DUST Search - How Many People Would Care If Domination Disappeared From This Game?

All Channels

General Discussions

How Many People Would Care If Domination Disappeared From This Game?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 813	Posted - 2015.09.21 16:47:00 - [1] - Quote Domination is clearly a trashy gamemode and it should be done away with. Let's allow Acquisition to be the new Domination. CCP, I ask of you to please get rid of Domination from this game. Which ones amongst you all would be upset if Domination was eliminated from this game?
Lightning35 Delta514 The Warlords Legion No Context 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 16:48:00 - [2] - Quote I would. I like it. Its fast and all the action is is one place. CEO of T-W-L
Asad Thahab-Jabal Incorruptibles 90	Posted - 2015.09.21 16:49:00 - [3] - Quote Don't remove domination, just sprinkle it into the skirmish queue... after all, it's just a one point skirmish anyway.
maybe deadcatz Horizons' Edge No Context 837	Posted - 2015.09.21 16:49:00 - [4] - Quote Just about all the major corps would be annoyed since they would have to move around to cap the terminals. Dust 514:Plasma is magic.
LHughes Ancient Exiles. 465	Posted - 2015.09.21 16:52:00 - [5] - Quote Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Don't remove domination, just sprinkle it into the skirmish queue... after all, it's just a one point skirmish anyway. Ambush is JUST Dom without the objective. My signature
Asad Thahab-Jabal Incorruptibles 90	Posted - 2015.09.21 16:54:00 - [6] - Quote LHughes wrote: Ambush is JUST Dom without the objective. Got a pic of a null cannon and objective in ambush?
maybe deadcatz Horizons' Edge No Context 837	Posted - 2015.09.21 16:54:00 - [7] - Quote LHughes wrote: Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Don't remove domination, just sprinkle it into the skirmish queue... after all, it's just a one point skirmish anyway. Ambush is JUST Dom without the objective. Dom is JUST ambush with an objective Dust 514:Plasma is magic.
Death Shadow117 Wolf Pack Special Forces Rise Of Legion. 761	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:08:00 - [8] - Quote I think that the dust community would start to redevelop brain cells.
Vicious Minotaur 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:09:00 - [9] - Quote Domination is quite fun when you get two evenly matched teams that are devoid of the usual scrubtards, KDR maxipaders, and cantankerous protostomping cat molesters. And last time I checked, even Skirmish, Acquisition and Ambushit fall victim to DUSTs horrible playerbase, not just Domination. Just because Domination falls victim to those pricks more often does not mean it should be removed, because Dominations problem players will simply migrate. Fix the reasons why Domination is "trashy": Gear disparities EWAR imbalances Garbage rewards Butttouching the losers of battle Poorly thought out letter hack points [Insert other problems here] And you know what? Fixing those issues would... GASP ...make DUST a better game! The horror! Nope, best ignore underlying issues and just remove a gamemode. Much easier. I am a minotaur. Beware my poop.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 813	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:10:00 - [10] - Quote maybe deadcatz wrote: Just about all the major corps would be annoyed since they would have to move around to cap the terminals. They will get used to it.

Shadow Player Shadow Hitmen 328	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:18:00 - [11] - Quote No way! Domination is the best game mode after Acquitition! So many kills If you want to be a TRUE HITMAN, join Shadow Hitmen!!!
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 813	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:20:00 - [12] - Quote Vicious Minotaur wrote: Domination is quite fun when you get two evenly matched teams that are devoid of the usual scrubtards, KDR maxipaders, and cantankerous protostomping cat molesters. The matches you describe are too far and few between. And last time I checked, even Skirmish, Acquisition and Ambushit fall victim to DUSTs horrible playerbase, not just Domination. Just because Domination falls victim to those pricks more often does not mean it should be removed, because Dominations problem players will simply migrate. Fix the reasons why Domination is "trashy": Gear disparities EWAR imbalances Garbage rewards Butttouching the losers of battle Poorly thought out letter hack points [Insert other problems here wrote: And you know what? Fixing those issues would... GASP ...make DUST a better game! The horror! Nope, best ignore underlying issues and just remove a gamemode. Much easier. Domination is a lost cause. Just look at how many things you say need to be fixed to make Domination a decent gamemode. There comes a time when one needs to consider throwing out what's broken so that resources can be focused on making everything else better.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 813	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:22:00 - [13] - Quote Shadow Player wrote: No way! Domination is the best game mode after Acquitition! So many kills Notice how you said 'best gamemode after Acquisition'? You will still have Acquisition to play; in fact you will be able to play Acquisition a lot more because there would be no more people playing Domination.
Ghost Kaisar Fatal Absolution 13	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:22:00 - [14] - Quote How Can Titles Be Real If We Capitalize Every Word In The Sentence? Re-Retired PC Scout. I miss the old days ;_; Wanna play EVE? 30 day trial here
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 813	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:24:00 - [15] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: I would. I like it. Its fast and all the action is is one place. How often do you play Acquisition?
Press Attache The Office of The Attorney General 129	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:28:00 - [16] - Quote I don't play Dom because of bad map design and wouldn't miss it at all. Would be nice to see people back in skirm tbh. Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 813	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:30:00 - [17] - Quote Ghost Kaisar wrote: How Can Titles Be Real If We Capitalize Every Word In The Sentence? You do know it is common to capitalize the words of a title to something, right? I understand "small words" don't usually get capitalized but if me capitalizing the words if, from, and this, bother you I will try to keep you in mind next time I post something and refrain from doing so.
TIGER SHARK1501 Savage Bullet RUST415 403	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:35:00 - [18] - Quote I'd care. If you hate domination so much and prefer acquisition so much why don't you just play acquisition and drop it?
Lightning35 Delta514 The Warlords Legion No Context 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:41:00 - [19] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: I would. I like it. Its fast and all the action is is one place. How often do you play Acquisition? I play around downtime and I have all modes selected. I usually get 96% domination and like 1% o aquisition, skirmish, and ambush. CEO of T-W-L
Thumb Green 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:42:00 - [20] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: Domination is quite fun when you get two evenly matched teams that are devoid of the usual scrubtards, KDR maxipaders, and cantankerous protostomping cat molesters. The matches you describe are too far and few between. And last time I checked, even Skirmish, Acquisition and Ambushit fall victim to DUSTs horrible playerbase, not just Domination. Just because Domination falls victim to those pricks more often does not mean it should be removed, because Dominations problem players will simply migrate. Fix the reasons why Domination is "trashy": Gear disparities EWAR imbalances Garbage rewards Butttouching the losers of battle Poorly thought out letter hack points [Insert other problems here wrote: And you know what? Fixing those issues would... GASP ...make DUST a better game! The horror! Nope, best ignore underlying issues and just remove a gamemode. Much easier. Domination is a lost cause. Just look at how many things you say need to be fixed to make Domination a decent gamemode. There comes a time when one needs to consider throwing out what's broken so that resources can be focused on making everything else better. Except all those things need to be fixed for all the modes to be decent (except hack points for ambush, obviously). The game mode isn't broken, this game is and lots of players take advantage of that. The only thing removing dom will accomplish is making it quicker to get into the other modes since there will be more players queue'ing up for them. Good thing if you prefer the other modes, bad if you prefer dom. Either way everything else will stay the same, except in skirm it'll be "All aboard the stomp train, first stomp Alpha then rolling on to Bravo and Charlie." more often. Again, it's not the mode, it's the game. Trying to bring the slayer logi back.... unsuccessfully so far.

HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 963	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:51:00 - [21] - Quote I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in.
Langskne New eden Trash strike service 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 17:54:00 - [22] - Quote ye, Dom is Fast, Frantic and Brutal :3 dat guys need Dom, but i think more 'fresh soldier' is needed. for more match, more FW match XD
Death Shadow117 Wolf Pack Special Forces Rise Of Legion. 761	Posted - 2015.09.21 18:04:00 - [23] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. so you enjoy WW 2 Trench warfare?
Jammeh McJam XxAMBUSH FTWxX 369	Posted - 2015.09.21 18:18:00 - [24] - Quote If this > https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=217055&find=unread < existed then i wouldn't care about dom being removed from the game because i would have a new favourite game mode. Otherwise keep it in, i enjoy killing the midless noobs that i find in dom :) Steam name - Jammeh McJam PC master race
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 813	Posted - 2015.09.21 18:22:00 - [25] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. Really? I actually view Domination as a gamemode for people who can't switch tactics in the middle of a match. Everyone pretty much does the exact same thing in Domination and those who can't do the exact same thing they are used to just quit the match or AFK. Do you notice those times in Domination where once your team loses the objective nobody bothers to try to push to get it back? I am pretty sure a lot of that deals with the fact that a lot of those people have no idea how to switch tactics when the enemy is dug in. Acquisition facilitates people to switch tactics in a match. In Acquisition you can't just post up at one objective location and expect to win the match. Acquisition allows for people to see how versatile they can be in a match.
Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 18:48:00 - [26] - Quote What's Domination? PSN: RationalSpark
CommanderBolt Dead Man's Game 4	Posted - 2015.09.21 18:54:00 - [27] - Quote I don't really want Dom removed I just dont want to have to play it 90% of the time when queuing for pub matches. Clearly I don't like it as much as most of the playerbase.... "Madness how we turned our common-ground into a battle-ground.." - Essa
Soraya Xel Random Gunz Rise Of Legion. 6	Posted - 2015.09.21 18:56:00 - [28] - Quote I heavily advocated for Acquisition to REPLACE Domination during my term. Unfortunately, I got nowhere on gathering any data about the cause of Domination's problems or the obscenely high percentage of the time people would get Domination matches when queuing for all modes. I was completely stonewalled on the matter. I hope my successors in CPM2 are able to make more progress than me on this front. CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 552	Posted - 2015.09.21 18:58:00 - [29] - Quote Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.
Count- -Crotchula TasteTheTamsen 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 19:01:00 - [30] - Quote i hate domination but will play it because no other game mode is available, apart from ambush which is is an even worse stomp. skirmish is empty, the maps are always empty, people stay at one objective because they only know how to play domination acquisition is never running faction warfare doesn't exist. afw is broken right now. if you removed domination nobody would play because it's all anyone plays. YouTube!

Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Four Horseman Tactical Agency 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:28:00 - [31] - Quote RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . Teamwork is really important - said the Tyrannosarus Rex from Kung Fury .
Regnier Feros Pielords 714	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:31:00 - [32] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . I had issues with defiance. Hard freezes, disconnectionss, loading issues. those problems drove me away from the game LongLiveQueenZarZar
Asad Thahab-Jabal Incorruptibles 97	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:34:00 - [33] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console.
1913 DfLo ScReWeD uP InC 661	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:38:00 - [34] - Quote Always find a match when I choose Dom. That is all. *100% LeGiT* *On A Mission*
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Four Horseman Tactical Agency 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:38:00 - [35] - Quote Regnier Feros wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . I had issues with defiance. Hard freezes, disconnectionss, loading issues. those problems drove me away from the game I have never has anything happen to me so I could chalk that up as individual experience but you people need to stop defending this cluster frack of a game and demand that CCP gives this game the attention that it deserves . Or is that just me thinking that as well ? Teamwork is really important - said the Tyrannosarus Rex from Kung Fury .
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 966	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:42:00 - [36] - Quote Death Shadow117 wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. so you enjoy WW 2 Trench warfare? If the idiots like to hide in a hole I'll fill that hole with explosives. I can play several roles form heavy to scout, or tank to ads. I have every weapon and almost every fit, I think you missed my point
Press Attache The Office of The Attorney General 133	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:45:00 - [37] - Quote Death Shadow117 wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. so you enjoy WW 2 Trench warfare? Trench warfare was WWI not WWII. Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 966	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:46:00 - [38] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. Really? I actually view Domination as a gamemode for people who can't switch tactics in the middle of a match. Everyone pretty much does the exact same thing in Domination and those who can't do the exact same thing they are used to just quit the match or AFK. Do you notice those times in Domination where once your team loses the objective nobody bothers to try to push to get it back? I am pretty sure a lot of that deals with the fact that a lot of those people have no idea how to switch tactics when the enemy is dug in. Acquisition facilitates people to switch tactics in a match. In Acquisition you can't just post up at one objective location and expect to win the match. Acquisition allows for people to see how versatile they can be in a match. Seems more like spam apex nonstop since there are no clones. And for those who could care less about feeding a proto squads k/d it's perfect.
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Four Horseman Tactical Agency 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:47:00 - [39] - Quote Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console. It well known that people complain about it's configuration but is that because it was old or that it was cutting edge during it's time . The developers that took their time with said development of games had a free for all and some of the most beautiful games on the market . I could go down the list of developers that created smash hits on this platform . You people need to get out of that habit of smashing the tec that you get because in a few years , people like you will be talking about how outdated the PS4 is when the 5 comes out . Your always going to get something new , so does that mean that what was , was inferior ? You could say that about any and everything because there's always something new coming out and your always going to be spending money because that new doesn't necessarily mean better . My Sega Dreamcast still plays like it's fresh out of the box and the graphics are awesome . But keep on making excuses for CCP so that they could port a flawed game to another platform , you and a few others that are in denial will be the only one's playing it , it's no wonder why this F2P game has the numbers that it does and it's not because of the platform . I guess you just don't see that though . Teamwork is really important - said the Tyrannosarus Rex from Kung Fury .
Sequal's Back Dead Man's Game 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:16:00 - [40] - Quote @Shinobi : I agree about most things you say, but Dust is far from being the only game that messes up your ps3. DCUO also has hard freezes, glitches and lags on ps3, and it has NONE on ps4 & PC ! Defia'ce was evil as well. I couldn't stay online longer than 20 min without being dc'd ! Then I don't think that putting Dust on another platform will solve all issues the game has, but it'll help with MANY : slow menu, FPS drops, charge times, ugly graphics & texture glitches, etc. A port to ps4 would also financially benefit A LOT to CCP as it's a really good and addictive game. They would be able to hire a team to make it so much better, and that's only possible on a new platform (like the ps4). Bring your daughter... TO THE SLAUGHTER ! - Sequal Rise

Count- -Crotchula TasteTheTamsen 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:22:00 - [41] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console. It well known that people complain about it's configuration but is that because it was old or that it was cutting edge during it's time . The developers that took their time with said development of games had a free for all and some of the most beautiful games on the market . I could go down the list of developers that created smash hits on this platform . You people need to get out of that habit of smashing the tec that you get because in a few years , people like you will be talking about how outdated the PS4 is when the 5 comes out . Your always going to get something new , so does that mean that what was , was inferior ? You could say that about any and everything because there's always something new coming out and your always going to be spending money because that new doesn't necessarily mean better . My Sega Dreamcast still plays like it's fresh out of the box and the graphics are awesome . But keep on making excuses for CCP so that they could port a flawed game to another platform , you and a few others that are in denial will be the only one's playing it , it's no wonder why this F2P game has the numbers that it does and it's not because of the platform . I guess you just don't see that though . **** yeh dreamcast ftw man, you played pen pen? DO IT JUST DO IT!!!!!! YouTube!
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 3	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:27:00 - [42] - Quote When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. ++ Remove NPC orbitals from FW -- Fix orbital timers for Eve players assisting in Planetary Conquest ++
Commander Noctus Gallente Loyalist 275	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:43:00 - [43] - Quote I personally feel as if Acquisition needs to be even more fast-paced than it is now. I would prefer the time be cut significantly and more points be utilized. Make us move around and adapt much more than we do already, because honestly I get matches where it ends up being like dominations anyway. Gallente User since Jan. 28th, 2013. Touched on every Gallente role since.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 814	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:54:00 - [44] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Summa Militum wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. Really? I actually view Domination as a gamemode for people who can't switch tactics in the middle of a match. Everyone pretty much does the exact same thing in Domination and those who can't do the exact same thing they are used to just quit the match or AFK. Do you notice those times in Domination where once your team loses the objective nobody bothers to try to push to get it back? I am pretty sure a lot of that deals with the fact that a lot of those people have no idea how to switch tactics when the enemy is dug in. Acquisition facilitates people to switch tactics in a match. In Acquisition you can't just post up at one objective location and expect to win the match. Acquisition allows for people to see how versatile they can be in a match. Seems more like spam apex nonstop since there are no clones. And for those who could care less about feeding a proto squads k/d it's perfect. The **** are you talking about?
Count- -Crotchula TasteTheTamsen 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:59:00 - [45] - Quote look the simple fact here is that you could be playing a penguin olympics game right now, but instead you're all playing this. YouTube!
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 814	Posted - 2015.09.21 22:41:00 - [46] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition?
Genral69 death RAT PATROL INC. 740	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:04:00 - [47] - Quote Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=213777&find=unread
Soraya Xel Random Gunz Rise Of Legion. 6	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:07:00 - [48] - Quote Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode I suspect the whole "most played game mode" thing is due to a bug. But I have no way to confirm this. CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:14:00 - [49] - Quote Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down Domination is the most played gamemode because for some reason this game tends to queue people into Domination matches before it queues people into other gamemodes. This results in longer queue times which ends up pushing people to only selecting Domination so that they can get into a match quicker. Domination wins the popularity contest by default. If Domination was truly such a great gamemode you would not see so many people quitting matches. If Domination were a great gamemode you would more often see people pushing for the win the entire match instead of giving up and running off because they don't want to go negative on ISK. In Acquisition matches you don't see anywhere near as many people dropping out as you see in Domination and very rarely do you not see people fighting full force until the very end of the match.
Genral69 death RAT PATROL INC. 740	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:33:00 - [50] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down Domination is the most played gamemode because for some reason this game tends to queue people into Domination matches before it queues people into other gamemodes. This results in longer queue times which ends up pushing people to only selecting Domination so that they can get into a match quicker. Domination wins the popularity contest by default. If Domination was truly such a great gamemode you would not see so many people quitting matches. If Domination were a great gamemode you would more often see people pushing for the win the entire match instead of giving up and running off because they don't want to go negative on ISK. In Acquisition matches you don't see anywhere near as many people dropping out as you see in Domination and very rarely do you not see people fighting full force until the very end of the match. Domination is not the most popular by default. Its popular due to it being alot of action and 1 object . Most people don't want to be running around the entire map looking for people, they just want to shoot people. Yes people tend to quit due to people not wanting to actually put up a fight . https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=213777&find=unread

IceShifter Childhaspawn Rebels New Republic The Ditanian Alliance 768	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:34:00 - [51] - Quote -Ambush is a slaughterfest and I enjoy running my advanced suits. I have a few apex but do not run them because I dislike the limitations. Ambush matches dont allow myself much time to logi and less time to slay as my opposition is always officer gear and proto gear. -Aquisition is pointless. Its like ambush and domination had a child who couldnt sit still. Dont care about it, dont care for it. -Domination is like Skirmish but without the endless running from point to point, and the Fg and Snipers those maps breed. Tons of vehicles, plenty of blockades/ breaking of blockades. Also dominated by whoever brings out the officer gear first but bearable unlike Amb or Skirm. Point is that its all the same, choose your flavor. There is no difference in reward. There is no reason besides personal preferences to choose which to play. The game will continue to be dominated by the richest corps, the stomping never goes away the quitting goes away anytime blues FEEL like they have a chance in hell. Against a top ten corp they will quit. Certain maps? They will quit. Why should they waste the time? There is no reason to fight officer stompers. There is no reason to play the lag facility. Its no fun to fo either and the rewards are always the same. It's hard to beat up hundreds of armor piercing bullets using only your face...
DAAAA BEAST Corrosive Synergy 3	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:37:00 - [52] - Quote I want skirmish to be glorious again ... To be able to find a match at any time , to fight anyone. That's all. CEO of Corrosive Synergy Fear the plasma from my cannon !
IceShifter Childhaspawn Rebels New Republic The Ditanian Alliance 768	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:49:00 - [53] - Quote DAAAA BEAST wrote: I want skirmish to be glorious again ... To be able to find a match at any time , to fight anyone. That's all. I agree with you. They gave us a ton of cool stuff but took away a lot of the fun. It's hard to beat up hundreds of armor piercing bullets using only your face...
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:51:00 - [54] - Quote Genral69 death wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down Domination is the most played gamemode because for some reason this game tends to queue people into Domination matches before it queues people into other gamemodes. This results in longer queue times which ends up pushing people to only selecting Domination so that they can get into a match quicker. Domination wins the popularity contest by default. If Domination was truly such a great gamemode you would not see so many people quitting matches. If Domination were a great gamemode you would more often see people pushing for the win the entire match instead of giving up and running off because they don't want to go negative on ISK. In Acquisition matches you don't see anywhere near as many people dropping out as you see in Domination and very rarely do you not see people fighting full force until the very end of the match. Domination is not the most popular by default. Its popular due to it being alot of action and 1 object . Most people don't want to be running around the entire map looking for people, they just want to shoot people. Yes people tend to quit due to people not wanting to actually put up a fight . You describe Domination as if it is a gamemode for stupid people who lack actual skill. I just might have to agree with that. I see a lot more skilled players in Acquisition matches than I do Domination matches. If I am going to be beaten to death by Romulus Hex it's going to happen in an Acquisition match before any other.
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 3	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:35:00 - [55] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition? Honestly it is just boring. An objective pops up and everyone runs to it. The first one to get there pretty much holds it until the next one pops up. With some adjusting on the timers it could be a really good mode but where it is currently there is not enough time to mount a true offense against a well established defense so everyone just waits to win the race to the next yellow objective. This is absolutely my opinion but I feel like it is a more mindless version of domination since you can just wait until the next objective pops up instead of analyzing the opponents defense and making a good push. ++ Remove NPC orbitals from FW -- Fix orbital timers for Eve players assisting in Planetary Conquest ++
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 553	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:37:00 - [56] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . Have a look at the ps3 spec while you try to kid yourself that it has nothing to do with it. You have no idea about the technical side of it. Defiance is not the same as dust technically speaking so maybe you shouldn't comment on things you so clearly know nothing about. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:38:00 - [57] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition? Honestly it is just boring. An objective pops up and everyone runs to it. The first one to get there pretty much holds it until the next one pops up. With some adjusting on the timers it could be a really good mode but where it is currently there is not enough time to mount a true offense against a well established defense so everyone just waits to win the race to the next yellow objective. This is absolutely my opinion but I feel like it is a more mindless version of domination since you can just wait until the next objective pops up instead of analyzing the opponents defense and making a good push. You and I are playing completely different Acquisition matches.
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 553	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:40:00 - [58] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Regnier Feros wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . I had issues with defiance. Hard freezes, disconnectionss, loading issues. those problems drove me away from the game I have never has anything happen to me so I could chalk that up as individual experience but you people need to stop defending this cluster frack of a game and demand that CCP gives this game the attention that it deserves . Or is that just me thinking that as well ? Look who's talking. Stop defending the pos3 and stop trying to perpetuate the idiotic idea that its fine on pos3. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.
Garcon lyfe G.R.A.V.E The Ditanian Alliance 19	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:43:00 - [59] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: Domination is quite fun when you get two evenly matched teams that are devoid of the usual scrubtards, KDR maxipaders, and cantankerous protostomping cat molesters. The matches you describe are too far and few between. And last time I checked, even Skirmish, Acquisition and Ambushit fall victim to DUSTs horrible playerbase, not just Domination. Just because Domination falls victim to those pricks more often does not mean it should be removed, because Dominations problem players will simply migrate. Fix the reasons why Domination is "trashy": Gear disparities EWAR imbalances Garbage rewards Butttouching the losers of battle Poorly thought out letter hack points [Insert other problems here wrote: And you know what? Fixing those issues would... GASP ...make DUST a better game! The horror! Nope, best ignore underlying issues and just remove a gamemode. Much easier. Domination is a lost cause. Just look at how many things you say need to be fixed to make Domination a decent gamemode. There comes a time when one needs to consider throwing out what's broken so that resources can be focused on making everything else better. Except all those things need to be fixed for all the modes to be decent (except hack points for ambush, obviously). The game mode isn't broken, this game is and lots of players take advantage of that. The only thing removing dom will accomplish is making it quicker to get into the other modes since there will be more players queue'ing up for them. Good thing if you prefer the other modes, bad if you prefer dom. Either way everything else will stay the same, except in skirm it'll be "All aboard the stomp train, first stomp Alpha then rolling on to Bravo and Charlie." more often. Again, it's not the mode, it's the game. Lmao aahh the stomp train lol i know it all to well love that quote btw! GTC (Galactic Trade Center) The last trading site you will need! http://www.dust514gtc.enjin.com/
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 553	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:43:00 - [60] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console. It well known that people complain about it's configuration but is that because it was old or that it was cutting edge during it's time . The developers that took their time with said development of games had a free for all and some of the most beautiful games on the market . I could go down the list of developers that created smash hits on this platform . You people need to get out of that habit of smashing the tec that you get because in a few years , people like you will be talking about how outdated the PS4 is when the 5 comes out . Your always going to get something new , so does that mean that what was , was inferior ? You could say that about any and everything because there's always something new coming out and your always going to be spending money because that new doesn't necessarily mean better . My Sega Dreamcast still plays like it's fresh out of the box and the graphics are awesome . But keep on making excuses for CCP so that they could port a flawed game to another platform , you and a few others that are in denial will be the only one's playing it , it's no wonder why this F2P game has the numbers that it does and it's not because of the platform . I guess you just don't see that though . It's because the pos3 has an ok cpu with nothing else going for it. You should try posting less of your pos3 fanboi defensive nonsense and listen. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.

deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 3	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:44:00 - [61] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition? Honestly it is just boring. An objective pops up and everyone runs to it. The first one to get there pretty much holds it until the next one pops up. With some adjusting on the timers it could be a really good mode but where it is currently there is not enough time to mount a true offense against a well established defense so everyone just waits to win the race to the next yellow objective. This is absolutely my opinion but I feel like it is a more mindless version of domination since you can just wait until the next objective pops up instead of analyzing the opponents defense and making a good push. You and I are playing completely different Acquisition matches. I know my opinion is a bit different than many other because I only run pub matches solo and anytime I am in a squad I am in FW. Would you care to share your counters to my points? I feel like I am missing something. ++ Remove NPC orbitals from FW -- Fix orbital timers for Eve players assisting in Planetary Conquest ++
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 553	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:45:00 - [62] - Quote Sequal's Back wrote: @Shinobi : I agree about most things you say, but Dust is far from being the only game that messes up your ps3. DCUO also has hard freezes, glitches and lags on ps3, and it has NONE on ps4 & PC ! Defia'ce was evil as well. I couldn't stay online longer than 20 min without being dc'd ! Then I don't think that putting Dust on another platform will solve all issues the game has, but it'll help with MANY : slow menu, FPS drops, charge times, ugly graphics & texture glitches, etc. A port to ps4 would also financially benefit A LOT to CCP as it's a really good and addictive game. They would be able to hire a team to make it so much better, and that's only possible on a new platform (like the ps4). Vets who woke up and realised the joke would come back as well. That's probably at least double the current pop. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.
Bradric Banewolf Titans of Phoenix 1	Posted - 2015.09.22 01:05:00 - [63] - Quote I think you would start forcing dust mercs to think, work as a team, and run something other than jumpy MD fits.... Yeah remove dom! Hurry! These mercs need you to restore them to their former glory as tactical fighters! Right now the only thing they know how to do is camp and quit. "Anybody order chaos?"
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.22 01:10:00 - [64] - Quote This comment has been edited because I jacked up the quotes too much and it was only a downward spiral in my attempt to fix it. Please see comment below for what was here.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.22 01:23:00 - [65] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition? Honestly it is just boring. An objective pops up and everyone runs to it. The first one to get there pretty much holds it until the next one pops up. With some adjusting on the timers it could be a really good mode but where it is currently there is not enough time to mount a true offense against a well established defense so everyone just waits to win the race to the next yellow objective. This is absolutely my opinion but I feel like it is a more mindless version of domination since you can just wait until the next objective pops up instead of analyzing the opponents defense and making a good push. You and I are playing completely different Acquisition matches. I know my opinion is a bit different than many other because I only run pub matches solo and anytime I am in a squad I am in FW. Would you care to share your counters to my points? I feel like I am missing something. I can give it a shot though my response is going to be rather common sense. I also pretty much only run solo and I do pretty well in the majority of the matches I play. Your comment about Acquisition being boring... You pretty much described Domination except that in Domination a lot of people don't ever have the chance to take the objective once it has been secured by the redberries. With Acquisition you have three objective sites throughout the match to try to secure. In Acquisition a persons success or failure in that match is never determined in the first minute. Your comment about Acquisition being a mindless version of Domination... You can't just stand back and wait for the next objective site to pop up because the redberries are also waiting for the same objective site (some of us are already at the next objective site so good luck with that). As to why you don't analyze the redberries defense and launch a counter in the 5 minutes you are allotted per objective site? I have no idea how to answer that except to tell you to analyze what the redberries are doing quicker. Due to the fact that match conditions can change each time the objective moves I feel that Acquisition provides an opportunity to engage in more dynamic gameplay.
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 3	Posted - 2015.09.22 01:35:00 - [66] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: I can give it a shot though my response is going to be rather common sense. I also pretty much only run solo and I do pretty well in the majority of the matches I play. Your comment about Acquisition being boring... You pretty much described Domination except that in Domination a lot of people don't ever have the chance to take the objective once it has been secured by the redberries. With Acquisition you have three objective sites throughout the match to try to secure. In Acquisition a persons success or failure in that match is never determined in the first minute. Your comment about Acquisition being a mindless version of Domination... You can't just stand back and wait for the next objective site to pop up because the redberries are also waiting for the same objective site (some of us are already at the next objective site so good luck with that). As to why you don't analyze the redberries defense and launch a counter in the 5 minutes you are allotted per objective site? I have no idea how to answer that except to tell you to analyze what the redberries are doing quicker. Due to the fact that match conditions can change each time the objective moves I feel that Acquisition provides an opportunity to engage in more dynamic gameplay. I think this comes down to a difference in our play styles. Personally I would rather try to figure out the opponents defensive tactic and work to counter it. I actually find running solo so entertaining because I have figured out how to manipulate blue berries into certain positions through weakening enemy defense in places and setting up attack points with links and hives. I just find acquisition as being totally against this type of gameplay through not leaving enough time to establish tactical defenses or counters to those. Making timers shorter would turn it into the roaming defenses action that it should be. Making timers longer would make it about tactically being able to establish a hard defense against a few coordinated pushes. I feel like they intentionally figured out the middle ground on that but that only made it generally bland thanks to randoms not even having time to figure out what is going on. ++ Remove NPC orbitals from FW -- Fix orbital timers for Eve players assisting in Planetary Conquest ++
Moe Lester III Positive-Feedback. 125	Posted - 2015.09.22 01:37:00 - [67] - Quote I would care very much big time. I mostly play dom. I dont care for acquisition Redrum rectum
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.22 02:57:00 - [68] - Quote Moe Lester III wrote: I would care very much big time. I mostly play dom. I dont care for acquisition You'll adapt.
Thumb Green 2	Posted - 2015.09.22 03:06:00 - [69] - Quote RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . Have a look at the ps3 spec while you try to kid yourself that it has nothing to do with it. You have no idea about the technical side of it. Defiance is not the same as dust technically speaking so maybe you shouldn't comment on things you so clearly know nothing about. You're the one that clearly doesn't know what you're talking about. Put Dust on the ps4 with the same amount of effort that was put into it on the ps3 and it'll be just as ******. Sure ps3 ain't great but the technical problems of Dust have a hell of a lot more to do with the half-assery of CCP. Take the myro's, instead of finding out why their stacking penalty isn't working, they just limit them to 3; hit detection, instead of fixing it they just slowed everyone down; improper terrain collision boxes allowing snipers to not be counter-sniped which got really bad on Manus Peak, instead of fixing them, they just cut the mountain down to a stub . Then we have these huge fcking maps just eating up memory, they're what, 5x5 km and we only actually play on at most 1x1 km of it. There's a game on pc I like to bring up, it's called Starsiege: Tribes and came out in 1998. I like to bring it up because I feel like Dust is a wannabe Tribes. It had vehicles, customizable classes, deployable equipment, similarly sized maps and more of them, it supported up to 128 players but I never seen 64vs64 matches, 8vs8 & 16vs16 are what I remember seeing. Then you had the modding which threw in all sorts of extra stuff. Sure some things weren't as flushed out as in Dust but the point is, this was all happening on hardware that is inferior to the ps3. I can admit, the ps3 is a limiting factor, but it's one that wouldn't be a problem for what was in Dust and certainly not for what's in it now; if CCP wouldn't have half-assed it. So the hardware is really irrelevant at this point because the only thing that's pushed Dust to the ps3's limits is CCP dropping the ball. Hell, you can put Dust on a top of the line pc and it'll still be bad if the same effort was put into it. Which of course nobody would be blaming the hardware. Trying to bring the slayer logi back.... unsuccessfully so far.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.22 03:10:00 - [70] - Quote Stop talking about PS3 and PS4 capabilities. This thread is supposed to focus on how much ******** Domination is and how it is full of trashy players. Stay focused!

Thumb Green 2	Posted - 2015.09.22 03:19:00 - [71] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Stop talking about PS3 and PS4 capabilities. This thread is supposed to focus on how much ******** Domination is and how it is full of trashy players. Stay focused! Already stated the mode isn't broken, it's the game and that taking it out isn't going to help anything. Hell, if they take it out you'll probably end up bitching about how you've got to play with all the trashy players that would have normally been in dom. Hey man, you don't like dom then just uncheck it. Simple as that, if people that want to play FW can wait longer for a match then so can you. Trying to bring the slayer logi back.... unsuccessfully so far.
dzizur Nos Nothi 1	Posted - 2015.09.22 06:56:00 - [72] - Quote I would be very happy that I can queue less than 20 minutes for something else that is NOT dom..
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.09.22 07:46:00 - [73] - Quote All the pubs are is training for Faction Warfare and PC. They progressively and effectively establish- the basics of spawning and combat (Ambush, with the premise of 2 random warparties running into each other somewhere) the basics of terrain/topography use to successfully take and then hold one point/position on the map (Domination, premised on a DUST combat version of "king of the hill"), the basics of being flexible and adapting to battlefield changes and using said terrain/topography to successfully take and hold a point THEN MOVE to another that needs taking when the time comes (Aquisition, with its single yet moving console) until the merc is ready for Skirmish, which functionally is identical mode-wise to (whats supposed to be) the more upper-level competitive areas of Faction Warfare and PC, at which point the game structure of multiple, simultaneous, designated points draws on the lessons learned from the previous modes while teaching a whole set of new ones. All to prepare the merc for participation in the battlezones of New Eden's Factional Wars and Molden Heath's Planetary Conquest. ^ Fattest Run-On-Brick-of-Truth these forums have ever seen. TL;DR You pull Dom out of the game and will be removing an integral step in New Merc training and combat expectation familiarity. You don't like Dom, don't queue for it. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
Moe Lester III Positive-Feedback. 126	Posted - 2015.09.25 03:36:00 - [74] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Moe Lester III wrote: I would care very much big time. I mostly play dom. I dont care for acquisition You'll adapt. No I wont. If they take out dom I'll go to skirm. Acquisition is stupid and the main reason people like it is that there is no clone limit so proto squads can rack up as many kills as they want. Its a horrible game mode and I wont be made to play it :P Redrum rectum


Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

I am a minotaur.

LongLiveQueenZarZar