No I didn't. I heard it's not online anymore? Out survived by MAG. That's ugly...

MGO wasn't that great TBH...

No I didn't. I heard it's not online anymore? Out survived by MAG. That's ugly...

bad players, low KDR, it's all the same.

Teamwork + KDR will beat bad players with team work and bad KDR with team work.

^^^^^^THIS! ALL DAY!

Cant really say that tbh because the T-C side bas basically 2 bad clans to begin with and didnt even try since they had players who just sniped in ther spawn and were useless

That T-C side was the worst side picked for that match

So having a bunch of circle holders and "nurse nicks " is a bad idea to begin with. If you lack the ability to pew pew chances are your going to get walked all over. This isn't some new age concept. It's been part of shooters for awhile.

The only problem with this line of reasoning, though, is that it was the Romans who were using the outmoded style of warfare up until the Second Punic War in that they were still using the Hellenistic Phalanx as their primary formation and maneuver style.

In the Battle of Cannae, Hannibal used a double envelopment maneuver to use the Roman's own phalanx formation against the Romans in order to pin and destroy an estimated eight Legions of Roman troops by the numerically smaller force that Hannibal employed.

Now that take that as the reader will to support their positions on this thread, but the fallout of Cannae effectively destroyed the Roman army as a fighting force at that time, but as mentioned upthread there was no capitalization on this. However, the Roman army changed its warfare doctrines to become more tactically flexible as a result of the Cannae debacle, most notably going to its cohort and century system to allow more maneuvrability and ability to adapt to changing situations. As a result of Cannae several city-states did defect to the side of Carthage.

I would point out that Hannibal actually did pull together a racially and culturally diverse set of armies under his command, and he did so by creating his own form of culture. Hannibal united all these different groups in their hatred of the Romans, and a shared motivation like hatred can be a powerful thing under a leader that can properly motivate his men.

Other events and factors eventually led to the downfall of Carthage, and Hannibal, though.

This can almost be applied either way to your original argument, I just thought I would clairfy some of the history behind it.

As i remember it

Circle holders vs killers or whatever but the circle holders they picked were the bottom of the barrel with no tactics in any of the matches if i recall against LOL which had ther **** together

T-C would have done better if they didnt show up

T-C didnt try at all so to use it as an example is pointless

The only problem with this line of reasoning, though, is that it was the Romans who were using the outmoded style of warfare up until the Second Punic War in that they were still using the Hellenistic Phalanx as their primary formation and maneuver style.

In the Battle of Cannae, Hannibal used a double envelopment maneuver to use the Roman's own phalanx formation against the Romans in order to pin and destroy an estimated eight Legions of Roman troops by the numerically smaller force that Hannibal employed.

Now that take that as the reader will to support their positions on this thread, but the fallout of Cannae effectively destroyed the Roman army as a fighting force at that time, but as mentioned upthread there was no capitalization on this. However, the Roman army changed its warfare doctrines to become more tactically flexible as a result of the Cannae debacle, most notably going to its cohort and century system to allow more maneuvrability and ability to adapt to changing situations. As a result of Cannae several city-states did defect to the side of Carthage.

I would point out that Hannibal actually did pull together a racially and culturally diverse set of armies under his command, and he did so by creating his own form of culture. Hannibal united all these different groups in their hatred of the Romans, and a shared motivation like hatred can be a powerful thing under a leader that can properly motivate his men.

Other events and factors eventually led to the downfall of Carthage, and Hannibal, though.

This can almost be applied either way to your original argument, I just thought I would clairfy some of the history behind it.

it's like a secret war here, people who take heart in KD vs people who couldn't care less. wonder who's winning this war ^^

Yea but Regis T-C didnt even try

They didnt ask barely anyone and just picked ppl form ther clans, best circle holders lolno tbh had no gameplan or didnt even bother

It was lambs to the slaughter

LoL didn't try either.

You didnt have to against tht lot

So if I read this correct you got to have a high KDR to be of any use or be able to play as a team. So me and the other 75% of average and poor players might as well pack up and leave the game.

I 'm not the best but I play for fun and don't take it serious, I may be old but I thought the idea was to have fun winning was just a bonus

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!

GladI to cheer you up

Think what he's trying to say is that EVE and Dust by extension are taken very seriously.

Yes the sarcasm didn't come across very well in the first post, but I thought the second one would have.

Less spam, more history.