|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jane DeArc
Militaires Sans Jeux
87
   |
Posted - 2012.09.17 02:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Average Joe81 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Wait.
So, you called in a tank when you knew anti armor defense systems were still in place, and decided to engage in an area covered by them anyways.
Then you lost your tank between the railgun and enough time to be hit by 3 AV grenades without you or your gunner taking that guy out.
And that makes tanks UP?
Did I get that right? no, you didn't. i healed up before going forwards to sheild my allies from 3 assault people. my allies were retards and couldn't handle one enemy so then, not knowing there were any enemies behind me some one came with av nades and droped me from 100% to 0%. also i didn't see anyone prior to this so i didn't have a chance to get a gunner. Then that is your teams fault. Do not blame the AV weapons because your team went full ****** on you and left you in the ****. Instead, why didn't you just hang back? I tell you, theres been so many times I've had a tank supporting me, I've been engaged by a player (and just to clarify, I'm a **** shot who spends most of his time repairing or flying) and that Tank has just rolled on ahead leaving me to get annihilated, then gets done in himself because I wasn't there to help repair. He may well of seen a group of people charging towards us and wanted to "shield" me from the enemy, but it clearly didn't help me right there and in the end, didn't help him.
This so much.
Tanks need a team to be effective, and he's saying everything is OP when he lacks a team, so...unnerf tanks so they don't need a tank to go 34/0
|
Jane DeArc
Militaires Sans Jeux
87
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 02:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:The i win button is sniper rifles now I thought it was Cavity grenades?
It is Cavity grenades, he's just crying because he has a "Sniping is OP" thread. Which is based on flawed logic since the thread agrees that sniping damage is fine, there is just no one killing snipers, and the snipers giving anecdotes are people sniping CORRECTLY and in a SKILLED fashion. |
Jane DeArc
Militaires Sans Jeux
87
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 03:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:someone flies a dropship to the Plateaus tower, and literally NINE snipers are hanging out up there. *facepalm*
Oh man, haha. Some guy I've seen on the forums, FURRY BEAST, I think spawned next to me in ambush and I covered him with my NT-311 while he did something. A dropship landed and I was going to give him some decent turret kills since I'm a decent shot, but he just dropped off on a roof. We dropped uplinks and nanohives, I sniped the gunners out of dropships that came to get us, and laughed so hard I cried (STB-Forkuiwin was among the gunners that were flung from dropships as ragdoll corpses) until finally one dropship just crashed into us. |
Jane DeArc
Militaires Sans Jeux
87
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 03:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
STB Vermaak Doe wrote:The whole point of my threads is there shouldn't be one hit kills(other than vehicle to infantry like cruisers to frigates in eve) in a game designed to be like eve
Your logic doesn't follow. Should a mass driver one shot a scout or assault? Forge Gun? What about a high powered rifle that's designed to send a huge caliber bullet over massive spaces to destroy lightly armored infantry?
Have you looked at how real life works at all? Honestly, I don't use the charge rifle on my sniper suit and I'm perfectly ok with having the occasional 2 shot kill, or just wounding people for the assist.
Sniper rifles are doing their job. People aren't using teamwork to coordinate help or countersniping. |
Jane DeArc
Militaires Sans Jeux
87
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 04:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
STB Vermaak Doe wrote:Real life? Do we have walking tanks in real life carrying forge guns the fact that the mas driver is a close range and low velocity means you have to be still to take a direct hit, and similar with shot guns
We have people in real life carrying a multitude of anti-tank weaponry. In fact the most dangerous thing to the tanks in modern combat aside from mines are plain old infantry. If they get up close, a tank is literally toast. Even at range you have anti-tank rifles, anti-armor rounds, tons of remote, ground-launchable explosives, and more.
The mass driver is a grenade launcher. Tell me someone should be standing after taking a hit from one of those. Same for a shotgun to the face, or a sniper rifle round to the face.
No matter how sci-fi the game is, it's GROUNDED IN SOMETHING. Otherwise you would have to actually learn how the shields work, and why certain frequency space weapons destroy shields but barely damage flesh or machinery, and likewise how come bullets are stopped by shields but destroy flesh, and you would have high speed expanding projectiles for vehicles and machines.
Just stop, fantasy games are fantasy but they stick very close to reality to avoid having to compensate for what they introduce. Ask yourself what good is a shield that stops bullets if it doesn't always stop bullets? Why would bullets hitting energy cause less bullets to be able to be stopped (depleting shields)? Energy is just energy moving and if something is repelled by it, energy is pure force. No matter can deter it, so shield should always stay at the same power and only be pierced by certain weaponry.
I hope this is clear, so you'll just stop whining and more importantly stop coming up with kitten-brained responses. |
|
|
| |
|