Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dusters Blog
Galactic News Network
214
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 18:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
'Sources are reporting that last night a Planetary Response Organization cruiser shipment carrying between 300-600M ISK to a holding corporation facility, was intercepted by a striketeam of highly trained PFBHz operatives. No one is sure how the PFBHz obtained the intel or intended route of the cruiser, but within minutes they boarded the vessel, killed the entire crew including the protection detail and made off with a considerable amount of currency. Normally this amount of ISK is escorted by a flotilla of ships but for some untold reason PRO chose to go with a skeleton crew and small protection detail of mercs.'
read the rest here: http://tinyurl.com/blwntcn |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
393
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 18:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
LMAO
+1 for originality |
Lorena Dxun
The Red Guards
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Or you can read a realistic assessment of what happened:
GNN Article on Battle (With the footage of the fight)
Final Update
Seriously don't understand the point in overtly making up a story when there already is a story to tell. FYI, for those reading, this is the account Grezkev setup for me (Olivia) to use on the forums and in-game. Grez will prolly be mad at me for posting this but whatever....
I don't usually get into this GNN v Dusters crap (because, let's face it, it's stupid....hell they still use OUR name but whatever)...this however is just beyond my ability to fully comprehend.
The battle was waged on Ashged III. It was not in space. The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception.
What's the point of changing the story, when a story already exists? What's the point of trying to make up drama when there already exists a good deal of drama? At this point I have to call in the definition of the word "news":
The Dictionary wrote:news /n(y)o-Poz/ Noun
1) Newly received or noteworthy information, esp. about recent or important events. 2) A broadcast or published report of news.
In this context, I don't see how making up an event and reporting on the generalities of an ACTUAL event somehow breakdown into the concept of "news". This is the issue the REAL GNN has had with Dusters for years, especially back in the MAG days....changing reports (back then it was our reports) around to fit some sort of "general storyline" that Dusters made up. Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you.
Sorry, didn't mean to start drama and I know we'll hear more in responses about this....but I just felt the need to say something. The truth is available for anyone who takes the time to read it, and the MAG community all know it as well. Our posts are still up! History of the GNN Corporation. |
Phoenix Archer 128
Better Hide R Die
137
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
If this was in space (EVE, not Dust) 600mil ISK is worth nothing. Not even the space used to "report" on it.
So yeah...another score for the Duster's Blog... |
slap26
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
525
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote:Or you can read a realistic assessment of what happened: GNN Article on Battle (With the footage of the fight) Final UpdateSeriously don't understand the point in overtly making up a story when there already is a story to tell. FYI, for those reading, this is the account Grezkev setup for me (Olivia) to use on the forums and in-game. Grez will prolly be mad at me for posting this but whatever.... I don't usually get into this GNN v Dusters crap (because, let's face it, it's stupid....hell they still use OUR name but whatever)...this however is just beyond my ability to fully comprehend. The battle was waged on Ashged III. It was not in space. The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception. What's the point of changing the story, when a story already exists? What's the point of trying to make up drama when there already exists a good deal of drama? At this point I have to call in the definition of the word "news": The Dictionary wrote:news /n(y)o-Poz/ Noun
1) Newly received or noteworthy information, esp. about recent or important events. 2) A broadcast or published report of news. In this context, I don't see how making up an event and reporting on the generalities of an ACTUAL event somehow breakdown into the concept of "news". This is the issue the REAL GNN has had with Dusters for years, especially back in the MAG days....changing reports (back then it was our reports) around to fit some sort of "general storyline" that Dusters made up. Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you. Sorry, didn't mean to start drama and I know we'll hear more in responses about this....but I just felt the need to say something. The truth is available for anyone who takes the time to read it, and the MAG community all know it as well. Our posts are still up! History of the GNN Corporation.
z |
Tolen Rosas
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote:Or you can read a realistic assessment of what happened: GNN Article on Battle (With the footage of the fight) Final UpdateSeriously don't understand the point in overtly making up a story when there already is a story to tell. FYI, for those reading, this is the account Grezkev setup for me (Olivia) to use on the forums and in-game. Grez will prolly be mad at me for posting this but whatever.... I don't usually get into this GNN v Dusters crap (because, let's face it, it's stupid....hell they still use OUR name but whatever)...this however is just beyond my ability to fully comprehend. The battle was waged on Ashged III. It was not in space. The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception. What's the point of changing the story, when a story already exists? What's the point of trying to make up drama when there already exists a good deal of drama? At this point I have to call in the definition of the word "news": The Dictionary wrote:news /n(y)o-Poz/ Noun
1) Newly received or noteworthy information, esp. about recent or important events. 2) A broadcast or published report of news. In this context, I don't see how making up an event and reporting on the generalities of an ACTUAL event somehow breakdown into the concept of "news". This is the issue the REAL GNN has had with Dusters for years, especially back in the MAG days....changing reports (back then it was our reports) around to fit some sort of "general storyline" that Dusters made up. Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you. Sorry, didn't mean to start drama and I know we'll hear more in responses about this....but I just felt the need to say something. The truth is available for anyone who takes the time to read it, and the MAG community all know it as well. Our posts are still up! History of the GNN Corporation.
u have got 2 be the most pitiful person on the internet. no one cares about your claim to GNN. if u have a copyright sue them. this is all for fun.
I for prefer the RP aspect and what they bring to this very bland, boring game. u pretend to be a real news organization and take things super cereal in this videogame? ITS ALL MAKE BELIEVE!! go get a life plz.
|
Grezkev
The Red Guards
157
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tolen Rosas wrote:Lorena Dxun wrote:Or you can read a realistic assessment of what happened: GNN Article on Battle (With the footage of the fight) Final UpdateSeriously don't understand the point in overtly making up a story when there already is a story to tell. FYI, for those reading, this is the account Grezkev setup for me (Olivia) to use on the forums and in-game. Grez will prolly be mad at me for posting this but whatever.... I don't usually get into this GNN v Dusters crap (because, let's face it, it's stupid....hell they still use OUR name but whatever)...this however is just beyond my ability to fully comprehend. The battle was waged on Ashged III. It was not in space. The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception. What's the point of changing the story, when a story already exists? What's the point of trying to make up drama when there already exists a good deal of drama? At this point I have to call in the definition of the word "news": The Dictionary wrote:news /n(y)o-Poz/ Noun
1) Newly received or noteworthy information, esp. about recent or important events. 2) A broadcast or published report of news. In this context, I don't see how making up an event and reporting on the generalities of an ACTUAL event somehow breakdown into the concept of "news". This is the issue the REAL GNN has had with Dusters for years, especially back in the MAG days....changing reports (back then it was our reports) around to fit some sort of "general storyline" that Dusters made up. Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you. Sorry, didn't mean to start drama and I know we'll hear more in responses about this....but I just felt the need to say something. The truth is available for anyone who takes the time to read it, and the MAG community all know it as well. Our posts are still up! History of the GNN Corporation. u have got 2 be the most pitiful person on the internet. no one cares about your claim to GNN. if u have a copyright sue them. this is all for fun. I for prefer the RP aspect and what they bring to this very bland, boring game. u pretend to be a real news organization and take things super cereal in this videogame? ITS ALL MAKE BELIEVE!! go get a life plz.
LoL if ya don't care why'd ya respond??????????????????????????????????????
MUAH!
|
MassiveNine
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
125
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Phoenix Archer 128 wrote:If this was in space (EVE, not Dust) 600mil ISK is worth nothing. Not even the space used to "report" on it.
So yeah...another score for the Duster's Blog...
Hmmm... last I checked we are playing dust... so what's your point? |
DustMercsBlog
Galactic News Network
17
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:48:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tolen Rosas wrote: go get a life plz.
QFT
|
Phoenix Archer 128
Better Hide R Die
138
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
MassiveNine wrote:Phoenix Archer 128 wrote:If this was in space (EVE, not Dust) 600mil ISK is worth nothing. Not even the space used to "report" on it.
So yeah...another score for the Duster's Blog... Hmmm... last I checked we are playing dust... so what's your point? Last I checked, cruisers aren't present in Dust... |
|
Grezkev
The Red Guards
157
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 20:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Phoenix Archer 128 wrote:MassiveNine wrote:Phoenix Archer 128 wrote:If this was in space (EVE, not Dust) 600mil ISK is worth nothing. Not even the space used to "report" on it.
So yeah...another score for the Duster's Blog... Hmmm... last I checked we are playing dust... so what's your point? Last I checked, cruisers aren't present in Dust... EDIT: And I re-read it..."Normally this amount (300-600mil) of ISK is escorted by a flotilla of ships"....um...no. Just LOLno.
lol I didn't even notice that.
600mil could fit on a god damn Debit Card |
Protoman Is God
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 20:02:00 -
[12] - Quote
It doesn't matter who reports on it or even how they report it. CBJ+PRO still took probably the biggest "L" of DUST thus far.
http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110201055613/illcommunity/images/c/c8/Naslost.gif |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
158
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 20:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
This |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
707
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 21:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote:Or you can read a realistic assessment of what happened: GNN Article on Battle (With the footage of the fight) Final UpdateSeriously don't understand the point in overtly making up a story when there already is a story to tell. FYI, for those reading, this is the account Grezkev setup for me (Olivia) to use on the forums and in-game. Grez will prolly be mad at me for posting this but whatever.... I don't usually get into this GNN v Dusters crap (because, let's face it, it's stupid....hell they still use OUR name but whatever)...this however is just beyond my ability to fully comprehend. The battle was waged on Ashged III. It was not in space. The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception. What's the point of changing the story, when a story already exists? What's the point of trying to make up drama when there already exists a good deal of drama? At this point I have to call in the definition of the word "news": The Dictionary wrote:news /n(y)o-Poz/ Noun
1) Newly received or noteworthy information, esp. about recent or important events. 2) A broadcast or published report of news. In this context, I don't see how making up an event and reporting on the generalities of an ACTUAL event somehow breakdown into the concept of "news". This is the issue the REAL GNN has had with Dusters for years, especially back in the MAG days....changing reports (back then it was our reports) around to fit some sort of "general storyline" that Dusters made up. Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you. Sorry, didn't mean to start drama and I know we'll hear more in responses about this....but I just felt the need to say something. The truth is available for anyone who takes the time to read it, and the MAG community all know it as well. Our posts are still up! History of the GNN Corporation.
Yeah! Why read a made up story when you can read fair and balanced propaganda!
If anyone took inebriated, or even reportedly inebriated gamer rage even slightly seriously there wouldn't be but 2 or 3 corporations. Gamers for Christ, and maybe GǪ a few others.
I would probably go on a tirade and, well, you probably don't want to even hear about it. But judging by how much I yell at the tv and curse and rage every time I lose a tank, I can understand someone being somewhat disappointed that their money got stolen.
Plus I thought the little blurb here in the forums was kind of cute. A re-imagining of eventsGǪ But they could have left the part out about ships. Maybe written it like a noir thriller where a handful of mercenaries plan to meet in the desert in order to hand over a briefcase of ISK when a rival gang ambushes them and puts a stop to their money laundering schemeGǪ good times. |
Prius Vecht
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 23:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
+1 have always enjoyed what they bring to the game. the way some of you get bent out of shape about things said about your make believe avatars in a fantasy sci fi world is downright scary. |
Phoenix Archer 128
Better Hide R Die
144
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 23:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:+1 have always enjoyed what they bring to the game. the way some of you get bent out of shape about things said about your make believe avatars in a fantasy sci fi world is downright scary. If he actually fact-checked and had somewhat of an idea what he was talking about, maybe he'd get better results.
But seriously, saying 600mil lost in EVE (unless I'm missing my complimentary Dust cruiser, which then I need to go bug CCP again) is just downright silly, especially that it needs a fleet to guard...people transport billions of ISK alone everyday without problems (unless they autopilot...then they're kinda asking for the gankers to come after them...)
Fact-checking: As important in-game as it is IRL...
EDIT: Overlooked another silly part of this...ISK transfer isn't through physical means, in Dust or EVE... |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
122
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 23:41:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ok what I'm getting from this is that dusters role plays, but does it badly.
Like I mean they could have gone with "the PFBhz warbarge caught wind of a cash stash pro had hidden on a nearby planet. Despite the fact that PFBhz war barge contained a large sum that could be lost in the battle, the Mercs knew they were more than enough to raid the stash without risking the loss of their own cash. They attacked the stash and after decimating the pro forces, they were able to claim the now ownerless loot.
I mean if you're going to make up stuff, make it sound believable an logical in the realm of the story. >.> |
Prius Vecht
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 00:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
fact check in a videogame? as important as it is in real life? lololololol....
oh wait u were serious werent u? plz kill urself.
once again youre butthurt because they didnt fact check the imaginary or play make believe the way you'd like? get over yourselves its not that serious. again the whole thing is pretend, u look petty. |
Phoenix Archer 128
Better Hide R Die
145
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 00:27:00 -
[19] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:fact check in a videogame? as important as it is in real life? lololololol....
oh wait u were serious werent u? plz kill urself.
once again youre butthurt because they didnt fact check the imaginary or play make believe the way you'd like? get over yourselves its not that serious. again the whole thing is pretend, u look petty. You're new to EVE, aren't you? |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
158
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 00:49:00 -
[20] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:fact check in a videogame? as important as it is in real life? lololololol....
oh wait u were serious werent u? plz kill urself.
once again youre butthurt because they didnt fact check the imaginary or play make believe the way you'd like? get over yourselves its not that serious. again the whole thing is pretend, u look petty.
^ Is this guy serious? |
|
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1806
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 00:53:00 -
[21] - Quote
Grezkev wrote:Prius Vecht wrote:fact check in a videogame? as important as it is in real life? lololololol....
oh wait u were serious werent u? plz kill urself.
once again youre butthurt because they didnt fact check the imaginary or play make believe the way you'd like? get over yourselves its not that serious. again the whole thing is pretend, u look petty. ^ Is this guy serious? This is srz bznz bro. Keep up@!#%^!! |
Tolen Rosas
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:00:00 -
[22] - Quote
oh here comes grezkev gain telling us how he has the super secret recipe for GNN. leave it alone ur worse than contrabanjoe with the spam. |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
546
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:05:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote:The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception.
Source? ContraBanJoe argues that he was attempting to use the contract system to move money between two corporations. You even quote his public statement... Your article was just as guilty of sensationalising and misreporting the issue as Dusters Blog. |
Lorena Dxun
The Red Guards
12
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:09:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Lorena Dxun wrote:The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception. Source? ContraBanJoe argues that he was attempting to use the contract system to move money between two corporations. You even quote his public statement... Your article was just as guilty of sensationalising and misreporting the issue as Dusters Blog.
It was agreed through the corporate purchase system...meaning the system provided for the means of the contract purchase, unless you're accusing PFBH of hacking....lol. The contract was purchased legitimately and legally within the parameters of the game. That's what I meant by it was "agreed through the corporate purchase system." It may not have been agreed by the Party's as far as their intentions....but that's their problem.
Haven't you heard of the phrase "buyer beware"?
It's not sensationalizing, otherwise I wouldn't have put Joe's follow up statement (which you pointed out). People can toss around the meaning of what went on however much they want but those are the facts. Joe clarified what he did, but it was intercepted legally and withing the framework of the corporate purchasing system. |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
546
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:20:00 -
[25] - Quote
What exactly would a "random interception" involve, then, if this is a "legal interception"? |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
284
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
HNNNNNNGGGG NNNNNNGGHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!! |
Vaerana Myshtana
Bojo's School of the Trades
540
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:38:00 -
[27] - Quote
Dusters Blog wrote:'Sources are reporting that last night a Planetary Response Organization cruiser shipment carrying between 300-600M ISK to a holding corporation facility, was intercepted by a striketeam of highly trained PFBHz operatives. No one is sure how the PFBHz obtained the intel or intended route of the cruiser, but within minutes they boarded the vessel, killed the entire crew including the protection detail and made off with a considerable amount of currency. Normally this amount of ISK is escorted by a flotilla of ships but for some untold reason PRO chose to go with a skeleton crew and small protection detail of mercs.' read the rest here: http://tinyurl.com/blwntcn
Um... Sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but ISK is an electronic currency.
You cannot transport ISK directly.
|
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
546
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:55:00 -
[28] - Quote
Vaerana Myshtana wrote:Dusters Blog wrote:'Sources are reporting that last night a Planetary Response Organization cruiser shipment carrying between 300-600M ISK to a holding corporation facility, was intercepted by a striketeam of highly trained PFBHz operatives. No one is sure how the PFBHz obtained the intel or intended route of the cruiser, but within minutes they boarded the vessel, killed the entire crew including the protection detail and made off with a considerable amount of currency. Normally this amount of ISK is escorted by a flotilla of ships but for some untold reason PRO chose to go with a skeleton crew and small protection detail of mercs.' read the rest here: http://tinyurl.com/blwntcn Um... Sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but ISK is an electronic currency. You cannot transport ISK directly. This is my issue with players making assumptions in their lore-friendly explanations for things... |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:59:00 -
[29] - Quote
Dusters Blog wrote:'Sources are reporting that last night a Planetary Response Organization cruiser shipment carrying between 300-600M ISK to a holding corporation facility, was intercepted by a striketeam of highly trained PFBHz operatives. No one is sure how the PFBHz obtained the intel or intended route of the cruiser, but within minutes they boarded the vessel, killed the entire crew including the protection detail and made off with a considerable amount of currency. Normally this amount of ISK is escorted by a flotilla of ships but for some untold reason PRO chose to go with a skeleton crew and small protection detail of mercs.' read the rest here: http://tinyurl.com/blwntcn
system name and kill report or it didn't happen. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 02:01:00 -
[30] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Lorena Dxun wrote:The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception. Source? ContraBanJoe argues that he was attempting to use the contract system to move money between two corporations. You even quote his public statement... Your article was just as guilty of sensationalising and misreporting the issue as Dusters Blog.
that doesn't make very much sense. no one contracts isk. you lose a brokers fee doing so. |
|
Phoenix Archer 128
Better Hide R Die
148
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 02:04:00 -
[31] - Quote
low genius wrote:Dusters Blog wrote:'Sources are reporting that last night a Planetary Response Organization cruiser shipment carrying between 300-600M ISK to a holding corporation facility, was intercepted by a striketeam of highly trained PFBHz operatives. No one is sure how the PFBHz obtained the intel or intended route of the cruiser, but within minutes they boarded the vessel, killed the entire crew including the protection detail and made off with a considerable amount of currency. Normally this amount of ISK is escorted by a flotilla of ships but for some untold reason PRO chose to go with a skeleton crew and small protection detail of mercs.' read the rest here: http://tinyurl.com/blwntcn system name and kill report or it didn't happen. Good idea.
I really want to see how you'd actually transport ISK in a ship; any ship. And not in the form of mods, ammo, rigs, skillbooks, PLEX, tradegoods, and any other physical item that I have not included. |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
546
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 02:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
low genius wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Lorena Dxun wrote:The battle was a corporation battle between PRO and PFBH, agreed through the corporate purchase system. It was not a random interception. Source? ContraBanJoe argues that he was attempting to use the contract system to move money between two corporations. You even quote his public statement... Your article was just as guilty of sensationalising and misreporting the issue as Dusters Blog. that doesn't make very much sense. no one contracts isk. you lose a brokers fee doing so.
Have you tried loading a list of 1700 members and scrolling through it in order to give an alt your funds? Enjoy the puddle that used to be your PS3. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2248
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 02:29:00 -
[33] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote:Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. Sorry, but this is incorrect.
CCP makes only part of the story. Players make the rest.
Dusters still aren't a part of that with their take on things, but you're not 100% correct either.
CCP creates lore, and shapes the story, and players alter that story, sometimes in unpredictable ways. There are times where CCP might stage a scripted event, but how players react to that event frequently shapes New Eden more than the event itself did. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
122
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 02:51:00 -
[34] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:fact check in a videogame? as important as it is in real life? lololololol....
oh wait u were serious werent u? plz kill urself.
once again youre butthurt because they didnt fact check the imaginary or play make believe the way you'd like? get over yourselves its not that serious. again the whole thing is pretend, u look petty.
I don't know you but I already want to knock you the **** out.
Not many people that have angered me enough for me to say that.
Your the second person. Congrats |
Delanus Turgias
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
87
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:15:00 -
[35] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote: ...Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you...
Congratulations, butthead, you just missed the entire point of EvE Online with that sentence. You do understnad that the WHOLE ******* POINT of EvE is that they players make the story, not some lore wizards in the back. There are no quests that you do not make for yourself (sorta). The Battle For Caldari Prime? That's US writing the story. Yeah, we may not do all the details, but it's still our story. You just completely lost all credibility as a journalist for me.
Eat **** and Die. |
Zekain Kade
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1104
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:18:00 -
[36] - Quote
Damnit PFBH, I had some very reliable Intel about where the ISK was actually heading.
Looks like the blind orphans on Caldari prime wont be getting a new orphanage built for them after all. I mean, it's not like they're living under chunks of a massive, burning ship right now, or anything..... |
Veritas Vitae
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
102
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
PFBHz |
Lorena Dxun
The Red Guards
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:34:00 -
[38] - Quote
Delanus Turgias wrote:Lorena Dxun wrote: ...Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you...
Congratulations, butthead, you just missed the entire point of EvE Online with that sentence. You do understnad that the WHOLE ******* POINT of EvE is that they players make the story, not some lore wizards in the back. There are no quests that you do not make for yourself (sorta). The Battle For Caldari Prime? That's US writing the story. Yeah, we may not do all the details, but it's still our story. You just completely lost all credibility as a journalist for me. Eat **** and Die.
Me: Community makes the story, drama, development, not a single person/group You: Players make the story.
lol. Cool Story "Bro"! Glad to see we see eye-to-eye. Be sure to tell yourself that.
o_0 |
Delanus Turgias
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
87
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote:Delanus Turgias wrote:Lorena Dxun wrote: ...Heads up Dusters: CCP Makes the story, not you. The Community makes the drama and the development...not you...
Congratulations, butthead, you just missed the entire point of EvE Online with that sentence. You do understnad that the WHOLE ******* POINT of EvE is that they players make the story, not some lore wizards in the back. There are no quests that you do not make for yourself (sorta). The Battle For Caldari Prime? That's US writing the story. Yeah, we may not do all the details, but it's still our story. You just completely lost all credibility as a journalist for me. Eat **** and Die. Me: Community makes the story, drama, development, not a single person/group You: Players make the story, not a group of lone wizards lol. It seems we had a misunderstanding..... Glad to see we see eye-to-eye. Perhaps I used bad wording. Dunno why you think we are in disagreement; my whole point was that the community makes the story....whereas this story takes the events of the community and puts its own story to it. But whatever, I'm happy knowing that we agree even if you didn't see it. Sorry for confusion, but I 100% agree with you. I was only trying to express that the players make the story, not Dusters. o_0 But that's the thing, is that he can make the story. There is so much that goes on in EvE that CCP doesn't write about, that's why people like Dusters like to sensationalize things. Hell, CCP can work it into the story like "Early reports received conflicting intel, ranging from a raid in space to a heist". Nevertheless, don't be uptight about people making up their own story for events. We've all done it for some fiction that we've read/watched/whatever. |
Lorena Dxun
The Red Guards
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:55:00 -
[40] - Quote
Delanus Turgias wrote: But that's the thing, is that he can make the story. There is so much that goes on in EvE that CCP doesn't write about, that's why people like Dusters like to sensationalize things. Hell, CCP can work it into the story like "Early reports received conflicting intel, ranging from a raid in space to a heist". Nevertheless, don't be uptight about people making up their own story for events. We've all done it for some fiction that we've read/watched/whatever.
Well I guess you're right but that's not completely why I responded. Uptight about someone making their own story, not so much; oversensationalizing a corp battle that was just that---a corp battle......that's what I was partly uptight about. I mean, others in response to this thread, the facebook group, and the other various discussions on this issue have pointed out various faults with the story-type; ranging from why would ISK be travelling in cargo ships like this to why would this be considered closer to the EVE-side of things when it's Dust related.
I guess I just don't understand the need when all that happened is easy to understand. If Dusters would have had some drama story about the two Contracted parties (the organizations that setup the contracts) and the planet involved...all data which is listed in game and by the videos....then it would have been an amazing story. I try not to delve deep into that kind of fiction unless it's what people want.
But I see what you're saying and I realize that I guess I came off as a whiny *****. But whatever is "made up" should be done with consistency and a mind toward the community as a whole. Besides, there's so many different responses to all this its difficult to discern the worthwhile ones from the irrelevant ones. |
|
Grezkev
The Red Guards
160
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:57:00 -
[41] - Quote
Lorena stfu and let ppl complain. Who cares. |
Veritas Vitae
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
103
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:59:00 -
[42] - Quote
All I know is that this argument is not even worth popcorn, and you two GNNs just need to be a little more creative (and Dusters you need to get better at sensationalizing and do less misinformation) with your "News" networks. Considering the negative bias the community seems to hold in part or whole against both, it will be hard to get a good reputable news-cast going for a while unless you can change the presentation to better attract positive feedback. |
Delanus Turgias
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
87
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 04:01:00 -
[43] - Quote
Lorena Dxun wrote:Delanus Turgias wrote: But that's the thing, is that he can make the story. There is so much that goes on in EvE that CCP doesn't write about, that's why people like Dusters like to sensationalize things. Hell, CCP can work it into the story like "Early reports received conflicting intel, ranging from a raid in space to a heist". Nevertheless, don't be uptight about people making up their own story for events. We've all done it for some fiction that we've read/watched/whatever.
Well I guess you're right but that's not completely why I responded. Uptight about someone making their own story, not so much; oversensationalizing a corp battle that was just that---a corp battle......that's what I was partly uptight about. I mean, others in response to this thread, the facebook group, and the other various discussions on this issue have pointed out various faults with the story-type; ranging from why would ISK be travelling in cargo ships like this to why would this be considered closer to the EVE-side of things when it's Dust related. I guess I just don't understand the need when all that happened is easy to understand. If Dusters would have had some drama story about the two Contracted parties (the organizations that setup the contracts) and the planet involved...all data which is listed in game and by the videos....then it would have been an amazing story. I try not to delve deep into that kind of fiction unless it's what people want. But I mean, even EVE players will read that story and be like "huh? Why would ISK be transferred like that?" There isn't clarity to the story; some people are even asking if its a Dust event or an EVE event. That kind of confusion shouldn't exist in a "news" report (hence my citing of the word). But I see what you're saying and I realize that I guess I came off as a whiny *****. But whatever is "made up" should be done with consistency and a mind toward the community as a whole. Besides, there's so many different responses to all this its difficult to discern the worthwhile ones from the irrelevant ones. If I offended you or ruined your opinion of me then I apologize. I wholeheartedly agree. I realize I sounded like an ass in my first post, but thank you for being reasonable with me. I do think some level of consistency should be there, in terms of "filling in the gaps" of lore like this, but still. I think we should let the community take some baby steps towards writing some lore, and maybe we'll see some really cool stuff come out of it. |
Veritas Vitae
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
103
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 04:14:00 -
[44] - Quote
PFBHz Intel Office received word of an upcoming large ISK transfer being moved by Planetary Response Organization via local relay station. Checking data logs, it is identified that a PRO striketeam has been deployed to secure the relay station to ensure transfer of funds is successful. PFBHz accepts a defense contract in the region from the 24th Imperial Crusade to safeguard the relay stations, deploys logistical support to secretly utilize the relay for their own ends. PRO and PFBHz squads engage in a lopsided firefight as PRO was not expecting a deployment of such high-profile mercenaries to such a backwater relay station in such short time. PFBHz logistical suppport re-routes PRO funding through back-access hacks and successfully acquires funding as their contract from the crusade expires, and PRO forces are forced to withdraw with their mission being unsuccessful. |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
160
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 04:17:00 -
[45] - Quote
Veritas Vitae wrote:PFBHz Intel Office received word of an upcoming large ISK transfer being moved by Planetary Response Organization via local relay station. Checking data logs, it is identified that a PRO striketeam has been deployed to secure the relay station to ensure transfer of funds is successful. PFBHz accepts a defense contract in the region from the 24th Imperial Crusade to safeguard the relay stations, deploys logistical support to secretly utilize the relay for their own ends. PRO and PFBHz squads engage in a lopsided firefight as PRO was not expecting a deployment of such high-profile mercenaries to such a backwater relay station in such short time. PFBHz logistical suppport re-routes PRO funding through back-access hacks and successfully acquires funding as their contract from the crusade expires, and PRO forces are forced to withdraw with their mission being unsuccessful.
+1
Best post in this whole thread |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |