -
[49] - Quote
I like this idea CCP has for us mercs. All factions see us basically as "guns", you don't buy a gun and ask: "Who has been shot by this gun before? Anybody I know?" (Well IRL you might ask). I'll fight for you with 100% dedication while you pay me, if at the end of our contract you decide not to rehire me, then you understand that I will be a free agent and possibly fighting against you the day after my contract expires.
Also, how dare you people make CCP Foxfour answer real questions about real Dev related things?! We already have people that do that, they are called "everybody but Foxfour"
|
Aqil Aegivan
The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION
98
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 09:30:00 -
[50] - Quote
Warpfiend Thanos wrote:I like this idea CCP has for us mercs. All factions see us basically as "guns", you don't buy a gun and ask: "Who has been shot by this gun before? Anybody I know?" (Well IRL you might ask). I'll fight for you with 100% dedication while you pay me, if at the end of our contract you decide not to rehire me, then you understand that I will be a free agent and possibly fighting against you the day after my contract expires. Also, how dare you people make CCP Foxfour answer real questions about real Dev related things?! We already have people that do that, they are called "everybody but Foxfour"
Maybe we should be able to choose free "faction fittings" when we engage in FW battles. The level of the suits could increase as we engage in more battles for that faction as they become sure we can be trusted with the expensive stuff. |
|
Warpfiend Thanos
Destruction Initiative Enterprise
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 09:54:00 -
[51] - Quote
Aqil Aegivan wrote:Warpfiend Thanos wrote:I like this idea CCP has for us mercs. All factions see us basically as "guns", you don't buy a gun and ask: "Who has been shot by this gun before? Anybody I know?" (Well IRL you might ask). I'll fight for you with 100% dedication while you pay me, if at the end of our contract you decide not to rehire me, then you understand that I will be a free agent and possibly fighting against you the day after my contract expires. Also, how dare you people make CCP Foxfour answer real questions about real Dev related things?! We already have people that do that, they are called "everybody but Foxfour" Maybe we should be able to choose free "faction fittings" when we engage in FW battles. The level of the suits could increase as we engage in more battles for that faction as they become sure we can be trusted with the expensive stuff.
Damn you! That's a pretty sexy idea actually...
Ok let's do what Aquil said |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3147
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 10:25:00 -
[52] - Quote
XXfootnoteXX wrote:XXfootnoteXX wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. My question is if Mercs work for faction. Will we get LP for faction gear? BecauseThat is really what I want to see. No comment?
As someone else points out, I was asleep.
As for LP for fight? We are not introducing LP in Uprising. That does not mean never, just we have other priorities for now. |
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2771
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 12:00:00 -
[53] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:XXfootnoteXX wrote:XXfootnoteXX wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. My question is if Mercs work for faction. Will we get LP for faction gear? BecauseThat is really what I want to see. No comment? As someone else points out, I was asleep. As for LP for fight? We are not introducing LP in Uprising. That does not mean never, just we have other priorities for now.
So whats the POINT of FW other than just being able to pick sides and q sync full teams? |
Parson Atreides
Ahrendee Mercenaries
205
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 12:04:00 -
[54] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:XXfootnoteXX wrote:XXfootnoteXX wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:We don't currently have any plans for any kind of standings for DUST mercenaries participating in FW. As it stands we would rather see DUST players playing for the side they want to, and more importantly the side that will pay more. My question is if Mercs work for faction. Will we get LP for faction gear? BecauseThat is really what I want to see. No comment? As someone else points out, I was asleep. As for LP for fight? We are not introducing LP in Uprising. That does not mean never, just we have other priorities for now.
Is there going to be a devblog soon explaining why anyone should want to participate then? I was under the impression fighting for a certain faction enough gave access to certain gear and that it would be a Day One sort of deal. Without that, I see little incentive to actually playing FW.
I think CCP forgets sometimes that the majority of people don't really care about the lore or which faction wins what--it's the rewards we're interested in. |
IceStormers
Destruction Initiative Enterprise
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 12:14:00 -
[55] - Quote
I like the idea of fighting for the side that pays the most
Squad leaders should choose the side that pays the most based on the people in the squad
Hard part would be deciding how to determine which side would pay the most, cant be a set isk value, could be a multiplier?
Based on skill level, keeps the teams balanced, the higher your skill level the better your expected pay (AFKers would slowly get less and less pay for games)
Based on faction loyalty, adds depth, but means your stuck to one faction
Based on which side needs the merc the most at that point, values would alter during the picking stage, some would get forced to a side due to space at the end of the picking phase, would add in a nice hold off selecting a side to see if the contract value would increase
Not sure how it could be implemented but im eager to see the plans |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
491
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 12:45:00 -
[56] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:As someone else points out, I was asleep.
Sleeping? Then Uprising really is in Sony QA. |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3148
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 15:33:00 -
[57] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:As someone else points out, I was asleep. Sleeping? Then Uprising really is in Sony QA.
That is a really interesting connection you have made there.... not sure how I feel about it. Does it also mean I am done Fanfest preparation or that I was just resting before digging into it? |
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
491
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 15:35:00 -
[58] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:As someone else points out, I was asleep. Sleeping? Then Uprising really is in Sony QA. That is a really interesting connection you have made there.... not sure how I feel about it. Does it also mean I am done Fanfest preparation or that I was just resting before digging into it?
I suppose you deserve a day of rest now and then.
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2550
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 15:41:00 -
[59] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:As someone else points out, I was asleep. Sleeping? Then Uprising really is in Sony QA. That is a really interesting connection you have made there.... not sure how I feel about it. Does it also mean I am done Fanfest preparation or that I was just resting before digging into it? I suppose you deserve a day of rest now and then. I'm surprised...
I thought FoxFour was like Sadako/Samara from The Ring.
"I never sleep" |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |