Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TiMeSpLiT--TeR
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
On skirmish, I flew myself with a cheap dropship on top of a building. Put drop uplinks and nanohives. I equipped with swarm launchers and AV grenades.
9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus. I over scored the person who has 27 kills. We lost the game, but who cares. I get what I came for.
|
Spy Mouse
New Eden Space Pirates
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
You would have got more SP if your team had won. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
734
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spy Mouse wrote:You would have got more SP if your team had won.
Nope. This game rewards the losers more than winners. |
DUST Fiend
Immobile Infantry
1967
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
DUST, where losing is just as, if not more, profitable than winning
|
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
320
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:On skirmish, I flew myself with a cheap dropship on top of a building. Put drop uplinks and nanohives. I equipped with swarm launchers and AV grenades.
9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus. I over scored the person who has 27 kills. We lost the game, but who cares. I get what I came for.
Its getting like that isn't it.
Thousands of clone soldiers, staring off into space, the dreaded jovan disease finally sets in.
Maybe one plucky soldier fresh out the vats tries to lighten the mood with some talk about the guys in tech whispering about new weaponry, or that the empires are having problems with drones on planets. Try as he might he's met with icy cold stares and sighs, time to lock and load, trapped in endless warfare on the same planet. Oh yes, command might tell you its different worlds, be everyone knows we never left Murdus grasp, how could it be anything else? The same dirt tracks and roads in the same layout around the same buildings on the same dusty world. Time to die some more, to slaughter each other for his sick entertainment, reason is gone, cause is gone, all that remains is the empty hum of skill hardwiring and another deposit of isk in your bank account. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
iceyburnz wrote:TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:On skirmish, I flew myself with a cheap dropship on top of a building. Put drop uplinks and nanohives. I equipped with swarm launchers and AV grenades.
9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus. I over scored the person who has 27 kills. We lost the game, but who cares. I get what I came for.
Its getting like that isn't it. Thousands of clone soldiers, staring off into space, the dreaded jovan disease finally sets in. Maybe one plucky soldier fresh out the vats tries to lighten the mood with some talk about the guys in tech whispering about new weaponry, or that the empires are having problems with drones on planets. Try as he might he's met with icy cold stares and sighs, time to lock and load, trapped in endless warfare on the same planet. Oh yes, command might tell you its different worlds, be everyone knows we never left Murdus grasp, how could it be anything else? The same dirt tracks and roads in the same layout around the same buildings on the same dusty world. Time to die some more, to slaughter each other for his sick entertainment, reason is gone, cause is gone, all that remains is the empty hum of skill hardwiring and another deposit of isk in your bank account.
^^^!!! This !!!^^^
This is exactly how I feel. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
735
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:DUST, where losing is just as, if not more, profitable than winning
QFT. So much for Risk vs Rewards. |
Sobriety Denied
Universal Allies Inc.
480
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 18:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
who cares for objectives? the muted ppl i cant stand..
someone needs to make a new LFSquad channel called "we just dont give a crap", because i always get stuck with noobs and tryhards acting like it's their first skirmish match and screaming about the hack points.
|
Spy Mouse
New Eden Space Pirates
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 18:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
If you don't care for objectives, what are you doing in skirmish? They created ambush especially for you. |
TiMeSpLiT--TeR
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 18:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Spy Mouse wrote:If you don't care for objectives, what are you doing in skirmish? They created ambush especially for you.
The rewards are higher in skirmish. The game is broken. |
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1657
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 18:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
You could have hacked the objectives yourself if you were so busy while your uplink was racking up your WP score. Every successful hack gives you 100 for objectives and 50 for installations, CRUs and supply depots. You would have earned so much more in combination with your uplink and nanohive. |
Thumb Green
Starship Troppers
34
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:14:00 -
[12] - Quote
The rewards aren't really higher in skirmish and this has been pointed out time and time again. Sure the lump sum you get can be higher but overall ambush rewards you more. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
326
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:Spy Mouse wrote:If you don't care for objectives, what are you doing in skirmish? They created ambush especially for you. The rewards are higher in skirmish. The game is broken.
Per match the rewards are usually higher, but skirmish matches are typically about 15-20 minuets long. Which is easily 2-3 ambush matches. I tend to average about 3500 SP (without booster) in a ambush match, and on half-decent matches 1000+ WP. And ~250k ISk per match.
I think generally, they are pretty close. It's just that per-match ambush doesn't seem as impressive, but you can get more of them done in the same time-frame. |
TheBLAZZED
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
86
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:On skirmish, I flew myself with a cheap dropship on top of a building. Put drop uplinks and nanohives. I equipped with swarm launchers and AV grenades.
9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus. I over scored the person who has 27 kills. We lost the game, but who cares. I get what I came for.
Sounds like "pro" tactics. Professional campers. |
Geth Massredux
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
93
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 22:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
damn this is another reason PRO is well not pro |
TiMeSpLiT--TeR
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
335
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 07:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:Spy Mouse wrote:If you don't care for objectives, what are you doing in skirmish? They created ambush especially for you. The rewards are higher in skirmish. The game is broken. Per match the rewards are usually higher, but skirmish matches are typically about 15-20 minuets long. Which is easily 2-3 ambush matches. I tend to average about 3500 SP (without booster) in a ambush match, and on half-decent matches 1000+ WP. And ~250k ISk per match. I think generally, they are pretty close. It's just that per-match ambush doesn't seem as impressive, but you can get more of them done in the same time-frame. The idea was I didn't put too much effort. That's what this game is becoming. I could have made more but I'm just comparing myself to the person I over scored who goes for objectives. |
Doctor Norm
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 07:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:
9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus. I over scored the person who has 27 kills. We lost the game, but who cares. I get what I came for.
So what you are saying is that you're a loser and you're ok with that?
Fair enough. |
TiMeSpLiT--TeR
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
335
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 07:48:00 -
[18] - Quote
Doctor Norm wrote:TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:
9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus. I over scored the person who has 27 kills. We lost the game, but who cares. I get what I came for.
So what you are saying is that you're a loser and you're ok with that? Fair enough. I didn't lose anything. The fight was meaningless. |
SILENTSAM 69
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
435
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 08:14:00 -
[19] - Quote
I love people like this guy. They lose matches, and let my side win. |
bcs1a
River-Rats Mercenaries
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:09:00 -
[20] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus.
just in case this hasn't been said already
I would kill to get those kind of numbers out of a match and be happy to do it.
I'm one of those n00bs and "try hards" i don't see any reason to half ass something, so I either do my best, or log...
|
|
bunnywink
Improvise.
38
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 13:09:00 -
[21] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:Spy Mouse wrote:If you don't care for objectives, what are you doing in skirmish? They created ambush especially for you. The rewards are higher in skirmish. The game is broken. Per match the rewards are usually higher, but skirmish matches are typically about 15-20 minuets long. Which is easily 2-3 ambush matches. I tend to average about 3500 SP (without booster) in a ambush match, and on half-decent matches 1000+ WP. And ~250k ISk per match. I think generally, they are pretty close. It's just that per-match ambush doesn't seem as impressive, but you can get more of them done in the same time-frame. The idea was I didn't put too much effort. That's what this game is becoming. I could have made more but I'm just comparing myself to the person I over scored who goes for objectives.
If you truly didn't want to put in any effort, just AFK-farm in the MCC...
Meh, gotta love these double standards. A PRO member makes a post about not caring for objectives in Skirmish and it's a big no-no, but members of more respected corporations post about AFK-farming and that's totally acceptable. What's the difference? Either way, you don't care about winning the Skirmish match and are going for SP and ISK. |
TiMeSpLiT--TeR
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
337
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 20:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
bunnywink wrote:TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:Spy Mouse wrote:If you don't care for objectives, what are you doing in skirmish? They created ambush especially for you. The rewards are higher in skirmish. The game is broken. Per match the rewards are usually higher, but skirmish matches are typically about 15-20 minuets long. Which is easily 2-3 ambush matches. I tend to average about 3500 SP (without booster) in a ambush match, and on half-decent matches 1000+ WP. And ~250k ISk per match. I think generally, they are pretty close. It's just that per-match ambush doesn't seem as impressive, but you can get more of them done in the same time-frame. The idea was I didn't put too much effort. That's what this game is becoming. I could have made more but I'm just comparing myself to the person I over scored who goes for objectives. If you truly didn't want to put in any effort, just AFK-farm in the MCC... Meh, gotta love these double standards. A PRO member makes a post about not caring for objectives in Skirmish and it's a big no-no, but members of more respected corporations post about AFK-farming and that's totally acceptable. What's the difference? Either way, you don't care about winning the Skirmish match and are going for SP and ISK.
The thread is not about me for not caring for the objectives. I post this because the game is becoming like one. I forgot to mention that the game was public match. |
Medic 1879
The Tritan Industries
60
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 20:53:00 -
[23] - Quote
Logi's care for objectives good logis care for everything we would just peacefully saunter around healing repairing and reviving anyone but no people have to shoot us for some reason. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |