How long have you been here, Two or Three weeks?

Read the Forums. Read the Weekly Updates in Technical Support and Request/Feedback Forums.

Watch/read the interviews with the Devs.

Why does DUST need to be like MAG? That game studio failed so miserably that Sony erased them. Why nobody remembers the totally horrible launch problems with MAG* and how it basically destroyed the company as they redid their much discussed server architecture to get it to work At ALL.

Progress is being made and they are not working at your whim nor on your schedule. CCP is cautious and will do what they want to when they want to.

Posting yet another QQ DUST Is Not My Favorite Game thread and then spewing out entitled Kitten Excrement is getting Old!



* Otherwise known as the game that finally was MAG after nobody could figure out what M.A.G. supposedly meant.

CCP said they are looking to go to 24v24 in the next major update (probably in a month or so) with an increase to 6-merc squads. 32v32 is supposedly in the works but they aren't confident in the hardware.

As far as the nine lives, I hate to say it but unless EVE subs drop off (and for ten years they've kept going up), they've got as many lives as Jacus Roden has clones.

How long have you been here, Two or Three weeks?

Wrong forum section - don't expect them to read this until you learn where to properly post feedback :P

CCP, et al.:

Here's a short list why:

1. Maps are too big.
2. Too few players. 32 players doesn't cut the mustard on maps that could comfortably fit 64 players, if not more.
3. Small squad sizes. Four-person squads? Ha! Talk about a joke in this mode.
4. Randomly placed objectives. I feel like I'm playing in someone's crazed idea of an amusement park, not a military base or industrial/research hub.
5. Too little damage done when holding the letters.
6. It takes too long to finish a match.
7. Half the time skirmish is won or lost by the stupid clone count, not by destroying the enemy MCC.

If skirmish is eventually meant to be a version of MAG's domination mode (or, heck, even the pedestrian Sabotage mode) well, good God, we're going to be waiting a long time before it gets straightened out.

Look, I usually don't rant and rave about these things. I figure they'll get solved at some point. But, darnit, I've been patient long enough, and seen too few changes, to feel comfortable sitting on my butt and not saying a peep about design decisions by CCP.

Best of luck, CCP, but, man, you're really taking all nine of your cat's lives here and have no insurance left.

Wrong forum section - don't expect them to read this until you learn where to properly post feedback :P

Schooled.

Bitter.

... don't expect them to read this ...

CCP, et al.:

Here's a short list why:

1. Maps are too big.
2. Too few players. 32 players doesn't cut the mustard on maps that could comfortably fit 64 players, if not more.
3. Small squad sizes. Four-person squads? Ha! Talk about a joke in this mode.
4. Randomly placed objectives. I feel like I'm playing in someone's crazed idea of an amusement park, not a military base or industrial/research hub.
5. Too little damage done when holding the letters.
6. It takes too long to finish a match.
7. Half the time skirmish is won or lost by the stupid clone count, not by destroying the enemy MCC.

If skirmish is eventually meant to be a version of MAG's domination mode (or, heck, even the pedestrian Sabotage mode) well, good God, we're going to be waiting a long time before it gets straightened out.

Look, I usually don't rant and rave about these things. I figure they'll get solved at some point. But, darnit, I've been patient long enough, and seen too few changes, to feel comfortable sitting on my butt and not saying a peep about design decisions by CCP.

Best of luck, CCP, but, man, you're really taking all nine of your cat's lives here and have no insurance left.