Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
289
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure?
So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why? |
Jack Boost
Zarena Family
194
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Only reason... they can And ppl can defend it... Rest is pointles (all QQ) |
Gustaf McStrife
Abnormalz.
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure? So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why?
Hellstorm loves bringing out tanks in ambush...ask them why........ |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
289
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gustaf McStrife wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure? So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why? Hellstorm loves bringing out tanks in ambush...ask them why........
Who exactly?
|
Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
96
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
I drive HAVs because first person shooters are dumb and aircraft don't work yet.
I play ambush because the SP/hr is better than skirmish.
Ergo, I bring HAVs in on ambush. Fun fact: I don't have much better survivability in ambush than skirmish. The prime threat: someone with a forge gun in a place I can't see them, exists in either case! |
Gustaf McStrife
Abnormalz.
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
I'm not good with names but I think it was djin true blood... Not sure though and some other djin guys |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
110
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
this is pretty funny...
about 3 threads down, there is a post "snipers are ruining ambush"
and the op here is talking about insecurity with tank users?
c'mon man:
how insecure do you have to be to be one of the many snipers who hide and claim "it's not my job" when the squad is ordered to move and take the objective. hell half of these twinks don't even leave the red zone without a secret service escort and an extra box of tampons?
and ambush is straight up codmode. who cares what goes on in there? really seriously... it's fun once a day.
i'd say if you got it and you can use it, why not? if they have the money to blow through using tanks against casuals, let em do it.
if it's all about insecurity then give everyone a swiss army knife and tell em to go to town on each other.
6 of em will still be trying to snipe from the mountain top with a swiss army knife.
Peace B |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
289
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:this is pretty funny...
about 3 threads down, there is a post "snipers are ruining ambush"
and the op here is talking about insecurity with tank users?
c'mon man:
how insecure do you have to be to be one of the many snipers who hide and claim "it's not my job" when the squad is ordered to move and take the objective. hell half of these twinks don't even leave the red zone without a secret service escort and an extra box of tampons?
and ambush is straight up codmode. who cares what goes on in there? really seriously... it's fun once a day.
i'd say if you got it and you can use it, why not? if they have the money to blow through using tanks against casuals, let em do it.
if it's all about insecurity then give everyone a swiss army knife and tell em to go to town on each other.
6 of em will still be trying to snipe from the mountain top with a swiss army knife.
Peace B
Exactly, snipers and tankers are both cowards in their own way, thanks for the clarification
Major respect to those who use guns in this game! (even the heavies! )
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
102
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:this is pretty funny...
about 3 threads down, there is a post "snipers are ruining ambush"
and the op here is talking about insecurity with tank users?
c'mon man:
how insecure do you have to be to be one of the many snipers who hide and claim "it's not my job" when the squad is ordered to move and take the objective. hell half of these twinks don't even leave the red zone without a secret service escort and an extra box of tampons?
and ambush is straight up codmode. who cares what goes on in there? really seriously... it's fun once a day.
i'd say if you got it and you can use it, why not? if they have the money to blow through using tanks against casuals, let em do it.
if it's all about insecurity then give everyone a swiss army knife and tell em to go to town on each other.
6 of em will still be trying to snipe from the mountain top with a swiss army knife.
Peace B Exactly, snipers and tankers are both cowards in their own way, thanks for the clarification Major respect to those who use guns in this game! (even the heavies! )
Snipers - hide on hill in the redline sniping and most likely will live for the entire game and not do much
Tanks - requires huge amounts of SP/ISK to full upgrade one and use it well even tho milita grade stuff is more than enough to destroy one and tend to go into the heat of battle and get **** done while dodging OB because that is instant death most of the time for a tank
Hm yea they really are the same thing
|
CYRAX SERVIUS
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
22
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 12:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:this is pretty funny...
about 3 threads down, there is a post "snipers are ruining ambush"
and the op here is talking about insecurity with tank users?
c'mon man:
how insecure do you have to be to be one of the many snipers who hide and claim "it's not my job" when the squad is ordered to move and take the objective. hell half of these twinks don't even leave the red zone without a secret service escort and an extra box of tampons?
and ambush is straight up codmode. who cares what goes on in there? really seriously... it's fun once a day.
i'd say if you got it and you can use it, why not? if they have the money to blow through using tanks against casuals, let em do it.
if it's all about insecurity then give everyone a swiss army knife and tell em to go to town on each other.
6 of em will still be trying to snipe from the mountain top with a swiss army knife.
Peace B put perfectly my friend... |
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
289
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Snipers - hide on hill in the redline sniping and most likely will live for the entire game and not do much
Tanks - requires huge amounts of SP/ISK to full upgrade one and use it well even tho milita grade stuff is more than enough to destroy one and tend to go into the heat of battle and get **** done while dodging OB because that is instant death most of the time for a tank
Hm yea they really are the same thing
Philosophically, yes, they are.
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet... Just because a tanker pays more and spends more SP doesn't make them any less identical to redline snipers. Both are low-risk high-reward systems.
Also if a decently speced tanker is getting destroyed by a militia tank, then they truly suck.
Oh and ambush OB's are pretty few and far between, especially when playing against 100% solo players. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
How hard is it for most people to swap over to AV? |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
102
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Snipers - hide on hill in the redline sniping and most likely will live for the entire game and not do much
Tanks - requires huge amounts of SP/ISK to full upgrade one and use it well even tho milita grade stuff is more than enough to destroy one and tend to go into the heat of battle and get **** done while dodging OB because that is instant death most of the time for a tank
Hm yea they really are the same thing
Philosophically, yes, they are. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet... Just because a tanker pays more and spends more SP doesn't make them any less identical to redline snipers. Both are low-risk high-reward systems. Also if a decently speced tanker is getting destroyed by a militia tank, then they truly suck. Oh and ambush OB's are pretty few and far between, especially when playing against 100% solo players.
I was more on abuot a comparision in skirmish tbh
In ambush i rarely see snipers and tanks are rare unless a 4man group joins and drops 3tanks like some clans do even then bust out the milita AV stuff and take it down quite easily
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
Look at it this way.
Do you expect a prototype heavy to outlast 3 GEK AR soldiers at range? |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
197
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:24:00 -
[15] - Quote
I think a better question is why people use drop ships in ambush.... |
Thumb Green
Starship Troppers
21
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:How hard is it for most people to swap over to AV?
In ambush? Not hard, just got to die first and then switch to your av suit and respawn on the opposite side of the map from the tank (or right in front of the tank, who knows.) and fight your way all the way to the tank in an ill suited fit for infantry combat. In oms you've got the option of the supply depot which makes things a heck of a lot easier but that's only if the tank is near the supply depot.
With that said, lone tanks don't bother me a bit. It's the three tanks at a time that irks me. Even then that doesn't guarantee victory for the tanker's team; I was in a match the other night with the WarRavens on the enemy team and they called in a total of at least 5 tanks while keeping 3 on the field at a time. They still lost miserably and they weren't using militia tanks either. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
392
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Look at it this way.
Do you expect a prototype heavy to outlast 3 GEK AR soldiers at range? A better example would be using a standard or militia Ar. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
392
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:39:00 -
[18] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:I think a better question is why people use drop ships in ambush.... To scare the opposing team while screwing around |
Chibi Andy
Celtic Anarchy
38
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure? So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why?
i know what you mean, like last night while playing a random ambush map with my corp we bump into Mr Gloo Gloo and his corp members from what the french and guess what? TANKS!!!!! not one not two but THREE TANKS!!!
suffice to say, anywhere we spawn on the map we were subsequently gunned down before our screen even came out of the black screen. so basically before we can even see whats going on, we 're already dead. and then so the game just goes downhill for everyone else, no blue berries want to spawn in leaving a few people playing etc etc.
one tank i can understand but 3 tanks? thats overkill |
Travi Zyg
G I A N T
13
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 15:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:How hard is it for most people to swap over to AV?
agreed, stop whining about tanks in whatever mode and take the time to spec. into some decent AV gear...lvl your grenadier or swarms a little on the side instead of being all "ohhhh theres a tank! , let me swap into my militia grade AV nades or swarm starter suit" and expect to destroy it.
Theres a lack of laziness and dedication in this game for anyone to be more than a one trick pony. tanks can be stopped EASILY with the right Anti Armor loadouts and a little teamwork. |
|
Bruce3 Wayne3
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
10
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 15:40:00 -
[21] - Quote
infantry > AV > HAV > infantry
AV really hurts tanks, just as much as tanks hurt infantry |
Yagihige
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
179
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 15:41:00 -
[22] - Quote
Different limits per vehicle type and per mode.
I know there's a team vehicle quota but i'm not sure what it is. I'd say make it a limit of 4 tanks in Skirmish and 2 in Ambush. |
Bruce3 Wayne3
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
10
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 15:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Snipers - hide on hill in the redline sniping and most likely will live for the entire game and not do much
Tanks - requires huge amounts of SP/ISK to full upgrade one and use it well even tho milita grade stuff is more than enough to destroy one and tend to go into the heat of battle and get **** done while dodging OB because that is instant death most of the time for a tank
Hm yea they really are the same thing
Philosophically, yes, they are. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet... Just because a tanker pays more and spends more SP doesn't make them any less identical to redline snipers. Both are low-risk high-reward systems. Also if a decently speced tanker is getting destroyed by a militia tank, then they truly suck. Oh and ambush OB's are pretty few and far between, especially when playing against 100% solo players.
low risk high reward??? more high risk low reward since it takes 2-8 games to earn the ISK fot a HAV that can be killed easily by 3 enemies in a free default class.
on skirmish tanks have safety of red zone when damaged but on ambush tanks only hav risk of AV spawnin with HAV in range, being in a HAV is as risky as being against a HAV |
Groza Tragediya
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
72
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 15:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Anks are more easily destroyed in ambush. When you consider the enemy can spawn where ever, with whatever. Tanks are way more at risk. |
Bruce3 Wayne3
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
10
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 15:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Yagihige wrote:Different limits per vehicle type and per mode.
I know there's a team vehicle quota but i'm not sure what it is. I'd say make it a limit of 4 tanks in Skirmish and 2 in Ambush.
its 5 tanks per team but its rare that all 5 survive since thats 10 players (on average 2 ppl per tank) so likely about 6-8 enemies are AV, thats more than enough to insta kill tanks |
Yagihige
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
179
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 15:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
Bruce3 Wayne3 wrote:Yagihige wrote:Different limits per vehicle type and per mode.
I know there's a team vehicle quota but i'm not sure what it is. I'd say make it a limit of 4 tanks in Skirmish and 2 in Ambush. its 5 tanks per team but its rare that all 5 survive since thats 10 players (on average 2 ppl per tank) so likely about 6-8 enemies are AV, thats more than enough to insta kill tanks
Ok, good to know there's a specific limit just for HAVs. I had only reached the team quota for LAVs, though i didn't count and the most team HAVs i've seen in a battle was 4. Still, it seems there's no difference from Skirmish to Ambush and there is were i'd change something. 4 tanks in an Ambush (i've seen that) is a bit over the top. A lower team quota for Ambush would probably make sense, let's also not forget that most maps for that mode are a lot smaller.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
245
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 16:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:How hard is it for most people to swap over to AV? In Ambush? lol, no one ever wants to be that guy who swaps to AV right as the tank gets destroyed and then ends up with a useless fit. It's pretty much like the bystander effect, everyone expects someone else to bring down the tank... so no one actually does. At most you'll usually see 2-3 guys go AV, but it's almost always militia and it barely even scrathes most good tankers.
About tanks, if you bring out more than one, then you're trying to hard, at least in my opinion. |
Bruce3 Wayne3
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
10
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 16:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
Yagihige wrote:Bruce3 Wayne3 wrote:Yagihige wrote:Different limits per vehicle type and per mode.
I know there's a team vehicle quota but i'm not sure what it is. I'd say make it a limit of 4 tanks in Skirmish and 2 in Ambush. its 5 tanks per team but its rare that all 5 survive since thats 10 players (on average 2 ppl per tank) so likely about 6-8 enemies are AV, thats more than enough to insta kill tanks Ok, good to know there's a specific limit just for HAVs. I had only reached the team quota for LAVs, though i didn't count and the most team HAVs i've seen in a battle was 4. Still, it seems there's no difference from Skirmish to Ambush and there is were i'd change something. 4 tanks in an Ambush (i've seen that) is a bit over the top. A lower team quota for Ambush would probably make sense, let's also not forget that most maps for that mode are a lot smaller.
ive seeen 5 tanks on ambush a few times but its rare and usually 2 or 3 are militia tanks, ive even seen 2 tanks fight 4 on the small rocky map, but way i see it is everythings gotta balance.
more tanks on field means less infantry therefore allowing more AV which reduces tanks, then increases infantry to combat the AV troops... however many HAV drivers are known to rege quit after tanks get destroyed |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
297
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 16:06:00 -
[29] - Quote
Why do i tank in ambush.
Well skirmish is boring for me now. OBs are easily gained there and as a shield tank my surviving is all luck based. And being a aggressive tanker I am always lower on health or have used my modules. The isk is poor for how long you play in a skirmish. Just no reason to play a gamemode where the only AV in it is Orbitals.
Why play ambush. I make more isk according to my time put in I can make 3 times that in ambush then it takes to do a single skirmish match. I just play to grind out my SP so ambush again is faster there. My skill at least counts for some what of a factor against AV in ambush.
But really the main thing that has destroyed my enjoy of skirmish is OBs have destroyed the aspect of shield tanking because tanks have been slightly over nerfed and with the buffs they did on OBs they have became able to destroy fully pimped out shield tanks. And the enemy team does not need to risk anything they just need to play the game. And the thing is once I have made my tank a assest on the field I can not interchange like infantry can at supply depos. No matter what there is always a enemy squad that gains a OB so it all comes down to luck if it is not called in on my tank. |
General John Ripper
Baltar Research
22
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 16:08:00 -
[30] - Quote
Most of the tanks i play against in ambush SUCK. I think most tanks do not want to waste isk in an ambush match. I heard that tanks are alot more expensive compared to other load outs, other than vehicles. I think that might be the reason these tanks suck. |
|
Bruce3 Wayne3
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
10
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 16:20:00 -
[31] - Quote
General John Ripper wrote:Most of the tanks i play against in ambush SUCK. I think most tanks do not want to waste isk in an ambush match. I heard that tanks are alot more expensive compared to other load outs, other than vehicles. I think that might be the reason these tanks suck.
well you can get a tank for 150k ISK ready to go thatll last a noob 5 mins or get a spec'd out tank for 500k-1mill ISK after 1mill + SP that SHOULD survive a while longer |
Alex Bradshaw
NEW AGE EMPIRE
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 00:48:00 -
[32] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure? So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why?
dont forget, a decent tank needs 1 million + ISK and 3 million SP. If someone has put the effort in to a decent tank, they deserve to use it. Most tanks I see are "paper tanks", and get destroyed very quickly with AV grenades or swarm launchers. |
Y0UR NAME HERE
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
455
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 00:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure? So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why?
Here's a thought,
The reason people see tanks in ambush is because they're more likely to survive since advanced and up AV is OP.
Why?
Because ambush is cqc.
Which means your squad members can eat anyone with AV plus random spawns.
In skirmish,
Tanks will struggle to survive,
AV can be used at full range, even from behind the redline.
Your squad can help you?
I don't think so. |
BobThe843CakeMan
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
133
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 00:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:Why do i tank in ambush.
Well skirmish is boring for me now. OBs are easily gained there and as a shield tank my surviving is all luck based. And being a aggressive tanker I am always lower on health or have used my modules. The isk is poor for how long you play in a skirmish. Just no reason to play a gamemode where the only AV in it is Orbitals.
Why play ambush. I make more isk according to my time put in I can make 3 times that in ambush then it takes to do a single skirmish match. I just play to grind out my SP so ambush again is faster there. My skill at least counts for some what of a factor against AV in ambush. It is not oh we suck at AV so then the next step is for a team to drop the insta win OB.
But really the main thing that has destroyed my enjoy of skirmish is OBs have destroyed the aspect of shield tanking because tanks have been slightly over nerfed and with the buffs they did on OBs they have became able to destroy fully pimped out shield tanks. And the enemy team does not need to risk anything they just need to play the game. And the thing is once I have made my tank a assest on the field I can not interchange like infantry can at supply depos. No matter what there is always a enemy squad that gains a OB so it all comes down to luck if it is not called in on my tank. i have to agree with this so much. but i prefer ambush because well. It's more fun for me. Ambush is egh but i'll play it. |
mott royon
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 01:00:00 -
[35] - Quote
Y0UR NAME HERE wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure? So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why? Here's a thought, The reason people see tanks in ambush is because they're more likely to survive since advanced and up AV is OP. Why? Because ambush is cqc. Which means your squad members can eat anyone with AV plus random spawns. In skirmish, Tanks will struggle to survive, AV can be used at full range, even from behind the redline. Your squad can help you? I don't think so.
This. I was playing with YOUR NAME HERE last night on skirmish. We got them all the way back to the redline but they were to far away for us infantry to hit. So it became easier for there AV guys to take out his tank.
|
Y0UR NAME HERE
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
455
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 01:07:00 -
[36] - Quote
mott royon wrote:Y0UR NAME HERE wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Tanks in skirmish I have no issue with as they were designed for that... but tanks in ambush? Are some players really that insecure? So what toothpick rooster players here bring tanks to ambush? And why? Here's a thought, The reason people see tanks in ambush is because they're more likely to survive since advanced and up AV is OP. Why? Because ambush is cqc. Which means your squad members can eat anyone with AV plus random spawns. In skirmish, Tanks will struggle to survive, AV can be used at full range, even from behind the redline. Your squad can help you? I don't think so. This. I was playing with YOUR NAME HERE last night on skirmish. We got them all the way back to the redline but they were to far away for us infantry to hit. So it became easier for there AV guys to take out his tank.
Lol and did I lose it in one ambush?
Nope, but first skirmish we played, of course. |
Delanus Turgias
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
62
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 01:40:00 -
[37] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Snipers - hide on hill in the redline sniping and most likely will live for the entire game and not do much
Tanks - requires huge amounts of SP/ISK to full upgrade one and use it well even tho milita grade stuff is more than enough to destroy one and tend to go into the heat of battle and get **** done while dodging OB because that is instant death most of the time for a tank
Hm yea they really are the same thing
Philosophically, yes, they are. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet... Just because a tanker pays more and spends more SP doesn't make them any less identical to redline snipers. Both are low-risk high-reward systems. Also if a decently speced tanker is getting destroyed by a militia tank, then they truly suck. Oh and ambush OB's are pretty few and far between, especially when playing against 100% solo players. >low risk >tanks
Are you ******* kidding me? Yes, tanks are low risk against infantry armed with assault rifle and such garbage, but if someone has grenadier above 2 or has adv. Swarms/Forge guns, it gets really high risk fast.
Have you ever even driven tank? Because obviously you haven't, otherwise you would understand the fact that losing a tank means you don't get any net ISK gain at the end of the match, and often it's a net loss.
And calling snipers low-risk means you don't understand the way the game works. Yeah, you may do well personally, but you'll lose the match if you can't cap objectives.
Just because something works in ambush most of the time doesn't mean it works anywhere else the rest of the time. |
Y0UR NAME HERE
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
455
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 01:42:00 -
[38] - Quote
Delanus Turgias wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Snipers - hide on hill in the redline sniping and most likely will live for the entire game and not do much
Tanks - requires huge amounts of SP/ISK to full upgrade one and use it well even tho milita grade stuff is more than enough to destroy one and tend to go into the heat of battle and get **** done while dodging OB because that is instant death most of the time for a tank
Hm yea they really are the same thing
Philosophically, yes, they are. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet... Just because a tanker pays more and spends more SP doesn't make them any less identical to redline snipers. Both are low-risk high-reward systems. Also if a decently speced tanker is getting destroyed by a militia tank, then they truly suck. Oh and ambush OB's are pretty few and far between, especially when playing against 100% solo players. >low risk >tanks Are you ******* kidding me? Yes, tanks are low risk against infantry armed with assault rifle and such garbage, but if someone has grenadier above 2 or has adv. Swarms/Forge guns, it gets really high risk fast. Have you ever even driven tank? Because obviously you haven't, otherwise you would understand the fact that losing a tank means you don't get any net ISK gain at the end of the match, and often it's a net loss. And calling snipers low-risk means you don't understand the way the game works. Yeah, you may do well personally, but you'll lose the match if you can't cap objectives. Just because something works in ambush most of the time doesn't mean it works anywhere else the rest of the time.
+1 and this. |
KEROSIINI-TERO
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
248
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 02:16:00 -
[39] - Quote
People may have dedicated tank characters, all skill points on tanks. Considering that, can you blame them? Especially as tanks are far more vulnerable in ambushes. |
Y0UR NAME HERE
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
455
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 02:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:People may have dedicated tank characters, all skill points on tanks. Considering that, can you blame them? Especially as tanks are far more vulnerable in ambushes.
Less vulnerable.
Only vulnerable to AV grenades as I've found.
Skirmish is where you die in your tank.
|
|
XxWarlordxX97
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
151
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 03:46:00 -
[41] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:this is pretty funny...
about 3 threads down, there is a post "snipers are ruining ambush"
and the op here is talking about insecurity with tank users?
c'mon man:
how insecure do you have to be to be one of the many snipers who hide and claim "it's not my job" when the squad is ordered to move and take the objective. hell half of these twinks don't even leave the red zone without a secret service escort and an extra box of tampons?
and ambush is straight up codmode. who cares what goes on in there? really seriously... it's fun once a day.
i'd say if you got it and you can use it, why not? if they have the money to blow through using tanks against casuals, let em do it.
if it's all about insecurity then give everyone a swiss army knife and tell em to go to town on each other.
6 of em will still be trying to snipe from the mountain top with a swiss army knife.
Peace B Exactly, snipers and tankers are both cowards in their own way, thanks for the clarification Major respect to those who use guns in this game! (even the heavies! ) then why can't you use snipers and tanks if it's in the game? |
XxWarlordxX97
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
151
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 03:49:00 -
[42] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Look at it this way.
Do you expect a prototype heavy to outlast 3 GEK AR soldiers at range?
that would be Awesome |
Y0UR NAME HERE
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
455
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 03:52:00 -
[43] - Quote
XxWarlordxX97 wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:this is pretty funny...
about 3 threads down, there is a post "snipers are ruining ambush"
and the op here is talking about insecurity with tank users?
c'mon man:
how insecure do you have to be to be one of the many snipers who hide and claim "it's not my job" when the squad is ordered to move and take the objective. hell half of these twinks don't even leave the red zone without a secret service escort and an extra box of tampons?
and ambush is straight up codmode. who cares what goes on in there? really seriously... it's fun once a day.
i'd say if you got it and you can use it, why not? if they have the money to blow through using tanks against casuals, let em do it.
if it's all about insecurity then give everyone a swiss army knife and tell em to go to town on each other.
6 of em will still be trying to snipe from the mountain top with a swiss army knife.
Peace B Exactly, snipers and tankers are both cowards in their own way, thanks for the clarification Major respect to those who use guns in this game! (even the heavies! ) then why can't you use snipers and tanks if it's in the game?
To the guy you quoted.
This is exactly why vehicles will be nerfed to hell and continue to suck.
Because most of the game are AR only and everything else must be cheap and easy so Nerf it.
Dusts direction makes me sick.
I'm just fine with a gun, would you like to test it out? Give me an LR AR or MD.
The end result will be the same as my tank.
Shame on you.
I'd like to see you try tank for a week then i'll accept it when you come back to me QQing. |
nakaya indigene
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
43
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 05:03:00 -
[44] - Quote
so tank pilots that have put all their sp into tanks should not play ambush? UP YOURS ill do what I want |
Tribalfreak Baham
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 06:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
I personally fear a skilled dropship pilot than a skilled tanker in ambush. I watched 2 dropships utterly dominate a match. But on to the topic at hand. why NOT allow tanks to be used. The game is all about freedom, if you have resources you can bring to the fight, then by all means, you should be able to use them. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
244
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 07:03:00 -
[46] - Quote
Im not unsympathetic to this. But at the end of the day its about the sandbox and though it sucks now, eventually the tanks cant get any stronger and as you get wider and branch out from your specialty high end AV will become more prevalent and thus creating a check on tanks.
That said given the compressed size of some of the ambush maps and incredible amount of strain on frame rate there is no reason to consider reducing the vehicle limit to prevent tank spam to an uncontrollable level. It could also be a seperate vehicle limit for LAV, HAV and Dropship with a total vehicle limit still being 5 but only allow for a max of 5 LAVs, a max of 2 maybe 3 HAV and 2 Dropships max. Therefore the coding would allow a max of the particular vehicle type and no combination can exceed 5 vehicles total.
I know this is a restriction on the sandbox and perhaps the wrong suggestion but it may be the best way to balance ambush without affecting skirmish.
That or simply create a vehicle free variant of ambush and problem solved. I dont see why this couldnt exist, of course tankers will hate this idea as i could see an overwhelming majority playing here and therefore creating the only ambush matches tankers will find themselves against is other tankers and eager tank killing infantry. Which will for them be the same thing as banning tanks from ambush anyway since they arent going to risk their tanks like that. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |