Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 17:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
srsly........CCP.....take out the bs sun glare im wearing a futuristic suit but i can get blinded by glare....... another thing dunno if yall play that map at all at the office but it kinda makes it very annoyin to play on the side with the glare #justsayin
i know the kiddies here all want to feel "immersed" an **** but its annoyin.....get rid of it. kthnx |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1591
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 17:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Afraid someone is hiding in the glare? |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 17:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
seriously our helmet's don't have sunglasses mode? |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1058
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 17:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
What you said about the suit contradicts removing glare as lowering immersion- lowering glare would improve immersion because our suits don't suck. Even my minmatar suits have sunglasses tapped to a string I can pull down whenever I want. |
Necandi Brasil
Conspiratus Immortalis
245
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 17:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
A sunglass mode would be nice ! But I don't want to take it off |
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
200k plus years in the future, we do not have transition visors! I guess my glasses are super futuristic! |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Okay I am not immersed but again we a fighting on barren waste lands. These planets are all but destroyed really just shells we suck the life out of to make stuff(well at least that is what they will be when the game releases). So there is no ozone no green house gasses no nothing to protect it from any kinda ray that would from a sun that is that freaking close to a planet(litterally look at that thing it is huge in the sky).
Sorry you have to forgive me I am one of those kiddies who likes flavor to the game that I am playing.
Also good games earlier Mavado couldn't ever get on you guys side but it was still fun playing yall. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:06:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:srsly........CCP.....take out the bs sun glare im wearing a futuristic suit but i can get blinded by glare....... another thing dunno if yall play that map at all at the office but it kinda makes it very annoyin to play on the side with the glare #justsayin
i know the kiddies here all want to feel "immersed" an **** but its annoyin.....get rid of it. kthnx
+1 I always forget to mention that.......there's no reason for the glare. I can understand if it reflected the exact time of day in real life but it doesn't. There's no reason for glare and only one side of the map is affected. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:srsly........CCP.....take out the bs sun glare im wearing a futuristic suit but i can get blinded by glare....... another thing dunno if yall play that map at all at the office but it kinda makes it very annoyin to play on the side with the glare #justsayin
i know the kiddies here all want to feel "immersed" an **** but its annoyin.....get rid of it. kthnx +1 I always forget to mention that.......there's no reason for the glare. I can understand if it reflected the exact time of day in real life but it doesn't. There's no reason for glare and only one side of the map is affected.
True if they keep it allow it to affect both sides equally not just one side. By sides I mean usually one team in skirmish. |
StealthReborn
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
14
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Our suits > Sun?
No. |
|
Skihids
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
969
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
StealthReborn wrote:Our suits > Sun?
No.
Visors able to block the tiny amount energy producing the glare when it is billions of times less powerful than the laser energy attempting to melt your face?
Yes |
charlesnette dalari
Creative Killers
159
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:36:00 -
[12] - Quote
this could be a planet with a sun much closer than ours, earth, so even with sunglasses that may be the amount of light thaat still passes through the visor... but to be quite honest i like it it actually adds another tactical dynamic to gameplay no different than pilots in real life must contend with even with sunglasses or visors on their helmets. use it to your advantage
i like it my .02 isk |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
666
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 18:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Oh, you wish to equip sunglasses? That will be about $120 worth of AUR please. $60 for each eye. Available in a DUST 514 Marketplace near you. |
DEADPOOL5241
Doomheim
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 19:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:05:00 -
[15] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW That's no excuse to not change an annoying aspect of the map |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW
LOL this response right here. so u hinder one sides ability to see for a visual immersion effect this game is so competitive
gameplay > realism |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
673
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
Leave the glare alone!! If you want to moan about OP glare then take a look at bf3, all those dumb dust spots on the screen etc etc on top of sun glare and artificial light glare is just ridiculous. But leave the glare here alone. How can you say the glare is OP? Ever been on a planet with as many close proximity suns and planets? Nope, our sun is......what.....600 mil miles away or something like that? Now take a look at the star map and look how close alot if the planets are to their suns, on top of the fact that there's no clouds in the sky to filter the sun light on some planets, i think the glare is awesome. |
DEADPOOL5241
Doomheim
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:14:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW LOL this response right here. so u hinder one sides ability to see for a visual immersion effect this game is so competitive gameplay > realism
Its not just one side getting being hindered its everyone that turns that direction will get that same direct sun light effect. Yes, Ill take realism that goes that extra step to be different then the same BS that we have had for years in COD, BF. CCP is going for full immersion into the New Eden universe. If we were in battle and the sun was up and facing us, we would be having these issues. Sorry but Ill take Realism > over kids game-play mode.. I've played enough of those over the years. I came to Dust to see what the next great step up in the FPS gaming could do, adding Lightning effects, sun effects, soon weather effects to each planet will make Dust a unique experience.
Also I think you are QQ'ing for the sake of attention rather then trying to effect the game. But thats just my opinion. |
DEADPOOL5241
Doomheim
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:21:00 -
[19] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW That's no excuse to not change an annoying aspect of the map
Actually it is. :) |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:24:00 -
[20] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW That's no excuse to not change an annoying aspect of the map Actually it is. :) I actually agree with sleepy - for sake of gameplay realism can take a step back. A small one. |
|
Kevall Longstride
DUST University Ivy League
71
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
Can we buy some Oakleys for the mercs? I'd use Aurum. |
DEADPOOL5241
Doomheim
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:36:00 -
[22] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW That's no excuse to not change an annoying aspect of the map Actually it is. :) I actually agree with sleepy - for sake of gameplay realism can take a step back. A small one.
Then we agree to disagree (rare in the forums). You prefer to not have it, I think its a cool effect.
Have I died from it, yes. But Ive also used to my advantage many, many times. |
Myles Aarne
Amarrican Ground Forces I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
22
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:43:00 -
[23] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:our sun is......what.....600 mil miles away or something like that?
>.<
1 a.u., or about 93 million miles, or about 150 million kilometers, or a bit over eight light munutes, or -â-ä+¦+¦+¦-ë++ ++-à-ü+¦+¦+¦+¦-é -ä+¦-ä-ü+¦+¦++-â+¦+¦-é +¦+¦+¦ +++¦-ä-ë+¦+¦-â++-à-ü+¦+¦-é (804,000,000 stadia, using 185-190m / stadium.)
Don't make me go furlongs per fortnight...
But I agree that the glare is OK. And I am glad that we weren't talking what I first thought we were: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Glare_crust |
Skihids
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
969
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW
Nothing can block direct sunlight? So we shouldn't have any shadows at all because nothing can stop that sunlight from shining right through every single obect.
Of course you recognize that as absurd. Opaque objects are all around us.
So it is simple to posit a visor that can selectively opaque two spots on the visor such that it would prevent the direct light from shining into each eye. I'm pretty sure somone could cobble that together from current technology with something like an LCD visor, a light sensor, and a bit of electronics.
|
A TASTY SANDWICH
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
I too have been on both ends of the glare. I still prefer it be there. Glare is something that one would expect if the sun is close enough too almost touch. I prefer it stay. It adds another dimension to the game. |
DEADPOOL5241
Doomheim
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:50:00 -
[26] - Quote
Skihids wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW Nothing can block direct sunlight? So we shouldn't have any shadows at all because nothing can stop that sunlight from shining right through every single obect. Of course you recognize that as absurd. Opaque objects are all around us. So it is simple to posit a visor that can selectively opaque two spots on the visor such that it would prevent the direct light from shining into each eye. I'm pretty sure somone could cobble that together from current technology with something like an LCD visor, a light sensor, and a bit of electronics.
Dude, think about it. If it blocks direct sunlight do you think it would let anything else in? And unless you have a 100% computer image in front your eyes and we are not really looking out the visor then YES you get sunlight.
See NASA buddy, gold lens cover to not see direct sunlight in space. But can you look directly into the sun with it... NO.
|
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
711
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
Silly Mercs, CCP can't control the SUN. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 21:09:00 -
[28] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Skihids wrote:Nothing can block direct sunlight? So we shouldn't have any shadows at all because nothing can stop that sunlight from shining right through every single obect.
Of course you recognize that as absurd. Opaque objects are all around us.
So it is simple to posit a visor that can selectively opaque two spots on the visor such that it would prevent the direct light from shining into each eye. I'm pretty sure somone could cobble that together from current technology with something like an LCD visor, a light sensor, and a bit of electronics. Dude, think about it. If it blocks direct sunlight do you think it would let anything else in? And unless you have a 100% computer image in front your eyes and we are not really looking out the visor then YES you get sunlight. See NASA buddy, gold lens cover to not see direct sunlight in space. But can you look directly into the sun with it... NO. Actually, the idea of something that can adjust from totally transparent to totally opaque (like a super-transition lens), but is controlled by an internal computer that only opaques out certain parts of the visor would work.
It would basically be like putting your hand out in front of your face - you'd still get a bit of glare shining around the opaque areas, and you'd have a big black spot in the way of your vision, but it would be better than trying to stare into direct sunlight and find your target.
And it's bordering on believable near-future sci-fi tech, so it's conceivable that something like this could exist in New Eden. |
DEADPOOL5241
Doomheim
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 21:21:00 -
[29] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Skihids wrote:Nothing can block direct sunlight? So we shouldn't have any shadows at all because nothing can stop that sunlight from shining right through every single obect.
Of course you recognize that as absurd. Opaque objects are all around us.
So it is simple to posit a visor that can selectively opaque two spots on the visor such that it would prevent the direct light from shining into each eye. I'm pretty sure somone could cobble that together from current technology with something like an LCD visor, a light sensor, and a bit of electronics. Dude, think about it. If it blocks direct sunlight do you think it would let anything else in? And unless you have a 100% computer image in front your eyes and we are not really looking out the visor then YES you get sunlight. See NASA buddy, gold lens cover to not see direct sunlight in space. But can you look directly into the sun with it... NO. Actually, the idea of something that can adjust from totally transparent to totally opaque (like a super-transition lens), but is controlled by an internal computer that only opaques out certain parts of the visor would work. It would basically be like putting your hand out in front of your face - you'd still get a bit of glare shining around the opaque areas, and you'd have a big black spot in the way of your vision, but it would be better than trying to stare into direct sunlight and find your target. And it's bordering on believable near-future sci-fi tech, so it's conceivable that something like this could exist in New Eden.
Ok, +1 for thinking outside the box and coming back with an intelligent rebuttal. But black spot or glare... hmm lol |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 21:35:00 -
[30] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Ok, +1 for thinking outside the box and coming back with an intelligent rebuttal. But black spot or glare... hmm lol Black spot is only blindness where the black spot is. Glare from looking at the sun is blindness EVERYWHERE. |
|
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
174
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 21:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
I like the glare. |
Skihids
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
969
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 22:47:00 -
[32] - Quote
You can have the glare if you want, I'm just saying there is technology to eliminate it.
That's a good point about our view being projected on the inside of our helmet rather than being a direct view. Examine the assault suit to the left and you will see it's designed that way, making it trivial to process out the gare and dampen the direct representation of the sun.
Think about it for a moment and you realize it must work that way or the briefest flash of a laser rifle in your face would yeild permanent blindness. That would be even more effective than killing your opponent as he would still be around and ineffective rather than on his way to respawning, and you would only need a fraction of the energy required to melt through his armor. |
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 00:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
yea im really wishing for the source engine right about now, much better at handling dynamic lighting |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 00:47:00 -
[34] - Quote
we need to buff the glare...make it more realistic, tbh |
Skihids
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
969
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
If the glare isn't automatically filtered out from our suit projections I want flash grenades.
It would be a great support weapon to be able to blind everyone within a certain radius who happens to be looking in its direction. |
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:37:00 -
[36] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Skihids wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW Nothing can block direct sunlight? So we shouldn't have any shadows at all because nothing can stop that sunlight from shining right through every single obect. Of course you recognize that as absurd. Opaque objects are all around us. So it is simple to posit a visor that can selectively opaque two spots on the visor such that it would prevent the direct light from shining into each eye. I'm pretty sure somone could cobble that together from current technology with something like an LCD visor, a light sensor, and a bit of electronics. Dude, think about it. If it blocks direct sunlight do you think it would let anything else in? And unless you have a 100% computer image in front your eyes and we are not really looking out the visor then YES you get sunlight. See NASA buddy, gold lens cover to not see direct sunlight in space. But can you look directly into the sun with it... NO.
ohhh right I forgot no one in the future has those awesome things called eye lids, eye lashes, or iris(no I am not going to include the Purkinje effect). If you mix these with polarized lenses(to eliminate glare) you can have the sun, hell a god damn super sun) in your field of view and still see perfectly clearly. And thats the low tech version, never mind using something like smart glasses that would only darken the areas it needed to. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
I swear,people will complain about every thing,if given enough time. I agree that the glare is annoying and have been killed because of it,but I've killed just as much because of it as well.
It's obvious that the detractors of the direct sunlight haven't learned how to use it to their advantage,and to that I say let there be light. And while you can't see because of the sunlight,I'll continue to shoot you in the face. |
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:43:00 -
[38] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:Skihids wrote:Nothing can block direct sunlight? So we shouldn't have any shadows at all because nothing can stop that sunlight from shining right through every single obect.
Of course you recognize that as absurd. Opaque objects are all around us.
So it is simple to posit a visor that can selectively opaque two spots on the visor such that it would prevent the direct light from shining into each eye. I'm pretty sure somone could cobble that together from current technology with something like an LCD visor, a light sensor, and a bit of electronics. Dude, think about it. If it blocks direct sunlight do you think it would let anything else in? And unless you have a 100% computer image in front your eyes and we are not really looking out the visor then YES you get sunlight. See NASA buddy, gold lens cover to not see direct sunlight in space. But can you look directly into the sun with it... NO. Actually, the idea of something that can adjust from totally transparent to totally opaque (like a super-transition lens), but is controlled by an internal computer that only opaques out certain parts of the visor would work. It would basically be like putting your hand out in front of your face - you'd still get a bit of glare shining around the opaque areas, and you'd have a big black spot in the way of your vision, but it would be better than trying to stare into direct sunlight and find your target. And it's bordering on believable near-future sci-fi tech, so it's conceivable that something like this could exist in New Eden. Ok, +1 for thinking outside the box and coming back with an intelligent rebuttal. But black spot or glare... hmm lol
1) polarization eliminates glare with little loss of ambient light 2) you wouldn't have a black spot where the sun is, just a reduction in brightness to within the 100:1 static contrast ratio of the eye |
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:44:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:we need to buff the glare...make it more realistic, tbh
you mean by having your eyes actualy adapt to it. |
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:47:00 -
[40] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:I swear,people will complain about every thing,if given enough time. I agree that the glare is annoying and have been killed because of it,but I've killed just as much because of it as well.
It's obvious that the detractors of the direct sunlight haven't learned how to use it to their advantage,and to that I say let there be light. And while you can't see because of the sunlight,I'll continue to shoot you in the face.
it adds nothing to the game its simply anoying and is to situational to use tactical in any meaningful way. hell even cheese **** redline snipers cant use it to their advantage. |
|
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:50:00 -
[41] - Quote
Skihids wrote:You can have the glare if you want, I'm just saying there is technology to eliminate it.
That's a good point about our view being projected on the inside of our helmet rather than being a direct view. Examine the assault suit to the left and you will see it's designed that way, making it trivial to process out the gare and dampen the direct representation of the sun.
Think about it for a moment and you realize it must work that way or the briefest flash of a laser rifle in your face would yeild permanent blindness. That would be even more effective than killing your opponent as he would still be around and ineffective rather than on his way to respawning, and you would only need a fraction of the energy required to melt through his armor.
well said sir. Although apparently the minmatar only care about keeping one eye safe those crazy bastards. |
PAUL BERNARD
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
76
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
the sun is blinding in eve, and In dust.
I hate the ******* sun. stop it. please. |
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 02:06:00 -
[43] - Quote
tada I want one |
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
108
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 02:09:00 -
[44] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW
Originally I was going to say that I don't really care what happens to it, but after reading this, I completely agree with it being here. It's just so **** cool now!
Besides, it's not like one side is immune to it or that you'll always be starting out on the same side of the map. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 02:10:00 -
[45] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:I swear,people will complain about every thing,if given enough time. I agree that the glare is annoying and have been killed because of it,but I've killed just as much because of it as well.
It's obvious that the detractors of the direct sunlight haven't learned how to use it to their advantage,and to that I say let there be light. And while you can't see because of the sunlight,I'll continue to shoot you in the face.
speakin of learning u learn how to use that Balac yet? |
fred orpaul
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 02:16:00 -
[46] - Quote
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW Originally I was going to say that I don't really care what happens to it, but after reading this, I completely agree with it being here. It's just so **** cool now! Besides, it's not like one side is immune to it or that you'll always be starting out on the same side of the map.
Ive been arguing to get rid of it and why but hell If they would just treat it like the source engine does I wouldn't care, that's dynamic lighting and that's engaging, not this stupid, my character is too dumb to use his ******* eyelids, iris, and sun glasses, bullshit |
William HBonney
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 02:41:00 -
[47] - Quote
Having glare makes no sense and really doesn't add tactical advantage because you never know if the glare is the real reason you won the gun battle. Second is why are you guys even thinking that we are veiwing the environment with our human eyes? Our eyes are so flawed and prone to illusion that it would make more sense to have a virtual image of the landscape fed into our brains....which actually wouldn't be virtual at all. This is science fiction yet we fail to truely think outside the box. Our guns shouldn't have scopes at all...those physical optical enhancements are unneeded when you can have a direct feed into your gun giving all the information into you brain. Ads? Nope not "really " it is the ability to magnify the image and "scope " in. It is sad that ccp wants to hold onto such archaic ideas about future warfare. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 15:15:00 -
[48] - Quote
fred orpaul wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:I swear,people will complain about every thing,if given enough time. I agree that the glare is annoying and have been killed because of it,but I've killed just as much because of it as well.
It's obvious that the detractors of the direct sunlight haven't learned how to use it to their advantage,and to that I say let there be light. And while you can't see because of the sunlight,I'll continue to shoot you in the face. it adds nothing to the game its simply anoying and is to situational to use tactical in any meaningful way. hell even cheese **** redline snipers cant use it to their advantage.
What are you talking about that it adds nothing to the game?! If you stop sitting in one place and learn how to move to a more tactical position,then maybe you would see the advantages of it,instead of sitting with the sun in your face and complaining about how much is sucks when you die because you can't see.
Again,more people are trying to make this game easy to play,instead of rising to the challenges that it brings.
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 15:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:fred orpaul wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:I swear,people will complain about every thing,if given enough time. I agree that the glare is annoying and have been killed because of it,but I've killed just as much because of it as well.
It's obvious that the detractors of the direct sunlight haven't learned how to use it to their advantage,and to that I say let there be light. And while you can't see because of the sunlight,I'll continue to shoot you in the face. it adds nothing to the game its simply anoying and is to situational to use tactical in any meaningful way. hell even cheese **** redline snipers cant use it to their advantage. What are you talking about that it adds nothing to the game?! If you stop sitting in one place and learn how to move to a more tactical position,then maybe you would see the advantages of it,instead of sitting with the sun in your face and complaining about how much is sucks when you die because you can't see. Again,more people are trying to make this game easy to play,instead of rising to the challenges that it brings.
the irony here is world class |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
690
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 15:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote: What are you talking about that it adds nothing to the game?! If you stop sitting in one place and learn how to move to a more tactical position,then maybe you would see the advantages of it,instead of sitting with the sun in your face and complaining about how much is sucks when you die because you can't see.
Again,more people are trying to make this game easy to play,instead of rising to the challenges that it brings.
Oi! If we are gonna talk about realism, then I should be able to forward rolls, dive over obstacles, slide down ladders, take pot shots climbing ladders. Snipers should not be able to crouch and take pot shots at people. Sniper sniples should have bipod and snipers should crouch when they snipe. ARs should not have just iron sights. They should have mods like stabilitity mods, range scopes, red dots and flash lights. We should be able to activate our dampners any time. Heck if I jump the air and wanna activate my dampners I should be able to do so. Blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda! ***** moan ***** moan ***** moan etc etc etc.
The bottom line is you cant play the CCP got one thing real and not the rest. Either they get everything or the dont. There is a glare problem and its only one sided. Either give me my friggin sunshades or eclipse the sun.
PS: I want flashlights for the nighttime maps |
|
William HBonney
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 15:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
Hmmm that makes mw think if there was a bunch of "****** " things in this game we shouldn't want them changed but rise to the challenge.? |
Firestorm Zulu
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
158
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 15:56:00 -
[52] - Quote
Fix game ... Not glare. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
690
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 15:59:00 -
[53] - Quote
Firestorm Zulu wrote:Fix game ... Not glare.
Actually the gameplay is pretty smooth right now. I will take smooth gameplay any day. And you can create a separate topic for "fix game". This is a "fix glare" topic.
Just my 0.02 GTFO |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 16:39:00 -
[54] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:fred orpaul wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:I swear,people will complain about every thing,if given enough time. I agree that the glare is annoying and have been killed because of it,but I've killed just as much because of it as well.
It's obvious that the detractors of the direct sunlight haven't learned how to use it to their advantage,and to that I say let there be light. And while you can't see because of the sunlight,I'll continue to shoot you in the face. it adds nothing to the game its simply anoying and is to situational to use tactical in any meaningful way. hell even cheese **** redline snipers cant use it to their advantage. What are you talking about that it adds nothing to the game?! If you stop sitting in one place and learn how to move to a more tactical position,then maybe you would see the advantages of it,instead of sitting with the sun in your face and complaining about how much is sucks when you die because you can't see. Again,more people are trying to make this game easy to play,instead of rising to the challenges that it brings. the irony here is world class
Well explain how,instead of throwing out a blanketed statement.
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 17:12:00 -
[55] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:fred orpaul wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:I swear,people will complain about every thing,if given enough time. I agree that the glare is annoying and have been killed because of it,but I've killed just as much because of it as well.
It's obvious that the detractors of the direct sunlight haven't learned how to use it to their advantage,and to that I say let there be light. And while you can't see because of the sunlight,I'll continue to shoot you in the face. it adds nothing to the game its simply anoying and is to situational to use tactical in any meaningful way. hell even cheese **** redline snipers cant use it to their advantage. What are you talking about that it adds nothing to the game?! If you stop sitting in one place and learn how to move to a more tactical position,then maybe you would see the advantages of it,instead of sitting with the sun in your face and complaining about how much is sucks when you die because you can't see. Again,more people are trying to make this game easy to play,instead of rising to the challenges that it brings. the irony here is world class Well explain how,instead of throwing out a blanketed statement.
well if i gotta spell it out for u sure ur the same guy that got killed repeatedly along with ur boy cody constantly and started cryin how ur Balac should automatically mean u would win those gunfights, ur boy cody even went so far as to call me a cheater cuz i constantly killed u 2 in 1v2s so ur statement of rising to the challenge instead of complaining when u die and tryin to make things easy applies to u, no disrespect just sayin the irony here is world class |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
132
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 17:16:00 -
[56] - Quote
Lmao. This is a signature of EVE. When you look at stars there from close range those are literally blinding. CCP likes shiny objects. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 17:50:00 -
[57] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:
well if i gotta spell it out for u sure ur the same guy that got killed repeatedly along with ur boy cody constantly and started cryin how ur Balac should automatically mean u would win those gunfights, ur boy cody even went so far as to call me a cheater cuz i constantly killed u 2 in 1v2s so ur statement of rising to the challenge instead of complaining when u die and tryin to make things easy applies to u, no disrespect just sayin the irony here is world class
But did I say that something should be changed? Nope! All I did was ask you how you were able to survive and what fit you were running,when the first encounter with my GAR-21,you got dropped in like three shots.
You never answered my question,and always dodged it.You could have just as easily said that you didn't want to share your loadout specs and left it at that.I was trying to figure out how your mid tier gun was ripping through 401 shield,and my meta level 10 gun wasn't killing you as fast.
So back to the issue at hand,which has nothing to do with that situation nor makes anything ironic,again,you and others want to make the game more easy for you to suit your play style.
|
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
690
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 17:55:00 -
[58] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:You never answered my question,and always dodged it.You could have just as easily said that you didn't want to share your loadout specs and left it at that.I was trying to figure out how your mid tier gun was ripping through 401 shield,and my meta level 10 gun wasn't killing you as fast.
Numbz is just starting to get decent . He has a long way to go IMHO . |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 19:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:
well if i gotta spell it out for u sure ur the same guy that got killed repeatedly along with ur boy cody constantly and started cryin how ur Balac should automatically mean u would win those gunfights, ur boy cody even went so far as to call me a cheater cuz i constantly killed u 2 in 1v2s so ur statement of rising to the challenge instead of complaining when u die and tryin to make things easy applies to u, no disrespect just sayin the irony here is world class
But did I say that something should be changed? Nope! All I did was ask you how you were able to survive and what fit you were running,when the first encounter with my GAR-21,you got dropped in like three shots. You never answered my question,and always dodged it.You could have just as easily said that you didn't want to share your loadout specs and left it at that.I was trying to figure out how your mid tier gun was ripping through 401 shield,and my meta level 10 gun wasn't killing you as fast. So back to the issue at hand,which has nothing to do with that situation nor makes anything ironic,again,you and others want to make the game more easy for you to suit your play style.
seeing as i ACTUALLY corp battle and WANT competition i do believe i dont want to make the game easier nice try tho
suit my playstyle? thats lulzy considering im more versatile than most ppl on this game since i use almost all light weapons, smgs and i also tank so yea try again
PS: wanting to make the game easy is what u wanted when u said after that match that ur GAR-21 should automatically win u fights against a lower tier weapon. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 19:18:00 -
[60] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:
well if i gotta spell it out for u sure ur the same guy that got killed repeatedly along with ur boy cody constantly and started cryin how ur Balac should automatically mean u would win those gunfights, ur boy cody even went so far as to call me a cheater cuz i constantly killed u 2 in 1v2s so ur statement of rising to the challenge instead of complaining when u die and tryin to make things easy applies to u, no disrespect just sayin the irony here is world class
But did I say that something should be changed? Nope! All I did was ask you how you were able to survive and what fit you were running,when the first encounter with my GAR-21,you got dropped in like three shots. You never answered my question,and always dodged it.You could have just as easily said that you didn't want to share your loadout specs and left it at that.I was trying to figure out how your mid tier gun was ripping through 401 shield,and my meta level 10 gun wasn't killing you as fast. So back to the issue at hand,which has nothing to do with that situation nor makes anything ironic,again,you and others want to make the game more easy for you to suit your play style. seeing as i ACTUALLY corp battle and WANT competition i do believe i dont want to make the game easier nice try tho suit my playstyle? thats lulzy considering im more versatile than most ppl on this game since i use almost all light weapons, smgs and i also tank so yea try again And as everyone can see YET AGAIN,still didn't answer my question from what,three weeks ago now?
Your argument has no merit to me anymore. |
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 19:22:00 -
[61] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:
well if i gotta spell it out for u sure ur the same guy that got killed repeatedly along with ur boy cody constantly and started cryin how ur Balac should automatically mean u would win those gunfights, ur boy cody even went so far as to call me a cheater cuz i constantly killed u 2 in 1v2s so ur statement of rising to the challenge instead of complaining when u die and tryin to make things easy applies to u, no disrespect just sayin the irony here is world class
But did I say that something should be changed? Nope! All I did was ask you how you were able to survive and what fit you were running,when the first encounter with my GAR-21,you got dropped in like three shots. You never answered my question,and always dodged it.You could have just as easily said that you didn't want to share your loadout specs and left it at that.I was trying to figure out how your mid tier gun was ripping through 401 shield,and my meta level 10 gun wasn't killing you as fast. So back to the issue at hand,which has nothing to do with that situation nor makes anything ironic,again,you and others want to make the game more easy for you to suit your play style. seeing as i ACTUALLY corp battle and WANT competition i do believe i dont want to make the game easier nice try tho suit my playstyle? thats lulzy considering im more versatile than most ppl on this game since i use almost all light weapons, smgs and i also tank so yea try again And as everyone can see YET AGAIN,still didn't answer my question from what,three weeks ago now? Your argument has no merit to me anymore.
why would i tell u my fit? and its not that hard to fit a suit or figure out what someone has on still lookin for all other reasons as to why u got killed repeatedly other than just simply that guy was just better than me |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 20:33:00 -
[62] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:
well if i gotta spell it out for u sure ur the same guy that got killed repeatedly along with ur boy cody constantly and started cryin how ur Balac should automatically mean u would win those gunfights, ur boy cody even went so far as to call me a cheater cuz i constantly killed u 2 in 1v2s so ur statement of rising to the challenge instead of complaining when u die and tryin to make things easy applies to u, no disrespect just sayin the irony here is world class
But did I say that something should be changed? Nope! All I did was ask you how you were able to survive and what fit you were running,when the first encounter with my GAR-21,you got dropped in like three shots. You never answered my question,and always dodged it.You could have just as easily said that you didn't want to share your loadout specs and left it at that.I was trying to figure out how your mid tier gun was ripping through 401 shield,and my meta level 10 gun wasn't killing you as fast. So back to the issue at hand,which has nothing to do with that situation nor makes anything ironic,again,you and others want to make the game more easy for you to suit your play style. seeing as i ACTUALLY corp battle and WANT competition i do believe i dont want to make the game easier nice try tho suit my playstyle? thats lulzy considering im more versatile than most ppl on this game since i use almost all light weapons, smgs and i also tank so yea try again And as everyone can see YET AGAIN,still didn't answer my question from what,three weeks ago now? Your argument has no merit to me anymore. why would i tell u my fit? and its not that hard to fit a suit or figure out what someone has on still lookin for all other reasons as to why u got killed repeatedly other than just simply that guy was just better than me Wow dude,I guess you just can't read,because that's exactly what I said about not having to tell me.Anyhoo,since this is going to be a game that relies heavily on equipment along with skill,sometimes it won't matter how good you are because the other player with equal skill and better equipment will usually win.
Sorry if I'm actually trying to test the outer parameters of the beta of where skill ends and better equipment starts.Sorry if you are trying to boost your epeen instead of testing to make it better. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
328
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 21:16:00 -
[63] - Quote
I like the glare and want more effects just like it.
If I thought ps3 could handle the particle effects I'd love to fight in the middle of blinding 200mph sand storms.
You are all getting to used to the -bad- idea that Dust514 is some kind of competitive arena shooter with like 5 maps. You cry for nerfs etc etc.
In the future we should have very random maps, many of which will have seriously hard negatives against one side or the other.
This will be the real fun in Dust514.
We'll all have to load into the map and just DEAL with whatever problems we face. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 23:02:00 -
[64] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote: Wow dude,I guess you just can't read,because that's exactly what I said about not having to tell me.Anyhoo,since this is going to be a game that relies heavily on equipment along with skill,sometimes it won't matter how good you are because the other player with equal skill and better equipment will usually win.
Sorry if I'm actually trying to test the outer parameters of the beta of where skill ends and better equipment starts.Sorry if you are trying to boost your epeen instead of testing to make it better.
considering the amount of feedback posts ive done for the past months i do do my testing and report on it not trying to boost anything idc what ppl think i just found ur bs about rising to a challenge dumb when u and ur corp mate cried about something instead of rising to the challenge like u said and ya im sure u were trying to "test" those parameters
either way im done with that , the glare is ********, sure it adds a nice effect but im positive the game will do just nicely without it and no one will miss it either way it doesnt hamper me that much just an annoyin effect meant to make ppl feel "immersed"
|
Forlorn Destrier
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
914
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 23:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:First off we are talking about two separate things.
Direct Sun light is what we are seeing, and it does not matter what type of sun glasses or shield (see NASA visor) can block direct sunlight. Sorry but if you look at the sun, any sun on any planet you will not be able to see and eventually burn your eyes out.
Glare is sun light or any light source reflecting off another object. Examples are snow, glass, cement etc. This can be blocked by adding a polarized lens, that acts like a venetian blind and blocks glare from hitting your eyes.
What happens on that one map is direct sunlight hitting you from one side. While it is kinda annoying, it is a really great effect in game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP actually did it correctly and nothing can block direct sun light.
DPGäó FTW That's no excuse to not change an annoying aspect of the map
I don't have an opinion one way or the other, but as a sniper I'm a little surprised you don't use it to your advantage and put the sun to your back when possible. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 23:39:00 -
[66] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote: Wow dude,I guess you just can't read,because that's exactly what I said about not having to tell me.Anyhoo,since this is going to be a game that relies heavily on equipment along with skill,sometimes it won't matter how good you are because the other player with equal skill and better equipment will usually win.
Sorry if I'm actually trying to test the outer parameters of the beta of where skill ends and better equipment starts.Sorry if you are trying to boost your epeen instead of testing to make it better.
considering the amount of feedback posts ive done for the past months i do do my testing and report on it not trying to boost anything idc what ppl think i just found ur bs about rising to a challenge dumb when u and ur corp mate cried about something instead of rising to the challenge like u said and ya im sure u were trying to "test" those parameters either way im done with that , the glare is ********, sure it adds a nice effect but im positive the game will do just nicely without it and no one will miss it either way it doesnt hamper me that much just an annoyin effect meant to make ppl feel "immersed"
I'm now convinced that your an idiot.
Peace. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
3064
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 00:19:00 -
[67] - Quote
I like the blinding sunlight. Environmental factors effecting vision makes things more interesting. I would like to see some fog as well. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 00:58:00 -
[68] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:I like the blinding sunlight. Environmental factors effecting vision makes things more interesting. I would like to see some fog as well.
id like to see better variety maps maps tbh forested areas, proper snow maps
really wanna see this terrain generator be implemented already |
mikegunnz
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
425
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 01:39:00 -
[69] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:I like the blinding sunlight. Environmental factors effecting vision makes things more interesting. I would like to see some fog as well.
Basically, ppl complained about graphics, so CCP said: "Hey, BF3 is graphically pretty awesome. Let's take teh glare effect that they use, and throw it into our game, then people will think our game has awesome graphics too!"
As long as most of the fps mechanics are in line, maps are plentiful, meta-game aspects work well, and MAIN visuals are even decent... no one will care about secondary visuals like glare, fog, etc. Sure those are interesting additions, but thats like the LAST thing people care about. |
Jarlaxle Xorlarrin
SyNergy Gaming
67
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 02:51:00 -
[70] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote: Wow dude,I guess you just can't read,because that's exactly what I said about not having to tell me.Anyhoo,since this is going to be a game that relies heavily on equipment along with skill,sometimes it won't matter how good you are because the other player with equal skill and better equipment will usually win.
Sorry if I'm actually trying to test the outer parameters of the beta of where skill ends and better equipment starts.Sorry if you are trying to boost your epeen instead of testing to make it better.
considering the amount of feedback posts ive done for the past months i do do my testing and report on it not trying to boost anything idc what ppl think i just found ur bs about rising to a challenge dumb when u and ur corp mate cried about something instead of rising to the challenge like u said and ya im sure u were trying to "test" those parameters either way im done with that , the glare is ********, sure it adds a nice effect but im positive the game will do just nicely without it and no one will miss it either way it doesnt hamper me that much just an annoyin effect meant to make ppl feel "immersed" I'm now convinced that your an idiot. Peace.
You're a little unreasonable. |
|
ZiwZih
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
54
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 03:02:00 -
[71] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:I like the glare and want more effects just like it.
If I thought ps3 could handle the particle effects I'd love to fight in the middle of blinding 200mph sand storms.
You are all getting to used to the -bad- idea that Dust514 is some kind of competitive arena shooter with like 5 maps. You cry for nerfs etc etc.
In the future we should have very random maps, many of which will have seriously hard negatives against one side or the other.
This will be the real fun in Dust514.
We'll all have to load into the map and just DEAL with whatever problems we face.
Spot on.
I like the very annoyance that that glare gives. I like how it makes difference when sun is in certain spot and makes certain condition which might slightly boost your defence or make your attack harder. And, of course, I also hope we see much more of small things like this.
Who knows, if we ever get to fight in WH space "local spatial phenomena may cause strange effects" to our guns, too. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
323
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 04:40:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jarlaxle Xorlarrin wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Th3rdSun wrote: Wow dude,I guess you just can't read,because that's exactly what I said about not having to tell me.Anyhoo,since this is going to be a game that relies heavily on equipment along with skill,sometimes it won't matter how good you are because the other player with equal skill and better equipment will usually win.
Sorry if I'm actually trying to test the outer parameters of the beta of where skill ends and better equipment starts.Sorry if you are trying to boost your epeen instead of testing to make it better.
considering the amount of feedback posts ive done for the past months i do do my testing and report on it not trying to boost anything idc what ppl think i just found ur bs about rising to a challenge dumb when u and ur corp mate cried about something instead of rising to the challenge like u said and ya im sure u were trying to "test" those parameters either way im done with that , the glare is ********, sure it adds a nice effect but im positive the game will do just nicely without it and no one will miss it either way it doesnt hamper me that much just an annoyin effect meant to make ppl feel "immersed" I'm now convinced that your an idiot. Peace. You're a little unreasonable. Me? Nah!
Just sick of debating with someone that is twisting information and making up false facts.Opinions are opinions and that's fine,but when people start twisting the truth,I have no use for them anymore.
|
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 05:12:00 -
[73] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:I like the glare and want more effects just like it.
If I thought ps3 could handle the particle effects I'd love to fight in the middle of blinding 200mph sand storms.
You are all getting to used to the -bad- idea that Dust514 is some kind of competitive arena shooter with like 5 maps. You cry for nerfs etc etc.
In the future we should have very random maps, many of which will have seriously hard negatives against one side or the other.
This will be the real fun in Dust514.
We'll all have to load into the map and just DEAL with whatever problems we face. I hope we get planets with realistically handled low gravity so people who can't play right go slamming into stuff like scrubs in Tribes. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |