Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
[Veteran_LT Whichimazit]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 16:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
I really think Dust needs spawn shields for a couple of reasons. One reason is that when i spawn sometimes right when i actually get into the game i will be dead literally. Another reason is so that you can get out of the way if someone happens to be next of the spawn. So you guys at CCP should make at least a 5 second spawn shield.
PLEASE CONSIDER THIS!!!!! |
[Veteran_Traynor Youngs]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 16:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
I think a better idea than an arbitrary shield would be to say that the drop suit deployment requires a massively charged up shield to insert onto the surface of the planet, this large shield dissipates rapidly after deployment with some kind of exponential decay from say 1000% when you first land, to like 100% at 4-5 seconds and no boost at all after that.
This way if you spawn into the middle of an ongoing explosive firefight, you might still die very quickly, but you likely won't be able to be camped by one guy with a sniper rifle. |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 16:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shields for clone units are a must have: we should re-spawn inside the clone units, not appear out of nowhere magically (also lore-wise EVE doesn't have materialization) and have a shield that protects our spawn-door: grenades/explosives would be automatically deactivated passing through the shield and bullets won't be able to enter. Also clone units should have a sensor, 10 meter radius, so that if an enemy is camping near them he is automatically shown on the map. |
[Veteran_Traynor Youngs]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:Shields for clone units are a must have: we should re-spawn inside the clone units, not appear out of nowhere magically (also lore-wise EVE doesn't have materialization) and have a shield that protects our spawn-door: grenades/explosives would be automatically deactivated passing through the shield and bullets won't be able to enter. Also clone units should have a sensor, 10 meter radius, so that if an enemy is camping near them he is automatically shown on the map.
I rescind my earlier suggestion and agree with this wholeheartedly.
would fix the spawn-die problem. |
[Veteran_Austin Biffeh]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 19:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
LT Whichimazit wrote:=when i actually get into the game i will be dead literally.
I disagree with spawn shields, but I'm confirming that there is a major issue with players spawning and waiting at a black screen to get control of their character. The server appears to dump their model in before they gain control of anything, and that leads to insta-spawn deaths. It's pretty absurd.
As for spawn locations [this may need a different post] I'm getting tired, already, of watching people pop into existence in front of CRUs and next to objectives.
There really needs to be an animation for hopping out of a CRU, or perhaps just have an open door on it with a shield and have characters spawn inside.
As for spawning on objectives, drop pods, please.
OR take spawning on objectives OUT and keep it on CRUs only - also CRUs within dropships, of course. |
[Veteran_Austin Biffeh]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 19:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Traynor Youngs wrote:Templar Two wrote:Shields for clone units are a must have: we should re-spawn inside the clone units, not appear out of nowhere magically (also lore-wise EVE doesn't have materialization) and have a shield that protects our spawn-door: grenades/explosives would be automatically deactivated passing through the shield and bullets won't be able to enter. Also clone units should have a sensor, 10 meter radius, so that if an enemy is camping near them he is automatically shown on the map. I rescind my earlier suggestion and agree with this wholeheartedly. would fix the spawn-die problem.
Oh, hey, somebody beat me to this!
Yes, this - ten thousand times - this. |
[Veteran_LT Whichimazit]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 19:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yeah i just want something to where i don't die before i can even take control |
[Veteran_Dargondarkfire darkfire]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 20:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Austin Biffeh wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:Templar Two wrote:Shields for clone units are a must have: we should re-spawn inside the clone units, not appear out of nowhere magically (also lore-wise EVE doesn't have materialization) and have a shield that protects our spawn-door: grenades/explosives would be automatically deactivated passing through the shield and bullets won't be able to enter. Also clone units should have a sensor, 10 meter radius, so that if an enemy is camping near them he is automatically shown on the map. I rescind my earlier suggestion and agree with this wholeheartedly. would fix the spawn-die problem. Oh, hey, somebody beat me to this! Yes, this - ten thousand times - this. better idea, i watched the trailer on troops dropping down. theres a shock wave when they land. anyone standing in a spawn trying to shotgun or minigun people down should get killed or very badly hurt by the shockwave when a player spawns in. |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 07:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
Spawn Camping is serious problem and Dust 514 must not make the same mistake of Starhawk. We in the Starhawk beta denounced the abuse of spawn camping and the developers din't do anything to fix it, or at least limit it: at release dozens of threads have been made with people complaining abut Spawn Camping. it took them 3 weeks to reduce the cost of sawn beacons so to limit spawn camping but at today it's not fixed completely. Sure when cloning units will be ours to place before the match we will have less spawn-camping but please CCP at least add a shield to clone units: do something now before it becomes a game-breaking issue. |
[Veteran_Dargondarkfire darkfire]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 08:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
i still think the best method would be to have a drop blast from your decent (spawn) that would kill spawn campers, would act kinda like a telafrag) |
|
[Veteran_Sorry Accident]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 09:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dargondarkfire darkfire wrote:i still think the best method would be to have a drop blast from your decent (spawn) that would kill spawn campers, would act kinda like a telafrag)
I like the idea too, especially if you could direct your decent as to purposefully insta-gib the 1 or 2 guys harassing your team. Adds a bit of a tactical placement option for snipers, too (I just wouldn't want it to get out of hand like BF2 and MAG snipers). Actually, adds a tactical element for any dropsuit type you choose, depending on weapon, you could glide yourself toward or away from the heavier firefights. |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 10:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Dargondarkfire darkfire wrote:i still think the best method would be to have a drop blast from your decent (spawn) that would kill spawn campers, would act kinda like a telafrag)
Sadly that would resolve the problem for mercs using clone units: without a shield clone units are easy target of spawn-campers. |
[Veteran_Dargondarkfire darkfire]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 10:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:Dargondarkfire darkfire wrote:i still think the best method would be to have a drop blast from your decent (spawn) that would kill spawn campers, would act kinda like a telafrag) Sadly that would resolve the problem for mercs using clone units: without a shield clone units are easy target of spawn-campers.
not all the spawn points are clone stations. for a clone station i think, first you should spawn inside since there is a door. then there should be a 5-10 second shield (will only last 1 second after you begin attacking, if you started attacking before the shield timer ended. also this you spawn then wait for your screen to load in is a hindrance and needs to be removed, it doesn't happen in any other fps i have played.. |
[Veteran_DeeJay One]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 11:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
Dargondarkfire darkfire wrote:not all the spawn points are clone stations. for a clone station i think, first you should spawn inside since there is a door . then there should be a 5-10 second shield (will only last 1 second after you begin attacking, if you started attacking before the shield timer ended. also this you spawn then wait for your screen to load in is a hindrance and needs to be removed, it doesn't happen in any other fps i have played..
How about CRU shield bubbles like a POS in Eve has with an indicator how much shield is left for a given CRU on the spawn map? Then you could choose if spawning on X is safe. Of course spawning on objectives and drop uplinks should have a proper "hell from above" type of spawning, by shooting a pod down the orbit or spitting clones out from an MCC, even ejecting from an RDV would do the trick with inertia dampener active. |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 11:12:00 -
[15] - Quote
DeeJay One wrote: How about CRU shield bubbles like a POS in Eve has with an indicator how much shield is left for a given CRU on the spawn map? Then you could choose if spawning on X is safe. Of course spawning on objectives and drop uplinks should have a proper "hell from above" type of spawning, by shooting a pod down the orbit or spitting clones out from an MCC, even ejecting from an RDV would do the trick with inertia dampener active.
I agree with the "drop from sky spawn" for the Drop Uplinks, also is very much like what we have in the trailer, but the problems comes when you a place a spawn in-door. IMO either we should not be able to a place Spawns in-door, lore-wise materialization in EVE doesn't exist in EVE, or I here's an and old idea of mine:
DU could create some sore of "shield dome" around them that stop bullets form entering and form exiting it. (the diameter of this dome should be very small 3 meters at best) This way spawned player will be protected from enemy fire as soon as they spawn, but won't have anadvantage either staying inside the shield since they can't shoot back. This won't stop players from camping outside DU Shield, and enemy players will still be able to get inside the shield to destroy the DU, but at least it's something. |
[Veteran_FatalFlaw V1]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 12:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
Templar Two wrote: IMO either we should not be able to a place Spawns in-door, lore-wise materialization in EVE doesn't exist in EVE
HotDrop O'Clock would like to disagree with you.
I do feel there needs to be a change in the way people enter battle to prevent spawn camping. |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 12:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
FatalFlaw V1 wrote:Templar Two wrote: IMO either we should not be able to a place Spawns in-door, lore-wise materialization in EVE doesn't exist in EVE
HotDrop O'Clock would like to disagree with you. I do feel there needs to be a change in the way people enter battle to prevent spawn camping.
Don't quote my phrase without the final part: the real point is there.
|
[Veteran_Ozzian Tivianne]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 12:43:00 -
[18] - Quote
Dropsuits should be dropped off from the MCC if so choosen - we are in dropsuits after all. |
[Veteran_NewOldMan]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 13:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
If you actually look closely you can see inside of the CRU, which I assume is the place where we come from after we die. I would like to be able to walk out of it, with the CRU having a shield to prevent bullets or explosions from entering. Also if you are spawning in by any other way whether it be directly on an objective or a drop uplink. Or if the inside the CRU thing won't work out. I think that you should have a spawn shield, make it 3 seconds and make it disappear if you move or shoot, That way you would still have the ability to look around for any campers Also I would love the option to spawn drop of the MCC (like the orbital drop spawning that I've seen in trailers and what not) |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 15:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
Be "ejected" from MCC would definitely be a worthy addition to the spawning system. Of course it would not be a free-spawning system; we could only be deployed vertically under the MCC. MMC must not be as versatile as Dropships. |
|
[Veteran_NikNak Trhanhm]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:38:00 -
[21] - Quote
In MAG, when you spawn in on a bunker, you're INSIDE the bunker. Simply doing this would help tremendously. It would also add to the need to defend these stations. I've been in a few matches were the strategy was to let the enemy take them over just so we could destroy them. If we could spawn inside, the need to defend these stations would grow exponentially. That being said, it's also very true that not all spawn points are clone stations. Spawning on drop points should involve both "drop shields," as proposed earlier, as well as taking immediate control of the soldier. This time between physical spawn and control is killing me when we get pushed back to the base. I was in a match earlier where a single heavy was just standing there and was killing every single soldier who spawned in there, and 100% of the time, we were dead before being able to do anything about it. That guy ended that match with a 26/something KDR. It's a major exploit, and he knew it. I just hope he was recording it to share that it's a very real thing and it's happening right now |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 08:29:00 -
[22] - Quote
I too have met players with 29/0 KDR and they where camping with tanks in front of spawn points in skirmish. Not nice. |
[Veteran_Ascythian]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 18:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Personally I think static spawn points should not exist. If you are able to choose where a spawn point lands or where the soldiers land [for exmaple from a drop ship][ that would make a far more fluid gameplay and also mean that defence is more of a consideration for the defenders.
Soldiers could also arrive from off-map on the borders and get to choose where they march in from. If you can choose where a spawn point is then you can't complain about spawn campers because its your fault for not defending the spawn. |
[Veteran_Steve Dekx]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 18:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
NikNak Trhanhm wrote:This time between physical spawn and control is killing me when we get pushed back to the base.
Yeah that fade in is an absolute nightmare. I haven't had much trouble with people intentionally camping the spawns but they're high traffic, high value areas so I'm always getting shot before I've gained control by someone who just happens to be there. I wouldn't expect enemy players to stay out of there and I wouldn't expect them not to take advantage of the head start they get on me. Also there's a general weirdness to the directions it chooses to spawn you in. Is it just me or does it always drop you out facing away from the enemy teams spawn points? If there are two people fighting at the location it never fails to drop me between them facing the guy on my team. Granted all that just makes me choose my spawning locations carefully, but sometimes there's no choice. Your options get limited pretty fast when you know there's a heavy guarding nearby chokepoint. |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 08:17:00 -
[25] - Quote
Spawn-camping is a serious problem already and if it doesn't' get fixed it will only get worst. Free spawn is the best way but CCP wants to be faithful to the lore and so we can't fall out of the sky like in Section 8. Clone units are a good thing but they are really a capers' heaven as they are now.
Ascythian wrote:Personally I think static spawn points should not exist. If you are able to choose where a spawn point lands or where the soldiers land [for exmaple from a drop ship][ that would make a far more fluid gameplay and also mean that defence is more of a consideration for the defenders.
Soldiers could also arrive from off-map on the borders and get to choose where they march in from. If you can choose where a spawn point is then you can't complain about spawn campers because its your fault for not defending the spawn.
In certain matches we will be able to choose where to place the spawn points, it's confirmed, but still they would be visible on the map anyway and as soon as someone finds them camping will start again. |
[Veteran_Zalifer Nakamoda]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 09:42:00 -
[26] - Quote
From a lore perspective, spawning inside the CRU is the most logical solution. These things should be big, with a room, and walls lined with vats/containers full of mercs. Perhpaps when someone spawns, a vat door opens, they run out, and the vat slides into the floor, and pops up again, with another full one?
Shields or doors to stop people getting inside would only help somewhat, as they could just camp the doors in. There needs to be an area around it, where people can escape without being in a single spot.
But then, none of this really matters too much right now. One of the devs mentioned that there was supposed to be a random radius to spawns, so they would not be so predictable, but it was not working (probably forgot a zero, or something :D) |
[Veteran_Dewie Cheecham]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 09:54:00 -
[27] - Quote
From another thread on the topic.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=133163#post133163
Dewie Cheecham wrote:Potential solution?
We should get DROPPED by the MCC or one of its tenders aiming for a spawn point of our choosing, we then have about 10 seconds on free fall to guide us a little around that area for a final drop spot.
The longer drop time for player deployed spawn nodes can them be explained by having to be dropped from the MCC itself or the tender having to re-aim you first, the reduced time for higher tier nodes can then be the a function of signal strength.
It solves the problem of why clone vats are needed and you can still re-spawn on something the size of a laptop. The size of the clone vats can then be explained by being heavier signal generators and power supply, as deployed spawn nodes have a limited number of drops in them.
Caveat, actually dropping won't work inside.
Besides, the notion of waking up being shot out of a cannon, on a ballistic course towards your spawn point sounds awesome...
This would also help in two other ways, one, people are not just sitting there waiting for a timer, players dropping may be lucky and get a little information on enemy movements, and the best, almost evil part is that with a little control, we can literally drop in on an enemy...or on him. |
[Veteran_LT Whichimazit]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 15:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
That would work great |
[Veteran_King of Fools]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 08:17:00 -
[29] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:From another thread on the topic. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=133163#post133163Dewie Cheecham wrote:Potential solution?
We should get DROPPED by the MCC or one of its tenders aiming for a spawn point of our choosing, we then have about 10 seconds on free fall to guide us a little around that area for a final drop spot.
The longer drop time for player deployed spawn nodes can them be explained by having to be dropped from the MCC itself or the tender having to re-aim you first, the reduced time for higher tier nodes can then be the a function of signal strength.
It solves the problem of why clone vats are needed and you can still re-spawn on something the size of a laptop. The size of the clone vats can then be explained by being heavier signal generators and power supply, as deployed spawn nodes have a limited number of drops in them.
Caveat, actually dropping won't work inside.
Besides, the notion of waking up being shot out of a cannon, on a ballistic course towards your spawn point sounds awesome... This would also help in two other ways, one, people are not just sitting there waiting for a timer, players dropping may be lucky and get a little information on enemy movements, and the best, almost evil part is that with a little control, we can literally drop in on an enemy...or on him.
I had my own contribution of thoughts to this as well, on a seperate thread:
King of Fools wrote:-Hot Drops (Skirmish/large scale Ambush) ~It is implied mercs are first deployed from an orbiting station or ship, based on the pre-game lobby and the fact that we have inertial stabilizers for slowing atmospheric descent. At the beginning of the match, players are spawned via a "hot drop" - they select a point on the map, and instead of waiting ten seconds are immediately dropped into the game high in the sky on that point of the map. Spawning near enemy territory or turrets will cause them to shoot you out of the air, preventing enemies from just landing on the objective at the beginning of the game. For the rest of the game, a drop beacon is by default located at each team's base and encompasses it's entirety, eliminating any worry about enemy teams simply spawn camping the defending team's spawn point(s).
A deployable drop beacon can be implemented as well, making it possible for allies (the entire team, not just the squad like the drop uplink) to drop in the area around the beacon (highlighted on the map by a blue circle when the beacon is selected as a spawn point). Players would simply select where in the blue circle they would like to spawn, and bam - they start dropping. If they handled their descent properly, they'll land and be immediately ready for battle, no black fade to screw them up and no enemies able to predict their landing point.
-Clone Reserve Unit ~Players should spawn inside the CRU, rather than outside. Black fade in represents the clone's "eyes opening". ~Make CRU larger to reciprocate multiple people spawning inside ~Doors on either side of the CRU. Shielded so that enemies can't shoot in, but friendlies can shoot out (no fish in a barrel for heavy gunners). In order to kill people inside the CRU, simply hack it to disable the bullet-cancelling effect of the shields. |
[Veteran_Jack McReady]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 08:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
static spawn points should not exist in such a game.
imho the clone units should be able to launch your suits into a spot around the clone unit, a spot that you can select by yourself. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |