DUST Search - Roadmap Update: Fireteams (4) - Squads (8)

All Channels

General Discussions

Roadmap Update: Fireteams (4) - Squads (8) - Platoons (16)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Bjorn Vengeance Shining Flame Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2015.06.08 12:42:00 - [1] - Quote For next release Roadmap Trello Board
Terry Webber Molon Labe. RUST415 730	Posted - 2015.06.08 13:00:00 - [2] - Quote This is awesome! I never thought CCP would have this done so soon. PS: You deserve a "like" for showing this.
Mejt0 Dead Man's Game 1	Posted - 2015.06.08 13:03:00 - [3] - Quote Good. There will be 2 players less that cannot wipe their arses without logi's help. Loyal to The State Member of : State Protectorate Belongs to : Patriots power bloc Civire Bloodline
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 6	Posted - 2015.06.08 14:12:00 - [4] - Quote I like the look of this, but I'm still curious if this means Fireteams will also be the max grouping size for FW? Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Scheneighnay McBob Tribal Liberation Force Paramilitary 7	Posted - 2015.06.08 14:48:00 - [5] - Quote CCP is disappoint. Fire team: 4 people Squad: 2 fire teams and a squad leader Platoon: 4 squads and a pair of platoon leaders (A Lieutenant and a Sergeant) Rule 34.6.1: every parody will have a crossover
Songs of Seraphim Negative-Feedback. 1	Posted - 2015.06.08 19:56:00 - [6] - Quote Fire teams for pubs/FW/PC Squads for FW/PC Platoon for PC? Is that how it will work? Achura Bloodline Caldari Loyalist Join Caldari FW via Kirjuun Saaja
KingBabar The Rainbow Effect 2	Posted - 2015.06.08 20:15:00 - [7] - Quote Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG... Spkr4theDead wrote: Says the guy that was quitting the game because CCP were nerfing fused locus grenades.
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.08 20:24:00 - [8] - Quote My take is that this is the next step to limit the influence of a single squad in a pub match (current squad size is 6). While on the other hand we are more then likely to get MAG's platoon/team deploy for FW. It will basically come down to this: Fireteam= 4 man squads for pubs squads= 8 man squads for FW/PC platoon= 16 man team deploy for FW/PC This is a major step forward on encouraging teamwork in FW while lowerering the power of powerfull squads in public matches. It will aswell help with forming a team for PC matches cause the current setup is rather annoying. If this gets trough you better prepare yourself to encounter constantly professional teams in FW matches cause the only reason why you dont see 24/7 q-syncs is that people get annoyed when a q-sync fails. If Ratatti manages to do this then he will be the hero for FW. Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 11	Posted - 2015.06.08 20:33:00 - [9] - Quote Interesting to see that plans for fireteams, squads, and platoons were moved up from the Backlog UX to the next update for Warlords. Considering that Planetary Conquest 2.0 is already in the works and likely to have high priority, I am theorizing that CCP Rattati is taking the opportunity to bundle it all together in the same update. Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
Apocalyptic Destroyerr Shining Flame Amarr Empire 267	Posted - 2015.06.08 20:40:00 - [10] - Quote Hmm I wonder if they read my thread.... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2806857#post2806857

Tesfa Alem Death by Disassociation 1	Posted - 2015.06.08 20:50:00 - [11] - Quote Oh yeah those long waiting times should be halved by making sure groups of 6 players are cut from the que! Stopping groups of players from playing dust together will surely keep them logging on right? Who the hell plays this game with friends anyway? I mean sure there'a 15 minute wait for fw or 24 hr scheduled pcs right? Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me. "I sometimes wonder why I share stuff "- CCP Rattati
Scheneighnay McBob Tribal Liberation Force Paramilitary 7	Posted - 2015.06.08 22:00:00 - [12] - Quote KingBabar wrote: Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG... It used to be a very popular theory that 514 meant 256 v 256 + either 2 commanders, or 2 eve players in orbit. Rule 34.6.1: every parody will have a crossover
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 11	Posted - 2015.06.08 22:04:00 - [13] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: KingBabar wrote: Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG... It used to be a very popular theory that 514 meant 256 v 256 + either 2 commanders, or 2 eve players in orbit. Wait, so it wasn't a confirmation of Half-Life 3? Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 7	Posted - 2015.06.09 01:17:00 - [14] - Quote MaybeGäó
Yokal Bob Dead Man's Game 936	Posted - 2015.06.09 01:36:00 - [15] - Quote Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust Vote Dust for PS4

CCP Rattati C C P C C P Alliance 24	Posted - 2015.06.09 02:39:00 - [16] - Quote Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW "As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"

Nocturnal Soul Primordial Threat 6	Posted - 2015.06.09 02:44:00 - [17] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW It LIVES!!!!! "The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 7	Posted - 2015.06.09 02:46:00 - [18] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW That explains everything!
deezy dabest 2	Posted - 2015.06.09 02:52:00 - [19] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Maybe now that a dev said it people will listen. Nah probably not. See you guys in the next matchmaking thread talking about how it sucks in FW.
VAHZZ Corrosive Synergy No Context 2	Posted - 2015.06.09 03:12:00 - [20] - Quote deezy dabest wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Maybe now that a dev said it people will listen. Nah probably not. See you guys in the next matchmaking thread talking about how it sucks in FW. Nobody listens, nor do they know how to search. "I bring nothing, I bless nothing, I save nothing; I just erase; completely, shatter."

hails8n DEATH BY DESTRUCTION 303	Posted - 2015.06.09 03:27:00 - [21] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Thats why it works so much better than pubs. I can actually get a full 16 v 16 most of the time in FW, unlike pubs where right off the bat 8 people leave and I'm in an 8 v 16. Just remove the matchmaking already or just let matches autofill with whoever Scotty can get. What id really like is for you to bring the dimension domination style deployment back where you can choose your match. Petition to ban the trainyard map.
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.09 03:46:00 - [22] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Well apart from putting 16 people on each side there is no other matchmaking factor. It just takes whos qued and calls it a day. Though ive noticed scotty prefers to put full squads into FW over people that que solo. Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.
TIGER SHARK1501 Savage Bullet RUST415 231	Posted - 2015.06.09 03:51:00 - [23] - Quote Mejt0 wrote: Good. There will be 2 players less that cannot wipe their arses without logi's help. I will let you know I only hand heavies the softest of toilet tissue.
TIGER SHARK1501 Savage Bullet RUST415 231	Posted - 2015.06.09 03:54:00 - [24] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: KingBabar wrote: Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG... It used to be a very popular theory that 514 meant 256 v 256 + either 2 commanders, or 2 eve players in orbit. That sounds epic!!
Scheneighnay McBob Tribal Liberation Force Paramilitary 7	Posted - 2015.06.09 04:11:00 - [25] - Quote Bright Cloud wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Well apart from putting 16 people on each side there is no other matchmaking factor. It just takes whos qued and calls it a day. Though ive noticed scotty prefers to put full squads into FW over people that que solo. That's probably because there's usually only 1 FW battle going on in each front at a given time. It's not exactly a popular game mode. Rule 34.6.1: every parody will have a crossover
Cat Merc Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 17	Posted - 2015.06.09 04:26:00 - [26] - Quote VAHZZ wrote: deezy dabest wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Maybe now that a dev said it people will listen. Nah probably not. See you guys in the next matchmaking thread talking about how it sucks in FW. Nobody listens, nor do they know how to search. To be fair the forums' search engine sucks. "To find out if they consent, poke the giant boobs. If they jiggle once, that means no. If twice, that means yes" - Anon
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 11	Posted - 2015.06.09 04:39:00 - [27] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Matchmaking will probably put a 16 man squad against randoms in FW. Such is the way of dust there is no matchmaking in FW Senpai noticed us! Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
Michael-J-Fox Richards Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 382	Posted - 2015.06.09 05:39:00 - [28] - Quote KingBabar wrote: Remember those days when we could play 128 vs 128 with next to no lag? Each time had: 1 commander 4 platoon leaders 16 squad leaders My bad, that was MAG... i remember.... i was there.... alts are for sissies. too legit, too legit to quit.
Aeon Amadi Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 10	Posted - 2015.06.09 05:48:00 - [29] - Quote Now they just need to make it to where Platoons can 'spawn' an FW battle in a list format that other platoons can fight against. Design a Skin Challenge POLL (Vote Now!)
rayakalj9 Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 18	Posted - 2015.06.09 06:48:00 - [30] - Quote wish they have 128 vs 128 born jamaican



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

Caldari Loyalist