Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
670
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
On a random physicisty note this link http://what-if.xkcd.com/20/ |
Fraceska
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
260
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:28:00 -
[32] - Quote
Railguns weaponize velocity as others have said the Forge Gun is just a larger version of the sniper rifle with a higher muzzle velocity. The friction is so great that in the milliseconds after being fired it ignites the air particles themselves but that doesn't last since air resistance slows the round enough that its not a line of fire behind it.
When the rail gun hits its the pressure wave that does damage. A single shot from a rail gun on a tank should rip buildings apart. Pass right through a tank leaving the crew as a messy red streak from the exit hole. And all but rip a body apart. Personal shields must incredibly powerful to stop a round with a velocity of 4,200 m/s. |
G Torq
ALTA B2O
97
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:37:00 -
[33] - Quote
80 GJ Railgun 149 KJ After-Eight wafer
so, 1 shot from the large railgun turret equals 536,913 thin chocolate wavers. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
87
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:53:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:mollerz wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:mollerz wrote:
You're a cantaloupe.
^^^ good quote ^^^ From the movie Real Love, and the best/most well acted scene ever put to film IMO. You mean True Romance? OR did you see some foreign translation of it? but yes! spot on :D Dennis Hopper vs. Walken? PFFT! Defines FTW! Yah your right. My bad. Been a long time. Even though, don't know how the hell I kittened that up. It truly is an amazing scene though: The full scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM&feature=youtube_gdata_playerA little on the racist side, although I don't think that Clarence's dad was a racist, and that the only reason he said what he did was out of spite and to avoid torture.
Nah- he wasn't racist- he was just a former mean alcoholic who knew how to push people's buttons :D After all, he hadn't killed anyone since the 80s! lolz. |
Joseph Ridgeson
Cactus Rats
12
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 20:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
Just the thing being fired would pretty much kill anything around it. 80 GJ is a hell of a lot of force. 1 ton (2,000 pounds / 907.185 kilos) of TNT gives off 4.184 GJ of energy. Even the puny side blasters give off over four and a half tons of TNT, with a rate of fire of 857.1 rounds a minute.
Be well. |
Fraceska
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
260
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 21:13:00 -
[36] - Quote
We should be given ammunition types like in EvE though some choices don't seem all that valid for a weapon traveling kilometers a second. I would use slugs of the heaviest, densest metal I could find for ground based warfare and watch all those expensive things go boom. |
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 01:02:00 -
[37] - Quote
This was fun for me, so I'll give it another wack. I think found a way to make the 80Gj fit. Lets say this isn't the work done on the projectile, but the energy consumed per second of operation, or in otherwords power.
Using a formula found at http://home.insightbb.com/~jmengel4/rail/rail-intro.html no idea if it is correct, but lets work with it and see what we get.
v(muz)=I(2DLu/m)^.5 v(muz)=Muzzle velocity (Meters/Second) D=Length of rails (Meters) m=Mass of projectile (Kilograms) I=Current through projectile (Amperes) L=Width between rails (Meters) u=1.26x10^-6 (The magnetic permeability of free space, Henries/Meter)
Lets assume vmuz=4000m/s
Going on what I remember what the turrets look like, D=6m L=0.25m
and lets say mass m=2kg
The only thing left unknown is the current. Solving for that I find I=2.90 Mamps
This is almost the same problem thats given on the website, but the writer says it actually takes 6.5Ma to do this because of friction and air drag. Thats about 2.24 times the calculated result. Eventhough I know this will be higher for greater Vmuz, I'm going to cheat a little bit and just use that for other calculations. I think it will be within the ballpark.
Just for fun, I'll make up some numbers for the other weapons that I think could fit. So now lets use some numbers that our forge gun could be using. Vmuz=7000m/s D=1m L=0.1m m=2kg Solving, I=11.27Ma..........2.24x11.27Ma=25.2Ma
The sniper rifle Vmus=2500m/s D=1.5m L=0.05m m=0.5kg Solving I=4.06Ma............2.24x4.06Ma=9.1Ma
The Large RailGun VMus=7000m/s D=6m L=0.25 m=10kg Solving I=11.39Ma.........2.24x11.39Ma=25.29Ma
We know the power consumption from P=E/t =80Gj/1s=80Gw Doc Brown would be proud, to bad its not 1.21Gw
and P=V*I V=P/I=80Gw/25.29Ma=3.16kv
So we get a railgun at 25.29Ma and 3.16kv from 80Gw or 80Gj That doesn't sound that bad, although, now for the bad part.
kinetic energy=0.5*m*v^2 Turret: KE=0.5*10kg*(7000m/s)^2=245Mj Forge Gun: KE=0.5*2kg*(7000m/s)^2=49Mj
This would mean the turret should be doing 5 times the damage of the forge gun, however, it seems like they are doing the same damage, so they must be using the same projectile mass, which doesn't make much since because why not just have a forge gun on a stand instead of a huge turret.
|
Don Von Hulio
UnReaL.
133
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 01:27:00 -
[38] - Quote
This is a pretty cool thread, im not gonna lie. And even though im not all that good with physics problems, i still thought the guns did not live up to their name. lol
CCP need to overhaul all the weapons with more particle effects, and more bad assitude in general. Firing any rail based weapon should look like an explosion from its point of origin, and then there needs to be (depending on the planets atmosphere) more of a delayed boom as the round flies passed you.
The Sniper rifles should at least have a somewhat explosive impact, and CCP can just shove "Even though it is a rail gun still, the blast from a round thats not a direct hit does not generate enough force to break through modern shields." into the lore.
Shields should also react accordingly. I want to see lasers refracting, rounds bouncing/deforming/exploding as they are vaporized by the shield.
But for the Tank Rail and the emplacement, it should have a slight radius buff, but bigger explosion appearance when firing and when a round makes contact.
I doubt they will scale the weapons to make them politically correct, but they could at least make them sound and appear beefier.
Edit: I hope alot of people from CCP see this thread so they can have a better idea of what they are supposed to be portraying. |
Shaszbot
Angels of Anarchy AL3XAND3R.
22
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 01:47:00 -
[39] - Quote
VicBoss wrote:So unless physics works different in Iceland....
So they are 80 GJ railguns that is 80,000,000,000 J
Work equals change in energy
80,000,000,000= 1/2 M V^2
assuming the mass of railgun projectile is 100 kg (prolly on the heavy side)
V= 28,284 M/S
Seems to me you're assuming 100% efficient conversion of electrical energy into kinetic. Rarely does that happen.
|
Fraceska
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
261
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 02:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
They built the Jump Gates, can travel faster than the speed of light and have immortality. I think superconductor efficiency is a non-issue.
Another thing is what alloys are they using to prevent arcing and that amount of sheer electromagnetic energy pushing the rails apart has to be incredibly strong. I don't see snipers changing out rails every few shots from damage. Recoil from a rail gun is not linear (forward to back) but expanding out as the forces react upon one another. That is the problem of building man portable and vehicle mounted rails guns is their resilience to those forces. |
|
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 02:50:00 -
[41] - Quote
Aighun wrote:Like many things in Dust 514 they are so advanced they have gone all the way around the other side and become antiquated versions of themselves. They have technological "improvements" too. Just look at the badminton shuttlecocks that pass for Mass Driver rounds. It's hilariously ineffective. |
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:09:00 -
[42] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:There are an awful lot of assumptions here, most importantly that gravity and atmospheric density on Dust planets are the same as Earth's. 16GN is not a measurement that would exist anywhere other than our own planet. Unless I missed something Pent'noir was referencing the energy (work) for change in position, not gravitational force.
But yeah it would be pretty elaborate to have a muzzle drop discussion for different planet densities. Different averaged gravities near a planetary surface would also change movement rates on clones, vehicles, don't want to even contemplate the effects on Dropships. |
Fraceska
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
261
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Django Quik wrote:There are an awful lot of assumptions here, most importantly that gravity and atmospheric density on Dust planets are the same as Earth's. 16GN is not a measurement that would exist anywhere other than our own planet. Unless I missed something Pent'noir was referencing the energy (work) for change in position, not gravitational force. But yeah it would be pretty elaborate to have a muzzle drop discussion for different planet densities. Different averaged gravities near a planetary surface would also change movement rates on clones, vehicles, don't want to even contemplate the effects on Dropships.
Also air composition at that point. Not every habitable planet is going to have the same concentrations of gases. And what about inhospitable ones? How will all those gases effect a weapon? What is the atmospheric pressure of those worlds? Higher or lower wind speeds? Moisture content? All of that could effect how any weapon performs. It would be hilariously terrible if they included that much detail.
Quick this is a high pressure/gravity world got to change to lighter ammo and a heavy suit to be able to even move! |
Logi Bro
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
946
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
Well, if you want to get all technical....
-Why does the MCC just spontaneously explode when its health runs out? Shouldn't it slowly deteriorate and then fall to pieces? But nope, it looks perfectly fine until the last shot then it auto-detonates.
-Why do I die when my armor runs out? What if I'm being shot in the leg? Since when has anyone died instantly from a bullet to the leg?
-Why do handheld forge guns do more than the massive railguns on tanks?
-Why are we only allowed to use better technology when we receive imaginary SP points?
-Why does losing a battle award you the same things as winning?
-etc. etc. etc. |
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:17:00 -
[45] - Quote
VicBoss wrote: So they are 80 GJ railguns that is 80,000,000,000 J
Work equals change in energy
Good thread VicBoss. Plus one.
Not to be a wet blanket here but is that 80GJ the energy put into the projectile or the energy used in the system to then move said projectile. If the later the amount would be less than 80 GJ. Probably significantly so.
Obviously the only way to be sure is for us all to get together with a railgun and experiment. That and rig a grill above the wire coils so we can grill up some Mongolian barbecue. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
489
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:23:00 -
[46] - Quote
It seems like that's the energy being put in to me because it's on the same power scale as the blaster, and there's no way each blaster round has that much force put into it |
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:26:00 -
[47] - Quote
Fraceska wrote:Also air composition at that point. Not every habitable planet is going to have the same concentrations of gases. And what about inhospitable ones? How will all those gases effect a weapon? What is the atmospheric pressure of those worlds? Higher or lower wind speeds? Moisture content? All of that could effect how any weapon performs. It would be hilariously terrible if they included that much detail.
Quick this is a high pressure/gravity world got to change to lighter ammo and a heavy suit to be able to even move! Funny I know.
We must be on the same page. Including drag (from gasses) had occurred to me. For weapons it's generally insignificant unless said object is moving a ridiculous velocity (*cough* railguns *cough*) or said gas is particularly dense (gas giants at certain altitudes).
In total agreement with you Fraceska that too much science can be a bad thing. My opinion is too little isn't any better. Half the fun (and headache) is finding the balance. |
Fraceska
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
261
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:34:00 -
[48] - Quote
Indeed I feel the same. There needs to be a balance. A reasonable explanation for what they do have, but the ability to overlook the minute details of some aspects is a must. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3118
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 03:37:00 -
[49] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Well, if you want to get all technical....
-Why does the MCC just spontaneously explode when its health runs out? Shouldn't it slowly deteriorate and then fall to pieces? But nope, it looks perfectly fine until the last shot then it auto-detonates.
-Why do I die when my armor runs out? What if I'm being shot in the leg? Since when has anyone died instantly from a bullet to the leg?
-Why do handheld forge guns do more than the massive railguns on tanks?
-Why are we only allowed to use better technology when we receive imaginary SP points?
-Why does losing a battle award you the same things as winning?
-etc. etc. etc.
1. Armor rating is relative, its how much power the ship provides itself to keep reactors in containment. In eve online hull layer does this as well, and its possible to have a bleed though hit and crit the ship instantly killing it despite large amounts of hull left though this is extremely rare.
2. Same for you infantry 'armor' rating is how well the nanites are pumping though your veins to keep the body up and aware, if a critical level is reached all the sustained injuries becomes too much for the nanites to handle and you collapse from physical exhaustion until the nanites get rebooted.
3. To further the 80GJ question, how much of that energy is used in generating mass for the shot? Likewise the Forge gun is a easily modified mining blaster of sorts, its efficient in cracking asteroids apart and plays Hell Mary on materials and not though pure kinetics. Resonance and destabilization of the atomic structure is probably played into the forge gun shots as well.
4. All soldiers are preprogrammed to a point. Allowing us to use any militia gear effectively provided firmware updates go out. As for more advanced technologies, you subconscious manages most of the suits higher automated functions that would make most soldiers jealous. For example adding a field resonance to a magnetic bubble that perfectly counters the defensive harmonics of the target shields is purely managed by your subconscious. Higher tech equipment requires a greater deal of understanding the technology and how it all works and training your subconcious to be aware of all the featuers to minimally make it work. In the similar example above lets say you pick up a prototype AR but you never trained it up in the first place. Fire it and BLAM the entire thing slags in the armature killing you instantly because you subconciously didn't know how to form the magnetic bubble proper.
5. As the great and glorious overlords trying to kill us all.
|
Charlotte O'Dell
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 06:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
BUFF RAILGUNS! ANY TANK HIT BY A RAILGUN SHOULD STOP EXISTING! IN FACT...EVERYTHING IN THE PATH OF A RAILGUN SHOULD STOP EXISTING. THAT INCLUDES THE MCC...WHY WOULD WE USE MISSILES WHEN WE HAVE RAILGUNS!? NOW IM JUST MAD. **** IT. BUFF EVERYTHING. 1 SHOT KILLS ALL DAY BC MY RAILGUN HAS DONE A FULL 360 AND BECOME A CANNON...LIKE FROM THE 17TH CENTURY. WTF. KILL ME NOW. |
|
G Torq
ALTA B2O
99
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 07:19:00 -
[51] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Fraceska wrote:Also air composition at that point. Not every habitable planet is going to have the same concentrations of gases. And what about inhospitable ones? How will all those gases effect a weapon? What is the atmospheric pressure of those worlds? Higher or lower wind speeds? Moisture content? All of that could effect how any weapon performs. It would be hilariously terrible if they included that much detail.
Quick this is a high pressure/gravity world got to change to lighter ammo and a heavy suit to be able to even move! Funny I know. We must be on the same page. Including drag (from gasses) had occurred to me. For weapons it's generally insignificant unless said object is moving a ridiculous velocity (*cough* railguns *cough*) or said gas is particularly dense (gas giants at certain altitudes). In total agreement with you Fraceska that too much science can be a bad thing. My opinion is too little isn't any better. Half the fun (and headache) is finding the balance.
Look at this bit of Video, around 1:08 and forward |
IRuby Heart
DIOS EX.
420
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 07:25:00 -
[52] - Quote
Am i the only one lost in this thread? Sorry, Physics was a class I cheated and BS'd my way through in high school and college.
I now make 6.75$ an hour at McDonalds. |
Don Von Hulio
UnReaL.
137
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 09:30:00 -
[53] - Quote
IRuby Heart wrote:Am i the only one lost in this thread? Sorry, Physics was a class I cheated and BS'd my way through in high school and college.
I now make 6.75$ an hour at McDonalds.
Go and do construction work. Pays alot better, you can learn something, and if you actually work hard you stay in shape at the same time. Also requires no real need for college.
|
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
74
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 09:49:00 -
[54] - Quote
Opps, I didn't realize that the railguns are actually Coil Guns. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Hybrid_Turrets It says what they are at the bottom under Technology.
Well that would invalidate my second post with calculating the power used by the entire system. Why not just call them Coil Guns. The principles are completely different. There are no rails, just a bunch of coils in a line, thus coil gun. However, I guess the kinetic energy formulas still stand because it is shooting a projectile, it does have mass, and velocity.
Looking at it that the 80Gj refers to the work done on the projectile and not the energy used by the system. The projectiles must have huge amounts of mass or ridiculous velocity.
Or I guess there is always the other option. Their coil guns suck at timing and much of the work done on the projectile is invalidated by opposing magnetic forces. Like an iron bullet stuck between two magnets. Or atleast thats how I see it. I've never built one, but come on, I think i've seen ppl on youtube build them for highschool science projects. |
VicBoss
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
178
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 23:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
Shaszbot wrote:VicBoss wrote:So unless physics works different in Iceland....
So they are 80 GJ railguns that is 80,000,000,000 J
Work equals change in energy
80,000,000,000= 1/2 M V^2
assuming the mass of railgun projectile is 100 kg (prolly on the heavy side)
V= 28,284 M/S
Seems to me you're assuming 100% efficient conversion of electrical energy into kinetic. Rarely does that happen.
VicBoss wrote:So unless physics works different in Iceland.... So they are 80 GJ railguns that is 80,000,000,000 J Work equals change in energy 80,000,000,000= 1/2 M V^2 assuming the mass of railgun projectile is 100 kg (prolly on the heavy side) V= 28,284 M/S Now that makes it from my house in Wisconsin to Iceland roughly 3 min. That would be enough to orbit almost ANY planet That hits the 600 m max range in .02 seconds. If you had a 30 FPS film of the railgun you would not even catch the projectile in 1 frame The air pressure would be enough to blow clones away Now lets assume the shield tank weighs about 100 Metric tons (M1 abrams tank weighs 60 Metric Tons) Then M1V1= (M1+M2) V2 V2 = v tank V2 = 31 M/S That is more than the top speed of the tank, so if it is moving at full speed it will be pushed back at about 10 m/s So CCP are they really 80GJ railguns? Even assuming something insane, like a 50% railgun inefficency, just half all the speeds and double the times and it is still outrageous. I lol so bad when i was doing this!
So ya, this is what I do when I don't play Dust |
Victor Czar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 00:06:00 -
[56] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:VicBoss wrote: So they are 80 GJ railguns that is 80,000,000,000 J
Work equals change in energy
Good thread VicBoss. Plus one. Not to be a wet blanket here but is that 80GJ the energy put into the projectile or the energy used in the system to then move said projectile. If the later the amount would be less than 80 GJ. Probably significantly so. Obviously the only way to be sure is for us all to get together with a railgun and experiment. That and rig a grill above the wire coils so we can grill up some Mongolian barbecue. Commonsense would indicate that the 80GJ's refers to the projectile energy because otherwise it wouldn't actually tell you anything about the system. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3131
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 00:52:00 -
[57] - Quote
Victor Czar wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:VicBoss wrote: So they are 80 GJ railguns that is 80,000,000,000 J
Work equals change in energy
Good thread VicBoss. Plus one. Not to be a wet blanket here but is that 80GJ the energy put into the projectile or the energy used in the system to then move said projectile. If the later the amount would be less than 80 GJ. Probably significantly so. Obviously the only way to be sure is for us all to get together with a railgun and experiment. That and rig a grill above the wire coils so we can grill up some Mongolian barbecue. Commonsense would indicate that the 80GJ's refers to the projectile energy because otherwise it wouldn't actually tell you anything about the system.
Dunno current navy railguns use energy going in as a measurement since that's predictable. Not energy out. current marks are at 15MJ though if i recall right. goal is for 60MJ gun. |
Jax Thrife
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 01:01:00 -
[58] - Quote
VicBoss wrote:So unless physics works different in Iceland.... So they are 80 GJ railguns that is 80,000,000,000 J Work equals change in energy 80,000,000,000= 1/2 M V^2 assuming the mass of railgun projectile is 100 kg (prolly on the heavy side) V= 28,284 M/S Now that makes it from my house in Wisconsin to Iceland roughly 3 min. That would be enough to orbit almost ANY planet That hits the 600 m max range in .02 seconds. If you had a 30 FPS film of the railgun you would not even catch the projectile in 1 frame The air pressure would be enough to blow clones away Now lets assume the shield tank weighs about 100 Metric tons (M1 abrams tank weighs 60 Metric Tons) Then M1V1= (M1+M2) V2 V2 = v tank V2 = 31 M/S That is more than the top speed of the tank, so if it is moving at full speed it will be pushed back at about 10 m/s So CCP are they really 80GJ railguns? Even assuming something insane, like a 50% railgun inefficency, just half all the speeds and double the times and it is still outrageous. I lol so bad when i was doing this! So ya, this is what I do when I don't play Dust
you sir have done your homework lol |
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
74
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 01:11:00 -
[59] - Quote
I wonder what the reason for that could be. When someone says Joule as an electrical power input, it can be a bit confusing. Atleast it is confusing to me. However, it may make more sense to a physicist than an electrical engineer. Maybe it makes the math easier to just leave everything in joules rather than converting it to watts. If I saw that, then the first thing that would pop in my head would be to just divide it by 1s to get watts because that's what my school class taught me, but ofcourse, the time could be anything 0.3s, 5s, 1ps... Interesting, I'll have to look up why they do that. |
Dr Debo Galaxy
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
247
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 02:28:00 -
[60] - Quote
I just think this is were people are drawing the line on physics. Not the drop uplinks creating mini wormholes. Not the inertia dampener. Not the any number of other things that don't really make sense science wise. This a rail gun is the point were people are saying "no, this just doesn't make sense". |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |