DUST Search - STANDINGS: Social Justice, Vengeance and Solidarity for all, as it in EVE, let ...

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

STANDINGS: Social Justice, Vengeance and Solidarity for all, as it in EVE, let ...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.15 02:59:00 - [1] - Quote STANDINGS Hell yea there should be standings. Standings are a simple and proven mechanic that flags friend from foe. Best of all CCP owns this concept and has already deployed it in EVE Online which is the universe that Dust 514 shares. Grunts and Corporations should be able to set each other a darker shade of red so that rivalries and blood feuds can be indulged. The insulting loud mouth in local should be rewarded with all sorts of love. On the flip side of this is that perhaps you donGÇÖt want to shoot your allies. Being able to set standing at will for any reason in Dust 514 would empower Players to determine who they want to target or ally. This puts social justice back into the Players hands. STANDINGS MATCH FILTER Dust Mercenaries or Corporations set to red standings would never be found on the same team. This setting need not be mutual in order to take effect. Blues would never be found on the opposing side. However the individuals or corporations involved must set each other positive to benefit from the Blue effect. STANDINGS & FRIENDLY FIRE Standings combined with a Standings Match Filter are a solution that allows for friendly fire to be enabled. So from the moment a new player's boots hit Dust 514 he/she has the ability choose who not to play with. Everyone would have the freedom to set anyone red for any reason at any moment. If someone were to TK you, you set the tard red and abandon the contract. Next time you see him/her it will always be in your crosshars with a marker that lets you know there is someone special to kill. Offenders of friendly fire or other behavior that undermines a team could find themselves in lonely situations. What makes the political spectrum in EVE Online intriguing is the simple fact that you can at any moment shoot anyone at will. What keeps one from crossing the brink are the consequences. I enjoy sandbox gaming. I love the freedom to choose. It is my choice to pull the trigger without any formal declaration of war. Implementing a grand conquest aspect of Dust 514 without friendly fire is going to be a neutered version of what one would expect from EVE. When I call in an Orbital Strike, I would like for GÇ£Danger CloseGÇ¥ to mean something!
Arbor Viridanus Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic 196	Posted - 2013.02.15 03:09:00 - [2] - Quote This is absolutely brilliant. I can't believe no one's thought of it before.
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.15 03:25:00 - [3] - Quote Technically it is CCP's idea. A simple version of the STANDINGS FILTER is being used for the Targeting Overview in EVE Online. The technology has been already created. It just needs to be adapted to Dust 514.
Patoman Radiant ZionTCD Legacy Rising 53	Posted - 2013.02.15 03:27:00 - [4] - Quote random matches for factions should just be that, random. Why does the gallente federation care if merc company b doesn't like a. If you don't want to play with rivals use current game mechanics.
sarow kideth XERCORE R.E.P.O. 7	Posted - 2013.02.15 03:31:00 - [5] - Quote As i said in game i think its great
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.15 03:41:00 - [6] - Quote PVP in New Eden is not random or scripted.
Vaerana Myshtana ScIdama Endless Renaissance 203	Posted - 2013.02.15 04:01:00 - [7] - Quote Nicely thought out. +1 I'm dying for standings. Of course, I also think it'd be hilarious to see someone CONCORDed for TKing. POOF! "Holy carp! When did this game get MTACs?! Why can't I sprint?!"
Jack Louphane XERCORE R.E.P.O. 1	Posted - 2013.02.15 04:08:00 - [8] - Quote good stuff
Jack Louphane XERCORE R.E.P.O. 1	Posted - 2013.02.15 04:13:00 - [9] - Quote very good stuff
Ser Chard Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 8	Posted - 2013.02.15 05:25:00 - [10] - Quote I like the idea. But I also like the idea of rival corps forced to work together on a contract. Maybe they never would? But what if the offer is too good to turn down? Or they dont know until they hit the field? Drama!

Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.15 05:44:00 - [11] - Quote Ser Chard wrote: I like the idea. But I also like the idea of rival corps forced to work together on a contract. Maybe they never would? But what if the offer is too good to turn down? Or they dont know until they hit the field? Drama! It happens in EVE. Regional Blocs of Power will agree to a temporary cease fire and blue standings for the duration of dealing with foreign invaders. Neighborly Enemies become frenemys for a common goal and then go back to fighting each other once the greater threat to their individual sovereignty is neutralized. There have been many occasions that a temporary blue would reset standings during a fight and side with the enemy. STANDINGS are that flexible.
Zin Suddu DUST University Ivy League 3	Posted - 2013.02.15 05:44:00 - [12] - Quote Agree. +1 It would be interesting to see if two rival factions could pull it together FTW, or if one would flip on the contract and go all double cross on their rivals.
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.15 23:05:00 - [13] - Quote A little bump to get this one back in view.
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.17 02:56:00 - [14] - Quote I feel this is a fairly important suggestion. One that could address many interest and concerns. So I will be bumping this one daily till it gets noticed by a DEV.
2-Ton Twenty-One Imperfects Negative-Feedback 235	Posted - 2013.02.17 07:03:00 - [15] - Quote Could be a good thing to implement in a few builds. Game needs far more fleshing out first.
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.17 07:44:00 - [16] - Quote This is part of that "first" of many things that are needed. Shooting members of your own corporation because of a some script of code randomly placed them on the opposing team and not having the choice to team up them to kill everyone else is not the New Eden universe that I have known for over seven years.
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.18 23:39:00 - [17] - Quote
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.20 03:46:00 - [18] - Quote Randoms are stealing my fitted rides and crashing them. I cant shoot them. I cannot prevent them from being on my side. Current system lacks consequences. In fact there are zero consequences in Dust 514. This is not the EVE Universe. I need standings.
Rachoi HavoK Core 17	Posted - 2013.02.20 03:49:00 - [19] - Quote i agree with the standings thing, would make it easier to bear with the random matches... would also make it so i dont end up against my own corporation, since that's happend a couple of times, was a nice challenge match, but i really dont want to makea habit of it
Ten-Sidhe Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 414	Posted - 2013.02.20 07:08:00 - [20] - Quote In old build there was a standings tab, said coming soon when selected. So, I think some form of standing was planned, this suggested version would be great. In EvE, factions will let you take missions if down to -2 standing on a scale of -10 to +10. The more profitable missions are only open to pilots in good standing. High standings are needed for other things, like building space stations in there territory. At -5, if I remember right, the npc of that faction fire on you. Player corps can set standings to player corps at will. Npc faction standing is average of all players separate standings. edit. Rather then never blue vs blue or red on team, make it a preference so it puts them that way if possible then balances team with extra if needed. This would avoid issue of corps with a lot of blue/red set having trouble with finding matches. Maybe have a separate setting for will play against/with that has default set by red/blue. So a blue sparring partner could be set blue/will fight against, for example.

Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.20 07:50:00 - [21] - Quote Well Ted, I am very confident that there will never be a situation in which everyone will be blue to each other. New Eden has been around for about 10 years. There has been every oppurtunity and freedom to make a Blue Universe but that has never come to past. People like to blow each other to hell. Corporations and Alliance would go on a reset binge if there was too much blue. Reset standings was always inclinded in this idea.
Necrodermis GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 460	Posted - 2013.02.20 08:04:00 - [22] - Quote set everyone to good. fight in empty matches
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.20 09:05:00 - [23] - Quote They would have to set you blue as well.
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.23 11:13:00 - [24] - Quote
Velvet Overkill Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS. 104	Posted - 2013.02.24 01:09:00 - [25] - Quote Vaeul wrote: Randoms are stealing my fitted rides and crashing them. I cant shoot them. I cannot prevent them from being on my side. Current system lacks consequences. In fact there are zero consequences in Dust 514. This is not the EVE Universe. I need standings. This would make a lot of vehicle users happy.
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.24 02:47:00 - [26] - Quote
Vaeul XERCORE R.E.P.O. 27	Posted - 2013.02.25 16:11:00 - [27] - Quote
sarow kideth XERCORE R.E.P.O. 7	Posted - 2013.02.25 23:57:00 - [28] - Quote Would realy be nice possibly prevent haveing crap like haveing the same guy steal our dropship just to crash it with us in it twice... We were furious
Balzich Rotaine Rotaine Shipping Inc 17	Posted - 2013.02.26 00:19:00 - [29] - Quote +1Standings would be awesome. The first thing I would do is go through the forums and flag all these Terd merchants crying about everything. Then i would have a tea bag bonanza on the battlefield. It would be glorious.
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 28	Posted - 2013.03.09 23:51:00 - [30] - Quote Here is your universal solution to improving the gaming experience.

Thrillhouse Van Houten DIOS EX. 23	Posted - 2013.03.13 04:24:00 - [31] - Quote No reason not to have this. For a start, it is in Eve and it works in Eve. Dust is in New Eden just like Eve and has Corporations and will have Factions just like Eve. I'm honestly kindof disappointed in CCP for not incorporating more ideas that work almost perfectly in Eve into Dust. Standings is one of those ideas.
Lonnar KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 13	Posted - 2013.03.13 05:54:00 - [32] - Quote You sir, just became my new hero. +1 for you, and I can only express the hope that this will be implemented when Friendly Fire comes out ... or at least this better be hot on it's heels.
DeathStalker Synchro D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION 25	Posted - 2013.03.13 06:14:00 - [33] - Quote +1 Dude, if they do this, you just made this twice as awesome
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 35	Posted - 2013.03.13 20:03:00 - [34] - Quote Please let there be standings
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 38	Posted - 2013.03.15 02:19:00 - [35] - Quote I am in favor of all players having access to game content, learning to play the same game and not waiting for a CEO or Director to moderate a issue.
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 38	Posted - 2013.03.16 21:09:00 - [36] - Quote I guess that I should be bumping this thread until a DEV acknowledges that it has been read.
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 38	Posted - 2013.03.17 20:19:00 - [37] - Quote big badda bump!
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 39	Posted - 2013.03.24 21:57:00 - [38] - Quote STANDINGS = good
Corbina Ninja Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 98	Posted - 2013.03.24 23:27:00 - [39] - Quote +1
slypie11 Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 16	Posted - 2013.03.25 01:32:00 - [40] - Quote maybe there should be different levels of red and blue, like personal and corp. It would be the difference between "I don't want this guy on my team" and telling all your friends "I wan't him dead, I want his family dead"

Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 41	Posted - 2013.03.25 03:03:00 - [41] - Quote slypie11 wrote: maybe there should be different levels of red and blue, like personal and corp. It would be the difference between "I don't want this guy on my team" and telling all your friends "I wan't him dead, I want his family dead" Yep. In fact it is like that in EVE. The basic framework is already setup. Personal Standings Corporate Standings Alliance Standings You would have the ability to sets standings for yourself. CEOs and Directors would set standings for their corporation. Alliance Executor would set standings for an alliance. Now they just need to enable it all in Dust 514 and add a Standings Based Match Filter. Standings plus a Standings Match Filter is a simple solution that would address so many issues. I don't know of any FPS out there that has something like this. So not only here is a chance to address the big issues that are a concern in this game but also an opportunity to be innovative. Standing would still be useful even If this game were to offer Planetary Open Worlds at a future date. You would still need to let the perimeter defenses, turret installation and ect know who to tear apart if the "No Trespassing" is not translated properly.
slypie11 Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 18	Posted - 2013.03.25 03:05:00 - [42] - Quote Dammit, CCP stole my idea
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 43	Posted - 2013.03.25 04:11:00 - [43] - Quote slypie11 wrote: Dammit, CCP stole my idea Nonetheless, you had a good thought :D
2-Ton Twenty-One Imperfects Negative-Feedback 348	Posted - 2013.03.25 04:18:00 - [44] - Quote How can I set everyone red? That way I don't have to play on the same team as anyone.
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 43	Posted - 2013.03.25 04:47:00 - [45] - Quote 2-Ton Twenty-One wrote: How can I set everyone red? That way I don't have to play on the same team as anyone. You would have to manually set each person red to be the man against the universe. Yea if you wanted that, it should be your prerogative and an option. Its been done in EVE.
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 44	Posted - 2013.03.29 09:58:00 - [46] - Quote We need standings and a standings based match filter.
G Torq ALTA B2O 120	Posted - 2013.03.29 10:13:00 - [47] - Quote Vaeul wrote: STANDINGS STANDINGS MATCH FILTER Dust Mercenaries or Corporations set to red standings would never be found on the same team. This setting need not be mutual in order to take effect. Blues would never be found on the opposing side. However the individuals or corporations involved must set each other positive to benefit from the Blue effect. We're Mercs - We're hired to do a job, not to care about who is on what team.
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 44	Posted - 2013.04.01 00:56:00 - [48] - Quote G Torq wrote: Vaeul wrote: STANDINGS STANDINGS MATCH FILTER Dust Mercenaries or Corporations set to red standings would never be found on the same team. This setting need not be mutual in order to take effect. Blues would never be found on the opposing side. However the individuals or corporations involved must set each other positive to benefit from the Blue effect. We're Mercs - We're hired to do a job, not to care about who is on what team. You did not actually read the post.
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 44	Posted - 2013.04.08 00:24:00 - [49] - Quote Bump
Vaeul XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S 44	Posted - 2013.05.18 17:37:00 - [50] - Quote Hello

slypie11 Planetary Response Organisation 283	Posted - 2013.05.18 18:18:00 - [51] - Quote hello. Just came up with a new idea for bounties which I think fit in with this thread. So, if you place a bounty on someone's head, everyone on the opposing team sees a colored chevron above that person's head. When aimed at, it shows that bounty, and number of times that bounty will be paid. Alternatively, it shows time of bounty or amount of money paid according to amount of money lost by the person whom the bounty is put on. So let me explain. Number of times the bounty will be paid means the number times the hunted is killed that the bounty will be paid. For instance, if the contracter sets this to 5 and the bounty to 5,000(random number), the next 5 people that kill this person with receive 5,000 isk. Time of bounty means the time in game that the bounty is active. For instance, if this is set to 5 minutes, anyone that kills him/her in 5 minutes will receive the bounty.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.