DUST Search - CCP IS IGNORING/BREAKING THEIR OWN RULES FOR THE TOURNAMENT!!!!!!!!!

All Channels

General Discussions

CCP IS IGNORING/BREAKING THEIR OWN RULES FOR THE TOURNAMENT!!!!!!!!!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
red ed Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.11.11 21:46:00 - [1] - Quote WTF CCP why are you breaking your own rules?!!! Quote: CCP Cmdr Wang: Grand Championship: 10-11 November No time limit - Each match of the Grand Championship has no time limit, and only ends when one side destroys the otherGÇÖs MCC. Best of 4 matches - Two matches will be held on the EU battleserver and two matches on the NA battleserver. In the event of a tie, the team with the most Kills from the last 4 matches shall be the winner. According to your own rules posted here Rules Imperfects should not have won their first match as described here Tournament Finals Quote: GM Grave: An amazingly close match with [P0NY-] dominating early on by holding points A & C for the majority of the game giving them a huge lead on MCC damage to [IMPPP-] . However [IMPPP-] made a come back and took all 3 points although just at the end of the match while [P0NY-] retook objective B [P0NY-] also had more MCC structure but began to run out of clones and lost the match when they exceeded their clone limit giving a hard fought win to [IMPPP-]. According to the rules you laid out CCP clones were not suppose to be a limit on the finals. These are the finals and yet you allowed a victory based on clone depletion when the rules clearly stated it HAD to be an MCC destruction which never occurred. How are we as a community suppose to have any faith in your word CCP when you don't stick to your word when it comes to rules you laid out about this tournament!? Not to detract from Imperfects victory, they will win either way with the help of their modded controllers that everyone knows they uses. Hard not to lose when your top players have fully auto-matic tactical rifles. I guess that is something else CCP will let slide along with their rules, I mean why not? There is probably a few CCP in Imperfects, would make sense since they let them get away with so much.
Leither Yiltron KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 417	Posted - 2012.11.11 21:47:00 - [2] - Quote 3/10 would not troll again.
Knightshade Belladonna Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 288	Posted - 2012.11.11 21:49:00 - [3] - Quote ouch.. comments ccp?
Jason Pearson Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 742	Posted - 2012.11.11 21:51:00 - [4] - Quote Bad thread is bad.
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 21:57:00 - [5] - Quote u mad bro?
red ed Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:00:00 - [6] - Quote it's not a bad thread, and it's not a troll. this is a legitimate concern. If the roles were switched and seraphim had won due to clone loss I would have still made this thread. It's against the rules plain and simple and it isn't fair to either side. There should be a rematch where the rules are actually acknowledged this time. I was considering investing money in this game but since we can't trust them to follow their own rules and guidelines for their first tournament I'm having serious second thoughts. Heck its reasonable to say that because of this its fair that everyone should have second thoughts.
red ed Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:02:00 - [7] - Quote Paran Tadec wrote: u mad bro? 2006 called they wan't their catch phrase back. Don't worry I called the 70's and asked to borrow their come back, they said it was ok because you're a tool box.
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:03:00 - [8] - Quote red ed wrote: it's not a bad thread, and it's not a troll. this is a legitimate concern. If the roles were switched and seraphim had won due to clone loss I would have still made this thread. It's against the rules plain and simple and it isn't fair to either side. There should be a rematch where the rules are actually acknowledged this time. I was considering investing money in this game but since we can't trust them to follow their own rules and guidelines for their first tournament I'm having serious second thoughts. Heck its reasonable to say that because of this its fair that everyone should have second thoughts. Invest money? In a free game? LOLLOLOLOLOLOL.
Tyrus 4 Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 83	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:03:00 - [9] - Quote red ed wrote: it's not a bad thread, and it's not a troll. this is a legitimate concern. If the roles were switched and seraphim had won due to clone loss I would have still made this thread. It's against the rules plain and simple and it isn't fair to either side. There should be a rematch where the rules are actually acknowledged this time. I was considering investing money in this game but since we can't trust them to follow their own rules and guidelines for their first tournament I'm having serious second thoughts. Heck its reasonable to say that because of this its fair that everyone should have second thoughts. lol the fact that you felt you had to say that shows that you wouldn't have.
Obama DAT Doomheim 389	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:04:00 - [10] - Quote Who cares? 99% of the 200 people left playing this game dont.
red ed Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:05:00 - [11] - Quote Paran Tadec wrote: Invest money? In a free game? LOLLOLOLOLOLOL. you laugh but everyone knows ya bought. the merc pack
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:05:00 - [12] - Quote red ed wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: u mad bro? 2006 called they wan't their catch phrase back. Don't worry I called the 70's and asked to borrow their come back, they said it was ok because you're a tool box. Its from 2003 really, but wasnt big until 2010. Also, "wan't" isn't a word.
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:06:00 - [13] - Quote red ed wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Invest money? In a free game? LOLLOLOLOLOLOL. you laugh but everyone knows ya bought. the merc pack which scrublet in SI are you? SHOW YOURSELF.
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:06:00 - [14] - Quote Tyrus 4 wrote: red ed wrote: it's not a bad thread, and it's not a troll. this is a legitimate concern. If the roles were switched and seraphim had won due to clone loss I would have still made this thread. It's against the rules plain and simple and it isn't fair to either side. There should be a rematch where the rules are actually acknowledged this time. I was considering investing money in this game but since we can't trust them to follow their own rules and guidelines for their first tournament I'm having serious second thoughts. Heck its reasonable to say that because of this its fair that everyone should have second thoughts. lol the fact that you felt you had to say that shows that you wouldn't have. /thread
red ed Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:12:00 - [15] - Quote Paran Tadec wrote: [ Its from 2003 really, but wasnt big until 2010. Also, "wan't" isn't a word. Actually it wasn't from 2003 but it's good to see you're also a liar as well as a cheater. Also wan't is a word the ' is what's called an accent. Why bring it up? u mad bro, that i'm right? Why ask you clearly are.
Knightshade Belladonna Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 288	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:12:00 - [16] - Quote Paran Tadec wrote: red ed wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: u mad bro? 2006 called they wan't their catch phrase back. Don't worry I called the 70's and asked to borrow their come back, they said it was ok because you're a tool box. Its from 2003 really, but wasnt big until 2010. Also, "wan't" isn't a word. I understand, You just mad bro, cause you aint like me.. common words used in early free style rapping going back to the early 90's .. did not catch on as a meme to the general public until 2003, when well known yet ****** rapper CamRon or however spelled, had a picture of him with the phrase YOU MAD across it plastered all over the usual entertainment networks
I-Shayz-I ZionTCD Legacy Rising 172	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:13:00 - [17] - Quote red ed wrote: 2006 called they wan't their catch phrase back. Don't worry I called the 70's and asked to borrow their come back, they said it was ok because you're a tool box. AND YOU DIDN'T WARN THEM ABOUT THE HURRICANES AND EARTHQUAKES AND OSAMA?
Knightshade Belladonna Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 288	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:17:00 - [18] - Quote I-Shayz-I wrote: red ed wrote: 2006 called they wan't their catch phrase back. Don't worry I called the 70's and asked to borrow their come back, they said it was ok because you're a tool box. AND YOU DIDN'T WARN THEM ABOUT THE HURRICANES AND EARTHQUAKES AND OSAMA? LOL, that truly made me laugh
Icy Tiger Universal Allies Inc. 1026	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:20:00 - [19] - Quote Who cares, they lost either way. Read the whole thing and they barely capped objectives. Amazing teams, but someone had to lose. Also both teams had same rules. Good games either way, I don't see Seraphim crying about it. But you're probably an alt anyways.
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:21:00 - [20] - Quote red ed wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: [ Its from 2003 really, but wasnt big until 2010. Also, "wan't" isn't a word. Actually it wasn't from 2003 but it's good to see you're also a liar as well as a cheater. Also wan't is a word the ' is what's called an accent. Why bring it up? u mad bro, that i'm right? Why ask you clearly are. TROLO
Cyn Bruin Imperfects Negative-Feedback 651	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:25:00 - [21] - Quote Paran Tadec wrote: red ed wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: [ Its from 2003 really, but wasnt big until 2010. Also, "wan't" isn't a word. Actually it wasn't from 2003 but it's good to see you're also a liar as well as a cheater. Also wan't is a word the ' is what's called an accent. Why bring it up? u mad bro, that i'm right? Why ask you clearly are. TROLO Please let it go Paran.
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:27:00 - [22] - Quote Cyn Bruin wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: red ed wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: [ Its from 2003 really, but wasnt big until 2010. Also, "wan't" isn't a word. Actually it wasn't from 2003 but it's good to see you're also a liar as well as a cheater. Also wan't is a word the ' is what's called an accent. Why bring it up? u mad bro, that i'm right? Why ask you clearly are. TROLO Please let it go Paran. Oh, I was done with him.
red ed Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:28:00 - [23] - Quote Yeah Paran, better listen to yo mama. I know you're mad that I'm 100% right but better not make a deal of it. Better to just ignore this and let it die before people start paying attention to it also realize I'm right and then BAMZOOP next thing ya know ya gotta redo the finals this time using the actual stated rules.
Sha Kharn Clone Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 1087	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:29:00 - [24] - Quote About this dispute lolz no one in SI has disputed anything. Imperfects won fair and square and we had a wicked time in every game. Dont care bout the rules we were here for the good fight and hell yea we finaly got three Wicked night and thanks to all ..even you CCP.
Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:31:00 - [25] - Quote red ed wrote: Yeah Paran, better listen to yo mama. I know you're mad that I'm 100% right but better not make a deal of it. Better to just ignore this and let it die before people start paying attention to it also realize I'm right and then BAMZOOP next thing ya know ya gotta redo the finals this time using the actual stated rules. says the freshly made npc corp alt
steadyhand amarr Imperfects Negative-Feedback 338	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:32:00 - [26] - Quote ^^ same back at ya that first game was most fun iv had in any game for a long time ^^ real nail bitter
Icy Tiger Universal Allies Inc. 1026	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:33:00 - [27] - Quote OK, time to bring logic out. In rules, it says that there will be no time limit, and battle ends when MCC is destroyed. Technically, when a team has no clones, it's MCC will be destroyed eventually anyways. Therefore, rules have been followed, and you can shove your shoe down your throat.
Sha Kharn Clone Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 1087	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:36:00 - [28] - Quote Icy Tiger wrote: OK, time to bring logic out. In rules, it says that there will be no time limit, and battle ends when MCC is destroyed. Technically, when a team has no clones, it's MCC will be destroyed eventually anyways. Therefore, rules have been followed, and you can shove your shoe down your throat. Lolz nevar stop posting No really SI is totaly not fussed about this and TBH its no ones concern but ours. We are not concerned so drop it cos no one cares k
Leither Yiltron KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 417	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:38:00 - [29] - Quote Oh, actually I didn't realize that they had scheduled the finals for today. This is actually fully bullshit. It explicitly says that the match would not end until one side's MCC was destroyed. Then again, CCP have been really bad all tournament long at like...everything organization wise. The one thing I can give them props for was that they were mostly on time putting the matches up to join. Honestly, this is less of a tournament problem and more a problem with the clone count game mechanic. It's just a terrible idea all around.
Kain Spero Imperfects Negative-Feedback 898	Posted - 2012.11.11 22:38:00 - [30] - Quote Sha Kharn Clone wrote: About this dispute lolz no one in SI has disputed anything. Imperfects won fair and square and we had a wicked time in every game. Dont care bout the rules we were here for the good fight and hell yea we finaly got three Wicked night and thanks to all ..even you CCP. Really amazing fights. It was a lot of fun facing you guys on the battlefield.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.