DUST Search - How Many People Would Care If Domination Disappeared From This Game?

All Channels

General Discussions

How Many People Would Care If Domination Disappeared From This Game?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Four Horseman Tactical Agency 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:28:00 - [31] - Quote RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . Teamwork is really important - said the Tyrannosarus Rex from Kung Fury .
Regnier Feros Pielords 714	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:31:00 - [32] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . I had issues with defiance. Hard freezes, disconnectionss, loading issues. those problems drove me away from the game LongLiveQueenZarZar
Asad Thahab-Jabal Incorruptibles 97	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:34:00 - [33] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console.
1913 DfLo ScReWeD uP InC 661	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:38:00 - [34] - Quote Always find a match when I choose Dom. That is all. *100% LeGiT* *On A Mission*
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Four Horseman Tactical Agency 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:38:00 - [35] - Quote Regnier Feros wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . I had issues with defiance. Hard freezes, disconnectionss, loading issues. those problems drove me away from the game I have never has anything happen to me so I could chalk that up as individual experience but you people need to stop defending this cluster frack of a game and demand that CCP gives this game the attention that it deserves . Or is that just me thinking that as well ? Teamwork is really important - said the Tyrannosarus Rex from Kung Fury .
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 966	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:42:00 - [36] - Quote Death Shadow117 wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. so you enjoy WW 2 Trench warfare? If the idiots like to hide in a hole I'll fill that hole with explosives. I can play several roles form heavy to scout, or tank to ads. I have every weapon and almost every fit, I think you missed my point
Press Attache The Office of The Attorney General 133	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:45:00 - [37] - Quote Death Shadow117 wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. so you enjoy WW 2 Trench warfare? Trench warfare was WWI not WWII. Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 966	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:46:00 - [38] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. Really? I actually view Domination as a gamemode for people who can't switch tactics in the middle of a match. Everyone pretty much does the exact same thing in Domination and those who can't do the exact same thing they are used to just quit the match or AFK. Do you notice those times in Domination where once your team loses the objective nobody bothers to try to push to get it back? I am pretty sure a lot of that deals with the fact that a lot of those people have no idea how to switch tactics when the enemy is dug in. Acquisition facilitates people to switch tactics in a match. In Acquisition you can't just post up at one objective location and expect to win the match. Acquisition allows for people to see how versatile they can be in a match. Seems more like spam apex nonstop since there are no clones. And for those who could care less about feeding a proto squads k/d it's perfect.
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Four Horseman Tactical Agency 2	Posted - 2015.09.21 20:47:00 - [39] - Quote Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console. It well known that people complain about it's configuration but is that because it was old or that it was cutting edge during it's time . The developers that took their time with said development of games had a free for all and some of the most beautiful games on the market . I could go down the list of developers that created smash hits on this platform . You people need to get out of that habit of smashing the tec that you get because in a few years , people like you will be talking about how outdated the PS4 is when the 5 comes out . Your always going to get something new , so does that mean that what was , was inferior ? You could say that about any and everything because there's always something new coming out and your always going to be spending money because that new doesn't necessarily mean better . My Sega Dreamcast still plays like it's fresh out of the box and the graphics are awesome . But keep on making excuses for CCP so that they could port a flawed game to another platform , you and a few others that are in denial will be the only one's playing it , it's no wonder why this F2P game has the numbers that it does and it's not because of the platform . I guess you just don't see that though . Teamwork is really important - said the Tyrannosarus Rex from Kung Fury .
Sequal's Back Dead Man's Game 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:16:00 - [40] - Quote @Shinobi : I agree about most things you say, but Dust is far from being the only game that messes up your ps3. DCUO also has hard freezes, glitches and lags on ps3, and it has NONE on ps4 & PC ! Defia'ce was evil as well. I couldn't stay online longer than 20 min without being dc'd ! Then I don't think that putting Dust on another platform will solve all issues the game has, but it'll help with MANY : slow menu, FPS drops, charge times, ugly graphics & texture glitches, etc. A port to ps4 would also financially benefit A LOT to CCP as it's a really good and addictive game. They would be able to hire a team to make it so much better, and that's only possible on a new platform (like the ps4). Bring your daughter... TO THE SLAUGHTER ! - Sequal Rise

Count- -Crotchula TasteTheTamsen 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:22:00 - [41] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console. It well known that people complain about it's configuration but is that because it was old or that it was cutting edge during it's time . The developers that took their time with said development of games had a free for all and some of the most beautiful games on the market . I could go down the list of developers that created smash hits on this platform . You people need to get out of that habit of smashing the tec that you get because in a few years , people like you will be talking about how outdated the PS4 is when the 5 comes out . Your always going to get something new , so does that mean that what was , was inferior ? You could say that about any and everything because there's always something new coming out and your always going to be spending money because that new doesn't necessarily mean better . My Sega Dreamcast still plays like it's fresh out of the box and the graphics are awesome . But keep on making excuses for CCP so that they could port a flawed game to another platform , you and a few others that are in denial will be the only one's playing it , it's no wonder why this F2P game has the numbers that it does and it's not because of the platform . I guess you just don't see that though . **** yeh dreamcast ftw man, you played pen pen? DO IT JUST DO IT!!!!!! YouTube!
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 3	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:27:00 - [42] - Quote When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. ++ Remove NPC orbitals from FW -- Fix orbital timers for Eve players assisting in Planetary Conquest ++
Commander Noctus Gallente Loyalist 275	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:43:00 - [43] - Quote I personally feel as if Acquisition needs to be even more fast-paced than it is now. I would prefer the time be cut significantly and more points be utilized. Make us move around and adapt much more than we do already, because honestly I get matches where it ends up being like dominations anyway. Gallente User since Jan. 28th, 2013. Touched on every Gallente role since.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 814	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:54:00 - [44] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Summa Militum wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I would rather they got rid of aq/amb. Ambush is for c.o.d. Babies that can't understand objective's, aq is for people who can't switch tactics when an enemy is dug in. Really? I actually view Domination as a gamemode for people who can't switch tactics in the middle of a match. Everyone pretty much does the exact same thing in Domination and those who can't do the exact same thing they are used to just quit the match or AFK. Do you notice those times in Domination where once your team loses the objective nobody bothers to try to push to get it back? I am pretty sure a lot of that deals with the fact that a lot of those people have no idea how to switch tactics when the enemy is dug in. Acquisition facilitates people to switch tactics in a match. In Acquisition you can't just post up at one objective location and expect to win the match. Acquisition allows for people to see how versatile they can be in a match. Seems more like spam apex nonstop since there are no clones. And for those who could care less about feeding a proto squads k/d it's perfect. The **** are you talking about?
Count- -Crotchula TasteTheTamsen 1	Posted - 2015.09.21 21:59:00 - [45] - Quote look the simple fact here is that you could be playing a penguin olympics game right now, but instead you're all playing this. YouTube!
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 814	Posted - 2015.09.21 22:41:00 - [46] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition?
Genral69 death RAT PATROL INC. 740	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:04:00 - [47] - Quote Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=213777&find=unread
Soraya Xel Random Gunz Rise Of Legion. 6	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:07:00 - [48] - Quote Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode I suspect the whole "most played game mode" thing is due to a bug. But I have no way to confirm this. CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:14:00 - [49] - Quote Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down Domination is the most played gamemode because for some reason this game tends to queue people into Domination matches before it queues people into other gamemodes. This results in longer queue times which ends up pushing people to only selecting Domination so that they can get into a match quicker. Domination wins the popularity contest by default. If Domination was truly such a great gamemode you would not see so many people quitting matches. If Domination were a great gamemode you would more often see people pushing for the win the entire match instead of giving up and running off because they don't want to go negative on ISK. In Acquisition matches you don't see anywhere near as many people dropping out as you see in Domination and very rarely do you not see people fighting full force until the very end of the match.
Genral69 death RAT PATROL INC. 740	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:33:00 - [50] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down Domination is the most played gamemode because for some reason this game tends to queue people into Domination matches before it queues people into other gamemodes. This results in longer queue times which ends up pushing people to only selecting Domination so that they can get into a match quicker. Domination wins the popularity contest by default. If Domination was truly such a great gamemode you would not see so many people quitting matches. If Domination were a great gamemode you would more often see people pushing for the win the entire match instead of giving up and running off because they don't want to go negative on ISK. In Acquisition matches you don't see anywhere near as many people dropping out as you see in Domination and very rarely do you not see people fighting full force until the very end of the match. Domination is not the most popular by default. Its popular due to it being alot of action and 1 object . Most people don't want to be running around the entire map looking for people, they just want to shoot people. Yes people tend to quit due to people not wanting to actually put up a fight . https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=213777&find=unread

IceShifter Childhaspawn Rebels New Republic The Ditanian Alliance 768	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:34:00 - [51] - Quote -Ambush is a slaughterfest and I enjoy running my advanced suits. I have a few apex but do not run them because I dislike the limitations. Ambush matches dont allow myself much time to logi and less time to slay as my opposition is always officer gear and proto gear. -Aquisition is pointless. Its like ambush and domination had a child who couldnt sit still. Dont care about it, dont care for it. -Domination is like Skirmish but without the endless running from point to point, and the Fg and Snipers those maps breed. Tons of vehicles, plenty of blockades/ breaking of blockades. Also dominated by whoever brings out the officer gear first but bearable unlike Amb or Skirm. Point is that its all the same, choose your flavor. There is no difference in reward. There is no reason besides personal preferences to choose which to play. The game will continue to be dominated by the richest corps, the stomping never goes away the quitting goes away anytime blues FEEL like they have a chance in hell. Against a top ten corp they will quit. Certain maps? They will quit. Why should they waste the time? There is no reason to fight officer stompers. There is no reason to play the lag facility. Its no fun to fo either and the rewards are always the same. It's hard to beat up hundreds of armor piercing bullets using only your face...
DAAAA BEAST Corrosive Synergy 3	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:37:00 - [52] - Quote I want skirmish to be glorious again ... To be able to find a match at any time , to fight anyone. That's all. CEO of Corrosive Synergy Fear the plasma from my cannon !
IceShifter Childhaspawn Rebels New Republic The Ditanian Alliance 768	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:49:00 - [53] - Quote DAAAA BEAST wrote: I want skirmish to be glorious again ... To be able to find a match at any time , to fight anyone. That's all. I agree with you. They gave us a ton of cool stuff but took away a lot of the fun. It's hard to beat up hundreds of armor piercing bullets using only your face...
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.21 23:51:00 - [54] - Quote Genral69 death wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Genral69 death wrote: Lol, cant even believe this tread. Yes you may completely hate domination but is the most played game mode and I think alot of people would be pissed of if they got ride of it. Skirmish- run around alot and try to keep several objects, relying on your blues Ambush - get to the high ground / ranged weapons Aqu/dom - hack the point, push redline or bunker down Domination is the most played gamemode because for some reason this game tends to queue people into Domination matches before it queues people into other gamemodes. This results in longer queue times which ends up pushing people to only selecting Domination so that they can get into a match quicker. Domination wins the popularity contest by default. If Domination was truly such a great gamemode you would not see so many people quitting matches. If Domination were a great gamemode you would more often see people pushing for the win the entire match instead of giving up and running off because they don't want to go negative on ISK. In Acquisition matches you don't see anywhere near as many people dropping out as you see in Domination and very rarely do you not see people fighting full force until the very end of the match. Domination is not the most popular by default. Its popular due to it being alot of action and 1 object . Most people don't want to be running around the entire map looking for people, they just want to shoot people. Yes people tend to quit due to people not wanting to actually put up a fight . You describe Domination as if it is a gamemode for stupid people who lack actual skill. I just might have to agree with that. I see a lot more skilled players in Acquisition matches than I do Domination matches. If I am going to be beaten to death by Romulus Hex it's going to happen in an Acquisition match before any other.
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 3	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:35:00 - [55] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition? Honestly it is just boring. An objective pops up and everyone runs to it. The first one to get there pretty much holds it until the next one pops up. With some adjusting on the timers it could be a really good mode but where it is currently there is not enough time to mount a true offense against a well established defense so everyone just waits to win the race to the next yellow objective. This is absolutely my opinion but I feel like it is a more mindless version of domination since you can just wait until the next objective pops up instead of analyzing the opponents defense and making a good push. ++ Remove NPC orbitals from FW -- Fix orbital timers for Eve players assisting in Planetary Conquest ++
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 553	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:37:00 - [56] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . Have a look at the ps3 spec while you try to kid yourself that it has nothing to do with it. You have no idea about the technical side of it. Defiance is not the same as dust technically speaking so maybe you shouldn't comment on things you so clearly know nothing about. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death Smart Deploy 821	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:38:00 - [57] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: Summa Militum wrote: deezy dabest wrote: When it comes to pub matches I very seldom play anything other than domination. If I want skirmish I generally go to FW and I really do not like acquisition or ambush. I think we should remove skirm from pub contracts as Rattati mentioned before. We should also make all FW contracts 5 point maps and 3 point maps. What is it that you don't like about Acquisition? Honestly it is just boring. An objective pops up and everyone runs to it. The first one to get there pretty much holds it until the next one pops up. With some adjusting on the timers it could be a really good mode but where it is currently there is not enough time to mount a true offense against a well established defense so everyone just waits to win the race to the next yellow objective. This is absolutely my opinion but I feel like it is a more mindless version of domination since you can just wait until the next objective pops up instead of analyzing the opponents defense and making a good push. You and I are playing completely different Acquisition matches.
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 553	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:40:00 - [58] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Regnier Feros wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Taking away from a game that neds to change platform is not a solution. You're targeting a symptom, not a cause. What would a change in platform bring when the game runs like crap ? Is that the PS3's fault ? Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library ? Could it be that CCP isn't dedicating the necessary resources in the development of this game ? Hasn't it been like this for the existence of the game ? I don't think a platform change would change the poor performance , glitches and bugs that this game has . That's the dev's task but ..... You people need to stop blaming the platform and address the cause like you mentioned . The cause is the lack of attention and resources that this game has and who's fault is that .?. the PS3's ? I don't have anywhere near the problems of any other game on the PS3 that Dust 514 gives me , to the point where my game would hard freeze and cut off . No other game . I can play Defiance all day and not have frame rate issues , glitches , bugs , screen freezes , game freezes and a multitude of other issues that only playing Dust 514 gives me . That sir , has zero to do with the platform . I had issues with defiance. Hard freezes, disconnectionss, loading issues. those problems drove me away from the game I have never has anything happen to me so I could chalk that up as individual experience but you people need to stop defending this cluster frack of a game and demand that CCP gives this game the attention that it deserves . Or is that just me thinking that as well ? Look who's talking. Stop defending the pos3 and stop trying to perpetuate the idiotic idea that its fine on pos3. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.
Garcon lyfe G.R.A.V.E The Ditanian Alliance 19	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:43:00 - [59] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: Domination is quite fun when you get two evenly matched teams that are devoid of the usual scrubtards, KDR maxipaders, and cantankerous protostomping cat molesters. The matches you describe are too far and few between. And last time I checked, even Skirmish, Acquisition and Ambushit fall victim to DUSTs horrible playerbase, not just Domination. Just because Domination falls victim to those pricks more often does not mean it should be removed, because Dominations problem players will simply migrate. Fix the reasons why Domination is "trashy": Gear disparities EWAR imbalances Garbage rewards Butttouching the losers of battle Poorly thought out letter hack points [Insert other problems here wrote: And you know what? Fixing those issues would... GASP ...make DUST a better game! The horror! Nope, best ignore underlying issues and just remove a gamemode. Much easier. Domination is a lost cause. Just look at how many things you say need to be fixed to make Domination a decent gamemode. There comes a time when one needs to consider throwing out what's broken so that resources can be focused on making everything else better. Except all those things need to be fixed for all the modes to be decent (except hack points for ambush, obviously). The game mode isn't broken, this game is and lots of players take advantage of that. The only thing removing dom will accomplish is making it quicker to get into the other modes since there will be more players queue'ing up for them. Good thing if you prefer the other modes, bad if you prefer dom. Either way everything else will stay the same, except in skirm it'll be "All aboard the stomp train, first stomp Alpha then rolling on to Bravo and Charlie." more often. Again, it's not the mode, it's the game. Lmao aahh the stomp train lol i know it all to well love that quote btw! GTC (Galactic Trade Center) The last trading site you will need! http://www.dust514gtc.enjin.com/
RogueTrooper 2000AD Neckbeard Absolution 553	Posted - 2015.09.22 00:43:00 - [60] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Why isn't this an issue with other games in it's library? The PS3 version of Skyrim will not allow me to enable autosaving or, once the file size reaches a certain point, the game freezes after seconds of me loading in. The PS3 has caused many game companies fits because of it's strange architecture. The PS4/PC are much easier to work with. We should endeavor to remove any barriers we can in CCP's path to updating the game. That includes this dinosaur of a console. It well known that people complain about it's configuration but is that because it was old or that it was cutting edge during it's time . The developers that took their time with said development of games had a free for all and some of the most beautiful games on the market . I could go down the list of developers that created smash hits on this platform . You people need to get out of that habit of smashing the tec that you get because in a few years , people like you will be talking about how outdated the PS4 is when the 5 comes out . Your always going to get something new , so does that mean that what was , was inferior ? You could say that about any and everything because there's always something new coming out and your always going to be spending money because that new doesn't necessarily mean better . My Sega Dreamcast still plays like it's fresh out of the box and the graphics are awesome . But keep on making excuses for CCP so that they could port a flawed game to another platform , you and a few others that are in denial will be the only one's playing it , it's no wonder why this F2P game has the numbers that it does and it's not because of the platform . I guess you just don't see that though . It's because the pos3 has an ok cpu with nothing else going for it. You should try posting less of your pos3 fanboi defensive nonsense and listen. Self appointed best player and right honourable space king of dust. I also taught the likes of bons everything. K den.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

LongLiveQueenZarZar