Adding hull = good

As for everything else, keep terrible ideas to your self

Um how is anything terrible it all pretty much focused around the hull.

As for posting negative ignorant comments keep them to your self.

I think the reason we have no hull is because you can be revived. If the hull is destroyed you cannot be revived. Also keep in mind that when you get hit by a grenade and die you cant be revived, as in for forge guns, massdrivers i think.

So you're saying having shields not take collision damage at all is balanced?

Btw nice comeback newberry

Obviously you haven't read the comments and you still aren't understanding "Plus if you feel something needs to be changed offer tips don't just blab negativity on my threads please." While I will admit this thread is a bit more productive then others I simply want a way to prevent all the massive incoming shield damage and a realistic hull for at least vehicles. It would be easy to implement things like repair tools to be able to rep hull or hull reps modules on vehicles.

+1 for having a Hull bar.

-9000 for all the bull**** arguments in the thread. Act like civilized human beings.

Obviously you haven't read the comments and you still aren't understanding "Plus if you feel something needs to be changed offer tips don't just blab negativity on my threads please." While I will admit this thread is a bit more productive then others I simply want a way to prevent all the massive incoming shield damage and a realistic hull for at least vehicles. It would be easy to implement things like repair tools to be able to rep hull or hull reps modules on vehicles.

We already have Hull, we just don't see it. When we are bleeding out we have taken Hull damage (so our suits are nonresponsive) and when we die instantly its because the damage we took was more than our total Hull HP.

Thats why a grenade at your feet will insta-kill you while one a few meters away will put you in bleed out mode. Also why a sniper usually just puts you in bleed out, but if you had low armor will insta-kill you.

Vehicles work the same way. It's just that most AV weapons do enough damage to destroy the remaining armor and Hull in the last shot. But, vehicles that are at 0 armor but have some Hull HP left cannot move but their turrets can still fire. It's rare, but happens.

At no point did i receive an answer to my question and saying "Plus if you feel something needs to be changed offer tips don't just blab negativity on my threads please." doesn't help things. By pointing out a hole in your proposal I am pointing out something that you have overlooked, this is your cue to answer it and to expand on the original idea, what you are currently doing will just stall this thread. On a side note please use comma's it helps make long sentences more readable.

I could see a hull bar on vehicles, might make for more differences between builds and also provide for more varience between levels.

Not a bad idea.

Would you want reduced speed module functionality once hull damage occurs? Or would it just be more hit points? if more HP, then don't know it would add too much.

About not taking shield damage yes i realize that actually would be a bit of a mistake simply because it would throw off the way things works. However shield damage takin from small falls running into objects is very high for shields and has been complained about before.

So you think having vehicles take no shield damage for collision is good?

.... What in the absolute **** is with this 'community' and their ****ing assumptions, god it's like talking to toddlers...

Let me spell it out for you since you obviously can't use context clues to save your life:

+1 (meaning that I am supporting this particular feature)
for (the action of)
having (implementing the particular feature)
a (self explanatory, but if you need me to explain this too I can)
Hull (the chassis, the bit beneath the armor)
Bar (a representation of the numerical Hit Point value)

Where in the **** did you EVER see 'hell yeah let's make it to where shields don't take collision damage'

FFS, I swear sometimes I feel like I'm the only son of a ***** with intellectual capability around here.

I did answer the question you obviously aren't smart enough to see that, read the above comments and you will see the negative comments. "keep ignorant ideas to your self" applys

that is not true at all there is nothing showing hull or saying hull even exist at this point. There are simply objects with tank and shield and no real indication that these objects even exist.

All of the so called bull**** arguments against this thread were either misguided into thinking he wanted this to apply to infantry as well as vehicles or against having shields take no collision damage, which more than likely would mean you agree with that ******* idea. It's not much of an assumption jack*** if you completely ignore something that would become a problem.