| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Bjorn Vengeance
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
0
   |
Posted - 2015.06.08 12:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
For next release
Roadmap Trello Board |
Terry Webber
Molon Labe.
RUST415
730
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 13:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
This is awesome! I never thought CCP would have this done so soon.
PS: You deserve a "like" for showing this. |
Mejt0
Dead Man's Game
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 13:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Good.
There will be 2 players less that cannot wipe their arses without logi's help.
Loyal to The State
Member of : State Protectorate
Belongs to : Patriots power bloc
Civire Bloodline
|
Mobius Wyvern
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
6
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 14:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
I like the look of this, but I'm still curious if this means Fireteams will also be the max grouping size for FW?
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Liberation Force Paramilitary
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 14:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP is disappoint.
Fire team: 4 people
Squad: 2 fire teams and a squad leader
Platoon: 4 squads and a pair of platoon leaders (A Lieutenant and a Sergeant)
Rule 34.6.1: every parody will have a crossover
|
Songs of Seraphim
Negative-Feedback.
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 19:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Fire teams for pubs/FW/PC
Squads for FW/PC
Platoon for PC?
Is that how it will work?
Achura Bloodline
Caldari Loyalist
Join Caldari FW via Kirjuun Saaja
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 20:15:00 -
[7] - Quote
Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag?
Each time had:
1 commander
4 platoon leaders
16 squad leaders
My bad, that was MAG... 
Spkr4theDead wrote:
Says the guy that was quitting the game because CCP were nerfing fused locus grenades.
|
Bright Cloud
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 20:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
My take is that this is the next step to limit the influence of a single squad in a pub match (current squad size is 6). While on the other hand we are more then likely to get MAG's platoon/team deploy for FW. It will basically come down to this:
Fireteam= 4 man squads for pubs
squads= 8 man squads for FW/PC
platoon= 16 man team deploy for FW/PC
This is a major step forward on encouraging teamwork in FW while lowerering the power of powerfull squads in public matches. It will aswell help with forming a team for PC matches cause the current setup is rather annoying. If this gets trough you better prepare yourself to encounter constantly professional teams in FW matches cause the only reason why you dont see 24/7 q-syncs is that people get annoyed when a q-sync fails.
If Ratatti manages to do this then he will be the hero for FW.
Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University
Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 20:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Interesting to see that plans for fireteams, squads, and platoons were moved up from the Backlog UX to the next update for Warlords. Considering that Planetary Conquest 2.0 is already in the works and likely to have high priority, I am theorizing that CCP Rattati is taking the opportunity to bundle it all together in the same update.
Eve Online Invite
https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
|
Apocalyptic Destroyerr
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
267
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 20:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Hmm I wonder if they read my thread....
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2806857#post2806857 |
|
|
Tesfa Alem
Death by Disassociation
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 20:50:00 -
[11] - Quote
Oh yeah those long waiting times should be halved by making sure groups of 6 players are cut from the que! Stopping groups of players from playing dust together will surely keep them logging on right? Who the hell plays this game with friends anyway?
I mean sure there'a 15 minute wait for fw or 24 hr scheduled pcs right?
Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.
"I sometimes wonder why I share stuff "- CCP Rattati
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Liberation Force Paramilitary
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 22:00:00 -
[12] - Quote
KingBabar wrote:Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG...
It used to be a very popular theory that 514 meant 256 v 256 + either 2 commanders, or 2 eve players in orbit.
Rule 34.6.1: every parody will have a crossover
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University
Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 22:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:KingBabar wrote:Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG... It used to be a very popular theory that 514 meant 256 v 256 + either 2 commanders, or 2 eve players in orbit.
Wait, so it wasn't a confirmation of Half-Life 3?
Eve Online Invite
https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 01:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
MaybeGäó |
Yokal Bob
Dead Man's Game
936
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 01:36:00 -
[15] - Quote
Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust
Vote Dust for PS4
|
|
CCP Rattati
C C P
C C P Alliance
24
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 02:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust
there is no matchmaking in FW
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
6
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 02:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
It LIVES!!!!!
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 02:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
That explains everything! |
deezy dabest
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 02:52:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
Maybe now that a dev said it people will listen.
Nah probably not. See you guys in the next matchmaking thread talking about how it sucks in FW. |
VAHZZ
Corrosive Synergy
No Context
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 03:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
deezy dabest wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Maybe now that a dev said it people will listen. Nah probably not. See you guys in the next matchmaking thread talking about how it sucks in FW.
Nobody listens, nor do they know how to search.
"I bring nothing, I bless nothing, I save nothing; I just erase; completely, shatter."
|
|
|
hails8n
DEATH BY DESTRUCTION
303
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 03:27:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
Thats why it works so much better than pubs. I can actually get a full 16 v 16 most of the time in FW, unlike pubs where right off the bat 8 people leave and I'm in an 8 v 16. Just remove the matchmaking already or just let matches autofill with whoever Scotty can get. What id really like is for you to bring the dimension domination style deployment back where you can choose your match.
Petition to ban the trainyard map.
|
Bright Cloud
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 03:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
Well apart from putting 16 people on each side there is no other matchmaking factor. It just takes whos qued and calls it a day. Though ive noticed scotty prefers to put full squads into FW over people that que solo.
Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.
|
TIGER SHARK1501
Savage Bullet
RUST415
231
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 03:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mejt0 wrote:Good.
There will be 2 players less that cannot wipe their arses without logi's help.
I will let you know I only hand heavies the softest of toilet tissue. |
TIGER SHARK1501
Savage Bullet
RUST415
231
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 03:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:KingBabar wrote:Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG... It used to be a very popular theory that 514 meant 256 v 256 + either 2 commanders, or 2 eve players in orbit.
That sounds epic!! |
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Liberation Force Paramilitary
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 04:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
Bright Cloud wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Well apart from putting 16 people on each side there is no other matchmaking factor. It just takes whos qued and calls it a day. Though ive noticed scotty prefers to put full squads into FW over people that que solo.
That's probably because there's usually only 1 FW battle going on in each front at a given time.
It's not exactly a popular game mode.
Rule 34.6.1: every parody will have a crossover
|
Cat Merc
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
17
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 04:26:00 -
[26] - Quote
VAHZZ wrote:deezy dabest wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Maybe now that a dev said it people will listen. Nah probably not. See you guys in the next matchmaking thread talking about how it sucks in FW. Nobody listens, nor do they know how to search.
To be fair the forums' search engine sucks.
"To find out if they consent, poke the giant boobs. If they jiggle once, that means no. If twice, that means yes" - Anon
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University
Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 04:39:00 -
[27] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
Senpai noticed us!
Eve Online Invite
https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
|
Michael-J-Fox Richards
Ostrakon Agency
Gallente Federation
382
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 05:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
KingBabar wrote:Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG...
i remember....
i was there....
alts are for sissies. too legit, too legit to quit.
|
Aeon Amadi
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
10
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 05:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
Now they just need to make it to where Platoons can 'spawn' an FW battle in a list format that other platoons can fight against.
Design a Skin Challenge POLL (Vote Now!)
|
rayakalj9
Opus Arcana
Covert Intervention
18
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 06:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
wish they have 128 vs 128
born jamaican
|
|
|
Starlight Burner
Arrary of Clusters
280
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 08:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Don't see anything with Factional Warfare being fixed up a bit. :/
CEO of Arrary of Clusters, a close relations corporation
Caldari Factional Warfare, enlist today!
Thank you for DUST
|
Fluffy Exterminatus
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
41
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 09:36:00 -
[32] - Quote
Tesfa Alem wrote:I mean sure there'a 15 minute wait for fw or 24 hr scheduled pcs right? FW is the 30 sec or less if you pick Amarr or Caldari because all the average players are going for the easy wins. You dont like 15min wait time git gud.
CCP Rattati - Grand Dragon Wizard of the Gaylente Agenda
Touched by his noodly appendage
|
Yokal Bob
Dead Man's Game
939
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 11:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
Well whatever it is that puts fw matches together, lets call it rennie the fw battle master
Vote Dust for PS4
|
Terry Webber
Molon Labe.
RUST415
732
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 15:44:00 -
[34] - Quote
Starlight Burner wrote:Don't see anything with Factional Warfare being fixed up a bit. :/ Rattati has stated in a podcast that CCP is focused on revamping planetary conquest for now. In my opinion, they'll turn their attention to faction warfare once that's done. |
VAHZZ
Corrosive Synergy
No Context
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 18:13:00 -
[35] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:
To be fair the forums' search engine sucks.
Forums don't know how to search.
"I bring nothing, I bless nothing, I save nothing; I just erase; completely, shatter."
|
CommanderBolt
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
3
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 18:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Now they just need to make it to where Platoons can 'spawn' an FW battle in a list format that other platoons can fight against.
Kinda like how the domination matches were that other week in the "Other Contracts" section. It would be cool to see the battles pop up on a list like that.
So much better to click a battle and join right away than wait 2,3,5 mins for not much.
"Madness how we turned our common-ground into a battle-ground.." - Essa
|
danie braz
Krusual Covert Operators
Minmatar Republic
108
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 20:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
Explain trello...
...please.
Fluoride uranium carbon potassium bismuth technetium helium sulfur germanium thulium Molybdenum neon yttrium
|
Mastodonhead
THE RETURN OF BLOOD FOR BLOOD
179
|
Posted - 2015.06.09 20:45:00 -
[38] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
So you should make the same thing on PUBS, maybe the battles will be again 16 vs 16 and not 15 vs 1 
I feel like shit!!!................................. but at least i feel something!!!
Sangre por Sangre de por vida \m/
|
Draconic Presence
Bad Blueberries
19
|
Posted - 2015.06.10 14:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ratatti, are we going to be able to join fire teams during a match?
Always ready for Gallente FW or ambush. Stack ISK, SP, and LP. Lookin' for chill people to squad up 0200-0600.
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
10
|
Posted - 2015.06.10 14:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:
Kinda like how the domination matches were that other week in the "Other Contracts" section. It would be cool to see the battles pop up on a list like that.
^
Shoot scout with yes. - Ripley Riley (for CPM2)
|
|
|
BAD FURRY
Oh No You Didn't
933
|
Posted - 2015.06.10 15:03:00 -
[41] - Quote
Fireteams (4) - Squads (8) - Platoons (16)
Omg someone knows what the **** is a fire team from a squad !?!?
Yes i am a Undead Hell Wolf ... nice to meat you!
|
Count- -Crotchula
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2015.06.10 15:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
KingBabar wrote:Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG...
OIC ftw |
Bradric Banewolf
D3ATH CARD
RUST415
910
|
Posted - 2015.06.10 16:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:CCP is disappoint.
Fire team: 4 people
Squad: 2 fire teams and a squad leader
Platoon: 4 squads and a pair of platoon leaders (A Lieutenant and a Sergeant)
This is actually closer to what a fire team is in real life guy. Actually CCP gave you an extra guy so you girls can keep the rep tool going lol!
My fire team, in real life, has always been 3 guys. A squad is 6 with 2 fire teams in special operations. Line units are 12 man squad with 4 fire teams or 2 teams of 6 depending on op tempo.
CCP not only got it right, but they made it unique. Kudos o7
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
Vesperz
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
221
|
Posted - 2015.06.11 00:17:00 -
[44] - Quote
Bradric Banewolf wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:CCP is disappoint.
Fire team: 4 people
Squad: 2 fire teams and a squad leader
Platoon: 4 squads and a pair of platoon leaders (A Lieutenant and a Sergeant) This is actually closer to what a fire team is in real life guy. Actually CCP gave you an extra guy so you girls can keep the rep tool going lol! My fire team, in real life, has always been 3 guys. A squad is 6 with 2 fire teams in special operations. Line units are 12 man squad with 4 fire teams or 2 teams of 6 depending on op tempo. CCP not only got it right, but they made it unique. Kudos o7
This guy knows.
"Live by honor, kill by stealth."
Gal Scout since 1.0, Min Scout since 1.1
|
CELESTA AUNGM
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
569
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 18:22:00 -
[45] - Quote
deezy dabest wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:[quote=Yokal Bob]Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW.
Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW
Maybe now that a dev said it people will listen. /quote]
 No! SHHHH! Rattati shouldn't tell us that, and it's good that people won't listen and know.
Matchmaking is supposed to help Post-Newberrys feel more confident about their performance, Casual players feel more comfortable having fun without having to donate tons of time practicing/grinding, and whatnot.
The matchmaking engine should be subtle about what it's doing, and once you leave Public Matches behind, should disappera entirely as part of the concept of 'progression' in this game.
But, SHHHHGǪ don't tell us about that. LESS-educated players in Dust, make better hordes to round up and shoot. It equals FUN!
Universe of good wishes for the 49, especially CCP Eterne...
No story can have life without writers and publishers.
|
Victor889
warravens
251
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 18:45:00 -
[46] - Quote
I don't understand how this trello works - is it supposed to be devoid of information or am I supposed to click somewhere to be able to see more about what the 'board' is supposed to represent?
It just looks like some arbitrary tiles and a single line of text as a note..? |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |