Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS.
229
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
I mean: Sony announced the new ps4. What will Dust514 do? will it stay on ps3 for 10 years? will it work on both ps3/ps4? What's the big plan? A dev's answer would be appreciated... |
SSBBW Amber
Church of the Unforgiven
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
10 year (at least) life span planned for DUST, at that rate, it HAS to be supported on PS4, otherwise what happens when players start trading in the PS3 for PS4? |
Elijah Sol' Dzusaki
Onward Defrosted Tuna Team
485
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
It will more than Likely stay on Ps3 for awhile, but be on PS4 also.
Destiny by bungie is doing that so I would expect Dust to be the same. |
Nelo Angel0
UnReaL.
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
i'm pretty sure the CCP has said it'll be on both systems. Until the ps3 can't handle dust there's no reason to stop supporting it on ps3 |
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS.
229
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
yeah ok...but moving on ps4 as it is...it's kinda waste the potentiality... |
usrevenge2
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
64
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
all I know is he ps4 looked incredible. |
Jack Boost
Zarena Family
194
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
With x86 architecture.. it is..... it is .. shiny new PC :D
CCP BRING CARBON PLEASE !!! lol ( * for some parts)
|
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
It's possible that the PS4 version may have additional graphical flourishes that the PS3 version doesn't. Eventually they may do a fairly significant graphical overhaul of the game such that it takes advantage of the PS4's hardware capability to a greater capacity.
In the meantime, moving Dust to the PS4 "as is" would be useful in that it would allow people who own a PS4 and not a PS3 to play Dust, or continue to keep playing Dust. Dust will need to keep up with the times, as PS3 owners will probably be switching to a PS4 fairly quickly after the PS4 hits the shelves. |
SSBBW Amber
Church of the Unforgiven
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:It's possible that the PS4 version may have additional graphical flourishes that the PS3 version doesn't. Eventually they may do a fairly significant graphical overhaul of the game such that it takes advantage of the PS4's hardware capability to a greater capacity.
In the meantime, moving Dust to the PS4 "as is" would be useful in that it would allow people who own a PS4 and not a PS3 to play Dust, or continue to keep playing Dust. Dust will need to keep up with the times, as PS3 owners will probably be switching to a PS4 fairly quickly after the PS4 hits the shelves.
I'm not sure I agree that people will be switching over fairly quickly. Both Sony and MS have shown that the more complicated they make the console, the more issues there are in the first year of release. While I think that there will be a large number of sales, I don't think that those sales will be record breaking in the first year.
The economy is still sluggish and the PS is going to have at least a $500 price tag, probably higher since most $500 laptops can't compare with the PS4's hardware. Sony is known for releasing the PS with a high price, not because its not worth it, but because they have to turn a dollar on it. Additionally, we have yet to hear from MS on it's next gen console. I don't expect them to make the same mistake that Sony made 7 years ago with the PS3, so the next Xbox will release this year as well and people are going to be watching. Sony has raised the stakes, but MS still controls the living room.
|
Tailss Prower
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 03:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
SSBBW Amber wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:It's possible that the PS4 version may have additional graphical flourishes that the PS3 version doesn't. Eventually they may do a fairly significant graphical overhaul of the game such that it takes advantage of the PS4's hardware capability to a greater capacity.
In the meantime, moving Dust to the PS4 "as is" would be useful in that it would allow people who own a PS4 and not a PS3 to play Dust, or continue to keep playing Dust. Dust will need to keep up with the times, as PS3 owners will probably be switching to a PS4 fairly quickly after the PS4 hits the shelves. I'm not sure I agree that people will be switching over fairly quickly. Both Sony and MS have shown that the more complicated they make the console, the more issues there are in the first year of release. While I think that there will be a large number of sales, I don't think that those sales will be record breaking in the first year. The economy is still sluggish and the PS is going to have at least a $500 price tag, probably higher since most $500 laptops can't compare with the PS4's hardware. Sony is known for releasing the PS with a high price, not because its not worth it, but because they have to turn a dollar on it. Additionally, we have yet to hear from MS on it's next gen console. I don't expect them to make the same mistake that Sony made 7 years ago with the PS3, so the next Xbox will release this year as well and people are going to be watching. Sony has raised the stakes, but MS still controls the living room.
If ya asked me I think it is a poor choice to ever choose a xbox now don't get me wrong I have one sitting in my room but I think the PS3 was way better than the Xbox 360 I think what got sony was the price but at the same time if ya think about how the xbox 360 was when it first came out they were pretty even in price seeing how you needed all this extra stuff just to get it to do some the things you wanted and then theirs xbox live which I hate I only play the xbox consoles for certain games like halo but I'll always be a FAN of SONY so I disagree that Xbox 360 is in the lead as I don't see a lead really they are about even more than anything from my standpoint view of things :P |
|
SSBBW Amber
Church of the Unforgiven
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 04:45:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tailss Prower wrote:
If ya asked me I think it is a poor choice to ever choose a xbox now don't get me wrong I have one sitting in my room but I think the PS3 was way better than the Xbox 360 I think what got sony was the price but at the same time if ya think about how the xbox 360 was when it first came out they were pretty even in price seeing how you needed all this extra stuff just to get it to do some the things you wanted and then theirs xbox live which I hate I only play the xbox consoles for certain games like halo but I'll always be a FAN of SONY so I disagree that Xbox 360 is in the lead as I don't see a lead really they are about even more than anything from my standpoint view of things :P
I can certainly see your point, but numbers speak volumes:
http://www.geekwire.com/2012/xbox-360-tops-wii-ps3-1st-time-yearly-global-sales/
Also, owing both consoles, I hardly ever play games on my Xbox, I use it more for media purposes more than anything else. Whereas I use my PS3 for gaming. That being said, the reason has always been because MS just had better content over the years as far as movies and music. Sony had always had big games released for download on the same day as the were released in the stores, where MS didn't. MS has now started offering new releases for some games as downloads, while Sony has increased it's movie and music market more over the years. Additionally, if MS has it's way, every internet and cable provider in the country will offer features on Xbox. Verizon and Comcast both do already, not to mention companies such as HBO are climbing on board the MS bandwagon. Sony can't say that. So that leaves Sony in the dust for now, but MS does have a history of putting all it's eggs in one basket while the rest of the industry innovates and leave them behind. |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 04:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
have you SEEN eve online 3 years ago and now 10 years later?
Dust is most likely already planned to run on the PS5, at modern graphics of that time. This is CCP we're talking about, not some lazy game company that makes squeals to everything. |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
666
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 05:16:00 -
[13] - Quote
SSBBW Amber wrote:Tailss Prower wrote:
If ya asked me I think it is a poor choice to ever choose a xbox now don't get me wrong I have one sitting in my room but I think the PS3 was way better than the Xbox 360 I think what got sony was the price but at the same time if ya think about how the xbox 360 was when it first came out they were pretty even in price seeing how you needed all this extra stuff just to get it to do some the things you wanted and then theirs xbox live which I hate I only play the xbox consoles for certain games like halo but I'll always be a FAN of SONY so I disagree that Xbox 360 is in the lead as I don't see a lead really they are about even more than anything from my standpoint view of things :P
I can certainly see your point, but numbers speak volumes: http://www.geekwire.com/2012/xbox-360-tops-wii-ps3-1st-time-yearly-global-sales/Also, owing both consoles, I hardly ever play games on my Xbox, I use it more for media purposes more than anything else. Whereas I use my PS3 for gaming. That being said, the reason has always been because MS just had better content over the years as far as movies and music. Sony had always had big games released for download on the same day as the were released in the stores, where MS didn't. MS has now started offering new releases for some games as downloads, while Sony has increased it's movie and music market more over the years. Additionally, if MS has it's way, every internet and cable provider in the country will offer features on Xbox. Verizon and Comcast both do already, not to mention companies such as HBO are climbing on board the MS bandwagon. Sony can't say that. So that leaves Sony in the dust for now, but MS does have a history of putting all it's eggs in one basket while the rest of the industry innovates and leave them behind.
Yes, numbers speak volumes. And the article you linked to was from last freaking year.
Here is this year's article. Get with the times.
http://www.geekwire.com/2013/official-playstation-atop-console-market/
Yeesh. |
Dregan808 Sintori
Imperial Dragoon Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 06:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Aighun wrote:SSBBW Amber wrote:Tailss Prower wrote:
If ya asked me I think it is a poor choice to ever choose a xbox now don't get me wrong I have one sitting in my room but I think the PS3 was way better than the Xbox 360 I think what got sony was the price but at the same time if ya think about how the xbox 360 was when it first came out they were pretty even in price seeing how you needed all this extra stuff just to get it to do some the things you wanted and then theirs xbox live which I hate I only play the xbox consoles for certain games like halo but I'll always be a FAN of SONY so I disagree that Xbox 360 is in the lead as I don't see a lead really they are about even more than anything from my standpoint view of things :P
I can certainly see your point, but numbers speak volumes: http://www.geekwire.com/2012/xbox-360-tops-wii-ps3-1st-time-yearly-global-sales/Also, owing both consoles, I hardly ever play games on my Xbox, I use it more for media purposes more than anything else. Whereas I use my PS3 for gaming. That being said, the reason has always been because MS just had better content over the years as far as movies and music. Sony had always had big games released for download on the same day as the were released in the stores, where MS didn't. MS has now started offering new releases for some games as downloads, while Sony has increased it's movie and music market more over the years. Additionally, if MS has it's way, every internet and cable provider in the country will offer features on Xbox. Verizon and Comcast both do already, not to mention companies such as HBO are climbing on board the MS bandwagon. Sony can't say that. So that leaves Sony in the dust for now, but MS does have a history of putting all it's eggs in one basket while the rest of the industry innovates and leave them behind. Yes, numbers speak volumes. And the article you linked to was from last freaking year. Here is this year's article. Get with the times. http://www.geekwire.com/2013/official-playstation-atop-console-market/Yeesh.
So Sony has been combining their PS2 and PS3 numbers when releasing their statement to make their figures look better... Seems pretty shady to me. |
The Loathing
The Southern Legion
21
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 07:01:00 -
[15] - Quote
What I sincerely hope is a major Engine upgrade if and when they move to the PS4. Unreal Engine 3 will look CRAPPY by next year. |
The Loathing
The Southern Legion
21
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 07:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tailss Prower wrote:
If ya asked me I think it is a poor choice to ever choose a xbox now don't get me wrong I have one sitting in my room but I think the PS3 was way better than the Xbox 360 I think what got sony was the price but at the same time if ya think about how the xbox 360 was when it first came out they were pretty even in price seeing how you needed all this extra stuff just to get it to do some the things you wanted and then theirs xbox live which I hate I only play the xbox consoles for certain games like halo but I'll always be a FAN of SONY so I disagree that Xbox 360 is in the lead as I don't see a lead really they are about even more than anything from my standpoint view of things :P
While the PS3 may be a higher end bit of kit, the Xbox Live service craps all over the PSN. When I moved to PS3 for Dust I wanted to scream on the Sony forums for not having a party system and easier friends/contacts options. They better get it right this time, cos waiting for voice in squads, etc is bollocks. |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 07:11:00 -
[17] - Quote
The Loathing wrote:What I sincerely hope is a major Engine upgrade if and when they move to the PS4. Unreal Engine 3 will look CRAPPY by next year.
unreal 4 is not hard to run unreal 3 gams on, high poly modeling means all of the art is allready done for ps4 |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 07:17:00 -
[18] - Quote
Tbh, i d rather have information on the future of dust ON PS3 as it s been a while we didnt get precise informations. Give us love, devblogs, screens, new buuild stuff etc..
PS4 info can wait until fanfest |
Bald Crusader
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
30
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 07:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
The Loathing wrote:What I sincerely hope is a major Engine upgrade if and when they move to the PS4. Unreal Engine 3 will look CRAPPY by next year. Next year? |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 08:34:00 -
[20] - Quote
Bald Crusader wrote:The Loathing wrote:What I sincerely hope is a major Engine upgrade if and when they move to the PS4. Unreal Engine 3 will look CRAPPY by next year. Next year? ps4 and unreal 4 both out by this November |
|
Sylvana Nightwind
Expert Intervention Caldari State
60
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 08:36:00 -
[21] - Quote
They are saving all announcements for Fanfest I am sure of that ;) |
SSBBW Amber
Church of the Unforgiven
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 09:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
Aighun wrote:SSBBW Amber wrote:Tailss Prower wrote:
If ya asked me I think it is a poor choice to ever choose a xbox now don't get me wrong I have one sitting in my room but I think the PS3 was way better than the Xbox 360 I think what got sony was the price but at the same time if ya think about how the xbox 360 was when it first came out they were pretty even in price seeing how you needed all this extra stuff just to get it to do some the things you wanted and then theirs xbox live which I hate I only play the xbox consoles for certain games like halo but I'll always be a FAN of SONY so I disagree that Xbox 360 is in the lead as I don't see a lead really they are about even more than anything from my standpoint view of things :P
I can certainly see your point, but numbers speak volumes: http://www.geekwire.com/2012/xbox-360-tops-wii-ps3-1st-time-yearly-global-sales/Also, owing both consoles, I hardly ever play games on my Xbox, I use it more for media purposes more than anything else. Whereas I use my PS3 for gaming. That being said, the reason has always been because MS just had better content over the years as far as movies and music. Sony had always had big games released for download on the same day as the were released in the stores, where MS didn't. MS has now started offering new releases for some games as downloads, while Sony has increased it's movie and music market more over the years. Additionally, if MS has it's way, every internet and cable provider in the country will offer features on Xbox. Verizon and Comcast both do already, not to mention companies such as HBO are climbing on board the MS bandwagon. Sony can't say that. So that leaves Sony in the dust for now, but MS does have a history of putting all it's eggs in one basket while the rest of the industry innovates and leave them behind. Yes, numbers speak volumes. And the article you linked to was from last freaking year. Here is this year's article. Get with the times. http://www.geekwire.com/2013/official-playstation-atop-console-market/Yeesh.
Perhaps you shoudl read the article...Yeesh. Sony out sold Xbox by 1 million units, by COMBINING total sales of both PS2 and PS3, as did Nintendo. Therefore, since MS sold more units over the holiday season in the US than Sony, it can be safely assumed that worldwide compared straight up, Xbox360 has sold more units than PS3. IN fact in the 5th full paragraph, its clearly states on the basis that Sony combined the numbers of of both PS2 and 3, Xbox wins.
I may have gotten the wrong year, but at least I read what I linked.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |