I mean all these people can keep coming with their fancy comebacks for me.... I will just go infantry suits me just fine I enjoy gaming whether it be in a tank or on foot or in the air it's only a game

Okay, people cry about tanks. You raise the price of tanks to cut back on tanks. People cry some more about tanks. You make them not as effective while making AV more effective. Now my question is when do the prices on AV go up being its better? When will the prices of tanks go back down being they are worse? I mean I don't have to use a tank to have fun in this game. As well I am not going to be buying things that aren't effective. Such as a rail gun that costs 400k and only does 120 splash. I mean grenades do more splash damage than a missile turret! I mean really A FREAKIN MISSILE THAT DOES LESS SPLASH THAN A GRENADE? That makes not one bit of since to me. Really stop giving in to all the babies. I lose tanks to AV squads and they have to work together but yeah it's a squad. They are supposed to work together! Might as well just take the tank out of the game. My grenades are more effective now. SMH at CCP

Then they made nano hives and supply depots... I assume you havent used those yet..... I mean if thats your arguement I am willing to pay for my ammo if it makes it better

Ted, would you support limited ammo counts for HAVs that could only be replenished at supply depots, and separate positions for the driver and main gunner?

I would support buying ammo I mean being able to resupply isn't really going to fix the infinite ammo problem in my eyes. I mean you get low and just pull up to a supply point and hey I have all the ammo I want again. Now in my opinion if I had to supply myself with my own ammo I wouldn't just "waste" ammo shooting at everything I think I could kill. I would take my shots and make them count. As far as my main gun no way I would trust a random blue dot to fight another tank for me. I had to pay for the tank I couldn't put it at risk with someone else shooting at other tanks. I mean they can't compensate for my movement meaning they may miss while i'm trying to meneuver on my target. I personally think thats a bad idea. Any thoughts on my opinion?

I would support buying ammo I mean being able to resupply isn't really going to fix the infinite ammo problem in my eyes. I mean you get low and just pull up to a supply point and hey I have all the ammo I want again. Now in my opinion if I had to supply myself with my own ammo I wouldn't just "waste" ammo shooting at everything I think I could kill. I would take my shots and make them count. As far as my main gun no way I would trust a random blue dot to fight another tank for me. I had to pay for the tank I couldn't put it at risk with someone else shooting at other tanks. I mean they can't compensate for my movement meaning they may miss while i'm trying to meneuver on my target. I personally think thats a bad idea. Any thoughts on my opinion?

Well with the new nerf they kind of do. Bring a solo tank out and see how long it lasts. Use a squad to help fend off the infantry and see how long they last. Right?

And there's some credence to this point as well. As an example, established doctrine within the US Army is to never use tanks without infantry support, which is part of why you almost always see Abrams platoons operating with Bradley support.

It is too risky as I mentioned before regardless who is in the tank gunning. If I turn left while they are shooting they may miss the target. I guess it would go both ways. I wouldn't use tanks if I couldn't shoot people I don't think. I do fly dropships... well i did until today its a waste of isk lol

What I wanted to highlight though is that an HAV should require the same level of teamwork to go steamrolling through infantry as the infantry would need to kill it. If you and your gunner are on audio with each other you can coordinate your attacks to minimize vulnerability. Also, who says you have to be the driver? They've been considering squad-locking of vehicles, and if they implement that, you could let someone else drive while you gun.

I guess it would be an interesting aspect to try.... I still think it would generate negative feedback kind of like how this nerf did.... It would be worth a try I wouldn't be the one testing it out though. Definately not at 1.5+ mil a pop....