Adding hull = good

As for everything else, keep terrible ideas to your self

I think the reason we have no hull is because you can be revived. If the hull is destroyed you cannot be revived. Also keep in mind that when you get hit by a grenade and die you cant be revived, as in for forge guns, massdrivers i think.

So you're saying having shields not take collision damage at all is balanced?

Btw nice comeback newberry

We already have Hull, we just don't see it. When we are bleeding out we have taken Hull damage (so our suits are nonresponsive) and when we die instantly its because the damage we took was more than our total Hull HP.

Thats why a grenade at your feet will insta-kill you while one a few meters away will put you in bleed out mode. Also why a sniper usually just puts you in bleed out, but if you had low armor will insta-kill you.

Vehicles work the same way. It's just that most AV weapons do enough damage to destroy the remaining armor and Hull in the last shot. But, vehicles that are at 0 armor but have some Hull HP left cannot move but their turrets can still fire. It's rare, but happens.

At no point did i receive an answer to my question and saying "Plus if you feel something needs to be changed offer tips don't just blab negativity on my threads please." doesn't help things. By pointing out a hole in your proposal I am pointing out something that you have overlooked, this is your cue to answer it and to expand on the original idea, what you are currently doing will just stall this thread. On a side note please use comma's it helps make long sentences more readable.

I could see a hull bar on vehicles, might make for more differences between builds and also provide for more varience between levels.

Not a bad idea.

Would you want reduced speed module functionality once hull damage occurs? Or would it just be more hit points? if more HP, then don't know it would add too much.