DUST Search - To Peeps Calling for a Port

All Channels

General Discussions

To Peeps Calling for a Port

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Diablo Gamekeeper Anunnakii 729	Posted - 2015.11.29 13:58:00 - [1] - Quote I just want to say a port won't fix much when most of the problems lie in the coding. A port will improve some things but not much will be fixed. I'm back Rainbow Dash I have DESTROYED CCP Rattati
General Mosquito Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 416	Posted - 2015.11.29 14:10:00 - [2] - Quote This game still needs years of work before it could be considered ready for either the PC or ps4 market place. Aka never going to happen. The Attorney General - Mr. Hybrid Vayu
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 4	Posted - 2015.11.29 14:38:00 - [3] - Quote Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: I just want to say a port won't fix much when most of the problems lie in the coding. A port will improve some things but not much will be fixed. I think everyone with half a brain has accepted the fact that just slapping this on a new platform will do nothing what so ever. The issue is the rest of the people actually believe the rhetoric that the PS3 is the problem and not the fact that this game was built on a foundation of quicksand. As long as people keep dumping money into a bad game why would CCP have any reason to even attempt to improve or even consider leaving behind a cash cow like this. Show there is a future #CCPSpeakOn514
Raven-747 WarRavens Imperium Eden 248	Posted - 2015.11.29 14:38:00 - [4] - Quote @op don't bother this community is selfish and dumb. Most of the port qqers are retired players who don't even touch the game and the rest think that after a port they won't get stomped. Get real #FixDustNotPort When you headshot a frontline with proto
Draxus Prime Nos Nothi 4	Posted - 2015.11.29 14:39:00 - [5] - Quote the old hardware is holding back A LOT of the potential. We can't even have trees cause of the mesh count... When it does move to current gen/PC they can do a lot more with the game "Spilling floor cleaner only makes the floor cleaner." - Draxus Prime Closed Beta Vet Scout
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 7	Posted - 2015.11.29 14:42:00 - [6] - Quote Okay, let's clear this up. When we're talking about a Port, we aren't literally saying CCP should just take all of this game and put it on another platform. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't, because the game is currently coded for the PS3's architecture which is completely different from the x86 that PCs and newer consoles use. Project Legion is basically what you guys think we're asking for. Notice that CCP dropped the copyright on "EVE Legion" because they doubtlessly realized just as the rest of us did that taking the current version of Dust and slapping it on PC with some shinier graphics wasn't going to fix anything. I hope that clears this up. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 4	Posted - 2015.11.29 14:49:00 - [7] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Okay, let's clear this up. When we're talking about a Port, we aren't literally saying CCP should just take all of this game and put it on another platform. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't, because the game is currently coded for the PS3's architecture which is completely different from the x86 that PCs and newer consoles use. Project Legion is basically what you guys think we're asking for. Notice that CCP dropped the copyright on "EVE Legion" because they doubtlessly realized just as the rest of us did that taking the current version of Dust and slapping it on PC with some shinier graphics wasn't going to fix anything. I hope that clears this up. Legion was a total rebuild on top of a heavily customized version of UE3. The Legion copyright was dropped because the amazing mess which was FF14 tarnished that name into oblivion. Whatever happened with that rebuild and the possible naming of it went totally up in the air when the storm had finally passed from the most epic PR failure I have ever witnessed live. Show there is a future #CCPSpeakOn514
Egypt Musk Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 194	Posted - 2015.11.29 14:59:00 - [8] - Quote Raven-747 wrote: @op don't bother this community is selfish and dumb. Most of the port qqers are retired players who don't even touch the game and the rest think that after a port they won't get stomped. Get real #FixDustNotPort If ccp knew how to fix teir game they would have already . You dumb for still playing this game.#rougewedding Nvr 4get what ccp did http://jestertrek.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/fanfest-day-two-red-wedding.html
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 7	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:00:00 - [9] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Okay, let's clear this up. When we're talking about a Port, we aren't literally saying CCP should just take all of this game and put it on another platform. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't, because the game is currently coded for the PS3's architecture which is completely different from the x86 that PCs and newer consoles use. Project Legion is basically what you guys think we're asking for. Notice that CCP dropped the copyright on "EVE Legion" because they doubtlessly realized just as the rest of us did that taking the current version of Dust and slapping it on PC with some shinier graphics wasn't going to fix anything. I hope that clears this up. Legion was a total rebuild on top of a heavily customized version of UE3. The Legion copyright was dropped because the amazing mess which was FF14 tarnished that name into oblivion. Whatever happened with that rebuild and the possible naming of it went totally up in the air when the storm had finally passed from the most epic PR failure I have ever witnessed live. Legion was a total rebuild of gameplay mechanics that would still run on the current heavily customized UE3. I watched all the videos they uploaded from the convention. Given that the current "heavily customized" version of UE3 can't even render some interior spaces without dropping your framerate below playable levels, what the heck makes you think that would have succeeded? That's not even to mention the still persistent memory leak that's never been addressed. How many people do you think would still be playing EVE Legion when they realized that the amount of RAM they have determines how long they can play the game before the framerate drops through the floor? Anyone else remember Battlefield 4? How it was when it first launched? Yeah, that would have been EVE Legion. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Cat Merc Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 18	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:06:00 - [10] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: I just want to say a port won't fix much when most of the problems lie in the coding. A port will improve some things but not much will be fixed. I think everyone with half a brain has accepted the fact that just slapping this on a new platform will do nothing what so ever. The issue is the rest of the people actually believe the rhetoric that the PS3 is the problem and not the fact that this game was built on a foundation of quicksand. As long as people keep dumping money into a bad game why would CCP have any reason to even attempt to improve or even consider leaving behind a cash cow like this. And why do you think this game was built on a foundation of quicksand? CCP was over ambitious for the platform, and we got what we got. Ripley Riley: > Post Hotfix Foxour Gallente Assault: > DakkadakkadakkadakkaFREEDOMdakkadakka

Aeon Amadi 13	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:06:00 - [11] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: I just want to say a port won't fix much when most of the problems lie in the coding. A port will improve some things but not much will be fixed. I think everyone with half a brain has accepted the fact that just slapping this on a new platform will do nothing what so ever. The issue is the rest of the people actually believe the rhetoric that the PS3 is the problem and not the fact that this game was built on a foundation of quicksand. As long as people keep dumping money into a bad game why would CCP have any reason to even attempt to improve or even consider leaving behind a cash cow like this. And why do you think this game was built on a foundation of quicksand? CCP was over ambitious for the platform, and we got what we got. Quicksandbox Negative Introspection - Aeon's CPM Blog Skype: nomistrav
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 7	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:08:00 - [12] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: Cat Merc wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: I just want to say a port won't fix much when most of the problems lie in the coding. A port will improve some things but not much will be fixed. I think everyone with half a brain has accepted the fact that just slapping this on a new platform will do nothing what so ever. The issue is the rest of the people actually believe the rhetoric that the PS3 is the problem and not the fact that this game was built on a foundation of quicksand. As long as people keep dumping money into a bad game why would CCP have any reason to even attempt to improve or even consider leaving behind a cash cow like this. And why do you think this game was built on a foundation of quicksand? CCP was over ambitious for the platform, and we got what we got. Quicksandbox Not good for pooping in. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Cat Merc Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 18	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:09:00 - [13] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Cat Merc wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: I just want to say a port won't fix much when most of the problems lie in the coding. A port will improve some things but not much will be fixed. I think everyone with half a brain has accepted the fact that just slapping this on a new platform will do nothing what so ever. The issue is the rest of the people actually believe the rhetoric that the PS3 is the problem and not the fact that this game was built on a foundation of quicksand. As long as people keep dumping money into a bad game why would CCP have any reason to even attempt to improve or even consider leaving behind a cash cow like this. And why do you think this game was built on a foundation of quicksand? CCP was over ambitious for the platform, and we got what we got. Quicksandbox Not good for pooping in. Speak for yourself. You can ask Breakin how much we enjoy shitting on it (especially when other players are in the line of shit). Ripley Riley: > Post Hotfix Foxour Gallente Assault: > DakkadakkadakkadakkaFREEDOMdakkadakka
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 4	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:15:00 - [14] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Okay, let's clear this up. When we're talking about a Port, we aren't literally saying CCP should just take all of this game and put it on another platform. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't, because the game is currently coded for the PS3's architecture which is completely different from the x86 that PCs and newer consoles use. Project Legion is basically what you guys think we're asking for. Notice that CCP dropped the copyright on "EVE Legion" because they doubtlessly realized just as the rest of us did that taking the current version of Dust and slapping it on PC with some shinier graphics wasn't going to fix anything. I hope that clears this up. Legion was a total rebuild on top of a heavily customized version of UE3. The Legion copyright was dropped because the amazing mess which was FF14 tarnished that name into oblivion. Whatever happened with that rebuild and the possible naming of it went totally up in the air when the storm had finally passed from the most epic PR failure I have ever witnessed live. Legion was a total rebuild of gameplay mechanics that would still run on the current heavily customized UE3. I watched all the videos they uploaded from the convention. Given that the current "heavily customized" version of UE3 can't even render some interior spaces without dropping your framerate below playable levels, what the heck makes you think that would have succeeded? That's not even to mention the still persistent memory leak that's never been addressed. How many people do you think would still be playing EVE Legion when they realized that the amount of RAM they have determines how long they can play the game before the framerate drops through the floor? Anyone else remember Battlefield 4? How it was when it first launched? Yeah, that would have been EVE Legion. That is somewhat correct. The difference is Legion started on a version of UE3 which had already been heavily customized along the way. Dust was a build as you go situation thanks to the game being forced off of Carbon and having to be rushed into production. There is some good discussion on it here. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4581084 Show there is a future #CCPSpeakOn514
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 4	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:18:00 - [15] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: I just want to say a port won't fix much when most of the problems lie in the coding. A port will improve some things but not much will be fixed. I think everyone with half a brain has accepted the fact that just slapping this on a new platform will do nothing what so ever. The issue is the rest of the people actually believe the rhetoric that the PS3 is the problem and not the fact that this game was built on a foundation of quicksand. As long as people keep dumping money into a bad game why would CCP have any reason to even attempt to improve or even consider leaving behind a cash cow like this. And why do you think this game was built on a foundation of quicksand? CCP was over ambitious for the platform, and we got what we got. I missed this post. The foundation of quick sand was due to 2 factors from my perspective. 1. Carbon seriously over using system resources on the PS3 to the point that Sony said no go thanks to all of the destroyed PS3s. 2. (This is only an assumption seen from the outside) Instead of hiring a few good UE3 consultants CCP basically decided to send the programmers in blind. Even great coders who know nothing about the "quirks" of something such as a full game engine are going to end up with a giant mess when they are trying to both build a game under a huge crunch as well as optimize said system. Show there is a future #CCPSpeakOn514
Death Shadow117 Wolf Pack Special Forces Rise Of Legion. 888	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:41:00 - [16] - Quote Draxus Prime wrote: the old hardware is holding back A LOT of the potential. We can't even have trees cause of the mesh count... When it does move to current gen/PC they can do a lot more with the game A lot of the problems ccp is having with the hardware stems from the sockets taking up too much data and the ps3 having to render a giant ass map everytime you load into a game. True the problem is the ps3 not being able to handle the load of dust but the reason it can't is exactly what I stated. If we want things fixed dust will have to shut down for awhile and get fixed what we want can't happen in a day
Diablo Gamekeeper Anunnakii 729	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:44:00 - [17] - Quote Death Shadow117 wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: the old hardware is holding back A LOT of the potential. We can't even have trees cause of the mesh count... When it does move to current gen/PC they can do a lot more with the game A lot of the problems ccp is having with the hardware stems from the sockets taking up too much data and the ps3 having to render a giant ass map everytime you load into a game. True the problem is the ps3 not being able to handle the load of dust but the reason it can't is exactly what I stated. If we want things fixed dust will have to shut down for awhile and get fixed what we want can't happen in a day But what about battlefield, with larger maps? It is the coding, not the system. Also Skyrim renders perfectly (yea i know its not multiplayer but theres ALOT more stuff in that game then this one) I'm back Rainbow Dash I have DESTROYED CCP Rattati
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:52:00 - [18] - Quote Boykos we should cut nonsence of this. Basicaly there is still work to do in Dust 514 here on Ps3. We hope all hope for good of dust and that is core. *"Who is postapo?!"*
Dreis ShadowWeaver Dead Man's Game 8	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:56:00 - [19] - Quote Literally no one wants a straight-up port of DUST as it is right now. No one. What we want is for DUST to be fixed and improved upon during the transition period. That's not to say that we should have DUST perfect on the PS3 before we port, as that's not going to happen, and is not going to help. We want DUST to be as it was intended to be. We want the glorious dream realised, and we want it on a more powerful system that can handle all that. A more powerful system that actually isn't dead/dying. Perhaps that will mean that DUST will cease to exist for a time whilst the new version is made. Who knows how long this will take. Over a year? Perhaps. But I'm sure we would all believe it would be worth the wait, to have DUST as it was meant to be, completed and perfect, fully integrated with EVE. RIP Nova Knifers United
Diablo Gamekeeper Anunnakii 729	Posted - 2015.11.29 16:57:00 - [20] - Quote Cat merc I got you that 1 like you needed :) didn't even red your post yet I'm back Rainbow Dash I have DESTROYED CCP Rattati

postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:03:00 - [21] - Quote Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Literally no one wants a straight-up port of DUST as it is right now. No one. What we want is for DUST to be fixed and improved upon during the transition period. That's not to say that we should have DUST perfect on the PS3 before we port, as that's not going to happen, and is not going to help. We want DUST to be as it was intended to be. We want the glorious dream realised, and we want it on a more powerful system that can handle all that. A more powerful system that actually isn't dead/dying. Perhaps that will mean that DUST will cease to exist for a time whilst the new version is made. Who knows how long this will take. Over a year? Perhaps. But I'm sure we would all believe it would be worth the wait, to have DUST as it was meant to be, completed and perfect, fully integrated with EVE. Dreis boyko You know i agree with most. But honestly what will be easyfix issue or remade game once more. This is real question, because we all know Ps3 is not issue, reall roblem is coding. And i honestly starts to thing that legion what we saw in past was just another instalment for Ps3 and DUST. Heavily utilized U3 engine? Ask yourself why they want to use U3 engine for upcoming console. More logical step is prefix of faulty core mechanix in existing program. ERGO What if Legion was/is actually project to revive DUST through heavily improved engine? I know it just idea, but you never know. BTW this is not rumor mongering it is just my cohesive/association style thinking ;) "Who is postapo?!"*
Diablo Gamekeeper Anunnakii 729	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:05:00 - [22] - Quote postapo wastelander wrote: Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Literally no one wants a straight-up port of DUST as it is right now. No one. What we want is for DUST to be fixed and improved upon during the transition period. That's not to say that we should have DUST perfect on the PS3 before we port, as that's not going to happen, and is not going to help. We want DUST to be as it was intended to be. We want the glorious dream realised, and we want it on a more powerful system that can handle all that. A more powerful system that actually isn't dead/dying. Perhaps that will mean that DUST will cease to exist for a time whilst the new version is made. Who knows how long this will take. Over a year? Perhaps. But I'm sure we would all believe it would be worth the wait, to have DUST as it was meant to be, completed and perfect, fully integrated with EVE. Dreis boyko You know i agree with most. But honestly what will be easyfix issue or remade game once more. This is real question, because we all know Ps3 is not issue, reall roblem is coding. And i honestly starts to thing that legion what we saw in past was just another instalment for Ps3 and DUST. Heavily utilized U3 engine? Ask yourself why they want to use U3 engine for upcoming console. More logical step is prefix of faulty core mechanix in existing program. ERGO What if Legion was/is actually project to revive DUST through heavily improved engine? I know it just idea, but you never know. *BTW this is not rumor mongering it is just my cohesive/association style thinking ;) Remaking the game would just cause more problems. Its very hard to code and with a relaunch there would be soooooo many bugs I'm back Rainbow Dash I have DESTROYED CCP Rattati
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:08:00 - [23] - Quote Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Literally no one wants a straight-up port of DUST as it is right now. No one. What we want is for DUST to be fixed and improved upon during the transition period. That's not to say that we should have DUST perfect on the PS3 before we port, as that's not going to happen, and is not going to help. We want DUST to be as it was intended to be. We want the glorious dream realised, and we want it on a more powerful system that can handle all that. A more powerful system that actually isn't dead/dying. Perhaps that will mean that DUST will cease to exist for a time whilst the new version is made. Who knows how long this will take. Over a year? Perhaps. But I'm sure we would all believe it would be worth the wait, to have DUST as it was meant to be, completed and perfect, fully integrated with EVE. Dreis boyko You know i agree with most. But honestly what will be easyfix issue or remade game once more. This is real question, because we all know Ps3 is not issue, reall roblem is coding. And i honestly starts to thing that legion what we saw in past was just another instalment for Ps3 and DUST. Heavily utilized U3 engine? Ask yourself why they want to use U3 engine for upcoming console. More logical step is prefix of faulty core mechanix in existing program. ERGO What if Legion was/is actually project to revive DUST through heavily improved engine? I know it just idea, but you never know. BTW this is not rumor mongering it is just my cohesive/association style thinking ;) Remaking the game would just cause more problems. Its very hard to code and with a relaunch there would be soooooo many bugs I know and that is more reasonable to prefix what you have. Making new game from start will ahve another bugs, another issues and that is reasson why i believe there is still chance to fix what is broken. Everything made can be fixed. "Who is postapo?!"*
Diablo Gamekeeper Anunnakii 730	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:10:00 - [24] - Quote postapo wastelander wrote: Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Literally no one wants a straight-up port of DUST as it is right now. No one. What we want is for DUST to be fixed and improved upon during the transition period. That's not to say that we should have DUST perfect on the PS3 before we port, as that's not going to happen, and is not going to help. We want DUST to be as it was intended to be. We want the glorious dream realised, and we want it on a more powerful system that can handle all that. A more powerful system that actually isn't dead/dying. Perhaps that will mean that DUST will cease to exist for a time whilst the new version is made. Who knows how long this will take. Over a year? Perhaps. But I'm sure we would all believe it would be worth the wait, to have DUST as it was meant to be, completed and perfect, fully integrated with EVE. Dreis boyko You know i agree with most. But honestly what will be easyfix issue or remade game once more. This is real question, because we all know Ps3 is not issue, reall roblem is coding. And i honestly starts to thing that legion what we saw in past was just another instalment for Ps3 and DUST. Heavily utilized U3 engine? Ask yourself why they want to use U3 engine for upcoming console. More logical step is prefix of faulty core mechanix in existing program. ERGO What if Legion was/is actually project to revive DUST through heavily improved engine? I know it just idea, but you never know. *BTW this is not rumor mongering it is just my cohesive/association style thinking ;) Remaking the game would just cause more problems. Its very hard to code and with a relaunch there would be soooooo many bugs I know and that is more reasonable to prefix what you have. Making new game from start will ahve another bugs, another issues and that is reasson why i believe there is still chance to fix what is broken. Everything made can be fixed. Except autistic babies (i really hope i dont get banned for that lol) I'm back Rainbow Dash I have DESTROYED CCP Rattati
Dreis Shadowweaver Dead Man's Game 8	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:13:00 - [25] - Quote postapo wastelander wrote: Everything made can be fixed. DUST was never made as it was supposed to be from the start. How can you fix something that never existed? RIP Nova Knifers United
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:14:00 - [26] - Quote Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Everything made can be fixed. DUST was never made as it was supposed to be from the start. How can you fix something that never existed? C-¦mon we playing existing game boyko ;) And honestly one of my philosophies is:"Everything needs to be completed." *"Who is postapo?!"*
Dreis Shadowweaver Dead Man's Game 8	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:16:00 - [27] - Quote postapo wastelander wrote: Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Everything made can be fixed. DUST was never made as it was supposed to be from the start. How can you fix something that never existed? C-¦mon we playing existing game boyko ;) ... Go and have a look at some of the grand ideas that were being promoted before DUST was even released. Now come back to me and say we are playing that game. Pro tip: You can't. RIP Nova Knifers United
Ahkhomi Cypher Opus Arcana 1	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:19:00 - [28] - Quote I thought that people knew that when we say "port dust" we also intended that dust be improved/changed/fixedup/reworked/rewritten/watever in the process of porting it. Improving the game is kinda why alot of us want a port. A straight port of how dust currently is now would be bad because of how broken it is. Tyrant King, Opus Arcana
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:20:00 - [29] - Quote Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Diablo Gamekeeper wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Literally no one wants a straight-up port of DUST as it is right now. No one. What we want is for DUST to be fixed and improved upon during the transition period. That's not to say that we should have DUST perfect on the PS3 before we port, as that's not going to happen, and is not going to help. We want DUST to be as it was intended to be. We want the glorious dream realised, and we want it on a more powerful system that can handle all that. A more powerful system that actually isn't dead/dying. Perhaps that will mean that DUST will cease to exist for a time whilst the new version is made. Who knows how long this will take. Over a year? Perhaps. But I'm sure we would all believe it would be worth the wait, to have DUST as it was meant to be, completed and perfect, fully integrated with EVE. Dreis boyko You know i agree with most. But honestly what will be easyfix issue or remade game once more. This is real question, because we all know Ps3 is not issue, reall roblem is coding. And i honestly starts to thing that legion what we saw in past was just another instalment for Ps3 and DUST. Heavily utilized U3 engine? Ask yourself why they want to use U3 engine for upcoming console. More logical step is prefix of faulty core mechanix in existing program. ERGO What if Legion was/is actually project to revive DUST through heavily improved engine? I know it just idea, but you never know. BTW this is not rumor mongering it is just my cohesive/association style thinking ;) Remaking the game would just cause more problems. Its very hard to code and with a relaunch there would be soooooo many bugs I know and that is more reasonable to prefix what you have. Making new game from start will ahve another bugs, another issues and that is reasson why i believe there is still chance to fix what is broken. Everything made can be fixed. Except autistic babies (i really hope i dont get banned for that lol) You know boyko I have asperger syndrome and fixing thigies is little OCD situation for me. I got your joke, but trust me there is nothing to fix on autistic people. They just have different view, different perception on world around. "Who is postapo?!"*
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:23:00 - [30] - Quote Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: postapo wastelander wrote: Everything made can be fixed. DUST was never made as it was supposed to be from the start. How can you fix something that never existed? C-¦mon we playing existing game boyko ;) ... Go and have a look at some of the grand ideas that were being promoted before DUST was even released. Now come back to me and say we are playing that game. Pro tip: You can't. What happened to you. From idealist to really sour and nihilistic boyko. We pushed for good of game. Not for bashing like this. *"Who is postapo?!"*



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

Rainbow Dash

Rainbow Dash

Rainbow Dash

Rainbow Dash

Rainbow Dash