Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Gusk Hevv
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 11:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
Problem with tanks? A tank can kill an AV guy multiple times but when a AV guy kills a tank it probably is the end of him as an AV guy can spawn with AV fits much more frequently. Tanks are weak GTFO your 'sate zone' ARs and HTFU.
I have spent over 2 mil SP into tanks and there are people who spent much more; you spent SP on dropsuits we spent it in on tanks hence why we don't have good 'pubstomp' infantry fittings like you so we remain in our tanks.
I have yet to see a noob in EVE telling me I'm a coward for flying Battleships and I should use Frigates like him (HAVs are more like dreadnoughts in eve but I can't fly them :( ) |
BlG MAMA
PLAYSTATION4
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 11:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:BlG MAMA wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:BlG MAMA wrote:Mr Zitro wrote:Tanks are easy to kill, make a squad and try to adapt. If you want tank fits and av fits go get my book how about when people stay with tanks far in the red zone and you cant get to them and all they do is tank sniping? 2 players. Both skill into LIght Weapon Sharpshooter. One brings Laser Rifle, the other brings Swarm Launcher. There aren't many redzones deep enough to hide. Yeah in Ambush red zone is not that deep so you can get to them but i was playing Skirmish and the red zone is prety deep for the opposing team and there was this tank far into red zone and high on a hill who was sniping objective A , it was easy for him to get behind the hill if there was any danger for him. In another Skirmish game i encountered same move but it was in our team. I found that a prety cheap move. They have a tank that hides as soon as it starts taking fire. You have a dedicated person directing fire at it so it keeps staying hidden. Can you say "stalemate"? The Laser is a viable defense against approaching enemy infantry as well as being available to support the AV guy when the tank pops up again. The tank will spend the entire match hiding, and achieve precisely nothing. Or if you can lure it a little too far forward before opening fire, you can get lucky and rip it open. Or if your team brings a second AV player with a Forge Gun, you have a decent chance of popping the tank before it has time to run. And yes, I've done this to a tank before (Laser + Swarm. I was Swarm). I got more kills with my SMG than the tank guy got with his tank. I only had a couple of early-game hack points, and the 100 points I got for kills on softened-up infantry (thank you Laser guy), but I was the primary reason why an enemy had 0 WP and 0 kills even though he spend the whole match in a Gunnlogi.
yeah prety much , he killed me 3 times untill i learned his position high in the hills far in the red zone
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 11:37:00 -
[33] - Quote
Yawn... didn't read anything in this thread, but:
I want to see CCP implement a tanks only ambush variant.
How awesome would this be? Even if it was just for a week or even a day. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
931
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 11:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ambush is full of tryhard tactics, tbh. They try the same weapons/tactics in skirmish but it isn't so problematic because there are objectives to be taken. So, one may end up losing the game if they aren't focused on winning. |
Chances Ghost
Prototype Technology Corp.
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 11:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Ambush is full of tryhard tactics, tbh. They try the same weapons/tactics in skirmish but it isn't so problematic because there are objectives to be taken. So, one may end up losing the game if they aren't focused on winning.
Theres no reason to win skirmish, just killing is oftin the correct way to play it, usuing objectives more as bait than anything else |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
32
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 13:24:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Yawn... didn't read anything in this thread, but:
I want to see CCP implement a tanks only ambush variant.
How awesome would this be? Even if it was just for a week or even a day.
no tanker would go to a tank only game, they'd lose their tanks lol. the whole idea of them using tanks in ambush is so that they won't lose their tanks, all the guys talking about tears and trash like that are simply chicken ***** avoiding skirmish. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Yawn... didn't read anything in this thread, but:
I want to see CCP implement a tanks only ambush variant.
How awesome would this be? Even if it was just for a week or even a day. no tanker would go to a tank only game, they'd lose their tanks lol. the whole idea of them using tanks in ambush is so that they won't lose their tanks, all the guys talking about tears and trash like that are simply chicken ***** avoiding skirmish.
Do you tank? I do. In my experience it is far more risky to bring a tank into ambush than skirmish. So your reasoning makes no sence to me.
As an experienced tanker, I would actually be quite interested in a tanks only ambush, for nothing more than fun factor (money isn't everything, and for those to whom it is, I pitty you). Wouldn't be able to do it often though. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
132
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
Derek Barnes wrote:Every Ambush match I get into now, there are Gunnlogis, Madrugars, or on some occasions Sagaris'. Usually I'm on the team with the better tank(s) , but they still clear the field of enemies before anyone does much. I think it's only going to get worse from here on out. Or am I just having very bad luck finding ambush or OMS matches?
You brought it on yourself
Infact the entire community brought tanks into ambush because all they did was complain and whine about how they cannot destroy a 2mil armored vehicle with an AR so the HAV got nerfed, its mods got nerfed and removed, the turrets got nerfed
AV got buffed, it got made eazy, you have milita AV if your too lazy to even skill up, its easy to kill a tank and to top it off if your in skirmish you dont need to bother with tanks just save up enough WP and blap it out of the game with the press of a button
So tanks are now in ambush, not enough time to get an OB in 90% of games so no easy way out to destroy the tank, also it would require a little bit of teamwork so that means drop uplinks and an ambush party but again very unlikely to happen
You get what you cried for
|
|
CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
966
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:23:00 -
[39] - Quote
I've deleted some personal attacks from this thread. |
|
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
216
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mr Zitro wrote:Derek Barnes wrote:Mr Zitro wrote: Sorry I'm not in the mood to talk with an idiot, you joined Zion. That is why you suck at something so simple as killing a tank. Enjoy and learn to adapt There's the Zitro I know , always trying to pull insults whenever he's losing at an argument Also I started this conversation about tankers on my team ending matches so fast, the rest of the team doesn't get to do much. How did we get to talking about tanks on the opposite team than me? I know how to stay out of sight of enemy tanks in ambush matches, I'm a ghost in the wind. Funny you know me but I don't know you
I don't know Derek either, but that's not necessarily a bad thing as he clearly waits until he has something valuable to say before posting, argues effectively and without resorting to personal attacks, and so on (not to mention his point is spot on, whereas your own is . . . meh).
Your 'advice', as Derek suggests, is horrible. Only bad tankers that sit there and take it or tankers in crap tanks are killed by that method. Smart tankers high-tail it out of range, reassess the situation, then reengage, often from a different direction. Sometimes you get them, because you've swarmed effectively and they didn't have enough infantry support, but once again, we're talking about a bad tanker.
AV nades are great, and if a tanker stands there and lets you and your squad nade spam them, yep, it's dead, no matter how good it is. Zitro's advice isn't completely wrong but it's not enough alone. Compliment the AV nades with some real AV, a high quality swarm or forge, and the good tanks will crack, too. Multiple good tanks, with good drivers, covering each other and with solid infantry support, however, and you're dead unless you have multiple squads dedicated to AV, but then, often, the infantry roll over you.
Really, really want to move past pub matches as the backbone of DUST. There will be no way to really talk balance until then. |
|
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
32
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:30:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:calisk galern wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Yawn... didn't read anything in this thread, but:
I want to see CCP implement a tanks only ambush variant.
How awesome would this be? Even if it was just for a week or even a day. no tanker would go to a tank only game, they'd lose their tanks lol. the whole idea of them using tanks in ambush is so that they won't lose their tanks, all the guys talking about tears and trash like that are simply chicken ***** avoiding skirmish. Do you tank? I do. In my experience it is far more risky to bring a tank into ambush than skirmish. So your reasoning makes no sence to me. As an experienced tanker, I would actually be quite interested in a tanks only ambush, for nothing more than fun factor (money isn't everything, and for those to whom it is, I pitty you). Wouldn't be able to do it often though.
I ride with a alot of tankers, and their is only one risky map to bring your tank in as far as ambush is concerned.
as for skirmish the maps are larger, but they have ALOT more time to get your tank, they can get orbitals, and you have to stay alive alot longer, it's by far the riskier of the those two game modes at least if you're a decent tanker.
|
Severance Pay
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:32:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Yawn... didn't read anything in this thread, but:
I want to see CCP implement a tanks only ambush variant.
How awesome would this be? Even if it was just for a week or even a day.
+1 I suggested this very thing a week ago. Can you imagine thisk pool in tankbush? Would be in the millions. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3075
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:34:00 -
[43] - Quote
And next week.
It will all be AV warfare! |
IRuby Heart
DIOS EX.
400
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
Mr Zitro wrote:Derek Barnes wrote:Mr Zitro wrote:Tanks are easy to kill, make a squad and try to adapt. If you want tank fits and av fits go get my book We are still at the point of the beta where everyone's specializing in different weapons and equipment. Not everyone has strong AV as one another. A squad of 4 using militia or standard AV gear is not going to kill a heavy shielded/armored tank especially when most of the time the same team has multiple tanks practically guarding each other out on a small Ambush map. I do destroy a lot of tanks in Ambush, but those are the guys thinking they are tankers. Ok let me explain something very simple, the solution to vehicle is av nade spam. Why cause even basic av nades have a higher dps than most SL and FG. Get a squad of 4 people they don't even have to be good. All they have to do is spam 1 button and throw nanohives. Examples of classes: normal AR or whatever you use plus av nades(if you don't have a nanohive on a ground class you have bigger problems than tanks). This can easily kill an armor tank with 2-3 throws (AS a squad not solo) For a shield tank on or two guys have standard flux. Combine the flux plus av nades and that's a dead shield tank. Remember do this as a squad. If you are not heavily spec into av you CAN NOT Rambo a well fit tank. Now please learn how to play this game efficiently so I don't have to explain how to kill one of my tanks. It is pretty sad how dumb the average dust player is.
lol right, I mean c'mon how hard is it to approach a tank that can kill you and your squad in less time than it takes to even throw an AV grenade, let alone having to get through the infantry surrounding it. That's easy, and of course the tank driver isn't going to just run away after the first 2 nades and go regen. Pretty sad how dumb the average tank driver is.
True AV weapons are the only truly efficient way to deal with tanks. Can AV grenades get the job done? Yes, but it's highly unlikely full squad or not, you're limited by range and ammo, AV's are meant for LAV's or taking out vehicles that are almost dead. I'm already starting to see more and more people use Swarms and Forge guns in pub matches, people are catching on and when more people start specializing into Forge Guns and Swarm Launchers, the tankers will be the ones crying.
|
Spy Mouse
New Eden Space Pirates
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
Stryker Battalion wrote:I think there are two primary reasons. One obvious the other not as much.
1) Like the rest of us tankers are trying to max SP and ISK gains after cap
2) Orbital Bombardments have chased HAV drivers out of Skirmish since an opposing team has more means and time to get WP. OB's being insta-death and a big loss of ISK to anything but a high end or well built armor HAV.
Just my take. My Gunnlogi can survive a Precision Strike. |
Severance Pay
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:38:00 -
[46] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:And next week.
It will all be AV warfare! Good to see my corp is not the only 1 speccing into antivehicle. Last night I was in random ambush and me and another forge gunner kept the madrugar at bay. He didn't even cross the intersection. He was too afraid of losing his 600k tank in a 200k ambush. He spawned that tank for nothing because everytime he exposed himself he ate forge gun. They ended up losing the fight because the tank couldn't contribute.
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
52
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 14:39:00 -
[47] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:calisk galern wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Yawn... didn't read anything in this thread, but:
I want to see CCP implement a tanks only ambush variant.
How awesome would this be? Even if it was just for a week or even a day. no tanker would go to a tank only game, they'd lose their tanks lol. the whole idea of them using tanks in ambush is so that they won't lose their tanks, all the guys talking about tears and trash like that are simply chicken ***** avoiding skirmish. Do you tank? I do. In my experience it is far more risky to bring a tank into ambush than skirmish. So your reasoning makes no sence to me. As an experienced tanker, I would actually be quite interested in a tanks only ambush, for nothing more than fun factor (money isn't everything, and for those to whom it is, I pitty you). Wouldn't be able to do it often though. I ride with a alot of tankers, and their is only one risky map to bring your tank in as far as ambush is concerned. as for skirmish the maps are larger, but they have ALOT more time to get your tank, they can get orbitals, and you have to stay alive alot longer, it's by far the riskier of the those two game modes at least if you're a decent tanker. Not my experience. But then I am very rarely actually killed by an orbital (try though they do). It helps to constantly be on the move (at least as much as possible) and changing directions constantly as well.
|
2-Ton Twenty-One
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
272
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 15:03:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tanks are not worth the isk or WP per reward for killing, When I play I just avoid them because the amount of wp per minute and isk per minute i get from killing them compared to players is laughable. Tanks need to give a higher ISK reward probably 1/3 of that tanks worth as reward (should be the same for Dropsuits).
Fighting tanks is not worth my time with i can kill 10-20 players in the time i could spend chasing a tank around the map. The only time I bother to hunt tanks is when it becomes less profitable for me to avoid the tank then to hunt it down. And then he goes down but it still only worth my time because he was personally in my way.
I'm selfish that way, I don't care if my team is getting slaughters as long as its to my benefit to not hunt that tank down I wont. Wining and losing the match is not even a factor because it does not matter if you win or lose the match all that matters is how much SP/ISK I can pull per min.
Make it work my while to hunt them. |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
32
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 15:11:00 -
[49] - Quote
2-Ton Twenty-One wrote:Tanks are not worth the isk or WP per reward for killing, When I play I just avoid them because the amount of wp per minute and isk per minute i get from killing them compared to players is laughable. Tanks need to give a higher ISK reward probably 1/3 of that tanks worth as reward (should be the same for Dropsuits).
Fighting tanks is not worth my time with i can kill 10-20 players in the time i could spend chasing a tank around the map. The only time I bother to hunt tanks is when it becomes less profitable for me to avoid the tank then to hunt it down. And then he goes down but it still only worth my time because he was personally in my way.
I'm selfish that way, I don't care if my team is getting slaughters as long as its to my benefit to not hunt that tank down I wont. Wining and losing the match is not even a factor because it does not matter if you win or lose the match all that matters is how much SP/ISK I can pull per min.
Make it work my while to hunt them.
nope it's laughable how little killing one rewards you, but it's the merit and challenge bringing the tankers down a bit that I enjoy. like I said before their is little else left to do in beta. I got plenty of isk, and am really not worried about wp. |
Zahle Undt
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 20:55:00 -
[50] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:Mr Zitro wrote:Tanks are easy to kill, make a squad and try to adapt. If you want tank fits and av fits go get my book how about when people stay with tanks far in the red zone and you cant get to them and all they do is tank sniping?
Kill the other red dots (my wife says we should call them cherries btw) until you get an orbital, drop orbital on tank, tank dies, this continues to happen until the lame red line tank sniper is broke and cannot afford tanks.
|
|
Zahle Undt
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:00:00 -
[51] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Ambush is full of tryhard tactics, tbh. They try the same weapons/tactics in skirmish but it isn't so problematic because there are objectives to be taken. So, one may end up losing the game if they aren't focused on winning. Theres no reason to win skirmish, just killing is oftin the correct way to play it, usuing objectives more as bait than anything else
If all you care about is ISK and SP you are right, winners like winning for the sake of....winning |
Assi9 Ventox
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
7
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:23:00 -
[52] - Quote
Derek Barnes wrote:Every Ambush match I get into now, there are Gunnlogis, Madrugars, or on some occasions Sagaris'. Usually I'm on the team with the better tank(s) , but they still clear the field of enemies before anyone does much. I think it's only going to get worse from here on out. Or am I just having very bad luck finding ambush or OMS matches?
With my 4 points into swarm launchers I for one welcome my fat juic...I mean tank overlords. Srsly people you have alt fittings for a reason! A tank hits the field make a b line for the supply depot and reclone into an AV fit. FYI if you don't know AV nades eat militia vehicles for breakfast.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |