DUST Search - Sticky:Gribakir South Ward

All Channels

Gribakir South Ward (Deactivated)

Sticky:Gribakir South Ward - Map Feedback

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)

CCP raRaRa C C P C C P Alliance 24	Posted - 2012.12.06 14:31:00 - [1] - Quote High resolution image Skirmish - One and Only Two teams of mercenaries fight for control of a single console in the center of the battlefield. The console controls four NULL cannons and neither MCC can withstand a concentrated barrage for long, so capturing and holding the console is vital for both teams. The battle continues until one of the MCCs is destroyed or until one side depletes the otherGÇÖs clone supply.

Maken Tosch Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 1590	Posted - 2012.12.06 16:28:00 - [2] - Quote That's a lot of turrets.
843 pano 843 Boot Camp 200	Posted - 2012.12.06 16:32:00 - [3] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: That's a lot of turrets. That's 1100 WP for my LAV gunner, should be fun.
MrBlobz G I A N T 3	Posted - 2012.12.06 16:33:00 - [4] - Quote This is gonna be crazy
Skihids Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 968	Posted - 2012.12.06 16:50:00 - [5] - Quote I foresee many matches decided by clone depletion if one team doesn't beat the other and make an initial hack. It will be a huge meat grinder. Logis may not have a chance to res anyone before being cut down themselves. Blaster tanks might be needed to shield hackers long enough to take the point away from an enemy, but they are likely to be sacrificial.
Volgair Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 200	Posted - 2012.12.06 17:27:00 - [6] - Quote looks like the new "A" is where the old "C" was 5 months back when this was a 3 point map... I've already got like three ways i want to see this map be fought.
Vexen Krios Doomheim 95	Posted - 2012.12.06 18:00:00 - [7] - Quote glad to see im not the only one drooling over this one will really put my skills to the test...though, i imaging lots of ARs, heavies, and mass drivers. Edit, and possibly snipers lookin for easy kills. Did they get rid of the red lines for these matches? so we could actually go to the enemy base?
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis 774	Posted - 2012.12.06 19:18:00 - [8] - Quote Remote explosives, mass drivers, nova knives (cuz they're quite). This map could get crazy, looking forward to playing it.
MrBlobz G I A N T 3	Posted - 2012.12.06 19:36:00 - [9] - Quote Vexen Krios wrote: Did they get rid of the red lines for these matches? so we could actually go to the enemy base? Maybe that's why we get 5 turrets at our base
Vexen Krios Doomheim 95	Posted - 2012.12.06 19:40:00 - [10] - Quote lol i'll be hiding happily somewhere destorying said turrets lol, my favorite thing to do with my forge gun Edit: they should have put the objective point on top of the table top...make it kinda like king of the hill/mountain....whatever its called. Epic table top matches.

Tzaar Bomba Doomheim 174	Posted - 2012.12.06 19:46:00 - [11] - Quote Best idea yet.
Sinboto Simmons SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 140	Posted - 2012.12.06 19:47:00 - [12] - Quote as a shotgun user and a sniper I aprove of this map 100%
J'Jor Da'Wg KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 648	Posted - 2012.12.06 19:59:00 - [13] - Quote This is gonna get wild. I love the new map concepts!
G Torq ALTA B2O 88	Posted - 2012.12.06 20:47:00 - [14] - Quote Make a kit for running fast with additional hacking ability to get the A objective, then have teammates spawn on it?
Maffia- Thug 3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance 62	Posted - 2012.12.06 20:54:00 - [15] - Quote G Torq wrote: Make a kit for running fast with additional hacking ability to get the A objective, then have teammates spawn on it? Shhhhhhhh!
Blooticus Regime Of Shadow Marines 26	Posted - 2012.12.06 21:38:00 - [16] - Quote How about disabling the ability to spawn at A.
I-Shayz-I ZionTCD Legacy Rising 172	Posted - 2012.12.06 21:42:00 - [17] - Quote Obective A has not one, but FOUR null cannons? At least this will give players the incentive to defend the objective instead of hacking then running away.
Andius Fidelitas Algintal Core Gallente Federation 51	Posted - 2012.12.07 05:21:00 - [18] - Quote The one objective map looks most promising! What a crazy amount of turret fest, gunners will be most happy with this map. Plus I love the attacker/defender base layout. It's good to have definable permanent bases.
Belzeebub Santana SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 409	Posted - 2012.12.07 05:42:00 - [19] - Quote Calling it, defending side is gonna dominate this map, those buildings are gonna be prime spots to pick of hackers and rain down mass drivers, not only that but uplinks on top and it will be one sided quick.
Sylwester Dziewiecki Doomheim 83	Posted - 2012.12.07 07:14:00 - [20] - Quote I think that D3-E3 is missing supply depot

Kosen Driago WarRavens 25	Posted - 2012.12.07 07:22:00 - [21] - Quote Can't wait!
Bendtner92 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 369	Posted - 2012.12.07 12:49:00 - [22] - Quote After the first match on this map, which was an instant redline, I'm already annoyed by the fact that all the stuff drop throughout the match instead of being there from the start. We grabbed A right of the bat and redlined them instantly because they couldn't grab any CRU at the beginning, and it's a LONG way from the spawn to the objective. Also, remove spawning on objectives. It'll ruin this map I'm afraid, and it doesn't make any sense anyway.
Bendtner92 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 369	Posted - 2012.12.07 13:07:00 - [23] - Quote Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote: I think that D3-E3 is missing supply depot Yeah that's missing on the image, because there's one ingame :P
Odyllic Nova Tech Marines Hephaestus Forge Alliance 2	Posted - 2012.12.07 14:23:00 - [24] - Quote This excites me...lets see how it plays.
Jak Teston Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 99	Posted - 2012.12.07 15:45:00 - [25] - Quote Bendtner92 wrote: After the first match on this map, which was an instant redline, I'm already annoyed by the fact that all the stuff drop throughout the match instead of being there from the start. We grabbed A right of the bat and redlined them instantly because they couldn't grab any CRU at the beginning, and it's a LONG way from the spawn to the objective. Also, remove spawning on objectives. It'll ruin this map I'm afraid, and it doesn't make any sense anyway. My experience was similar. Instant red-line and no comeback after that. Maps should be considerably smaller for this game-mode. I'm talking about a quarter of the area they are now.
P-A-R-A-D-O-X A-S-S-A-S-S-I-N 0	Posted - 2012.12.07 22:41:00 - [26] - Quote MrBlobz wrote: This is gonna be crazy YES - it will be WAR - focused WAR - Lol!!! It'll be FUN!!! =D
P-A-R-A-D-O-X A-S-S-A-S-S-I-N 0	Posted - 2012.12.07 22:58:00 - [27] - Quote Vexen Krios wrote: lol i'll be hiding happily somewhere destorying said turrets lol, my favorite thing to do with my forge gun Edit: they should have put the objective point on top of the table top...make it kinda like king of the hill/mountain....whatever its called. Epic table top matches. Exactly - turrets don't mean much(even if they've got dedicated Logistics back up), as they'll be easily taken out - I'll enjoy the explosions & of course points... =P I'm just excited for the impending brutal CQ 'bloodshed' in the vicinity of the objective - the ONE objective... Sly Smile...It's gonna be WILD!!! =D Subsmachineguns"Brrrrrat!!!""Brrrrat!!!"Assault Rifles"Ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta!!!"Sniper Rifles"Peeyaww!!! Peeyaww!!!" Chaos I tell you... >.> CHAOS!!! O.O (=])
Kai Inu Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.12.07 23:01:00 - [28] - Quote Is it me or are all the good ( as in you have to look a bit to find them and there's some cover) sniperspots removed (not only in this map but everyone of the new versions)??? Except the starting points there aren't any left. Scout's are out except for a blitzrun at the start (almost no armor) . Not even sure if it would be faster / better to just take the 4x4 so you could use the heavies and imediately have some stronger defence. Think the logistics/triage peepz are going to earn their pay this time.
Kevall Longstride DUST University Ivy League 71	Posted - 2012.12.08 01:01:00 - [29] - Quote Most stupid game map ever. Played it once will never do so again.
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3064	Posted - 2012.12.08 01:01:00 - [30] - Quote FAVORITE new mode variant. Really fun. Only problem is the objective is not very visible, and took me a while to find where it actually is. This variation is definitely a keeper.

Icy Tiger Universal Allies Inc. 1026	Posted - 2012.12.08 05:28:00 - [31] - Quote Really fun, but needs balancing.
Maken Tosch Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 1590	Posted - 2012.12.08 06:01:00 - [32] - Quote This is definitely not the kind of map for lone wolf randoms. This map actually requires skill.
Kosen Driago WarRavens 25	Posted - 2012.12.08 07:15:00 - [33] - Quote The modes are pretty fun, but I do think there is something unbalanced about them... I'm noticing that there aren't many close matches. It seems to me, that either your team gets steam rolled or you're doing the steam rolling lol. I don't know what it is, and its not just this mode, it seems to happen on all the modes. Once one side gets the upper hand, theres just no stopping them. Maybe its just my luck (or lack there of depending on the match) but i've had this happen in just about every match i've played so far. I wouldn't have said anything if match results werent so consistent though...
Vaerana Myshtana ScIdama Endless Renaissance 197	Posted - 2012.12.08 18:36:00 - [34] - Quote I liked the focused nature of this map, but as someone else said, this map is almost entirely close combat. Snipers and logistics are not very useful over much of the map. The western tower bases are behind the redline, which is hard to figure out until you've snuck halfway across the map to find a good sniper position. It's unusual enough that I feel like the redline needs to be pulled back a little so that people can mount the bases. They're still not good sniping positions because everything is under cover- that's fine, but people should be able to get up there and figure it out, rather than feeling hemmed in by the redline. Also, the point about spawning on the single objective is very valid. If you don't control that objective, and the CRUs aren't available yet, it's WAY too far from your base to the objective. If you lose the initial hack race, by the time you can potentially recover the objective, your MCC shields are serious compromised. The CRUs should drop sooner, and perhaps the two on the south side (attacker) should be swapped left-right (move E3 to southern E4 and E4 to northern E3). That would put the closest CRUs at about the same distance from each base and the objective.
WhatszGudDawg ZionTCD Legacy Rising 48	Posted - 2012.12.08 18:47:00 - [35] - Quote PLEASE keep all of these new "Mercenary" maps. I think they're all great and offer a whole new look on the game. Be sure to introduce those other maps and game types soon too!
BaneSith Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 1	Posted - 2012.12.09 01:28:00 - [36] - Quote These new maps are fun. Keeping in mind that their purpose is to test new game modes, this one seems like a "King of the Hill" type map. many of the extra turrets don't show up until some time has gone by, this seems to give the losing team a chance to distract the camping team. camping would also be hard as the other team could come from many different angles. Practical knowledge of the maps layout would greatly benefit either team. This was my favorite of all the new game types. and i hope they become a permanent fixture.
Card Drunook DoC Deck of Contractors 79	Posted - 2012.12.09 11:13:00 - [37] - Quote I find this new setup fun but a fix needs to be made to prevent LAVs from being driven into the hack point. The defending team can drive a starter LAV into the point and any attackers are unable to hack until they either hack the LAV or blow up the LAV and wait for it to dissolve. Either of these scenarios gives the defenders enough time to spawn back in at lease once on the objective before it can be hacked.
aurther kain FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET 2	Posted - 2012.12.09 19:15:00 - [38] - Quote This has to be my personal fav of all the new game modes, it is "king of the hill" just cause ur team take objective A 1st dont mean u can sit back and relax, a good team who are communicating with each other can come straight in there and wipe u out! This game mode forces both teams to work tightly not onli with in there squads but as a whole team trying to find the weakness in the defences set in place by the side controlling the objective. once that is done they then have to take control of the objective and repel the onslaught that will be coming there way!!!
Beyobi Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire 44	Posted - 2012.12.09 23:39:00 - [39] - Quote put "A" in the cargo container seemed like a fun idea... until remote explosives came into play. What a cheap scheme. You can't get any angle on the explosive to shoot it as it is inside the containers, and trying to blow it up inside the cargo container kills you. I use grenades to try to blow up the explosive, but when I go inside to see if the explosive is gone... surprise, it's not. boom another bloody corpse. no blinking red lights or green wires or shiny silver duct tape, just a dark gray muted tone wad of "WTF". I even tried to scan the damn things to expose it to my team, sadly nothing.
1CLIP 1KILL Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 87	Posted - 2012.12.10 01:35:00 - [40] - Quote At first I was a bit confused about the starting positions, but I see that they are labeled "defender" and "attacker" so I guess the difference in difference is intentional. Does the attacking MCC have more hp or something? It would be cool if the defending MCC started with reduced shields and slowly regenerated them by a fixed amount (no regen for attack). You could then give checkpoint A to def. @ the start too, so they can spawn there. I thought about it a little more, and I guess your intention is for corps to control planets/areas, and to take over that area another corp has to battle the defending one? Is that why there's a slight advantage to def.? It'd make sense then.

Timothy Reaper ZionTCD Legacy Rising 321	Posted - 2012.12.10 09:33:00 - [41] - Quote The fire-fights can reach insane levels around the objective. Teamwork is definitely needed for success. Though I have to say placing it in a container makes it a bit too easy to guard. If a group comes up, grenades and mass drivers. If a lone soldier sneaks in, a pistol to the back of the head. The turrets that drop under the MCC are pretty much useless, except for providing points to forge gunners and swarm launchers. And the map seems a little big, but when we can have more mercs in one battle this could change. It's also too easy to redline/get redlined with the current setup. The narrowed redline makes sneaking around a competent sniper difficult, and any halfway decent team is going to have an anti-vehicle specialist or two so trying to rush with vehicles is a waste of ISK. If the enemy gets the objective first your only hope is an incompetent team; that or for all their controller batteries to run out at the same time.
Eternal Tyrant Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic 2	Posted - 2012.12.10 11:34:00 - [42] - Quote Had an awesome match here - the blues managed to capture the objective first and actually managed to organise into a tactical line of sorts to take on the incoming reds which had also organised into definite squads. We held out for about 7 minutes before the reds took over the objective and roles literally reversed, the blues attacking in squads against the reds who had taken up some effective formations. About 6 minutes later the battle flipped again. Very entertaining and the lack of snipers is refreshing although it must be harsh on those who specialise in that sort of thing - guess they should just avoid these close-quarters maps! If only I could get the HMG to be as effective as it should be... when I shoot an opponent at point blank range it seems like only 10% of the bullets actually happen, either that or it's way underpowered.
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 1058	Posted - 2012.12.10 13:56:00 - [43] - Quote It's very easy for a logi to just sit inside the container the node is in with a repair nanohive and remote explosives.
Muscaat 514 EVE Markets 14	Posted - 2012.12.10 17:41:00 - [44] - Quote Very fun, very intense matches on this map. I died a lot but I didn't mind
Sylwester Dziewiecki Doomheim 83	Posted - 2012.12.11 20:37:00 - [45] - Quote Blue structures falling from sky I think that if in next 15-20 or 30 second a blue CRU will drop from the sky, everyone in the team should get notification about that. It's very important information and I bet that if we could have Team Commander he would tell or show us where would the new structure land and when it would be activate. That information could be visible for everyone or only for Squad Commanders(to reduce "information noise"), beside cmdr's should be able to interact with it by setting some orders on it - def circle, or rally point(in that moment everyone in squad should "see" what they are defending).
dalt ud Vacuum Cleaner. LLC 62	Posted - 2012.12.12 08:00:00 - [46] - Quote good map, but i think 2 objective point will better, because will create something like line of front
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis 774	Posted - 2012.12.14 16:31:00 - [47] - Quote I very much like the concept of this map and hope that CCP continues to provide maps like it in future (single objective, tight play area, lots of hackable elements). That said the map needs polish, the ability for a team to park a LAV inside the objective space thus preventing a hack of the objective is beyond imbalanced and all the way into "only if the match has become totally one sided in favor of the they aggressor will this objective change hands". Obviously in games without the LAV parking the experience will differ, as such the physical characteristics of the objectives surroundings need to be such that no one is able to park a vehicle on top of it to prevent hacking.
crazy space 2100046106 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 879	Posted - 2013.01.12 03:35:00 - [48] - Quote I've never seen this map pop up :/
Odayian Dust Bunny One-Armed Bandits Orbital Rights 12	Posted - 2013.01.17 18:44:00 - [49] - Quote crazy space 2100046106 wrote: I've never seen this map pop up :/ I hope this comes back in to the rotation. I have yet to see this since the TQ merge.
Jayquan18 The Southern Legion 42	Posted - 2013.01.22 12:26:00 - [50] - Quote Sylwester Dziewiecki 2100045817 wrote: I think that D3-E3 is missing supply depot I never played this map before, and i always play skirmish.



Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.