|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
THUNDERGROOVE
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
1
|
Posted - 2015.05.27 18:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Zaria Min Deir wrote:Please, please don't reduce equipment count on any logi. 2 at standard is NOT ok, it is the same as what scouts have, how is the logi supposed to be the equipment specialist if a std scout can do the same job as a std logi? 3/3/4 as the Min has at the moment is acceptable, though I think you will find a lot of logis would support a 3/4/4 progression (if not 4/4/4), for good reasons too. The equipment is what defines the logistics class, making the 4 unlock only at proto is inelegant in my opinion (though, I assume some would say 4 at even adv is somehow OP :/). And giving logi suits only 2 equipment slots at std is worse. And yes, that is what the Cal and the Amarr have at the moment, there are reasons why so many of us logis have been asking for this slot progression balance pass for a long time ;)
Personally I believe that the Caldari extra (low) slot in trade for the one equipment slot is fair, but unnecessary... It should really just have the same standard slot progression, just mirrored with the Gal, but I thing actual Cal logis should weigh in on that. With one less low slot but another equipment, it would still need some adjustment to its CPU (as you are correct, it is paying for the old sins of it's original suit bonus and the power of the tac AR).
The Amarr logi trading a sidearm for an equipment is also fair enough, it should get the same amount of total slots as the others as well. Listen to her Rattati. Not only is she one of the best logis in the game she also knows the competitive side better than anyone else who have chimed into this thread.
Mace yourself, blame someone else itGÇÖs okay, no one will believe you
AIV member.
|
THUNDERGROOVE
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
1
|
Posted - 2015.05.28 05:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:what if proto is "only" 7 high/lows
Would need more HP to compensate. That is if the speed changes don't make it with this.
Mace yourself, blame someone else itGÇÖs okay, no one will believe you
AIV member.
|
THUNDERGROOVE
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
1
|
Posted - 2015.05.29 03:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I kind of wish we had a support weapon slot, for MD's, LR, PLC, Shotgun, Sniper and Swarm, to distinguish from "Rifles". Then Logis could be good at them, and bad at the others. As in only logos can equip them, or that logos can't equip rifles? Personally I feel like that's removing sandbox play, but its definitely a workable compromise with some tweaking. I agree. Removing this leads to certain strange "fun" things going away.
It's like long ago in EVEm a few people would fit up neuting bait Guardians(T2 Amarr logistics cruiser)
The ship had a per level bonus to "Cap emission modules" which most people used for remote capacitor transmitters but few learned that the bonus worked on neuts. Of course it was "fixed" but little things like this makes games much more interesting.
The cup is not half empty as pacifists sayyyyyyyyy
AIV member.
|
THUNDERGROOVE
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 07:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote: EDIT: Or how about (if possible) Cal deployables got some sort of extra flux resistance?.
50% per level nanohive HP. Screw resists. Just make it so they can eat a grenade before going pop.
The enemies of God stand broken before us. The light of the Reclaiming shines over them!
12/13/14 Never forget
|
|
|
|