DUST Search - If dust got a port, would you pay for it?

All Channels

General Discussions

If dust got a port, would you pay for it?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Immortal John Ripper 30	Posted - 2016.01.31 01:49:00 - [1] - Quote Say hypothetically it went to ps4/pc. Separated servers for balance.. Api support like eve for stat tracking and stuff. Promise of regular updates/maps/skins. Support like how dust was in it's prime but less crappy.. Let's say it has a f2p model but you have to completely work for everything you own. So you can still play and try out all the content or use the market to get access to skins/bpo. but you work for it. Would fp2 players tolerate a cola ad in loading screens if it helps pay for the servers? The subscription model also offers free skins/bpo's , boosters, and aur as well and guaranteed something new to abuse with every renewal. AS WELL as access to the testing server where you can test new weapons/maps before they are officially released. subscription content would be completely unique from direct arum purchases. Meaning you can't buy it with aurum from CCP and every month the stuff you get is a complete surprise. You just have to subscribe and get surprised. Would you pay for this game in the form of a monthly subscription of 10.00? I hil.... I mean John Ripper is just asking out of curiosity and no other reason. Support for this game is dying.. it seems. (from CCP), I am just wondering if the player base feels differently. ReversePyschology Give me more likes.
General John Ripper 30	Posted - 2016.01.31 01:49:00 - [2] - Quote Say hypothetically it went to ps4/pc. Separated servers for balance.. Api support like eve for stat tracking and stuff. Promise of regular updates/maps/skins. Support like how dust was in it's prime but less crappy.. Let's say it has a f2p model but you have to completely work for everything you own. So you can still play and try out all the content or use the market to get access to skins/bpo. but you work for it. Would fp2 players tolerate a cola ad in loading screens if it helps pay for the servers? The subscription model also offers free skins/bpo's , boosters, and aur as well and guaranteed something new to abuse with every renewal. AS WELL as access to the testing server where you can test new weapons/maps before they are officially released. subscription content would be completely unique from direct arum purchases. Meaning you can't buy it with aurum from CCP and every month the stuff you get is a complete surprise. You just have to subscribe and get surprised. Would you pay for this game in the form of a monthly subscription of 10.00? I hil.... I mean John Ripper is just asking out of curiosity and no other reason. Support for this game is dying.. it seems. (from CCP), I am just wondering if the player base feels differently. ReversePyschology Give me more likes.
Immortal John Ripper 30	Posted - 2016.01.31 01:50:00 - [3] - Quote Reserved ReversePyschology Give me more likes.
General John Ripper 30	Posted - 2016.01.31 01:50:00 - [4] - Quote Reserved ReversePyschology Give me more likes.
Scheneighnay McBob Penumbra or something 7	Posted - 2016.01.31 01:57:00 - [5] - Quote That particular model isn't too appealing (although I would still pay for it to support CCP) Subscription content needs more actual meat to it than cosmetic distractions and boosters- I would rather see things like access to missions free players can't get (with rewards such as cosmetics), as well as quality-of-life improvements, such as a higher fitting limit, and automatic/queued war-barge management. The anti-tunnel snake taskforce has assembled
Thumb Green Elephant Riders 2	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:32:00 - [6] - Quote Maybe after it's been out for a while and can show it isn't plagued by the same sort of bullsh!t it has been for the past 3 years. Until they get Dust or it's equivalent at least 75% right I'm not spending another penny on a CCP game. Sure the current team deserves to be compensated for the progress they've made with this mess but CCP doesn't deserve a damn thing with how they've treated Dust over the years. As for ads in a f2p model, I wouldn't mind a bit and think they should have done it already (it was brought up by another member a while ago). It doesn't have to be limited to the loading screen either, hell I've got this huge ass tv in my MC they could throw some ads on that thing; maybe a banner in the market. As long as there aren't any annoying ads that pop up anywhere obstructing the view. Look at them, it's like they're the star attraction in a fucking flea circus.
byte modal 446	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:32:00 - [7] - Quote A one time purchase with upgradable DLC or something sure. F2P with AUR options, yeah ok. For a sub though, we need considerably more access to the New Eden universe. I mean some legit transit to move from one system to another. Regionally accessible EVE markets to play the ECON game of buying and selling with options to hire EvE players for carrier services moving loot to other region markets. A 4rlz PVE - type campaign mode to learn the basics. Private firing range to test gear and fittings. Single- or coop- ground game mining missions. Security level pve/pvp missions. Standings. Skill-based refining and market play. Production and facility access---the same facility slots EVE pilots compete for. Security status in affect. FF in 4SEC-0SEC with SEC status penalties forcing player awareness of status, location, corp access risk by losing SEC rankings if corp is primarily HISEC. Etc., etc. You get the idea. I'm sure there's more. Pretty much everything EVE capsulers have but feathered over to ground troops as well. I'd sub to be a real part of New Eden. kitten bacon taco (nom)
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation 3	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:38:00 - [8] - Quote Pretty sure that succesful F2P games makes more money than P2P (most cases). take time or take aurums (Gò»#-_-)Gò»~~~GòºGòÉGòº [FSTNM SCDNM] #PortDust514
BATSHlT Crazy 0ther.Haven 42	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:39:00 - [9] - Quote If dust were ported to ps4..... I would buy another ps4 just for dust. I would pay upto 100$ for dust as long as that came with a lot o extras. I have already spent $1200+ on this game Xavier Zors alt
Thumb Green Elephant Riders 2	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:52:00 - [10] - Quote BATSHlT Crazy wrote: I would pay upto 100$ for dust as long as that came with a lot o extras. I have already spent $1200+ on this game Never before has a user name been so relevant. Look at them, it's like they're the star attraction in a fucking flea circus.

james selim brownstein NECROM0NGERS 235	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:53:00 - [11] - Quote Immortal John Ripper wrote: Say hypothetically it went to ps4/pc. Separated servers for balance.. Api support like eve for stat tracking and stuff. Promise of regular updates/maps/skins. Support like how dust was in it's prime but less crappy.. Let's say it has a f2p model but you have to completely work for everything you own. So you can still play and try out all the content or use the market to get access to skins/bpo. but you work for it. Would fp2 players tolerate a cola ad in loading screens if it helps pay for the servers? The subscription model also offers free skins/bpo's , boosters, and aur as well and guaranteed something new to abuse with every renewal. AS WELL as access to the testing server where you can test new weapons/maps before they are officially released. subscription content would be completely unique from direct arum purchases. Meaning you can't buy it with aurum from CCP and every month the stuff you get is a complete surprise. You just have to subscribe and get surprised. Would you pay for this game in the form of a monthly subscription of 10.00? I hil.... I mean John Ripper is just asking out of curiosity and no other reason. Support for this game is dying.. it seems. (from CCP), I am just wondering if the player base feels differently. Maybe, if i could pay the full year in one go, i dont like subscriptions. n++Gòª¦¦¦¦-ç¦+¦+¦+¦+ WAITING FOR DEPLOYMENTGòñGöÇGöÇGöÇ Gò¡Gê¬Gò«n+ên+¦n++n+¦n+ë
Meee One Amakakeru-Ryu-no-Hirameki 1	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:59:00 - [12] - Quote Immortal John Ripper wrote: Say hypothetically it went to ps4/pc. Separated servers for balance.. Api support like eve for stat tracking and stuff. Promise of regular updates/maps/skins. Support like how dust was in it's prime but less crappy.. Let's say it has a f2p model but you have to completely work for everything you own. So you can still play and try out all the content or use the market to get access to skins/bpo. but you work for it. Would fp2 players tolerate a cola ad in loading screens if it helps pay for the servers? The subscription model also offers free skins/bpo's , boosters, and aur as well and guaranteed something new to abuse with every renewal. AS WELL as access to the testing server where you can test new weapons/maps before they are officially released. subscription content would be completely unique from direct arum purchases. Meaning you can't buy it with aurum from CCP and every month the stuff you get is a complete surprise. You just have to subscribe and get surprised. Would you pay for this game in the form of a monthly subscription of 10.00? I hil.... I mean John Ripper is just asking out of curiosity and no other reason. Support for this game is dying.. it seems. (from CCP), I am just wondering if the player base feels differently. Exclusives? No. Something like : -increased SP gain -increased loot drops -increased ISK payouts -AUR discounts -More characters can have passive gain. -Early access to content -X amount of boosters/AUR monthly Things that would make the game more pleasurable. We don't need "elites" feeling superior because they have exclusives. Unbalancing this could potentially wreck CCPs game. Which is why moderation is needed. Official Blueberry of the Forums. Title by my #1 fan Sgt Kirk.
Twelve Guage Random Gunz The-Office 1	Posted - 2016.01.31 02:59:00 - [13] - Quote Sad to say but I would pay. I have no gun game.
Meee One Amakakeru-Ryu-no-Hirameki 1	Posted - 2016.01.31 03:08:00 - [14] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: That particular model isn't too appealing (although I would still pay for it to support CCP) Subscription content needs more actual meat to it than cosmetic distractions and boosters-1. I would rather see things like access to missions free players can't get (with rewards such as cosmetics), as well as quality-of-life improvements, such as a higher fitting limit,2.and automatic/queued war-barge management. Wow... 1.Look at PC to see how excluding players destroyed the game. You have to be in a big corp or be rubbed out by them. 1a.Keeping the "poors" out just because they make you feel dirty,and you want to stroke your ego is a bad idea. 2.It goes from management to demanding "priority". Then it becomes P2W. If every battle left 0 lingering effects this wouldn't be as bad. (Note:I said as bad,meaning it's still bad.) But if priority was given to subscribers,you'd have to subscribe to effectively do PCs or participate at all. Official Blueberry of the Forums. Title by my #1 fan Sgt Kirk.
Xvos Reigns PIanet Express 458	Posted - 2016.01.31 03:14:00 - [15] - Quote I would pay because I love this hot mess of a game All 20 class suits PROTO'd All weapons Prof. 3 or higher Officially NERF proof
General Vahzz PIanet Express 331	Posted - 2016.01.31 04:07:00 - [16] - Quote It is almost ready, just a little while longer. Then, that big plan, will be done. You can bite my shiny metal ass.
Russel Mendoza Klandatu 420	Posted - 2016.01.31 04:13:00 - [17] - Quote i will pay 10$ monthly, for: no lag no cheaters/glitchers 30day active boosters aurum i think this is fair. I'm the biggest Dustard in the universe!!! Summoning technique "Gorgon no jutsu" Vehicle request accepted.
Immortal John Ripper 30	Posted - 2016.01.31 04:15:00 - [18] - Quote Russel Mendoza wrote: i will pay 10$ monthly, for: no lag I would too. ReversePyschology Give me more likes.
General John Ripper 30	Posted - 2016.01.31 04:15:00 - [19] - Quote Russel Mendoza wrote: i will pay 10$ monthly, for: no lag I would too. ReversePyschology Give me more likes.
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Four Horseman Tactical Agency 2	Posted - 2016.01.31 05:16:00 - [20] - Quote BATSHlT Crazy wrote: I would buy another ps4 . I'm sure you would have to with all the hard freezes ( Had one earlier ) and blue screens you'll have . Teamwork is really important - said the Tyrannosarus Rex from Kung Fury .

TIGER SHARK1501 Savage Bullet RUST415 756	Posted - 2016.01.31 05:16:00 - [21] - Quote At a reasonable price sure. There's no reason they couldn't do ADS on a TV in my room. I'm one of those crazy mercs that have spent more than I'd like to say since this game launched. I just want the party to go on. Hopefully a PS4 port would bring some friends back.
Bradric Banewolf Eternal Beings I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth 1	Posted - 2016.01.31 06:37:00 - [22] - Quote yes "Anybody order chaos?"
Kaltos Darksbane Woodgrain Atari 1	Posted - 2016.01.31 06:43:00 - [23] - Quote I could see it starting at a measly sum of $3-$5 and later on when stuff is worked out (bugs, glitches, and lag) then they could possibly justify, maybe, $10 a month. All this is assuming the game is taken to another system and completely remade. The $10 aspect would be assuming a full integration into New Eden. If you don't receive the answer you want please be patient, my "F**k's Given" dispenser is broke. The Pancake is MINE!
Xvos Reigns PIanet Express 461	Posted - 2016.01.31 07:14:00 - [24] - Quote The subscription could always be related to corporate management. Your subscription would allow you to create a Corp and get it listed on both an in game and forum based recruitment board. I also like the idea of the subscription allowing passive sp gain on an extra character. Maybe a monthly allotment of keys All 20 class suits PROTO'd All weapons Prof. 3 or higher Officially NERF proof
Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 3	Posted - 2016.01.31 07:20:00 - [25] - Quote Subscription probably not 1 time fee yes
Operative 1174 Uuali True Companion Planetary Requisitions 1	Posted - 2016.01.31 07:28:00 - [26] - Quote Instead of subscription, make the proto gear aur only, reduce the slots and add built in suit bonuses that are the only bonuses that apply. You have a suit that is truly for the people with little time, but have disposable income and you are making a trade between the skill based bonuses of other suits vs. the built in bonuses of the proto suit so you don't get a more powerful suit, just a ready to go suit that is the equivilent of some relavent lvl 5 skills, but not all. Let the advanced suit be the one type of isk based role suit. Up the skills costs otherwise to promote purchases of aur suits by new and casual players as well as testing things before you skill it. No pay to win, just pay to have now vs. training later. CCP logic GÇô We fix what doesn't need breaking.
aussy sledge ScReWeD uP InC Devil's Descendants 49	Posted - 2016.01.31 08:39:00 - [27] - Quote Twelve Guage wrote: Sad to say but I would pay. Must you center one sentience. Does my lack of symmetry Bother you?<3 Spreading freedom to all my fellow dust bunnies!
Denchlad 7 Dead Man's Game 2	Posted - 2016.01.31 13:01:00 - [28] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: BATSHlT Crazy wrote: I would pay upto 100$ for dust as long as that came with a lot o extras. I have already spent $1200+ on this game Never before has a user name been so relevant. sweats over the fact I've spent more than double that You'll only find me playing Destiny now. PSN: TheMysteriousEnd (PS4/PS3) XBL: Mystend 7 (XB1/360)
shaman oga Dead Man's Game 5	Posted - 2016.01.31 13:17:00 - [29] - Quote I would pay the usual 70 euro for my physical copy of dust514. Then pay again 15 euro to receive MAJOR DLC, like new map packs ( at least 3 maps ) and game modes. Have different weapons only in dlc for dust would not make sense. Skin and visual stuff can still be monetized. Regressed to blueberry level =ƒÿ» #PortPatience514
tritan abbattere Canadian Kings BlackNova Mercenary Alliance 116	Posted - 2016.01.31 13:25:00 - [30] - Quote I would pay 60 dollars and DLC for this game and if it remains f2p I would buy AUR because I enjoy this game. This is 1 console Game I don't want to die. I want this to survive like EVE Online. So CCP port this game now PC or ps4 IDC but this game needs to live because theirs no other game like it out there. I am the all mighty Tritan. Fear me for I am a MassHole

The Attorney General 3	Posted - 2016.01.31 15:12:00 - [31] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: Maybe after it's been out for a while and can show it isn't plagued by the same sort of bullsh!t it has been for the past 3 years. Until they get Dust or it's equivalent at least 75% right I'm not spending another penny on a CCP game. Sure the current team deserves to be compensated for the progress they've made with this mess but CCP doesn't deserve a damn thing with how they've treated Dust over the years. . This is pretty much my opinion. CCP gets no benefit of the doubt from me ever again. No pre orders, no investing in a beta, or anything similar. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
Heimdallr69 Negative-Feedback. 6	Posted - 2016.01.31 17:03:00 - [32] - Quote They'd have to do a lot more to get me to pay for d1ck..full racial variants of everything fixed fps..jets/pilots/crusaders Give PC a reason to fight and not farm...And nothing less than 1080p
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2016.01.31 19:33:00 - [33] - Quote Immortal John Ripper wrote: Say hypothetically it went to ps4/pc. Separated servers for balance.. Api support like eve for stat tracking and stuff. Promise of regular updates/maps/skins. Support like how dust was in it's prime but less crappy.. Let's say it has a f2p model but you have to completely work for everything you own. So you can still play and try out all the content or use the market to get access to skins/bpo. but you work for it. Would fp2 players tolerate a cola ad in loading screens if it helps pay for the servers? The subscription model also offers free skins/bpo's , boosters, and aur as well and guaranteed something new to abuse with every renewal. AS WELL as access to the testing server where you can test new weapons/maps before they are officially released. subscription content would be completely unique from direct arum purchases. Meaning you can't buy it with aurum from CCP and every month the stuff you get is a complete surprise. You just have to subscribe and get surprised. Would you pay for this game in the form of a monthly subscription of 10.00? I hil.... I mean John Ripper is just asking out of curiosity and no other reason. Support for this game is dying.. it seems. (from CCP), I am just wondering if the player base feels differently. If game will be finished maybe, right now HELVETE DEFO NO!! After all setback i do not trust them anymore, honestly. *"Im the original Boii boyko"*
501st Synergy Intara Direct Action Caldari State 71	Posted - 2016.02.01 05:49:00 - [34] - Quote Yes, my wallet is waiting. But some upgrades would need to be made. Everyone here has hit most of them on the head.
sir RAVEN WING Corrosive Synergy RUST415 5	Posted - 2016.02.01 06:21:00 - [35] - Quote Okay, did not feel like reading. So I will assume that you said would you pay for a PS4 port of DUST. My Answer - Yes. I would support DUST being ported to PS4 at the cost of some money. This game is 3 years of memories for me. I miss it, even with better games, there really isn't anything that can replace DUST. *"I like Bernie's slogan, but I like it more literal with correct spelling. Just to watch them roast" - Locus*
Dried ShadowBeaver Nos Nothi 271	Posted - 2016.02.01 07:22:00 - [36] - Quote If they port, they should get rid of the damn FTP model. Charge -ú30 for the game, keep optional aurum purchases, bam - CCP is making more than ever before. The percentage of people who have ever played this game who have actually spent money on it is very small. Touch my beaver tail. Go on. Touch it.
Dried ShadowBeaver Nos Nothi 271	Posted - 2016.02.01 07:24:00 - [37] - Quote Why are you all so against a one-off payment, like most games? Much safer and more likely to make a profit than f2p/p2p. Touch my beaver tail. Go on. Touch it.
Karam Arami The Knights Of NewEden 125	Posted - 2016.02.01 08:07:00 - [38] - Quote HELL YES I WOULD PAY FOR IT!!! A fully customizable game that redefined fps gaming BEFORE it was hypothetically ported? SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!! Like i told Patt Mcrotch, "If your gonna act like a D!CK, grow some balls so you can do it properly..."
Karam Arami The Knights Of NewEden 125	Posted - 2016.02.01 08:14:00 - [39] - Quote Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Instead of subscription, make the proto gear aur only, reduce the slots and add built in suit bonuses that are the only bonuses that apply. You have a suit that is truly for the people with little time, but have disposable income and you are making a trade between the skill based bonuses of other suits vs. the built in bonuses of the proto suit so you don't get a more powerful suit, just a ready to go suit that is the equivilent of some relavent lvl 5 skills, but not all. Let the advanced suit be the one type of isk based role suit. Up the skills costs otherwise to promote purchases of aur suits by new and casual players as well as testing things before you skill it. No pay to win, just pay to have now vs. training later. i would kind of keep most pf it how it is. but i remove full proto gear or at least officer from public matches, i dislike the idea of mercs running around and relying more on equipment more than their skills... Like i told Patt Mcrotch, "If your gonna act like a D!CK, grow some balls so you can do it properly..."
demonkiller 12 The Naughty Ninjas The-Office 967	Posted - 2016.02.01 12:53:00 - [40] - Quote Subscription games are pretty dead, the only ones I can think of off the top my head are WoW and EVE, and both of them are now semi subscription, a one time buy-to-play is the best option as many games have shown (most noticeably Guild Wars 2) players prefer a one time lump sum, and as a developer myself I like that option the most, It tells me how much money I have to work with on content and paying my employees rather than a F2P or subscription model where everything is hazy at best and we have to hope all goes well. Would spend $60 USD on this game if it means CCP re-releases it with continued support and a proper studio crew. 10/10 Want to try EVE for free? https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=7bd8b611-1ae8-489d-831c-adc7ec16f6be&action=buddy

Grimmiers 912	Posted - 2016.02.01 13:06:00 - [41] - Quote They need to clean up the current marketplace first. Skins and keys are fine. It would probably improve performance if they got rid of all aur variants and just had a skill injection that decreased if you died while wearing gear related to that skill.
Banjo Robertson Random Gunz The-Office 781	Posted - 2016.02.01 13:07:00 - [42] - Quote I would not buy dust as a port for pc or ps4 as it currently stands. a PVP only game is not the kind of game that i buy, it would need PVE solo and PVE co-op
Meee One Amakakeru-Ryu-no-Hirameki 1	Posted - 2016.02.01 14:27:00 - [43] - Quote Dried ShadowBeaver wrote: Why are you all so against a one-off payment, like most games? Much safer and more likely to make a profit than f2p/p2p. Those players that can't pay are contributing too... As content. Answer this... Would you want 30 people playing this game,300,3000? The more players playing the less stale and stagnant a game is. A stale and stagnant game is a boring game,and a boring game is a dead game. The more you segregate your players into "payers" and "nonpayers",the faster a sense of elitism develops,and the sooner a game gets stale. (reference:PC) The best way to get the game into players hands is make it free. Then (if the game is ran correctly by CCP) some of those players will actually advertise this game for CCP saving them ad revenue. You seem to only look at what's in front of your face bro. You need to try to look at all the other f2p games and see why they're so successful.(Hint:It's the high player counts.) Official Blueberry of the Forums. Title by my #1 fan Sgt Kirk.
Thumb Green Elephant Riders 2	Posted - 2016.02.01 15:35:00 - [44] - Quote Dried ShadowBeaver wrote: If they port, they should get rid of the damn FTP model. Charge -ú30 for the game, keep optional aurum purchases, bam - CCP is making more than ever before. The percentage of people who have ever played this game who have actually spent money on it is very small. Dried ShadowBeaver wrote: Why are you all so against a one-off payment, like most games? Much safer and more likely to make a profit than f2p/p2p. The percentage of players that have spent money on any f2p game is small and yet it's very profitable for online games and is why there's so damn many of them these days. It's an effective and safe bet, think of it like FOTM, people run it because it's easy and it works really good. The flaws that keep Dust from being a thriving f2p are the flaws that would kill it if there was a paywall. Look at them, it's like they're the star attraction in a fucking flea circus.
General Vahzz PIanet Express 364	Posted - 2016.02.01 15:38:00 - [45] - Quote Nope, I would not, though most likely I would. You can bite my shiny metal ass.
ANON Cerberus TerranProtossZerg 1	Posted - 2016.02.01 18:35:00 - [46] - Quote I would certainly pay good money. My only criteria would be to have what we have right now on a more powerful system. PC preferably but even the PS4 would be enough to tempt me. A stable, fluid and working DUST 514 on PC? Hell yes. Even on the PS4 I think It would have sufficient processing and graphics power to run everything mint = 1080p@60+Fps. I'm just thinking what ~could~ be for DUST on PC - 4k resolution, community made super high-res texture packs.... Dust could look pretty good with some effort.
Ankbar Latrommi Roghnaigh Do Scrios 183	Posted - 2016.02.01 21:26:00 - [47] - Quote Immortal John Ripper wrote: Let's say it has a f2p model... Then no. The rest doesn't really matter. I'm an old-timer, inflexible weirdo--If they want me to pay for the game, then charge properly for it. Otherwise it's a free game in my book. They can use the whales/suckers/p2w-folks. Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." Eve> FPS
SOGZ PANDA warravens Imperium Eden 251	Posted - 2016.02.02 02:48:00 - [48] - Quote I would pay for it if it is nothing like it's current state. In saying that I would probably wait a bit, not that I can't afford it. But I won't make the same mistakes. The content of the game needs to meet what it was hyped 3 years ago. An open universe tactical shooter with many and varied forms of combat and suit/vehicle configuration. Where we go and plunder resources from worlds, or land masses for upgrading bases/making more clones and ships etc. Actually building an empire that must be defended from space and land (much like a very upscaled PC). That's what I would pay for. My 2 cents dust is life... ... uncertain, and usually pretty dissapointing.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

Give me more likes.

Give me more likes.

Give me more likes.

Give me more likes.

Give me more likes.

Give me more likes.