Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 07:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
Regis Mark V wrote: ...We don't want COD we want good gunplay! I've said it once and I'll sau\y it again the gun mechanics are unacceptable the game has been in dev for 3 years! Even with ex DICE working on the game this is **** poor. There is no way a game should be in dev for 3 years and this is what they have so far.
How many times me and you said that pal? Hundreds!
|
Icedslayer
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 07:31:00 -
[32] - Quote
Has COD or BF ever have to worry about connecting two different types of games together and running them all on one Shard? Has COD or BF ever have to worry about the lore behind the different races and have that reflect through the weapons/suits/ and vehicles? Has COD or BF ever had a Economy where everything has to be priced just right? Has COD or BF ever really innovated or pushed the Genre to a new area? (recent games)
This industry has gotten to stale with COD or COD rip offs. Does the game need some tuning Yes, and with time the game will run smoother as they fix all the bugs on the server side. |
MUDMASTEI2
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
135
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 07:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
theschizogenious wrote:you wan the gunplay to be as polished as COD yes?
well look at how many cod titles they made everytime they do a new cod seeing as it is a once a year thing they are basically just taking all the same stuff and putting under a new title with som new maps and a campaign that follows the same basic path as all the others.
every new "title" is more or less a glorified dlc that you insist on paying 60 dollars for the same experience every single year. cods gungame probably wasnt as appealing as its 10 polished version that you are currently accustomed to. in fact in cod 1 it was **** the first time cods online gungame was even remotely playable was with MW1 that was 5 or so YEARS into the making of the cod franchise and about 3 YEARS into them working on their multiplayer aspect.
it took cod 7-8 years to reach the multiplayer that they have today and they just bothere to do clan support after being aked about it since MW1 about 5 years ago.
5 YEARS just to be bothered enough to finally put a little more depth into the multiplayer aspect of their game. we are 1 build away from singularity they are still working on the next build and will continue to for what i hope will be a long time because they wont say oh we missed this bug/glitch oh well we'll just let it go unless it becomes too op or just ignore it and work on the next map pack because all they care about is separating you from your money.
look at EVE that wasnt a one year process that is a persistent work that both ccp and its amazingly vocal community genuinely care about and want to see become even greater. go to youtube find the videos on burn jita EVE was able to handle having around 2500 ships in one system and was still working.
cod has nothing on this game in any way shape or form quite frankly cod is a dissapointment because they dont give a damn about the gamer they just keep pushing out cookie cutter game every year and only change the color of the sprinkles. you dont like the game LEAVE. ill be more than happy to collect your portion of the loot.
that is all and have a nice day/night
Everything you wrote means practically nothing about what you're against.
You say we shouldn't want gungame as polished as CoD because CoD hasn't changed in 5 years? What the hell does that have to do with gungame?
. . . |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 11:21:00 -
[34] - Quote
You're all just mad because my chopper is greater than your crappy UAV. So... If you aren't damn good at CoD, don't slate it.
Now, wtf does this whole thread have to do with gun game? I just see CoD bashing. Like people saying it hasn't innovated ect. -ú35 for clan support. Proven. CCP could charge a similar fee with Dust. UVT much? There's a lot we don't know about Dust. What I do know, is COD is more social. Yes that's right, I have 6 people I can speak with there, 9 if ground war.
Basically CoD is king. Deal with it kids.
That said Dust gunplay is improving, and will be helpped when they fix lag so that corner camping isn't as over powered as it is now. Schizo, think what you're posting dude. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
648
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 11:29:00 -
[35] - Quote
theschizogenious wrote:Burger Helper wrote:so you're saying the people who complain about the hit detection being bad, and the very basic core shooter mechanics being poor, are just cod kids?
well damn i guess i better go out and buy black ops two im not saying that there arent any problems im saying that they are comparing a game in its infancy to one that has had over a decade to get it right. thats like comparing the yankees to a little league team
Schizo. There was a gameplay demo in 2009... They haven't been testing for just a few months... |
JonnyAugust
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
212
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 11:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
theschizogenious wrote:you wan the gunplay to be as polished as COD yes?
well look at how many cod titles they made everytime they do a new cod seeing as it is a once a year thing they are basically just taking all the same stuff and putting under a new title with som new maps and a campaign that follows the same basic path as all the others.
every new "title" is more or less a glorified dlc that you insist on paying 60 dollars for the same experience every single year. cods gungame probably wasnt as appealing as its 10 polished version that you are currently accustomed to. in fact in cod 1 it was **** the first time cods online gungame was even remotely playable was with MW1 that was 5 or so YEARS into the making of the cod franchise and about 3 YEARS into them working on their multiplayer aspect.
it took cod 7-8 years to reach the multiplayer that they have today and they just bothere to do clan support after being aked about it since MW1 about 5 years ago.
5 YEARS just to be bothered enough to finally put a little more depth into the multiplayer aspect of their game. we are 1 build away from singularity they are still working on the next build and will continue to for what i hope will be a long time because they wont say oh we missed this bug/glitch oh well we'll just let it go unless it becomes too op or just ignore it and work on the next map pack because all they care about is separating you from your money.
look at EVE that wasnt a one year process that is a persistent work that both ccp and its amazingly vocal community genuinely care about and want to see become even greater. go to youtube find the videos on burn jita EVE was able to handle having around 2500 ships in one system and was still working.
cod has nothing on this game in any way shape or form quite frankly cod is a dissapointment because they dont give a damn about the gamer they just keep pushing out cookie cutter game every year and only change the color of the sprinkles. you dont like the game LEAVE. ill be more than happy to collect your portion of the loot.
that is all and have a nice day/night
Let me summarize:
We should leave if we think this a beta that needs improvement. Do you fanboys realize that you are a contradiction in this game development? It astounds me. |
EriktheHeartless
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 11:51:00 -
[37] - Quote
#11 Posted: 2012.08.24 04:24 | Report Like Burger Helper wrote: so you're saying the people who complain about the hit detection being bad, and the very basic core shooter mechanics being poor, are just cod kids?
well damn i guess i better go out and buy black ops two
im not saying that there arent any problems im saying that they are comparing a game in its infancy to one that has had over a decade to get it right.
thats like comparing the yankees to a little league team at least the little leaguers have good hit detection. |
Regis Mark V
91
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 13:01:00 -
[38] - Quote
Icedslayer wrote:Has COD or BF ever have to worry about connecting two different types of games together and running them all on one Shard? Has COD or BF ever have to worry about the lore behind the different races and have that reflect through the weapons/suits/ and vehicles? Has COD or BF ever had a Economy where everything has to be priced just right? Has COD or BF ever really innovated or pushed the Genre to a new area? (recent games)
This industry has gotten to stale with COD or COD rip offs. Does the game need some tuning Yes, and with time the game will run smoother as they fix all the bugs on the server side.
Then from what you are saying here is obviously CCP has bitten off more than they can chew! They are so worried about the EVE connections and race lore that they forgot about core gun/gameplay mechanics. Then obviously the game needs to be pushed back possibly even built around a whole new engine? |
Regis Mark V
91
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 13:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:Regis Mark V wrote: ...We don't want COD we want good gunplay! I've said it once and I'll sau\y it again the gun mechanics are unacceptable the game has been in dev for 3 years! Even with ex DICE working on the game this is **** poor. There is no way a game should be in dev for 3 years and this is what they have so far.
How many times me and you said that pal? Hundreds!
1 to many! |
theschizogenious
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
167
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 16:24:00 -
[40] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Well, I hate to be "that guy" but Dust has been in development since 2009 -at least-, which would mean that this is it's third year of development and testing. More likely however, is that it has been in development since 2007 or 2008, in which case this would be its fourth or fifth year of development and testing. So your argument that Dust has only been in testing for a few months vs CoD which has had over a decade, is slightly skewed, and quite invalid really.
However, the same is true for CoD, it was probably in development for two-to-four years before launch, meaning Black Ops 2 will be around it's 12th or 13th year. So your argument should be Dust has only had five years of development and testing, where as CoD has had just over a decade, more than doubling the time that Dust has been around.
This argument is still valid however, as CoD took -three years- after its initial launch to finally have a decent feel about it, and really make it's name popular, meaning that Dust still has hope, quite a lot at that. So long as CCP keeps themselves devoted to their players, and never shelves Dust 514, it will grow, and it will gain a following, just like EVE has. There will always be people looking for a deeper experience, and Dust will provide that.
thats what i was getting at but the reason that i wasnt incorporating the amount of time that was years before each game was that its alot easier to have a game run smoothly when the people who are testing it are all on the same server in the same building instead of being strung out across the world like the betas are. |
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 16:30:00 -
[41] - Quote
theschizogenious wrote:W0olley wrote:What does good gunplay have to do with your hate for CoD. People want the gunplay to be on par with all fps not just CoD. You can say all you want against CoD but the gunplay is one thing they get right. what im saying is that it took cod years to get to its level of gunplay performance and yet your bashing ccp after theyve only been testing it for months
umm LOLwut? cod always had solid gunplay wtf are u smokin? |
theschizogenious
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
167
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 16:32:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tariq Tamir wrote:This is a beta. CCP want us to tell us what is wrong. Telling people to shut up or leave is the opposite of what should be happening.
Further, the gunplay should be smooth at launch - even the first CoD met the standard for what is required in a shooter. It's not ready until it is smooth; that's basic FPS gameplay and is not something that should be fixed after release in any circumstance ever.
That being said, I don't think CCP want to release the game until gunplay is smooth, so if you think you're defending their honor I think you'll find they disagree with your premise, value feedback, and you've missed the point of a beta.
im not being a fanboy and defending them im just saying that they want the gungame to be as polished as a decade old franchise when theyre coming right out of the gate on their first endeavor.
their technology is better so theyll be able to do it in less time but thats the main thing is TIME you cant expect to post a problem and then have them be able to fix it instantly.
you talk about the problem having been there in june but what your blinding ourself to is the improvements they have made which also address that problem along with the others.
all you E3 build guys may not know it but that build was the beggining of the beta essentially before that was basically the alpha build where people were getting used to the controls and the feel for the game E3 build was where they polished it up and started doing the tweaking and the fixing so that gives them about a month and a half to be adressing ALL the problems that have been reported not just the one problem.
just have patience aslong as people are showing interest they will be working to make this game better. |
Salimar Akieri
Doomheim
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 16:35:00 -
[43] - Quote
The gungame needs a ton of work. That is painfully obvious to anyone who has played an FPS and expects Dust to actually provide an MMOFPS experience.
Heck, I played MAG again a few nights ago, and for all its problems my bullets actually hit the people I was aiming at. It was such a welcome break from playing Dust it wasn't funny.
I will also say I do not like CoD that much, and do not want games to be like it. But, it does work at its core (its all the other stuff that is just infuriating)
Honestly, anyone who says the game is ready to be released within the next half-year (at the very least) is a foolish fanboy. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 16:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
The "this is my first entry into the genre" excuse isn't going to fly. EA/Bioware learned this the hard way after the TORtanic disaster. |
theschizogenious
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
167
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 19:13:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:theschizogenious wrote:W0olley wrote:What does good gunplay have to do with your hate for CoD. People want the gunplay to be on par with all fps not just CoD. You can say all you want against CoD but the gunplay is one thing they get right. what im saying is that it took cod years to get to its level of gunplay performance and yet your bashing ccp after theyve only been testing it for months umm LOLwut? cod always had solid gunplay wtf are u smokin?
cods first multiplayer was **** so idk what your smokin |
Tariq Tamir
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 00:08:00 -
[46] - Quote
theschizogenious wrote: im not being a fanboy and defending them im just saying that they want the gungame to be as polished as a decade old franchise when theyre coming right out of the gate on their first endeavor.
their technology is better so theyll be able to do it in less time but thats the main thing is TIME you cant expect to post a problem and then have them be able to fix it instantly.
you talk about the problem having been there in june but what your blinding ourself to is the improvements they have made which also address that problem along with the others.
all you E3 build guys may not know it but that build was the beggining of the beta essentially before that was basically the alpha build where people were getting used to the controls and the feel for the game E3 build was where they polished it up and started doing the tweaking and the fixing so that gives them about a month and a half to be adressing ALL the problems that have been reported not just the one problem.
just have patience aslong as people are showing interest they will be working to make this game better.
CoD "polished" many things over a decade, but it had smooth gunplay from the start. CCP needs to launch with that. They know that, and with the exception of yourself, we know that. There are many things they can improve over time. In a shooter, gunplay needs to be ready at launch whether you are new to the game or old hat. With a team of experienced shooter developers from companies such as DICE there is no 'lack of experience' excuse anyway. But I'm not complaining about CCP or how they are running things or how the game is coming along, as you insinuate. I only have a problem with the constant threads that say "everyone stop criticizing or GTFO!" when that is what we are here to do.
I am seeing the improvements, I'm not blind to this and I'm enjoying the game more with each build, but you were unquestionably telling us not to give CCP constructive criticism on issues such as gunplay.
In any beta there are kids who scream "this game is stupid!" and they are annoying as all hell -- but the people saying "hit detection is still off, this feels clunky, that's not working" are doing exactly what is requested of them by CCP. |
theschizogenious
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
167
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 02:27:00 -
[47] - Quote
game hasnt launched yet and theyre still working on it
its been said its a beta and everyone know's that with the exception of yourself |
Cthulhu Sothoth
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 02:50:00 -
[48] - Quote
I like how everyone is bitching about CCP not getting things done... for one Dust514 is FREE. I'm sorry you paid 60$ for the same ******* CoD games but nobody has to pay a cent for this game.
Secondly Dust514 is still in beta, something the Cod team could learn from before re-titling the same game and selling it as something new.
Third, this is nowhere to as complete as the actual game... Have any of you read the interviews stating what all is going to be added to Dust? This beta is just a sliver of the game and that's just what CCP has told people, there is so much more they refuse to talk about.
Get a ******* grip people. |
theschizogenious
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
167
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 03:18:00 -
[49] - Quote
you might not want to cuss so much
just pointing that out |
XxStonedAssassinxX
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 04:09:00 -
[50] - Quote
W0olley wrote:What does good gunplay have to do with your hate for CoD. People want the gunplay to be on par with all fps not just CoD. You can say all you want against CoD but the gunplay is one thing they get right.
lol and why that because every time you shot a person on cod its instant death the game is gay and ppl say its realistic when u die that fast haha sheit in rl alot off ppl still move when they get shot not instantly fall down like a ***** dust514 is gonna make cod into a new fps genre called fps arcade cause compared to dust cod is like a simple arcade game run n gun or more like camp n kill shot kill turn corner get killed over n over n over |
|
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 04:15:00 -
[51] - Quote
XxStonedAssassinxX wrote:W0olley wrote:What does good gunplay have to do with your hate for CoD. People want the gunplay to be on par with all fps not just CoD. You can say all you want against CoD but the gunplay is one thing they get right. lol and why that because every time you shot a person on cod its instant death the game is gay and ppl say its realistic when u die that fast haha sheit in rl alot off ppl still move when they get shot not instantly fall down like a ***** dust514 is gonna make cod into a new fps genre called fps arcade cause compared to dust cod is like a simple arcade game run n gun or more like camp n kill shot kill turn corner get killed over n over n over
If you feel that way get a friend to shoot you point blank in the torso and keep standing. If you live do the same thing agin at about 15 meters away. Now repeat the steps again while recording it. Last step: post on YouTube |
theschizogenious
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
167
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 14:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
STB Vermaak Doe wrote:XxStonedAssassinxX wrote:W0olley wrote:What does good gunplay have to do with your hate for CoD. People want the gunplay to be on par with all fps not just CoD. You can say all you want against CoD but the gunplay is one thing they get right. lol and why that because every time you shot a person on cod its instant death the game is gay and ppl say its realistic when u die that fast haha sheit in rl alot off ppl still move when they get shot not instantly fall down like a ***** dust514 is gonna make cod into a new fps genre called fps arcade cause compared to dust cod is like a simple arcade game run n gun or more like camp n kill shot kill turn corner get killed over n over n over If you feel that way get a friend to shoot you point blank in the torso and keep standing. If you live do the same thing agin at about 15 meters away. Now repeat the steps again while recording it. Last step: post on YouTube
cant see anything going wrong with that better yet let your friend use rubber rounds and see if you can stand after one of those at point blank or stab yourself with a taser |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 15:31:00 -
[53] - Quote
JonnyAugust wrote:theschizogenious wrote:you wan the gunplay to be as polished as COD yes?
well look at how many cod titles they made everytime they do a new cod seeing as it is a once a year thing they are basically just taking all the same stuff and putting under a new title with som new maps and a campaign that follows the same basic path as all the others.
every new "title" is more or less a glorified dlc that you insist on paying 60 dollars for the same experience every single year. cods gungame probably wasnt as appealing as its 10 polished version that you are currently accustomed to. in fact in cod 1 it was **** the first time cods online gungame was even remotely playable was with MW1 that was 5 or so YEARS into the making of the cod franchise and about 3 YEARS into them working on their multiplayer aspect.
it took cod 7-8 years to reach the multiplayer that they have today and they just bothere to do clan support after being aked about it since MW1 about 5 years ago.
5 YEARS just to be bothered enough to finally put a little more depth into the multiplayer aspect of their game. we are 1 build away from singularity they are still working on the next build and will continue to for what i hope will be a long time because they wont say oh we missed this bug/glitch oh well we'll just let it go unless it becomes too op or just ignore it and work on the next map pack because all they care about is separating you from your money.
look at EVE that wasnt a one year process that is a persistent work that both ccp and its amazingly vocal community genuinely care about and want to see become even greater. go to youtube find the videos on burn jita EVE was able to handle having around 2500 ships in one system and was still working.
cod has nothing on this game in any way shape or form quite frankly cod is a dissapointment because they dont give a damn about the gamer they just keep pushing out cookie cutter game every year and only change the color of the sprinkles. you dont like the game LEAVE. ill be more than happy to collect your portion of the loot.
that is all and have a nice day/night Let me summarize: We should leave if we think this a beta that needs improvement. Do you fanboys realize that you are a contradiction in this game development? It astounds me.
You forget jonny, the eve playerbase is slightly well, ass backwards. They pride themselves (at least a lot of them do) on making players rage quit eve.
What they don't get is this is an fps, the less people playing it the more boring it become.
|
Regis Mark V
91
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 16:31:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cthulhu Sothoth wrote:I like how everyone is bitching about CCP not getting things done... for one Dust514 is FREE. I'm sorry you paid 60$ for the same ******* CoD games but nobody has to pay a cent for this game. Secondly Dust514 is still in beta, something the Cod team could learn from before re-titling the same game and selling it as something new. Third, this is nowhere to as complete as the actual game... Have any of you read the interviews stating what all is going to be added to Dust? This beta is just a sliver of the game and that's just what CCP has told people, there is so much more they refuse to talk about. Get a ******* grip people.
Just because it's free doesn't mean it should suck...
I don't like the COD series at all but I'd rather give them my 60 dollars for a re skin game every year because at least I know it will work.
Dust 514 was in development for 3 years before the beta went live and is an over glorified alpha.
Once they start letting PS+ members in the next step like with all betas to hit console is to go public which is 1 build away then the final launch build. Also they've been charging people to get in the beta with the merc pack. Now this build is throwing out YLOD's. I'd be pissed if I dropped 20 dollars on a beta that plays like **** just to get my 200 + dollar machine destroyed by YLOD!
So no we wont get a grip because the only real improvements that were made was graphics which is still sub par! |
TEBOW BAGGINS
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET
549
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 16:40:00 -
[55] - Quote
theschizogenious wrote:if your illiterate then how can you be writing on these forums? i pracktice majic
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 16:44:00 -
[56] - Quote
So other than the following
Few more refinements in hit boxing. Sniper rifel red dot lies sometimes. Shotguns are OP at lower levels Swarm Launchers are fustrating to use. Forge Gun range overnerfed. Pernamently jerked out of aim when shot using ADS and Breach AR overnerfed And controller sensitivity doesnt scale well.
What other gun play issues we're having? |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 16:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:So othr than the following
Sniper rifel red dot lies sometimes. Shotguns are OP at lower levels and Swarm Launchers are fustrating and Breached overnerfed And controller sensitivity doesnt scale well.
What other gun play issues we're having?
They need to raise the breach ammo per mag to the same as the regular ar |
mikegunnz
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
425
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 16:50:00 -
[58] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:So other than the following
Few more refinements in hit boxing. Sniper rifel red dot lies sometimes. Shotguns are OP at lower levels Swarm Launchers are fustrating to use. Forge Gun range overnerfed. Pernamently jerked out of aim when shot using ADS and Breach AR overnerfed And controller sensitivity doesnt scale well.
What other gun play issues we're having?
Hit detection not quite there yet... almost, but still issues.
Also, there is one thing not often mentioned. (but there have been several ppl who brought it up in an old thread, even mentioned it in the "issues" section)
Weapon switching. It needs work. Hitting R2 to switch to secondary is unresponsive at times. It needs to be tweaked so that even a mild tap switches you. Right now you have to do a "full press" to get it to switch. So much so you can accidentally bring up the selection wheel at times. Not what you want to do in the middle of a fire fight. |
mikegunnz
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
425
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 16:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
STB Vermaak Doe wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:So othr than the following
Sniper rifel red dot lies sometimes. Shotguns are OP at lower levels and Swarm Launchers are fustrating and Breached overnerfed And controller sensitivity doesnt scale well.
What other gun play issues we're having? They need to raise the breach ammo per mag to the same as the regular ar
Yes, the breach guns have been OVER nerfed. Either keep damage as it is now, but raise the mag capacity to equal with the 60 round ARs, or keep it at current levels, but raise the damage up. Not necessarily to where it was originally, but in between. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1593
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 17:05:00 -
[60] - Quote
TEBOW BAGGINS wrote:massive TLDR bro
If reading a post that is only slightly bigger than the size of my hand is too long for you to read, then obviously you need to read some more.
Here, read this post made by the infamous Eve player James 315 as he floods your mind with endless and detailed explanations as to why miners are the scourge of New Eden and why they are conspiring to turn Eve into a theme park MMO.
http://themittani.com/features/truth-behind-mining-ship-rebalance-part-1
Please keep in mind that this is not the longest he posted. Try reading something like this multiplied by 10.
Then, only then, will you get the privilege to say "TL;DR". |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |