DUST Search - Planetside 2

All Channels

The Locker Room

Planetside 2

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Spaceman-Rob Galactic Alliance 514 64	Posted - 2013.01.15 14:38:00 - [1] - Quote Been watching a few vids of people playing it, and I can't help but wish dust was more like it, dust plays like the poor man's planetside, how do you think they compare?
Takahiro Kashuken Intara Direct Action Caldari State 102	Posted - 2013.01.15 14:41:00 - [2] - Quote Its unoptimized and really buggy Plus its just randoms in a game, its like a giant public match really and when you wake up you have lost what you fought for No end game at all
dust badger BetaMax. 283	Posted - 2013.01.15 14:45:00 - [3] - Quote I prefer Dust, people say dust is confusing to start off but playing PS2 i had no clue. Apart from that i wasnt that impressed, i had loads of bugs with the installation and running of it . and the actual game play was average
trollsroyce Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 164	Posted - 2013.01.15 14:46:00 - [4] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its unoptimized and really buggy Plus its just randoms in a game, its like a giant public match really and when you wake up you have lost what you fought for No end game at all It's a giant sandbox but a shallow one. Dust can become a kitty litter box through which you can dig a tunnel to china.
Iron Wolf Saber BetaMax. 2864	Posted - 2013.01.15 14:55:00 - [5] - Quote damn game is full of hacks. Like shooting though floor folks.
Jason Pearson Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 742	Posted - 2013.01.15 14:57:00 - [6] - Quote DUST is meant to eventually have meaning combat where battles affect other players. PS2 has no meaning to its combat, you can fight in the same place for 5 hours straight and it can be fun, but once you and your outfit are offline, the randoms will lose that place you held for so long and you'll get pushed back again. Theres also the fact theres no reason to actually "win". And then theres the whole, if you're losing just switch to an alt and fight on a different continent, it's dull and boring.
OrangeSauce Algintal Core Gallente Federation 2	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:12:00 - [7] - Quote Planetside 2 is far better than Dust, sorry guys. Player count, graphically, it plays in real time with a day/night cycle just to name a few. It's an ongoing battle that never ends unlike dust where you jump into a twenty minute fight where you get stomped on, or spawn trap the enemy. As far as bugs, don't even try to say that Dust wasn't just awful when we started playing. Everything has bugs when it first comes out. I do have high hopes for Dust and can't wait to see the improvements that are implemented over time.
Takahiro Kashuken Intara Direct Action Caldari State 102	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:19:00 - [8] - Quote OrangeSauce wrote: Planetside 2 is far better than Dust, sorry guys. Player count, graphically, it plays in real time with a day/night cycle just to name a few. It's an ongoing battle that never ends unlike dust where you jump into a twenty minute fight where you get stomped on, or spawn trap the enemy. As far as bugs, don't even try to say that Dust wasn't just awful when we started playing. Everything has bugs when it first comes out. I do have high hopes for Dust and can't wait to see the improvements that are implemented over time. PS2 is released still havnt fixed some bad bugs and its unoptimized which is a big no-no Gameplay>graphics and the playercout in good but filled with retards with open mics which is a big downer
Sobriety Denied Universal Allies Inc. 432	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:21:00 - [9] - Quote nb4lock yea of course it's better.. it runs on a gaming pc....
Noraa Anderson Nox Aeterna Security 184	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:28:00 - [10] - Quote C-can we have 48 player matches yet CCP?

tribal wyvern ZionTCD Legacy Rising 673	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:28:00 - [11] - Quote Spaceman-Rob wrote: Been watching a few vids of people playing it, and I can't help but wish dust was more like it, dust plays like the poor man's planetside, how do you think they compare? Planetside 2 is a failure of epic proportions. Played it, gave it a chance, didn't like it, deleted it (and so did a lot of others)
Sobriety Denied Universal Allies Inc. 432	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:35:00 - [12] - Quote i can imagine SOE tried to "evolve" planetside like the trend is now a days with every game remade, so the casuals, noobs and reetaards can feel good about themselves while everyone else suffers and is forced to play a dumbed down version of a classic game so the morons aka "expanded target audience" who never were that into gaming in the 1rst place can feel good about themselves
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming 2281	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:40:00 - [13] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: DUST is meant to eventually have meaning combat where battles affect other players. PS2 has no meaning to its combat, you can fight in the same place for 5 hours straight and it can be fun, but once you and your outfit are offline, the randoms will lose that place you held for so long and you'll get pushed back again. Theres also the fact theres no reason to actually "win". And then theres the whole, if you're losing just switch to an alt and fight on a different continent, it's dull and boring. sad thing is........ppl wanna turn DUST into that as well
Kain Spero Imperfects Negative-Feedback 891	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:46:00 - [14] - Quote trollsroycez wrote: Dust can become a kitty litter box through which you can dig a tunnel to china. This is now one of my favorite quotes referring to Dust. +1
Geth Massredux ZionTCD Legacy Rising 62	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:58:00 - [15] - Quote Well Dust has every right to be like planetside2. The thing is with planetside 2 it's only on PC. Dust is on ps3. By far no console- either it's 360 or ps3 can't support over thousands of players on one map at a time. I never played planetside2 so I'm not sure about player count. Look at BF3 it's incredible graphics. It's 60 players on pc. On ps3 and 360 it's only 24 players a map. Dust is on outdated console and ccp is just squeezing 40 something players on dust 514 when the final release comes. Hopefully you get my point.
Octavian Vetiver Dog Nation United Relativity Alliance 152	Posted - 2013.01.15 15:59:00 - [16] - Quote Except Dust is already past PS2 in affecting another game or universe. On a completely different system. How many games have PC and consoles connected into one basically. And by affecting I'm talking FW.
Geth Massredux ZionTCD Legacy Rising 62	Posted - 2013.01.15 16:03:00 - [17] - Quote Aye yes they are squeezing that as well. I say that's impressive.
Moonracer2000 Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 311	Posted - 2013.01.15 16:25:00 - [18] - Quote I've played Planetside 2 and it just doesn't excite me. Fighting over terrain on a huge map is a brilliant technical feat but they do a poor job of making new players understand how it is done or make it ever feel like you have accomplished something. Plus the skill system is painfully slow. While I feel Dust hasn't delivered the goods promised, I actually play Dust.
crazy space 2100046106 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 879	Posted - 2013.01.15 19:32:00 - [19] - Quote OrangeSauce wrote: Planetside 2 is far better than Dust, sorry guys. Player count, graphically, it plays in real time with a day/night cycle just to name a few. It's an ongoing battle that never ends unlike dust where you jump into a twenty minute fight where you get stomped on, or spawn trap the enemy. As far as bugs, don't even try to say that Dust wasn't just awful when we started playing. Everything has bugs when it first comes out. I do have high hopes for Dust and can't wait to see the improvements that are implemented over time. It feels buggy and old and way to big. It looks terrible, ther eis just something.... old about the graphics. Like large empty areas with plop building. It's not very good environment art. I know dust for some reason seems to have lost all the maps that were based around eve racial buildings. Becuase I know ccp has mental issues or something. But trust me communications for instance looked great. The ammar maps are going to be cool, dust just looks better than PS2. There is more to it. I was expecting borderlands 2 quality, instead the terrain feels like a video game from 1995.
crazy space 2100046106 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 879	Posted - 2013.01.15 19:38:00 - [20] - Quote Smaller maps are needed. 128v128 is a really good number for what feels like a large battle. With long range dropship runs and muliple bases to fight over, Fun LAV runs where after burns are useful. 60 minute matches. But 1000v1000 just isn't .... fun. It takes a long time to get to anything and nothing ever really feels like you are having an effect. World of tanks does a better job of making you feel like your taking over the globe. The World war map is great. Corps battle out over maps that are places from those areas. So when you fight in Russia you fight in Russia. People earn a sense of ownership. I hope FW is like that soon. With terrain and different districts having different types of buildings so a fight over the same place is the same map. But every map is slightly different based on planet type and time of day. World of tanks can do it dust can do it. And it's ok if the terrian is long term just bringing in more art , like attacking an ammar planet there should be ammar buildings. I think dust is going to work.

Fivetimes Infinity Immobile Infantry 1086	Posted - 2013.01.15 20:33:00 - [21] - Quote The bugginess/etc difference between Dust and Planetside 2 isn't worth commenting on. Both Dust and PS2 have performance issues, have bugs, have stuff that needs to be fixed via rebalancing. Neither game strikes me as any better balanced, less buggy, more optimized. And certainly Planetside 2 has handled the issue of snipers in big, open maps far, far better than Dust has. Snipers in Planetside 2 shoot bullets that have to travel to their targets, which drop over time, and the scope of their rifle always sways unless you use a "hold breath" button that gives you a couple seconds of steady aim. Snipers in Planetside 2 are a valuable addition to the game, but they don't dominate fights. Unlike in Dust. The games are totally different in terms of how they play. They cater to different tastes. I like Planetside 2, but I like Dust's depth and detail more. I like when death has consequence, I like fights which are scaled such that my actions actually make a difference. In Planetside, being one guy in an army of 600 people means you kind of fade into obscurity. You can't really hope to make much of an impact yourself. The lack of any end-game isn't really a sensible comparison. Dust has no end game either. Eventually it will, but eventually Planetside 2 will have outfits building bases and going to war with each other over resources and stuff. Comparing how Dust will be in a year to how Planetside is right now isn't very fair.
SILENTSAM 69 Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION 421	Posted - 2013.01.15 20:39:00 - [22] - Quote Planetside 2 does not offer anything I really want. Besides it is terrible for glitchers and hackers from what I hear. Its just a basic FPS with a bunch of people, and nothing fulfilling to do. DUST 514 on the other hand will be offering what I want, and doing it with some real depth. It may not seem that way yet, but it will as it further connects to EVE.
Fivetimes Infinity Immobile Infantry 1086	Posted - 2013.01.15 20:46:00 - [23] - Quote The glitches aren't bad and the hacking doesn't prevent you from playing the game normally. Maybe once a week you'll get wiped out by some guy hacking, but they're active in banning such people, and you just respawn (nothing is lost on death) and continue playing when it does happen.
Nstomper Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0 205	Posted - 2013.01.15 21:11:00 - [24] - Quote OrangeSauce wrote: Planetside 2 is far better than Dust, sorry guys. Player count, graphically, it plays in real time with a day/night cycle just to name a few. It's an ongoing battle that never ends unlike dust where you jump into a twenty minute fight where you get stomped on, or spawn trap the enemy. As far as bugs, don't even try to say that Dust wasn't just awful when we started playing. Everything has bugs when it first comes out. I do have high hopes for Dust and can't wait to see the improvements that are implemented over time. planetside 2 is garbage played beta and it sucked horse booty and the only reason the map is large scale with way more people in a match then dust has currently is because its a pc mmo
Crm234 Wraith Shadow Guards 166	Posted - 2013.01.15 21:19:00 - [25] - Quote It all comes down to appeal, if you dont play Eve than planet side 2 appeals more to you than Dust. If you do play Eve than Dust has far more potential then planet side 2. Skirmish is not going to drag BF3 players away from BF3, I wish it did. Ambush is not going to drag COD players away from Blops2, i wish it did. but on the other hand if you told them you could then play both modes together with 1999 other players that SOE is selling well . Where CCP keeps trying to sell Eve to people that dont play Eve or own a computer with the market and Eve space changing. Non of the reviews on Dust ever say the concept is crap, just their not sure what it offers to the player that doesnt play Eve on the PS3 mostly. Yes there are exceptions to the rules
DEADPOOL5241 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 230	Posted - 2013.01.15 21:22:00 - [26] - Quote Crm234 wrote: It all comes down to appeal, if you dont play Eve than planet side 2 appeals more to you than Dust. If you do play Eve than Dust has far more potential then planet side 2. Skirmish is not going to drag BF3 players away from BF3, I wish it did. Ambush is not going to drag COD players away from Blops2, i wish it did. but on the other hand if you told them you could then play both modes together with 1999 other players that SOE is selling well . Where CCP keeps trying to sell Eve to people that dont play Eve or own a computer with the market and Eve space changing. Non of the reviews on Dust ever say the concept is crap, just their not sure what it offers to the player that doesnt play Eve on the PS3 mostly. Yes there are exceptions to the rules Only 15 to 20% of game is in this beta. Wait for next update then see what Dust will be like.
Crm234 Wraith Shadow Guards 166	Posted - 2013.01.15 21:54:00 - [27] - Quote I hope so, with open beta next week. It really sounds pretty off to me that a company would go open beta with 80% of its game missing when even its player base saids the game is not strong enough to go open beta but we will see. I hope 80% percent does get added because the game cant feel like a mini game add on to Eve but more as a independent game to non Eve players.
Geth Massredux ZionTCD Legacy Rising 62	Posted - 2013.01.15 22:21:00 - [28] - Quote Crm234 wrote: I hope so, with open beta next week. It really sounds pretty off to me that a company would go open beta with 80% of its game missing when even its player base saids the game is not strong enough to go open beta but we will see. I hope 80% percent does get added because the game cant feel like a mini game add on to Eve but more as a independent game to non Eve players. It's so annoying that everybody thinks thinks or expects this open beta to have so much features. It's clearly still in beta. Not final.
The Loathing The Southern Legion 21	Posted - 2013.01.15 22:30:00 - [29] - Quote I would say Planetside 2 is A LOT prettier than Dust, but has a short-sighted future. Hence the fact it is a sequel. Dust 514 has been designed to outlast the technology. If and when CCP upgrade their platform to Unreal Engine 4 for the PS4 and then continue to add gameplay updates, new equipment and expand New Eden, Dust 514 will show who the winner is. CCP is more patient than most of their customers. And funnily enough, those customers come right back. Just look at Eve...
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2013.01.15 22:34:00 - [30] - Quote Fivetimes Infinity wrote: The bugginess/etc difference between Dust and Planetside 2 isn't worth commenting on. Both Dust and PS2 have performance issues, have bugs, have stuff that needs to be fixed via rebalancing. Neither game strikes me as any better balanced, less buggy, more optimized. And certainly Planetside 2 has handled the issue of snipers in big, open maps far, far better than Dust has. Snipers in Planetside 2 shoot bullets that have to travel to their targets, which drop over time, and the scope of their rifle always sways unless you use a "hold breath" button that gives you a couple seconds of steady aim. Snipers in Planetside 2 are a valuable addition to the game, but they don't dominate fights. Unlike in Dust. The games are totally different in terms of how they play. They cater to different tastes. I like Planetside 2, but I like Dust's depth and detail more. I like when death has consequence, I like fights which are scaled such that my actions actually make a difference. In Planetside, being one guy in an army of 600 people means you kind of fade into obscurity. You can't really hope to make much of an impact yourself. The lack of any end-game isn't really a sensible comparison. Dust has no end game either. Eventually it will, but eventually Planetside 2 will have outfits building bases and going to war with each other over resources and stuff. Comparing how Dust will be in a year to how Planetside is right now isn't very fair. u forgot something. u cant have bullet drop in dust because dust merc dont use bullets lol

Rayan Storm ZionTCD Legacy Rising 358	Posted - 2013.01.15 23:00:00 - [31] - Quote Spaceman-Rob wrote: Been watching a few vids of people playing it, and I can't help but wish dust was more like it, dust plays like the poor man's planetside, how do you think they compare? Planetside=terrible sorry
Aighun Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 666	Posted - 2013.01.15 23:17:00 - [32] - Quote Crm234 wrote: It all comes down to appeal, if you dont play Eve than planet side 2 appeals more to you than Dust. If you do play Eve than Dust has far more potential then planet side 2. Skirmish is not going to drag BF3 players away from BF3, I wish it did. Ambush is not going to drag COD players away from Blops2, i wish it did. but on the other hand if you told them you could then play both modes together with 1999 other players that SOE is selling well . Where CCP keeps trying to sell Eve to people that dont play Eve or own a computer with the market and Eve space changing. Non of the reviews on Dust ever say the concept is crap, just their not sure what it offers to the player that doesnt play Eve on the PS3 mostly. Yes there are exceptions to the rules I have never played EVE. It always sounded interesting. But I don't have anything like a gaming rig. That is the reason I don't play Planetside 2. Otherwise I would probably give it a shot. I don't buy this whole "DUST 514 is only for EVE players shoulda been on PC" garbage. Your post seems to share some of those underlying assumptions. There is a huge population of gamers of all stripes that own the PS 3. Not just a few exceptions to a made up and fallacious rule. But yes, you did get to the heart of what CCP is trying to do here. Sell EVE to people that don't play EVE. Why the hell would they try to sell EVE to people that already buy EVE? Makes no sense. DUST may fail to attract and hold player's attention. But this idea that players can only play one game at a time is ridiculous. Some players will probably play both COD Blops2 and DUST 514. 3 years from now if all goes well, you should still be able to play DUST 514 and it should be full of new content, have gone through a lot of refinement, etc. 3 years from now I doubt that the millions of COD players spending all their time on Blops 2 will still be loading it up as often as they do now. DUST should not exist to drag FPS players away from their favorite games. It should be a place where those players can go to experience a kind of gaming like nothing any of the other games have to offer. Even if there is a lot that is already familiar. Like, get gun, shoot enemy. Get killed, respawn.
Dezus 1000 Reaper Galactic 13	Posted - 2013.01.16 00:00:00 - [33] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: DUST is meant to eventually have meaning combat where battles affect other players. PS2 has no meaning to its combat, you can fight in the same place for 5 hours straight and it can be fun, but once you and your outfit are offline, the randoms will lose that place you held for so long and you'll get pushed back again. Theres also the fact theres no reason to actually "win". And then theres the whole, if you're losing just switch to an alt and fight on a different continent, it's dull and boring. That is what it is all about, having a reason to fight. A "real" dynamic scifi universe.
Fivetimes Infinity Immobile Infantry 1086	Posted - 2013.01.16 00:04:00 - [34] - Quote Nstomper wrote: planetside 2 is garbage played beta and it sucked horse booty and the only reason the map is large scale with way more people in a match then dust has currently is because its a pc mmo You realize the game has been released for a couple months now, right? Who cares if you played the beta, the beta is long over and the game has been substantially improved. DON RODIE II wrote: u forgot something. u cant have bullet drop in dust because dust merc dont use bullets lol The mercs in Dust don't exist. They use whatever CCP imagines they use.
fred orpaul Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 211	Posted - 2013.01.16 07:34:00 - [35] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: DUST is meant to eventually have meaning combat where battles affect other players. PS2 has no meaning to its combat, you can fight in the same place for 5 hours straight and it can be fun, but once you and your outfit are offline, the randoms will lose that place you held for so long and you'll get pushed back again. Theres also the fact theres no reason to actually "win". And then theres the whole, if you're losing just switch to an alt and fight on a different continent, it's dull and boring. this. For now yes dust loses by a land slide, but in the long run dust wins. CCP, whatever you might say about them, has a long history of sticking by their games and improving them bit by bit, never saying good enough. That said they also have a long history of taking FOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEERRRRR to get there. Im hoping the critical elements that add depth to this game will come more rapidly in the next couple of months as they have a large data pool and more people to fill the modes they implement(the closed beta suffered horribly from having too few players), but we could be in for a very long haul.
Beast Beastlington Bragian Order Amarr Empire 237	Posted - 2013.01.16 09:26:00 - [36] - Quote Planetside 2 crushes this game in every conceivable way. For starters it actually has functioning, quality gun-play. Also, it's a TON of fun and doesn't have a deluge of stat-****. I can't help but think people have swallowed the Dust marketing line. Like in any way shape or form Dust offers something deeper than any other shooter out there. It's instanced 10-20 min, small scale battles people. The core game-play offers nothing more nuanced or deep than any other game doing the rounds. Dust players have no primary impact on New Eden, they're pure mercenaries, you're not able to own planets, own space, compete with EVE players or create something meaningful (as it is now), you just accept any contract that comes up. I'm not sure how they can fix this problem and it's the biggest problem it has, if you really felt part of something bigger the bad gameplay could be forgiven. Even if it suddenly becomes an amazing game to play it's still not going to feel like an MMO
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2013.01.16 09:33:00 - [37] - Quote Nope ps2 don't crush this game. Ps2 runs at 1 fps lol Maybe, if it comes to ps4. But dust probably will still have more to offer then just a open world and player count
Beast Beastlington Bragian Order Amarr Empire 237	Posted - 2013.01.16 09:36:00 - [38] - Quote DON RODIE II wrote: Nope ps2 don't crash this game. Ps2 runs at 1 fps lol Maybe, if it comes to ps4. But dust probably will still have more to offer then just a open world and player count I can see you've thoroughly done your research.
Django Quik R.I.f.t 219	Posted - 2013.01.16 11:46:00 - [39] - Quote How can you people possibly be comparing Dust to PS2? Dust is still a long way off from release. PS2 is on PC and has already been released for quite some time. You can't compare apples to pears. Granted if Dust is exactly as it is now when it releases, it will be in serious trouble but there is absolutely 0% chance of this happening. Did any of you play the PS2 beta? That makes Dust look AAA.
Noraa Anderson Nox Aeterna Security 184	Posted - 2013.01.16 12:15:00 - [40] - Quote Django Quik wrote: How can you people possibly be comparing Dust to PS2? Oh, I don't know, they're both free 2 play MMOFPS games which let you use vehicles and a variety of soldier classes, set in what are respectively meant to be persistent worlds. Oh, and Sony is behind them both. It's absolute nonsense that we compare them! Dust is still a long way off from release. PS2 is on PC and has already been released for quite some time. You can't compare apples to pears. Well that really depends what you're comparing between things. Granted if Dust is exactly as it is now when it releases, it will be in serious trouble but there is absolutely 0% chance of this happening. Did any of you play the PS2 beta? That makes Dust look AAA. The thing about these games is that there is no final package that will ever be delivered. As soon as they go public that's pretty much it, they're released, and they will continue to be updated for however long it is economically viable. The core mechanics of Dust haven't been nailed down and the content is meager. Dust 514 is going to get panned awfully from the 22nd if it stays the way it is now. That's if anyone really realises it's availble to play.

Kiiran-B Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 45	Posted - 2013.01.16 14:05:00 - [41] - Quote Isn't DUST loading from a server? Which is why they can make the boundaries on a map as big as they want? I remember hearing something about how DUST loads from the server causing less strain in the ps3 which leaves more room for expansion. So they could be on par with ps2. I'm sure I heard something like that.
Beast Beastlington Bragian Order Amarr Empire 237	Posted - 2013.01.16 14:49:00 - [42] - Quote Kiiran-B wrote: Isn't DUST loading from a server? Which is why they can make the boundaries on a map as big as they want? I remember hearing something about how DUST loads from the server causing less strain in the ps3 which leaves more room for expansion. So they could be on par with ps2. I'm sure I heard something like that. LMAO
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2013.01.16 18:26:00 - [43] - Quote lol ps2 has some people at 1fps teleporting everywhere 10 times worst then dust. yeah the game looks pretty and sound good. graphic are overated in that game. how can u compete in a game where some people 100 fps and some people 1 fps? at less in dust u can compete and not worry about thousands of people teleporting like dragon ball z characters lol

GM Hercules Game Masters C C P Alliance 333	Posted - 2013.01.16 20:55:00 - [44] - Quote This topic has been moved from: General Discussion Before opening a new thread, please ensure that you're in the correct section. The forum is sectioned in Channels with a selection of forum threads that cover: Technical support, bug and feedback report, Corporations organisations. Feel free to explore the forum, read the announcements, sticks and the Forum Rules. GM Hercules Forum Community Moderator

Templar Eight Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 5	Posted - 2013.01.31 07:27:00 - [45] - Quote Planetside 2 is the only game stopping Dust 514 from ever going onto PC
MostFeared Beast SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 8	Posted - 2013.01.31 23:08:00 - [46] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: DUST is meant to eventually have meaning combat where battles affect other players. PS2 has no meaning to its combat, you can fight in the same place for 5 hours straight and it can be fun, but once you and your outfit are offline, the randoms will lose that place you held for so long and you'll get pushed back again. Theres also the fact theres no reason to actually "win". And then theres the whole, if you're losing just switch to an alt and fight on a different continent, it's dull and boring. sad thing is........ppl wanna turn DUST into that as well I don't want Dust to become like Planetside 2 I just would like to see some of the vehicles from planetside 2 in dust not identical but something like that. For example some fighters in the air sexy maybe some hover bikes would be awesome. I heard rumor that they might put something like exoskeletons. pretty interested to see how that works :]
James Thraxton The Exemplars 72	Posted - 2013.01.31 23:25:00 - [47] - Quote MostFeared Beast wrote: I don't want Dust to become like Planetside 2 I just would like to see some of the vehicles from planetside 2 in dust not identical but something like that. For example some fighters in the air sexy maybe some hover bikes would be awesome. I heard rumor that they might put something like exoskeletons. pretty interested to see how that works :] all SOON (tm)


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.